performance,capacity planning, supply chain, inventory management, forecasting, operations planning andscheduling, and resource planning etc., which are all closely related with the daily operations ofenterprises.The Course Learning Objectives (CLOs) are as follows: • Describe operations management and how it applies to project management engineering. • Analyze the role of behavior and communication in operations management. • Apply problem identification and problem-solving processes. • Determine the appropriate operations management tool(s) to be used during the problem-solving process. • Design and develop a process including comparison of methodologies to maintain and manage a process. • Determine the appropriate
earned his B.S. in Product Devel- opment Engineering Technology at ETSU in 2013. Mr. Craig also has held a Master Plumber License as well as a natural gas license since the early 1980’s. He owned and operated Lenny’s Plumbing and Water Treatment in the 1980’s and 1990’s. He currently works in the Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis department at ETSU as a doctoral fellow while pursuing his Ed.D. in Private Sector Educational Leadership. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Development of Engineering Management Education in K-12 Schools: A Longitudinal Case StudyAbstractIn partnership with Bristol Tennessee Essential Services (BTES) whose
Education, vol. 101, pp. 95 - 118, 2012. 4. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, "Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, p. 19, 2003. 5. M. Borrego, C. B. Newswander, L. D. McNair, S. McGinnis, and M. C. Paretti, "Using Concept Maps to Assess Interdisciplinary Integration of Green Engineering Knowledge," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. Winter, p. 26, 2009. 6. M. W. Roberts, C. Haden, M. K. Thompson, and P. J. Parker, "Assessment of Systems Learning in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Course using Concept Maps," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Expostion, Indianapolis, IN, 2014. 7. G. Starns and M. Hagge, "Quantifying
!maintain!active!listening!and revealing. In the last •! Maintain!confidentiality! •! Keeping!everyone!up!to!speed!so!share!new!information!each!week!four years, student !complaints about group process activities from teamwork projects has vanished from end of term !course evaluation comments. The number of times instructors have had to intervene or settleissues between team members has changed from 2-3 times per semester to zero. Achievementscores on team-based assignments have improved from a pattern of one A, several A- ‘s, severalB’s and a C to all A or A-s, even as the workload on student teams has increased. No studentshave been
process or decisionphases perspectives. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT Design Planning Execution S CREATE Product Design Portfolio Planning Product Transition U P P SOURCE Strategic Sourcing Supply Planning Purchasing & L Receiving Y MAKE Facility Location Production Planning Production C Design Scheduling H A
on each step. Figure 1: Project Adaptation Framework Cyclea. Identifying Outreach DetailsBefore jumping into activity development, it is important to understand the details of the event.The desired objective(s), location, time frame, budget, number of participants, and participants’age range are all important pieces of information required to shape an effective and appropriateactivity.[13] Misunderstanding or misinterpreting any of these details could produce anineffective activity that squanders resources and provide an inadequate experience forparticipants. For example, 5th and 6th graders would need more explanation and completion timeto successfully complete a project that was designed for 7th and 8th grade
. Pick one process to improve 2. Define scope 3. Map process 4. Verify map 5. ID opportunities for improvement 6. Choose opportunities for examination 7. Form a team(s) to examine individual opportunity(s) and propose new methods or improvements 8. Team tests methods and develops recommendations 9. Team presents recommendations to department and facilitates discussion 10. Implement consensus recommendation 11. Standardize method 12. Document/Map methodThe same group of faculty tackled the second most popular choice of projects from the originalsurvey. This project was selected to improve the student progression processes performed by thefaculty and staff in the COM department. This project would address
launchesstudents into a successful future by promoting academic engagement, encouraging success, andimproving the overall student learning satisfaction.References1. Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, “Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology (SME&T)”, NSF 96-139. Page 26.120.132. Cudney, E., Corns, S., Grasman, S., Gent, S., and Farris, J., “Enhancing Undergraduate Engineering Education of Lean Methods using Simulation Learning Modules within a Virtual Environment”, ASEE Annual Conference &
