led energy conservation research projects for Argonne National Laboratory. He has a BS in civil engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University and an MS in civil engineering with an emphasis in regional planning from Northwestern University. Wayne is a frequent speaker and author on continuing education for engineers, and is a member of the College of Engineering’s Education Innovation Committee.Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell is the Vice Provost for Lifelong Learning and Dean of the Division of Continuing Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In his role as Vice Provost, he is striving to make UW- Madison a global leader in the service to lifelong learners. He
Paper ID #15880An Innovative Approach to Offering a Global Supply Chain Class for Engi-neering Managers in an International ContextDr. S. Jimmy Gandhi, California State University, Northridge Dr. S. Jimmy Gandhi is an assistant professor at California State University, Northridge. His research interests and the courses he teaches includes Quality Management, Lean Manufacturing, Innovation & Entrepreneurship,Sustainability as well as research in the field of Engineering Education. He has over 30 conference and journal publications and has brought in over $500K in research grants to The California State University
analysis of human and organizational factors, along with technical elements, in offshore drilling safety with an emphasis on negative pressure test. She has been able to present and publish papers in the area of risk assessment and safety management in different conferences and scientific journals.Dr. S. Jimmy Gandhi, California State University, Northridge Dr. S. Jimmy Gandhi is an assistant professor at California State University, Northridge. His research interests and the courses he teaches includes Quality Management, Lean Manufacturing, Innovation & Entrepreneurship,Sustainability as well as research in the field of Engineering Education. He has over 30 conference and journal publications and has brought in over
, which was verified with this data. Stage 3: In this stage, the orthogonal arrays (OA) and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios are calculated and used to determine the most useful set of predictive variables. Larger S/N ratios are preferred and indicate a possible useful predictive variable. 3 Stage 4: The variables that were identified as significant due to a positive S/N are used to develop a forecasting model. Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of Raw Data Completers Range Factor N Mean Median
need is by using teams (Varvel, Adams,Pridie, & Ruiz Ulloa, 2004). Organizations recognize the importance for employees tounderstand how to work effectively with others, but also express that new employees do notbring adequate teaming skills to the workplace (S. Adams & Ruiz, 2004; Pascarella &Terenzini, 2005). Despite calls to promote teamwork as “an indispensable quality forengineering”(Lingard & Barkataki, 2011) engineering schools have been generally slow indeveloping pedagogies that successfully promote collaborative behaviors. Several initiativeshave been done in engineering education -like project-based learning and team-basedlearning to try to promote teamwork skills (Felder & Brent, 2009; Prince, 2004). However
]. Table 1: PDSA Details Phase Description Plan a change or test aimed at improvement Plan (P) by stating objective, questions, and predictions Carry out the change or run the experiment Do (D) and document problems and issues Analyze data graphically and statistically. Use earlier analysis to build a temporal Study (S) picture. Compare to prediction (expectations
class, did not have any work experience.These numbers are important to show why it is essential to design the class with a focus onpractical applications, and structure the assignments with this focus, which we will discuss inmore detail below. Table 1 Learning Outcomes Covered by Each Assignment/Activity Targeted Learning Assignment/Activity Description Outcome(s) Case studies, quantitative problems, conceptual short Homework
.Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18–35.Bullen, M. (2007). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.Candy, P. C., Crebert, G., and O’leary, J. (1994). Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education. AGPS Canberra.Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., and Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.Collins, M. (2000). Comparing Web, Correspondence and Lecture versions of a second-year non-major Biology course. British
Electrical Engineering at LJMU, for his support of this project.References1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.2. Charyton, C., & Merrill, J. (2009). Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 145–156.3. Howard, T. J., Culley, S., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160– 180.4. Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: E-integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27
"[11] J. S. Russell, "Mentoring in Engineering" [8] The SE3 report goes beyond the topics of diversity and inclusion to address key issuesrelating to job satisfaction for all structural engineers. Indeed, work done to understand whywomen and minorities leave the profession will help bolster a declining talent pool, but it mayalso help to understand job satisfaction across the board. Results could be expected to be similaramong other engineering disciplines, but this has yet to be explored. This is one area of studythat could be expanded. Other areas that merit focused is best practices for addressing work-lifebalance, managerial communication strategies, and tactics used to prompt an employee’semotional investment into a company
