the guide are objectivesthat state that “after performing activities in this booklet, students will be able to: • Define a pulley as a wheel with a grooved rim for a belt or cord which can transfer force or speed. • Build a model which will increase speed. • Build a model which will increase force. • Arrange pulleys so that the driver turns in the same direction as the follower. • Recognize that the turning ratio of one pulley to another is determined by the size of the pulleys. • Build a model that will transfer force at a 90-degree angle. • Have fun with pulleys!”Before beginning the session with the LEGO™s, the students are asked to complete a pre-testthat was developed by the MET faculty at the
introduction to engineering course on improving retention." Journal of Engineering Education, January 1998, 79-85. 10. Laux, Chad M., Abram Walton, Amy S. Van Epps, Kimberly M. Deranek, Darrel L. Sandall, Rick L. Homkes, and Sarah E. Leach. "Gateway experiences to engineering technology: development of an introductory course ETD IT/IET Interest Group." Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education, June 2011.11. Rojas-Oviedo, Ruben, and X. Cathy Qian. "Improving retention of undergraduate students in engineering through freshman courses." Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education, June 2002.12. Narum, Jeanne. "Transforming undergraduate programs in science, technology
science properties, including elastic modulus, strain, displacement, stress, yield, anderrors. The “Theory” section gives the students the opportunity to use the equation editor and toapply a general and consistent way to reference the equation(s) in the body of text. Similarlearning objectives are on adding a figure or drawing a new one using the drawing editor. The“Results and Discussion” section offers the students the opportunity to learn about datamanipulation and presentation, both in form of tables and graphs. Finally, the students learn howto refer and incorporate the necessary references.Two projects are usually assigned during this section. In the first one, the students receive anexample of a lab report without equations, figures
Hydraulics Safety QuestionsBe able to identify the fundamental parts of a hydraulic system and safety issues relating tohydraulicsYou will explore some of the safety issues associated with hydraulic systems and the fluids usedin them.QUESTION 1) Have you ever worked with hydraulic systems within a as a professionprofessional career?Yes_____ No_____IF yes, how long and on which system:3 years 1~3 years < 1 year NoneQUESTION 2) Have you received any training on safety of hydraulic systems?Yes_____ No_____If yes, what was the format? (workshop, online training, etc.)QUESTION 3) List hazard(s) associated with the use of hydraulic systems.QUESTION 4) What are the general safety procedures for working on hydraulic
& Sharma S, “Geometrical Tolerance Stack Up Techniques”, Chapter 52in DAAAM International Scientific Book, pp. 857-872, 2013. B. Katalinic & Z. Tekic (Eds.),Published by DAAAM International, ISBN 978-3-901509-94-0, ISSN 1726-9687, Vienna,Austria, 2013[2] Kenneth W. Chase, William H. Greenwood, Bruce G. Loosli, Loren F. Hauglund, Least CostTolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection,Manufacturing Review Vol 3, No 1, pp 49-59, 1990.[3] He, J. R., and Gibson, P. R., “Computer-Aided Geometrical Dimensioning and Tolerancingfor Process-Operation Planning and Quality Control”, The International Journal of AdvancedManufacturing Technology, 7:11-20, 1992[4] Gavankar, P., and Bedworth, D., “Stacked tolerance
isincreasing [13] as more industries are finding a positive impact on their business activities.Figure 2b. Morgue room (Modified from Rockay 3D, Unity) virtual scene with wall of fire effectand explosion fire effectFigure 3a. Particle effect and lightning applied to the project house to imitate the darkenvironmentFigure 3b. Fire particle effect Figure 3c. Entrance and the aisles of a burning houseTotal number of five students participated in the experimental virtual fire environment. Thestudents were asked to wear the Oculus Rift S VR headset to receive immersive experience in thevirtual fire scene simulation (Figures 4a & 4b). All the participants started with the Cabin scene
://www.sciencebusiness.net/sites/default/files/archive/Assets/94fe6d15-5432-4cf9-a656-633248e63541.pdf. [Accessed 19 Jan 2020].[6] S. Kaul, G.A. Chang, PM Yanik, and CW Ferguson (2015, June), “Development of a MentorshipProgram in Engineering and Engineering Technology,” presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Seattle, Washington.[7] M. Nelson, B. Ahn, and CN Nelson (2019, June), “Make to Innovate: Blending of Project-basedLearning and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies to Provide Real-world Engineering Experiences toEngineering Students,” presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 17(2), pp. 319-335, 2015.[4] M Upcraft, J Gardner, & B Barefoot, Challenging and supporting the first-year student. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2005[5] C Buyarski, S Kahn, (2013). “Giving students a compass: Seeking a conceptual model of a developmental ePortfolio,” Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, 2013[6] M Baxter Magolda, “Three elements of self-authorship,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 49(4), pp. 269-284, July/August, 2008.[7] Canvas Outcomes tool: What are Outcomes? retrieved from https://community.canvaslms.com/docs/DOC-10711-67952724565 , April 19, 2017[8] G. Rogers, Student Outcomes and Performance Indicators