social-cognitive perspective,” Theory into Practice, 43 (3), 189-196.[6]. Cohn, M., User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2004, Boston, MA 02116.[7]. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., and Greathouse, S., (1998), “Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 70-83.[8]. Eren, O., and Henderson, D. J., (2011), “Are we wasting our children's time by giving them more homework?” Economics of Education Review, 30 (5), 950-961.[9]. Ferreira, J., Sharp, H., and Robinson, H., (2011), “User experience design and agile development: Managing
.[6] C. K. De Dreu, “When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams,” J. Manage., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–107, 2006.[7] A. C. Amason, “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams,” Management, 1996.[8] T. A. O’Neill, N. J. Allen, and S. E. Hastings, “Examining the ‘Pros’ and ‘Cons’ of Team Conflict: A Team-Level Meta-Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict,” Hum. Perform., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 236–260, 2013.[9] K. A. Jehn and E. A. Mannix, “The Dynamic Nature of Conflict : A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and
critical success factors’, The TQM Journal, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 188-208.5. Cole, R. C. (1941). Vocational guidance for boys: a program for schools and social agencies. New York, London: Harper & Brothers.6. dos Santos Matai, P. H. L., & Matai, S. (2009). Cooperative Education: Andragogy. Retrieved from International Social Science Council,ISSC, 1, rue Miollis, Paris Cedex 15, 75732, France website: http://www.iiis.org/CDs2009/CD2009SCI/ag2009/PapersPdf/A064IQ.pdf7. Dukovska-Popovska, I., Hove-Madsen, V., & Nielsen, K. B. (2008). Teaching lean thinking through game: Some challenges. 36th European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) on Quality Assessment, Employability & Innovation.8. Eckes, G. (2001) The Six
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).14. A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, and K. F. Meyer , “Will Ten Pounds Fit into a Five Pound Bag?,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).15. S. H. VanderLeest, “Advocating Breadth in a World of Depth,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).16. B. R. Thompson, “The MS in Engineering Management at Milwaukee School of Engineering: An Update,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2005).17. S. Viswanathan and H. E. Evans, “Creating a Differentiated, Relevant, and
loyalty, improvequality, improve working conditions, improve employee job satisfaction, improve theirreputation, improve profits, and improve stakeholder returns. Things are never simply ‘goodenough’ for them; there is always room for improvement.Those organizations that have adopted this approach to quality are better off and more able tosuccessfully compete in today’s highly competitive global economy. They have become theleaders in their field. However, those organizations that have ignored the benefits of TQM willbecome the laggards in their field, struggling to survive right up to the time they go out ofbusiness.Bibliography1. Bailey, S. K. (1968). Objectives of the theory of public administration. Monograph of American Academy of
0.0613 0.0613 0.0077 Total 29 38.1737 S = 0.0875595 R-Sq = 99.84% R-Sq(adj) = 99.42% Figure 10. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) summary for the response variable “Moment”7. Learning Analysis and AssessmentGiven that the two courses, Product Design and Work Design, are offered for junior levelstudents, the majority of students had taken to the Introduction to Engineering Design coursewhere students are taught the basics of engineering design processes, methods, and decisionmaking using team design projects. Moreover, several students in the Product Design and Workdesign classes had previous internship experiences. The knowledge and experiences of thestudents brought in different ways of thinking and
members. In addition, it could be supplemented with tracking howmany students actually emailed the instructor (or teaching assistant) and the frequency of thoseemails. Also, a correlation between some of the student’s communication, attendance, andlearning management system usage versus their course grades could be completed. Further, anANOVA could be completed if demographic, ANGEL usage, email usage, and coursesatisfaction were known for each individual student (currently these are known only at theaggregate level).Bibliography 1. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/. Accessed July 1, 2016. 2. Jones, S. (Principal Author), The Internet Goes to College: How students are living in the future