-act-is-now?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth- 1801&hlkid=f8917367b4da4431926eb0f50b515749&hctky=1575970&hdpid=094bf139- fd76-400b-8896-e6caf6e19d81Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). News Release from BLS, US Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdfCarson, R. (1962). Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MACastellanos, S. (2018). Smart Elevators, Self-Driving Cars Require More Computing Power at Network’s Edge. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2018/01/02/smart-elevators-self-driving-cars-require-more- computing-power-at-networks-edge/Cisco. (2017). Cisco Announces $1 Billion Program for Smart Cities. Cisco the Network
assess whether the mentoringprogram increased the mentee’s confidence in STEM and a sense of belonging.References[1] Kloos, E. and Furterer, S., “Designing an Undergraduate Engineering Mentoring Program to Enhance Gender Diversity through Application of Lean Six Sigma Methods and Tools.” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 2019, June. https://peer.asee.org/32615[2] No Author, "Female Peer Mentors Help Retain College Women in Engineering." Education Digest, vol. 86, no. 4, Dec. 2017, p. 30. EBSCOhost,libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/ login.aspx?direct= true&db=f5h& AN=125896865&site=eds-live. Accessed January 30, 2019.[3] No Author, "Women in
work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate ResearchFellowship Program under Grant No. 1651272. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAmbrose, S. A. (2010). How learning works : seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Ammar, S., & Wright, R. (1999). Experiential learning activities in Operations Management. International Transactions in Operational Research, 6(2), 183.Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public. Educational
solution process is more important than the finalproduct.”Barrows4, doing research in the medical education field in the 1980’s, stated that problem-basedlearning can have many different meanings, depending on the skills of the teacher and theeducational learning objectives being pursued. In the medical field, existing cases taken from themedical research literature are an important part of the educational process. Barrows saw that ataxonomy was needed to help differentiate the many types of case-based learning processespossible. The taxonomy ranges from cases explained mostly via lecture, through looking at acase from beginning to end, applying lessons learned, and starting back at the beginning of thecase again, to see is a different approach to
their assigned topic.Learning Modules will consist of a: Power Point presentation At least one relevant article from the literature on the topic area Discussion of assigned materials and article Discussion questions with student discussion, and Presentation of the PowerPoint presentation in the class.The students will submit all materials via the course module assignment one week prior to theclass presentation. The instructor will upload the material onto the class web site so that theother students can review the material. The student(s) will then lead the class through alecture/Q&A session during the assigned class time. They will also moderate the discussionquestions during the presentation for their module
with the students the more standard sensitivityanalysis: change in price of goods, change in price of key raw material(s), change in price ofutilities, change in price of labor. These are the ones sometimes discussed in design textbooks.Ask students if that is all there is to a Financial Operational Model? See what the students answerhere. Get them to understand the sheer power of having the engineering design melded to theeconomics. What does that truly mean? Start to get them to see other types of sensitivities that arenot simply linear changes in slope but can have actual minimum or maximum optimal values.Examples include key design specifications to the product, parameter uncertainty in the modelsfor a piece of equipment such as extent of
has authored and co-authored several journal and conference publications in topics related to engineering education and course man- agement, design coordination, change management, site layout planning, constructability, claims and disputes, and simulation of design and construction operations.Miss Sarah Samir Sedra, United Arab Emirates university Sarah S. Sedra, a telecommunication engineer currently working at Etisalat UAE as mobile access plan- ning engineer. Worked previously for two years as an low voltage electrical engineer in AECOM middle east. Graduated in 2013 from Communication & electronics department in faculty of engineering Cairo university. After working for almost 4 years now I just started
Engineering.” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(3), 13–19, 2017. Retrieved from http://libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=tru e&db=eric&AN=EJ1156917&site=eds-live[7] JL Sliko, A. Morales, S. Agili, R.Asempapa, “Keeping women in stem majors: the penn state Harrisburg stem scholars program.” Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America. 2018;50(6):@Abstract no. 103-3. http://libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=tru e&db=guh&AN=844143-50&site=eds-live. Accessed March 17, 2019.[8] S. Bhatia S, JP Amati, “If These Women Can Do It, I Can Do It, Too”: Building Women