. Naval Surface Warfare Cen- ter at Carderock, Md. Dr. Tawfik is the co-author of more than 60 research papers in the areas of Hydrogen Fuel Cells, Biomass Energy, Thermo- fluids and Two Phase Flow published in prestigious peer reviewed journals and conference symposiums. He holds numerous research awards and owns the rights to four patents in the Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) fuel cells area. Currently, Dr. Tawfik is a SUNY Distinguished Service Professor and the Director of the Institute for Research and Technology Transfer (IRTT) at Farmingdale State College of the State University of New York.Dr. Yeong Ryu, State University of New York, Farmingdale YEONG S. RYU graduated from Columbia University with a Ph.D
community on first year engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 41, No. 3, 331-341.3. Frazier , W. & Eighmy, M. (2012). Themed Residential Learning Communities: The Importance of Purposeful Faculty and Staff Involvement and Student Engagement. Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.4. Golde, C., & Pribbenow, D. (2000). Understanding Faculty Involvement in Residential Learning Communities. Journal of College Student Development.5. Inkelas, K. (2007). The National Study of Living-Learning Programs: 2007 Report of Findings. University of Maryland-Universities Libraries DRUM. Retrieve from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/83926. Johnson, J., & Romanoff, S. (1999). Higher Education Residential
: Integrating social media and social work education. Journal of Social Work Education. 50(3): 387–390.Schmidt, H. (2013). Media literacy education from kindergarten to college : A comparison of how media literacy is addressed across the educational system. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5(1), 295–309.Stewart, J., Antonenko, P., Robinson, S. and Mwavita, M. (2013). Intrapersonal Factors Affecting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Agricultural Education Teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education. 54(3), pp. 157 – 170. DOI: 10.5032/jae.2013.03157Talley, K.G. (2013). Lights, camera, action! Peer-to-peer learning through graduate student videos. In Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education
on 10 years of sponsored senior design projects: Students win–clients win!” The Journal of Systems and Software 80 (2007) 1209–1216. [6] Cliff Mirman, “Pathways for Integrating Industry into an Engineering Technology Program”, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, San Antonio, TX. [7] Kornecki, A.J., Khajenoori, S., Gluch, D., Kameli, N., 2003. “On a partnership between software industry and academia.” Proc. of the 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Madrid, Spain, pp. 60–69. [8] Otieno, A. and Mirman, C., 2003, “Engineering Technology Capstone Experience: An Industry Based Partnership,” Proc. CIEC 2003 Conference
”, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA[8] Hyeoun-Seong Kim, Sangmi-Park, Sunju-Han, Leen-Seok Kang, “AR-based 4D CADsystem using marker and markerless recognition method”, Procedia Engineering 2017; 196:29 – 35[9] Tumkor Serdar, “Mixed Reality Tools in Engineering Drawing Course”, Proceedings of the2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, LA[10] Michael Fosmire, Amy S. Van Epps, Nastasha E Johnson, “Badging Your Way toInformation Literacy”, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June14-17, 2015, Seattle, WA[11] Rob van Roy, Sebastian Deterding, Bieke Zaman, “Collecting Pokémon or receivingrewards? How people functionalise badges in
sciences, technology, engineering, mathematics, and/or computational sciences. b. A professional skills component must be developed in consultation with leaders from the targeted industry, business, government, or nonprofit organizations. c. An experiential component that must include at least one capstone project, supervised collaboratively by faculty and employers, evaluated or graded by faculty, and typically developed with an employer(s), which integrates the practical application of scientific and professional knowledge, behavior, and skills. The experiential component typically includes a structured internship and provides an opportunity for students to