-act-is-now?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth- 1801&hlkid=f8917367b4da4431926eb0f50b515749&hctky=1575970&hdpid=094bf139- fd76-400b-8896-e6caf6e19d81Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). News Release from BLS, US Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdfCarson, R. (1962). Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MACastellanos, S. (2018). Smart Elevators, Self-Driving Cars Require More Computing Power at Network’s Edge. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2018/01/02/smart-elevators-self-driving-cars-require-more- computing-power-at-networks-edge/Cisco. (2017). Cisco Announces $1 Billion Program for Smart Cities. Cisco the Network
). Quality assurance in training and education. (p. 176). London: Koogan Page.[4] Hallencreutz, J., & Turner, D. (2011). Exploring organizational change best practice: are there any clear-cutmodels and definitions. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3(1), 60-68.[5] Knight, J. E., Allen, S., & Tracy, D. L. (2010). Using six sigma methods to evaluate the reliability of a teachingassessment rubric. The Journal for American Academy of Research Cambridge, 15(1), 1-6.[6] Kukreja, A., Ricks, J. M., & Meyer, J. A. (2009). Using Six Sigma for performance improvement in businesscurriculum: A case study. Performance Improvement, 48(2), 9-25.[7] Madu, C. N., & Kuei, C. H. (1993). Dimensions of quality teaching in higher
Operations Research, John Wiley & Sons, New York.2. Hillier, F. S., and Lieberman, G. J., 2001: Introduction to Operations Research (seventh edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.3. Hosein Anexa, Aczel James, and Clow Doug (2006). “The Teaching of Linear Programming in Different Disciplines and in Different Countries”, In: 3rd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at Undergraduate Level, 30 Jun-5 Jul 2006, Istanbul, Turkey.4. Albritton M.D, McMullen P. R., and gardiner L. R. (2003). “OR/MS content and visibility in AACSB- acreditted U.S. business schools. Interfaces 33 Num 5 page 83-89.5. Winston, W. L. and Venkataramanan M., 2003: Introduction to Mathematical Programming, Brooks/Cole- Thomson Learning
throughalgorithms is referred to as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL). Figure 1 showshow the two self-learning techniques are encapsulated within AI technology implementation, asdescribed by IBM. With the help of hi-powered computers, these algorithmic self-trainingtechnologies can process large amounts of data and recognize patterns. Adoption of these willresult in a new set of Tools Techniques and Procedures (TTPs)s for better PM performance wellbeyond what is currently being used. Figure 1. AI and its Encapsulated Self-Learning MethodsWell known and widely used implementation of AI is IBM’s Watson, Apple’s Siri, and Google’sAssistant. AI technology implementation is spreading wide and fast into many other areas suchas
, and S. Vanderby, “ENGINEERING ECONOMICS TASK FORCE - FINAL REPORT,” 2015.[4] V. Clinton and S. Khan, “Efficacy of Open Textbook Adoption on Learning Performance and Course Withdrawal Rates: A Meta-Analysis,” AERA Open, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2019.
analysis. Themodel has been modified to develop a Cost "S" Curve from the traditional point estimate valuebased upon the triangular distribution and using three parameters, H/L ratio, the percentile valuefor the point estimate and the percentile value for the most likely cost. This approach eliminatesthe need for the traditional triangular distribution parameters of the high with a specifiedpercentile, the low with a specified percentile, and the mode. It is difficult to get estimates of thehigh and low values associated with percentiles, whereas the H/L ratio is easier to obtain forestimates. The results from the model include the lowest cost, the most likely cost, the mediancost, the mean cost, and the highest cost estimate as well as the cost
thismaterial can be covered in a large-class setting, including how it can be examined. Our datasuggests that spreadsheets must be incorporated into quizzes and or examinations in order toassess student abilities in these areas. Thus, while our teaching has evolved to includespreadsheets, so must our examination procedures.IntroductionCapital investments require analyses by engineers with tools and insight into whether theinvestment is sound. The field of engineering economy provides these tools. In order to make asound decision, a three-phase approach to evaluate the risk of a project is necessary: 1. Identify the risk, or risks, of an investment project. 2. Analyze the identified risk(s) of the project. 3. Assess how the identified risks
– Importance of Knowing What Is Going on in the World Reported by SeniorsThe students were then asked to select their source(s) of current events from: Television,Websites, Radio, Magazines/Newspapers, and Others. They were allowed to select asmany as applied and asked to specific examples of each. Page 12.609.3 Sources of Current Events 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 r pe o er