Oriented Capstone Courses, Journal of Engineering Education, January 1997.6. Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., Harrison, O., Thompson, P., Trevisan, M., and Mount, B., A Conceptual Model for Capstone Engineering Design Performance and Assessment, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education 2006.7. BachnakR., Verma S. and Coppinger T., Restructuring the Capstone Course Leads to Successful Projects, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition , American Society for Engineering Education 2005.8. McKenzie L.J., Trevisan M.S., Davis D.C., and BeyerleinS.W., Capstone Design Courses and
ablended format and was the first semester in the MS program for all of the students. This limitedtheir prior knowledge and expectations for the blended class structure. All of the other classes inthe students’ degree program were in a traditional face-to-face format.The class used for this educational research project is a required course in operationsmanagement in the Engineering Management Master’s Degree at Missouri University of Scienceand Technology (Missouri S&T). The class is typically taught multiple times a year, both face-to-face and live streaming over the Internet for distance students. The Engineering ManagementMaster’s Degree is a “broadening” degree. Students enter the program with a BS degree inalmost any engineering and
project from the host organization and developing their initial project plan underthe close guidance of their project mentor. The team then moved to the partner site to conduct aRIE to create positive change for the organization. The team was responsible for facilitating anagreed upon definition of the problem, observing and documenting process flows for relatedareas, and collecting and analyzing key data related to the problem. This information was thenutilized to generate potential solutions, finalize and implement the selected solution(s), anddesign and implement appropriate controls to ensure that the problem stays fixed followingsolution implementation. These activities were run as a PDCA cycle consistent with thehealthcare approaches of
, social responsibility of theprofession, the human elements of project management, etc. As topics are presented,students are required to discuss opposing perspectives, reflect on their own aspirations,and ultimately identify opportunities for personal growth and further learning.The course goals are communicated to students in an introductory Module 0. The coursegoal(s) are stated as follows. Students will: 1. Identify the key knowledge, skills andabilities (KSAs) required for engineering success in the 21st century, 2. Explore relevantprofessional and technical topics, 3. Evaluate their own individual strengths andweaknesses relative to qualities demanded of future engineers, and 4. Identify areas forpersonal growth and opportunities for further
organizational platform and analytical toolsto administer institutional accountability. The approach originates from the quality movementproposed in the 1990’s by W. Edwards Deming for reinventing government as a customer-drivenservice and an adaptation of the Federal Government’s Office of Management and Budget,Congressional Budget Office, and Government Accounting Office. Advantages of the proposedenvironment are an increased emphasis on institutional accountability and quantifying institutionalrisk.I. BackgroundRegional institutions face increasingly complex challenges affecting accountability that includetechnological changes, political uncertainties, financial stability, demographic shifts in studentpopulations, and cultural issues [1]. Dynamic
course team project will be quantified and demonstrated through a game that theteam will design, create, play, and demonstrate. Teams are given full freedom (empowered) to Page 26.507.7 6create/innovate and even to adopt any existing game to suit the project under study. This SCLhas been successfully implemented in more than one course in the MS SustainabilityManagement program. This particular SCL is perhaps one of the most advanced SCL used in thegraduate classes since real world problems need to be well understood to be able to bring theconcepts down to game objective(s), rules, and winning
://www.griffith.edu.au/centre/gihe/griffith_graduate/home.html.7. Krajcik, J. S. (2010, April 23). Supporting Students in Developing Literacy in Science. Science, pp. 456-459.8. Chan, V. (2011). Teaching Oral Communication in Undergraduate Science: Are We Doing Enough and Doing it Right? Journal of Learning Design, 71-79.9. Noblitt, L. V. (2010). A comparison of case study and tradition teaching methods for improvement of oral communication and critical thinking skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26-32.10. Garber, R. I. (2011, August 14). 20 fears for a new millennium - replacing the 1977 Book of Lists . Retrieved from Joyful Public Speaking: http://joyfulpublicspeaking.blogspot.com/2011/08/20-fears-for-new-millennium
,” open source ebook for undergraduate engineering economics, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, August 20162. ABET web site of accredited programs from http://main.abet.org/aps/Accreditedprogramsearch.aspx3. American Society of Engineering Education, 2013 ASEE Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology College, accessed 10 December 2014 at http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/14_443- 474.pdf4. Connor, H., Dench, S. & Bates, P. (2002). Skills dialogue: An assessment of skill needs in engineering, Department for Education and Employment, UK. Retrieved October 15, 2005 from http://www.employment- studies.co.uk/summary/summary.php?id=dfeesd25. Goel, Sanjay