review.IntroductionThis project began in 2019. While it is still a work in progress, the authors wanted to focus onthe methodology chosen to undertake this study, as well as the current status of the researchbeing conducted. The topic itself arose from several conversations at the 2019 ASEE conferencein Tampa where the authors were curious about the landscape of engineering librarianshippublications, focusing on what research methods were typically being used by engineeringlibrarians in their research and how appropriate and well were these approaches being explained.Explorations of the types of studies typically conducted by librarians has been discussed, studiedand editorialized from many years [1]–[4] but the focus in most of the papers examined seemedto be
. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1133766.pdf[19] J. D. Basham, M. T. Marino, C. L. Hunt, and K. Han, “Considering STEM for Learners With Disabilities and Other Diverse Needs,” in Handbook of Research on STEM Education, Routledge, 2020, pp. 128–137. doi: 10.4324/9780429021381-13.[20] J. Halpern and M. Arral, “Work-in-Progress: Inclusive Mentoring Strategies for Neurodivergent Undergraduate Researchers in STEM,” ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 2022.[21] S. Matysiak, “STEM students with disabilities face extra barriers in earning degree,” The Badger Herald, Sep. 15, 2022. https://badgerherald.com/news/2022/09/15/stem- students-with-disabilities-face-extra-barriers-in-earning-degree (accessed Jan
support throughout their publication process from theircollege or university library, scholarly society, university press, or other service provider” [5].While a good deal of recent research points to research support as an area of importance foracademic research libraries, significant attention is paid to the role of data management and datascientists. In 2019, Koltay called for supporting Research 2.0 via research data management,further stating RDM services are “becoming increasingly important” and that academic librariesmust “recognize that they are part of a suite of services that meets (faculty) needs” [6].However, no mention of research intelligence or impact is included. Yet, others believe impactservices present an additional area of
Education, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/share/document.url?mid=cpx_9cb441b17030ed7bdbM7 a4610178163146&database=cpx[15] N. J. Washuta and P. Bass, “A complementary approach to implementing entrepreneurship into a mechanical engineering senior capstone course sequence,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringvillage.com/share/document.url?mid=cpx_9cb441b17030ed7bdbM7 5ba10178163146&database=cpx[16] P. Golding, S. A. Starks, R. V. Gonzalez, M. R. Kendall, D. G. Novick, and C. H. Joslyn, “Leadership in Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship,” in ASEE Annual Conference and
. Perez, and P.R. Hottinger, Complete evidence-based practice paper: The impact of information literacy instruction on the synthesis level of first-year engineering students. Presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34316[2] J. M. Williamson, N. Rice, C. Tenopir, J. Kaufman, C. J. Faber, and R. M. Ellestad. (2019). Best practices for engineering information literacy instruction: Perspectives of academic librarians. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/best-practices-for-engineering-information-literacy- instruction-perspectives-of-academic-librarians[3] R.A.M. Hensel, O. Brown
better? The prevalence andinterdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions," Journal ofInformetrics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 736- 756, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.006.[10] Q. Zhang, and K. Kozak, “Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research NeedsUsing Topic Modeling,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. Jun.2019, doi:10.18260/1-2—33223.[11] T. E. Behrens, P. Fox, A. Laird, and S. M. Smith. "What is the most interesting part of thebrain?" Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2-4, Jan. 2013, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.010.[12] Scopus. “Sources.” Scopus.com. https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri (accessed Mar. 11,2023)[13] E. W. Weisstein. “Statistical Test.” Concise
Obama administration, which held its own nationalWhite House Maker Faire in 2014. Public libraries were out front in embracing the makermovement, since their mission to serve as a hub for lifelong learning fit so well with one of themaker movement’s foundational purposes: to provide anyone, of any skill level, an opportunityfor self-directed learning. In response to the White House Maker Faire, over 100 Urban LibraryCouncil members signed a letter to President Obama in which they pledged their ongoingcommitment to being centers for creative making.Makerspaces have been called a variety of things – Fablabs, Idea Labs, Hackerspaces, InnovationLabs, to name a few – but in the ASEE PEER Document Repository, makerspace is by far themost frequently
Engineering Education (ASEE) [1]. World War II curtailed the activities of bothgroups. After the war, however, the engineering librarian communities in ACRL and ASEE grewquickly, offering new opportunities for professional development, networking, informationsharing, research, and advocacy.This paper seeks a deeper understanding of the academic engineering librarian community in the1940s and early 1950s through the analysis of data compiled from the Directory of CollegeEngineering Library Personnel [2], published in 1949 by the Engineering School LibrariesSection of ACRL and supplemented by data from other sources such as Who’s Who in LibraryService [3]. The Directory is a rich source of data that includes details such as position titles,degrees
practices and promotion of open data in science,” Sci Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–9, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.6087/kcse.149.[2] D. R. Berg and K. E. Niemeyer, “The case for openness in engineering research,” F1000 research, vol. 7, pp. 501–501, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3SH2PpQ[3] A. Johri, S. Yang, M. Vorvoreanu, and K. Madhavan, “Perceptions and Practices of Data Sharing in Engineering Education,” Advances in engineering education, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3Ur54hJ[4] B. Suhr, J. Dungl, and A. Stocker, “Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 9 September, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone
this role, Mr. Landmesser has honed his technical acumen and improved his management and communication skills while building strong organizational and leadership qualities. Mr. Landmesser is currently pursuing a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Tennessee, focusing on modeling soil- moisture impacts to wildland-urban interface. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Technical Standards in Engineering Education: A Survey Across Professional Sectors Final Submission: May 1, 2023: American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2023 Annual Conference and Exposition, Baltimore, MD on June 25-28, 2023AbstractThe global emphasis
Needs of Engineering Faculty: How the Library and Librarian Fit In," presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, July, 2021.[3] K. Tanaka et al., Teaching Business: Looking at the Support Needs of Instructors. Ithaka S+R, 2019.[4] Ithaka S+R. "About." https://sr.ithaka.org/about/ (accessed February 14, 2022).[5] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Agriculture Scholars," New York, NY, 2017.[6] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Asian Studies Scholars," New York, NY, 2018.[7] D. Cooper et al., "Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Public Health Scholars," New York, NY, 2017.[8] D