Leadership and Change. New York: Addison-Wesley.6. Deming, W.E. (1994). The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: The W. Edwards Deming Institute. Page 11.865.117. Edvinsson, L. & Malone, S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. New York: Harper Business.8. Gotterbarn, D. & Riser, R. (1994). Real-World Software Engineering: A Spiral Approach to a Project-Oriented Course. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Software Engineering, San Antonio, TX, pp. 119- 150.9. Howell, J. M. & Hall
, Surveying and Digital Media. He also earned his B.S. in Product Devel- opment Engineering Technology at ETSU in 2013. Mr. Craig also has held a Master Plumber License as well as a natural gas license since the early 1980’s. He owned and operated Lenny’s Plumbing and Water Treatment in the 1980’s and 1990’s. He currently works in the Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis department at ETSU as a doctoral fellow while pursuing his Ed.D. in Private Sector Educational Leadership.Mr. Addison Scott Karnes, East Tennessee State University Addison Karnes received his B.S. in Engineering Technology with a concentration in Product Develop- ment from East Tennessee State University (ETSU) in 2012. He then received his M.S. in
Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2006.[3] E.T. Pascarella,, P.T. Terenzini, (Eds.). (2005). How College Affects Student: Volume 2 A Third Decade ofResearch: Volume 2 A Third Decade of Research.[4] D. Merino, “A Proposed Engineering Management Body of Knowledge (Embok)” Proceedings of the AmericanSociety of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL 2006.[5] S. Murray, and S. Raper, “Encouraging Lifelong Learning For Engineering Management Undergraduates.Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007.[6] W. Davis, K. Bower, R. Welch, D. Furman, “Developing and Assessing Student’s Principled Leadership Skills:to achieve the Vision for Civil Engineers in 2025,” Proceedings of
. People, Equipment, Material, Environment, and Methods). It was emphasized to look for direct causes only at this point– not solutions and not indirect or root causes (Figure 4). b. 5-Whys: After completing the Ishikawa diagram, each team picked their top three to five causes and used the 5-Whys method to drill down to the potential root cause(s). From the Ishikawa diagram, the team identified three direct causes that could be contributing to the inconsistency in the distance. Using the 5-whys, the root causes were identified (Table 2). Figure 4: Brainstormed Causes of Inconsistency in Distance Table 2: Direct Causes vs. Root Causes
assess whether the mentoringprogram increased the mentee’s confidence in STEM and a sense of belonging.References[1] Kloos, E. and Furterer, S., “Designing an Undergraduate Engineering Mentoring Program to Enhance Gender Diversity through Application of Lean Six Sigma Methods and Tools.” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 2019, June. https://peer.asee.org/32615[2] No Author, "Female Peer Mentors Help Retain College Women in Engineering." Education Digest, vol. 86, no. 4, Dec. 2017, p. 30. EBSCOhost,libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/ login.aspx?direct= true&db=f5h& AN=125896865&site=eds-live. Accessed January 30, 2019.[3] No Author, "Women in
placed ‘on the clock’. This initiated a timeframe, usually a week,within which students had two challenges to complete in order to be eligible to take that topictest.The first challenge, the student needed to acquire a completely worked-out problem thatillustrated the concept of the just completed topic. This problem could be one of the studentsown devising or from a textbook, class web page, or any other source. The student then wouldschedule an appointment with the instructor to do an oral presentation of the problem. Thestudent would explain step by step the procedure(s) used in the solution of the problem. Thisprovides the instructor an opportunity to examine the students’ critical thinking skills. If thestudent is unable to completely
the complete problem.‖ (http://www.incose.org/practice/whatissystemseng.aspx) 2. A sub-field of electrical engineering. ―[E]mphasis is attached to the use of systems theory in applications [and] … tends to emphasize control techniques which are often software- intensive.‖9 3. A sub-field of industrial and systems engineering. The word ―system‖ is often added to industrial engineering to emphasize the interactions of parts of a system to create the overall behavior of the system. 4. A sub-field of engineering management or technology management. ―[S]ystems engineering includes taking into consideration all aspects of the life cycle of the system. Thus the systems engineering approach is said to