the U.S. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Currall was a member of the Nanotechnology Technical Advisory Group. He has been a grantee on $21,533,893 in external funding of which over 78% came from refereed research grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health. Currall was lead author of a book on university- business-government collaboration entitled, Organized Innovation: A Blueprint for Renewing America’s Prosperity (Oxford University Press, 2014). Based on a study funded by the NSF, the book is the cul- mination of a 10-year research project on interdisciplinary research involving science, engineering, and medicine. He has served as a member of
computing in the freshman engineering program. Bursic has done research and published work in the areas of engineering and project management and en- gineering education. She is a member of IIE and ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Pennsylvania. Page 25.479.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Does the Use of Clickers Increase Conceptual Understanding in the Engineering Economy Classroom?AbstractResponse devices or “clickers” are seeing increased use in many engineering classrooms. Thesedevices allow students to anonymously
mathematics and basic sciences but carry knowledge further toward creative application. These studies provide a bridge between mathematics and basic sciences on the one hand and engineering practice on the other. Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. It is a process…in which the basic sciences, mathematics, and the engineering sciences are applied to convert resources optimally to meet these stated needs.”These are courses beyond the basic math and sciences; in an engineering management programexamples of these could be Statics, Materials Science, or Project Management.AACSB accredits institutions that offer degree-granting programs in business or
. The conclusion is that the project description needsto be improved so that students have adequate guidance to provide the desired solution.Examining the results of the student survey, it is apparent that the students view the laboratory ashelpful. Most reported it increased their understanding and confidence in their ability to develop,implement and evaluate control charts for variables. Students also indicated that the laboratoryshould be used for future classes.Future ResearchThere is still much work left to finalize this laboratory. The most pressing need is to improve theproject description regarding benchmarks for production and quality. The currentimplementation is well suited for kinesthetic/tactile and visual learners due to the
communicate expectations onassignments, but are also encouraged to provide a personal comment, observation, or feedback tohelp students learn better [22].It is crucial to create various learning activities to help students achieve the learning objectives.Providing opportunities for interactions, not only among students, but also between the studentsand the instructor, and students and the content, will encourage collaborations and promotestudents’ learning. To do so, activities like team projects, discussions that help fostercommunication and problem-solving skills are developed. Providing feedback to students’submitted work and joining in students’ discussions will help student’s learning and build a senseof community.Providing a variety of engaging
International Science and Technology Award. Dr. Salado holds a BSc/MSc in electrical engineering from Polytechnic University of Valencia, an MSc in project management and a MSc in electronics engineering from Polytechnic University of Catalonia, the SpaceTech MEng in space systems engineering from Delft University of Technology, and a PhD in systems engineering from the Stevens Institute of Technology. He is a member of INCOSE and a senior member of IEEE and IIE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Industrial Engineering beyond Numbers: Optimizing under EthicsAbstractOptimization is a major component of industrial engineering. Simplistically (and naively), theeducation of industrial
. Facilitate opportunities for employees to work on projects or issues that are socially relevant Men working in engineering and computing to serve as role models. Emphasize ethical and social issues when teaching engineering and computing. Encourage a supportive environment in the classroom and in the program. Encourage and assist early contact between students and professionals. Emphasize the wide variety of expertise necessary to be successful as an engineer or computing professional. Highlight as early as possible the different facets that make up engineering and computing.Methodology and Educational Learning Strategies:This course came out of a passion by the instructor to enhance leadership
, and do not collaborate. Step 5. Save your Minitab file as a project file (not a worksheet!) with your name on it, e.g., TomWillemain.MPJ. Step 6. Save your answers as a Word file with your name on it, e.g., TomWillemain.doc. Step 7. Email both your MPJ project file and Word file to willet@rpi.edu. Step 8. Turn this paper with the signed consent form back to Prof. Willemain. Thank you for your participation in this research project. We hope your data will help evolve our courses to better educate engineers in the art of data analysis. Page 23.572.14B. Prompt for Web Visitors exercise
. Viviana Cesani is a professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez (UPRM). She completed her Ph.D. degree in Manufacturing and Production Systems at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998. Her areas of interest in teaching and research include production plan- ning and control, supply chain management, engineering economy, project management, and engineering education. She is currently the department head of the IE department at UPRM. Dr. Cesani is a senior member of IIE, President of the UPRM-Delta Chapter of the International Organization for Women Ed- ucators, and member of the Professional College for Engineers and Land Surveyors of Puerto Rico. She was recognized as UPRM
Project and Systems Engineering Management”, 3rd Edition, 2008, John Wiley2. Sage, A. and C. Cuppan (2001). “On the Systems Engineering and Management of Systems of Systemsand Federations of Systems.” Information, Knowledge and Systems Management 2(4): 325-345 Page 14.1117.7