Michael Spektor's bookmentioned above could be helpful in implementing this course.References:[1] Fall Protection in Construction. OSHA 3146-05R 2015[2] Spektor, M., Solving Engineering Problems in Dynamics, Industrial Press,[3] Grossman, S. and Derrick, W., Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Harper & Row Publishers[4] Churchill, R., Operational Mathematics, McGraw-Hill Book Company[5] Bracewell, R.M., The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, Chapter 11, The Laplace Transform, pp 219 to 240, McGraw-Hill BookCompany
EquipmentThe PLC Laboratory is equipped with twelve stations, all consisting of a Dell OptiPlex personalcomputer, an Allen Bradley Compact Logix PLC and PanelView Plus 600 HMI, and an Agilentoscilloscope, multimeter and power supply. All of the computers, PLCs and HMIs arenetworked using Ethernet communication, and the test equipment is connected by a GeneralPurpose Interface Bus (GPIB). The PLC system includes; The CompactLogix setup contains the following hardware: • 1769-L32E processor (slot 0) • 1769-PA16 power supply slot P/S • 1769-IA16 120V AC Input (slot 1) • 1769-OW16 16-Point AC/DC Relay Output (slot 2) • 1769-IF4XOF2 4-Input, 2-Output, Combination Analog I
=pubadmin_fac4. Hoy, M B. (2013). "3D printing: Making things at the library.” Medical reference services quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763869.2013.749139#.VM059C6gxdM5. Scalfani, V. F. and Sahib, J. (2013) "A model for managing 3D printing services in academic libraries." Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/13-spring/refereed1.html6. Colegrove, P. (2014). "Making It Real: 3D Printing as a Library Service." Educause Review Online. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/making-it-real-3d-printing-library-service7. Pryor, S. (2014). "Implementing a 3D Printing Service in an Academic Library." Journal of Library Administration
is required to assess a givenoutcome. In Figure 3, Part 3 displays a grading rubric which is utilized to evaluate student work.The distinction between the two different Part 3’s is important to note. Some courses utilizecoursework that demands objective evaluation. Other courses utilize work that must besubjectively graded. The inclusion of rubrics is critical in ensuring a consistent grading effortwhen evaluating subjective material.It is important to note that the form has only four entries that are editable by the faculty: thenumber of students engaged in the assessment, the number of students satisfying the performancetarget, the percentage equivalent and faculty comments. These editable variables were carefullyconsidered in the design
Technology (ABET; 2015). Accreditation Standards and ProgramCriteria for Manufacturing Engineering and Similar Programs. Washington, D.C.: ABET, Inc. [Available online:http://abet.org]5. Mott, R. L., Stratton, M. J., Jack, H., Gartenlaub, M., Bennett, R. J., Wendel, S., Waldrop, P.S. & Raju, V. (2012).The Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge: Its Application to Engineering Technology Programs. Journal ofEngineering Technology, 29 (2).6. Mott, R., Jack, H., Raju, V., & Stratton, M. (2011, July). The Four Pillars of Manufacturing Engineering. InProceedings of the 2011 SME Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.7. Rhoades, L.J. (2005). The Transformation of Manufacturing in the 21st Century. Bridge, 35 (1), pp. 13-20.8. Christensen, C. M., & Eyring
, but individually, neither of them meet the objectives ofthe course. There are more expensive choices (such as figure 8), but the cost of it exceeds the $100target range. Page 26.971.6 Figure 6. Pic Development Board $30 (1) Lacks enough peripheral components to be used for the course Figure 7. Raspberry PI $40 (2) Accessing the peripherals via the Linux O/S is not one of the objectives for the course (3) Figure 8. Embeded SBC with touch display $250The board that was developed for the course costs less than $45 and has everything that is needed
Paper ID #15247Fixture Design to Supplement Machining and Fuel Cell EducationProf. Yeong Ryu, State University of New York, Farmingdale YEONG S. RYU graduated from Columbia University with a Ph.D. and Master of Philosophy in Mechan- ical Engineering in 1994. He has served as an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Farmingdale State College (SUNY) since 2006. In addition, he has conducted various research projects at Xerox Corporation (1994-1995), Hyundai Motor Corporation (1995-1997), and New Jersey Institute of Technology (2001-2003). He has been teaching and conducting research in a broad range of
. Retrieved 2012, from http://www.objet.com/Portals/0/docs2/New%20materials%20data%20sheets_low%20res.pdf 11. PolyJet Materials Data Sheet. (n.d.). Retrieved 7 8, 2013, from http://www.stratasys.com/materials/polyjet/~/media/29592222B80C489BAC28803DB08C10E5.ashx 12. RayCE Americas. (2012-2015). Personal discussions. 13. Verma, S., Tyagi, K., and Yang, K., (2015), "Modeling and Optimization of Direct Metal Laser Sintering Process", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 77 (5-8), pp. 847-860. 14. Zheng, T. a. (2011). Injection Molding: Integration of Theory and Modeling Methods. Longdon, New York: Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht.
Engineering, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall.6. Yang, Horng-Jyh, (2015), Online resources utilization in geotechnical engineering laboratory for undergraduate civil engineering students, Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE North Central Section Conference, American Society for Engineering Education.7. Puchner, Richard, (2011), “Using Google Earth in geotechnical investigations”, Magazine of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, Volume 19, issue 3.8. Kumar, Saneev, (2014), “Teaching Geotechnical Engineering using Professional Practice”, International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, Florida.9. Boruff B. J., Emrich C., and Cutter S. L., (2005), Erosion Hazard Vulnerability of US Coastal Counties
. The stresses resulting from the angled cut are defined as average normal stress, σ’, and direct average shear stress, τ’, in the X’-Y’ coordinate system. Figure 6 depicts the average normal stress and direct average shear stress. Figure 6: Average Normal and Direct Average Shear Stresses NOTE: By definition, both stresses have uniform stress distributions across the cut surface. As the cut angle, , is varied from 0⁰ to 90 ⁰ in 5⁰ increments, the normal stress, σ’, and the shear stress, τ’, can be calculated. The solution for the cut at each angle represents a point on the circle developed by Christian Otto Mohr in the late 1800’s
designs for educational research. (Prentice Hall, 2005).17 Mendenhall, W. M., Sincich, T. L. & Boudreau, N. S. Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. (CRC Press, 2016).18 King, G. A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. (Princeton University Press, 2013).19 Sessa, V. I. & London, M. Continuous learning in organizations: Individual, group, and organizational perspectives. (Psychology Press, 2015).20 Kennedy, M. M. Generalizing from single case studies. Evaluation Review 3, 661-678 (1979).
database. Interfaced the database with the web and mobile client applications.Web and mobile applicationsWeb and mobile client applications provided the following functionality: Allow users to enter station parameters: station #, building name and address, load limit for each location (lbs./ft2 or kg/m2) Represent overlay colorized station locations (using GPS) and ID # onto aerial view of building. Colors indicated degree of safety: green = % below threshold, orange = close to threshold, red = at or exceeded threshold. Plot load, temperature(s) and building load limit vs. time (selectable time scale, i.e. day, week, month, years, etc.) for any station Sent alert messaging (text and email).All development and
. It has also improved the assessmentculture in the department, a key factor for the continuous improvement of the programs offeredby the department.References:1. Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A., 2013, Digest of Education Statistics 2012 (NCES 2014-015), National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington D.C.2. Obama, B., 2009, President Obama’s Address to Congress, retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/us/politics/24obama-text.html?_r=2 on Feb 20 2010, accessed on Jan 24, 2017.3. U.S. Department of Education, 2006, A test of leadership: Charting the future of American higher education (Report of the commission appointed by Secretary of Education Margaret
, Clarence Central School District Abigail Gordon obtained her B.S. and M.S.ed. from Daemen College in Amherst, NY. She is currently a special education teacher in the Clarence Central School District. Abigail works as a special education consultant teacher for second and fifth grade. Many of Abigail’s daily roles include front loading her students on lessons that they will later see in their mainstream classrooms. She has become an expert in this field and has been involved in efforts to modify the elementary age front loading technique to other age groups of learners.Dr. Brian Scott Rice, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Brian S. Rice is an assistant professor in the Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering
Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018.[2] Shekar, A., “Project-Based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing Best Practices,”Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June, 2014.[3] Wright-Carlsen, R., Zyhier, S., Sirinterlikci, A., “Project-Based Learning: Engaging BiomedicalEngineering Sophomores Through a Collaborative Vein-Finder Device Project with Nursing,” Proceedingsof the 125th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June, 2018.[4] Rockenbaugh, L.A., Kotys-Schwartz, D.A., Reamon, D.T., “Project-Based Service Learning and StudentMotivation,” Proceedings of the 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver BC, June,2011.[5] Puttagounder, D.S
exams, or quizzes identical to the work of other students, using cell phones duringexaminations, submitting computer codes identical to that of another student(s) or copying codesfrom the internet, submitting old versions of laboratory reports, etc. Academic Misconduct Incidents 105 76 70 45 46 30 32 22 2015-16 2016-17