ablended format and was the first semester in the MS program for all of the students. This limitedtheir prior knowledge and expectations for the blended class structure. All of the other classes inthe students’ degree program were in a traditional face-to-face format.The class used for this educational research project is a required course in operationsmanagement in the Engineering Management Master’s Degree at Missouri University of Scienceand Technology (Missouri S&T). The class is typically taught multiple times a year, both face-to-face and live streaming over the Internet for distance students. The Engineering ManagementMaster’s Degree is a “broadening” degree. Students enter the program with a BS degree inalmost any engineering and
Paper ID #6598Educating the Professional Engineer of 2020:Dr. Susan L. Murray, Missouri University of Science & Technology Susan L. Murray is a professor of engineering management and systems engineering at Missouri Univer- sity of Science and Technology. Dr. Murray received her B.S. and Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. Her M.S. is also in industrial engineering from the University of Texas-Arlington. She is a professional engineer in Texas. Her research and teaching interests include human systems in- tegration, productivity improvement, human performance, safety, project management, and
instructional design expert for such a project like an online coursetransformation as described in this paper. Instructional design in engineering education isrelatively new. It would be worth to seek out for help from instructional design expertise. Nomatter how the mode of course delivery is determined, well-designed quality instruction is amust to be considered first for creating a better learning experience. Page 25.787.6Appendix A: Guided Questions for Course Evaluation SurveyQ: Describe your time commitment for this course considering the following questions: • What was the (average) amount of time you spent on this course per week (from Monday
organizational performance. Dervitsiotis17 (2004) proposed a systematicapproach to performance management that viewed the organization as a living entity optimizedas a whole. Morgan38 (2003) asserted that organizations implement PM systems that reflectmanagement’s abilities and beliefs along with those of the workers. Franco-Santos and Bourne18(2005) found that a successful PM system required a commitment from top management,enabled workers, and open communication. Bititci, Turner, and Begemann7 (2000) investigatedhow information technology (IT) systems could perform self-auditing functions using variousmanagement tools. Nudurupati and Bititci43 (2005) concluded that IT support was able toidentify weaknesses, enhance improvement projects, and improve
isexplicitly or implicitly expected”7.Following the “Guiding Principles” and the “Framework” provided in sections 4 and 5 of ISO10001: 2007, respectively, the objectives, processes and resources for the application of threeS2C2s, as well as the codes themselves, were planned and developed in accordance with section 6of the standard. The S2C2s included the “response” code, which guaranteed the professor’sresponse to a student inquiry within a set time, as well as the “review” and “schedule” codes,which promised prompt review of projects, assignments and exams, and conformance to the setlecture schedule, respectively. Subsequently, the first two codes were implemented in all fourcourses, while the schedule code was used in courses “A”, “B” and “D”. The
AC 2009-1142: ASSESSING ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT STUDENTS’PERCEPTION OF ON-LINE LEARNINGErtunga Ozelkan, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Ertunga C. Ozelkan, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management and the Associate Director of the Center for Lean Logistics and Engineered Systems (CLLES) at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (UNC Charlotte). Before joining academia, Dr. Ozelkan worked for i2 Technologies, a leading supply chain software vendor in the capacity of a Customer Service and Curriculum Manager and a Consultant. He also worked as a project manager and a consultant for Tefen Consulting in the area of productivity improvement
STEM faculty; and 4) professional advice and career paths. The initial mentoringprogram design was developed through two Lean Six Sigma projects, where they collected voiceof the customer (mentors and mentees) data, and designed the program. The program waspiloted in Fall 2019, spearheaded by the Women Engineering Program in the School ofEngineering, the director and a student graduate assistant. The success of the pilot program wasassessed in three ways: 1) number of mentor/mentee pairs starting the program, compared to theinitial number interested; 2) retention of women in engineering and science during the programperiods; and 3) through mentor and mentee reflections. In the initial voice of customer datacollection, we identified 14 possible
fifth task requires exercising Bayes' theorem directly or using the box as a tool to aid the calculation.A working design engineer will never encounter a problem where the setting, scaffolding,challenges, and targets are clearly evident. For real problems, structure must be created. Thisinvolves clarifying more than the type of information typically given in traditional textbookproblems. The current conditions and knowledge, the new knowledge needed, the resourcesneeded, the solution method, and the nature of the terminal state must all be defined and clarified.The process may not be orderly all the way through a project, but when the time allotted is almostover, a successful project must produce something that can be clearly displayed
Research Initiative (NAAMREI). Dr. Gonzalez is a founding leader of the initiative which seeks to develop the infrastructure for an integrated PK through practice educational system for the Rio South Texas Region. This endeavor involves a strong relationship with the Economic Development community, South Texas College and Region One Education Service Center which facilitates the activities of the proposed project. Because of his experience and role as a regional leader in a wide variety of endeavors, Dr. Gonzalez has served and continues to serve in leadership positions in technology based economic development in the Rio South Texas Region.Connie M Borror, Arizona State University West
Systems Engineering Research and the Fulbright International Science and Technology Award. Dr. Salado holds a BSc/MSc in electrical engineering from Polytechnic University of Valencia, an MSc in project management and a MSc in electronics engineering from Polytechnic University of Catalonia, the SpaceTech MEng in space systems engineering from Delft University of Technology, and a PhD in systems engineering from the Stevens Institute of Technology. He is a member of INCOSE and a senior member of IEEE and IIE.Mr. John Ray Morelock, Virginia Tech John Morelock is a doctoral candidate at Virginia Tech. His research interests include student motivation, game-based learning, and gamified classrooms. He received the NSF
activities, plans and projects to turn the Strategic Intent into reality.Operations professionals will need to provide company leaders with a clear picture of thecompany’s capabilities in terms of technologies and their innovations. They will need to findchallenges that serve the deployment of the corporate strategies in ways the operation’semployees find interesting and engaging. They will explore new areas of operation andknowledge that take advantage of teamwork and shared technical expertise. They have alsoknowledge of the rhythms and cycles of technological change, which they can apply to decisionsrelated to product innovation.One of the additional resources employed in the class is the analysis and discussion of a videorelated to the
Faculty E421 was changed to have different analytical models for different disciplines or tasks.29 (Contractors, consultant, project, process, etc.) Faculty, Spring Fall 2005 students 2005 TG 401 and TG 501 were added to the EM section of the ACE assessment website30 Faculty Fall 2004 Fall 2005 As part of the process of combining EM 366 with EM 365, space was opened up in the31 curriculum for a new course. The new course EM 351 Management of
, and peer review and final selection are based solely on your application and accompanying materials. • Do your homework. A thoroughly researched, well-planned application for a carefully chosen award (the best match of applicant to award) will have a considerable advantage over its competitors. • Realize that collaborative projects between a U.S. and an overseas scholar are more compelling to reviewers • Have a clear strategy. Make sure all parts of your application work to form an integrated whole. • Your application should o Highlight the aspects about you and your career that will give reviewers a focused yet well-rounded view of your candidacy o Convince
management and project management in the MS&T.Dr. Elizabeth A. Cudney, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Elizabeth Cudney is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineer- ing Department at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University, Master of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering and MBA from the University of Hartford, and doctorate in Engineering Management from the University of Missouri – Rolla. In 2018, Dr. Cudney received the ASQ Crosby Medal for her book on Design for Six Sigma. Dr. Cudney received the 2018 IISE Fellow Award. She also received the 2017 Yoshio Kondo Academic
control to optimize operations. Other research interests include the Deming System of Profound Knowledge (SoPK), developing continuous improvement programs as well as sustainable management systems based on ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and other international standards. He has over 25 years of experience in the quality management field as a quality engineer, corporate quality manager, consultant and trainer. His experience is extensive in quality management systems as wells as Lean and Six Sigma methods. In addition, he coached and mentored Green & Black Belts on process improvement projects in the manufacturing and service industries. Dr. Shraim is a Certified Quality Engineer (CQE) & a Certified Six Sigma Black
M L M L LE126 – Mechanics of Solids L M L L L M L M LEM470 – Engineering Management L L L M M M MEM 475 – Project Management L H MEM365 – Statistics for Engineering Mgrs M M LEM380 – Engineering Management Lab. M L M
. The 20 characteristics chosen bythe author was based on Deming’s 14 points that pertained to TQM. This was recorded in a spreadsheet form as shown in Appendix B. Theseportfolios can also be graded, evaluated and assessed using a variety of rubrics andassessment tools. The author has previously presented some of these results in a form atthe 114th ASEE Annual Conference in Honolulu, Hawaii (Narayanan 2007). Theauthor plans to generate and utilize a rubric for purposes of holistic assessment. Thisrubric is based on Washington State University’s Critical Thinking Project. This isshown in Appendix D. The 20 characteristics chosen by the author are recorded and incorporated intoan excel spreadsheet for documenting collected data
Management. The course istypically offered in fall and spring semesters with enrollment of approximately 90 students eachsemester. The course exists to introduce the management functions of planning, organizing,motivating, and controlling. Further, the course analyzes the application of these functions inresearch, design, production, technical marketing, and project management and studies theevolution of the engineering career and the transition to engineering management.The course was regularly delivered in a traditional format with two 75-minute classroomsessions each week, including lecture by the instructor with student response to questions usingclickers. Assessment typically involved individual assignments and several multiple-choiceexams each
the history of engineering education.” Actions toattract and train technically active mid-career professionals as ABET evaluators would takelonger. The Participation Project and its successor, Partnership to Advance VolunteerExcellence (PAVE) continued the collaboration between member societies, volunteers, andheadquarters staff to advance ABET’s commitment to continuous quality improvement of itsvolunteer processes beginning in 2003. PAVE led to a program evaluator competency model,new experiential volunteer training, workshops on assessment, and a new volunteer managementtool. Further demonstrating commitment to continuous quality improvement, ABET wasformally recognized as ISO 9001:2008 certified in 2015.Engineering Criteria as a Quality
Paper ID #23891Lessons Learned from Implementing a Textbook’s Companion Website intoa Production Operations Management CourseLt. Col. John P Richards P.E., United States Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel John Richards currently serves as an Assistant Professor at the United States Mili- tary Academy in the Department of Systems Engineering, focusing on topics in project and operations management. He is a career Army Engineer Officer and previously taught in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He holds masters degrees in both Engineering Management (University of