perspective.As discussed in the section relating the impact of the project on infrastructure, the choice ofhealthcare robotics seems to be a good one that manages to satisfy all conditions set for growinga research program. Also notable are the funding opportunities that come with a real-worldoriented project.Bibliography1. Website for Council on Undergraduate Research (www.cur.org)2. S. Berri, A. Zhang and G. and Gailani. "Importance of undergraduate research in engineering technology Page 23.350.8 programs". American Society of Engineering Education 2012 National Conference, San Antonio, TX, 20123. Multiple Authors, "A research roadmap for
of Engineering Education, January 2004. 3. Starrett, S. and M. M. Morcos, “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp 93-99, January 2001. 4. Higley, K. A. and C. M. Marianno, “Making Engineering Education Fun,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No.1, pp 105-107, January 2001. 5. Gabelnik, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., and Smith, B.L., editors, Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Jossey-Bass, 1990 6. Goodwin, T. & Hoagland, K. E. (1999). How to get started in research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research. 7
used for someexperiments) would impact the quality of education by potentially diminishing design creativitywith subsequent course offerings.References 1. Rosentrater, K. A. & Al-Kalaani, Y. 2006. Renewable energy alternatives – a growing opportunity for engineering and technology education. The Technology Interface, 6, 1. 2. Anderson, O. R. 1976. The Experience of Science: A New Perspective on Laboratory Teaching, Teachers College Press, New York. 3. Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. 1982. The role of Laboratory in Science Teaching education: Neglected Aspects of Research, Review of Educational Research, 52, 2, 201-217. 4. Edward, N. S. 2002. The role of laboratory work in engineering
Schrock, S., “Are Students ENTITLED to High Grades?”, ASEE, Proceedings of the 2010Midwest Section Conference of the ASEE, 2010, section 302.[2] Land, R., “First Use Of A Prototype Nationally-Normed Assessment Exam For EET Programs”, ASEEProceedings of the 2010 National Conference and Exhibition, June 2010. Also:http://sme.org/downloads/cert/ASEEPaper.pdf[3] Land, R., “EET Nationally-Normed Assessment Exam: First Experiences and Their Relations to ABETOutcomes”, ASEE Proceedings of the 2010 National Conference and Exhibition, June 2011.[4] Shaeiwitz J. and Briedis, D., “Direct Assessment Measures”, ASEE Proceedings of the 2007 NationalConference and Exhibition, June 2007.[5] Lookadoo, J., “TC2K Accreditation: An EET Success Story”, ASEE
be to use aBASIC Stamp for the servo control. All it needs to do is receive the direction command on twoinput ports and then enable the appropriate servo(s).IV. Firmware DesignThe transmitter firmware, written in combination of the free version Hi-Tech C and MPASMassembler, demonstrates some of the capabilities if the rfPIC12F675 by transmitting the status ofthe two buttons GP3 and GP4 on the transmitter4 5. A 0x23h is transmitted if the left button ispressed and a 0x43 is transmitted if the right button is pressed. The Xmit function used totransmit the data uses a simplified KeeLoq protocol based on the assembler code provided withthe PICkit 1 and has been adapted to interface to the Hi-Tech C compiler. The Xmit functions
with the system demonstration (15 minutes teampresentation).Design Team: The project is executed by two member teams. A formal Project Report (consistingof Abstract, introduction, Design Description consisting of Schematic(s) and Software Code andBibliography) will be prepared by each member of the group.Duration: Week 13, 14 and 15Project Grading: Five points for the design features, 10 points for successful execution anddemonstration, 5 points for code quality and organization, total 20 points, which is the 20% of the Page 25.515.5total class grade. IV. STUDENT AND FACULTY FEEDBACKThis class is offered in every
tangible or intangible rewards. His original theories were extreme and could be interpreted to mean that human beings do not have real freedom of action, but merely respond to their environment. Albert Bandura’s theory of observational learning, also known as social learning19,20, states that people learn by observing the behavior of others and then imitating the behavior that produces a desired reward. For example, if the student sees others getting good grades and recognition, s/he will be motivated to copy the behavior to achieve the same results. 2. Cognitive theories According to Jean Piaget21, individuals have an innate need to organize their experiences
: 1. Understand the basic logic gates and combinational logic functions, symbols, truth tables, timing diagrams, and logic circuits. 2. Simplify complex logic circuits by applying Boolean algebra laws and theorems 3. Understand the operation of basic counters, decoders, multiplexers and arithmetic circuits. 4. Convert between the decimal, binary, and hexadecimal number systems. 5. Understand binary, and BCD, and the need for alphanumeric codes, especially the ASCII code. 6. Perform binary addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division on binary (using the 2's-complement system) and hexadecimal numbers. 7. Understand the basic types of flip-flop. 8. Understand sequential logic systems including
the 21st Century; Proceedings of Construction ’91. Cambridge, MA: ASCE; 1991:484-489.10. LePatner, Barry B. Broken Buildings, Busted Budgets: How to Fix America’s Trillion-Dollar Construction Industry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007.11. Johnson S. Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation. New York: Riverhead Books; 2010. Page 24.756.912. Construction Innovation Forum: NOVA Award. NOVA Award. 2013. Available at: http://www.cif.org/nova- award.php. Accessed December 30, 2013.13. Zakaria F. “Restoring the American Dream – How to Innovate” – Global Public Square - CNN.com
Application of a Pedagogical Framework to Improve Existing Instruction”. IEEE Medical Biology. July/August 2003, pp. 71-79. 6. Nelson, J.K., “Work in Progress: Project-Based Assignments for a Graduate-Level Digital Signal Processing Course”. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference No. 36, October, 2006, Session M4D. 7. Fink, F.K., Enemark S., and Moesby E., “UICEE Center for Problem-Based Learning (UCPBL) at Aalborg University”. Presented at the 6th Baltic Region Seminar on Engineering Education, Wismar, Germany, September, 2002. 8. Sheppard.K. and Gallois, B. “Implementation of Technogenesis in the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum”. Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE/SEFI/TUB Colloquium, American Society for Engineering
. Bertoline, Dean, College ofTechnology at Purdue University. Dean Bertoline penned an unpublished work titled FutureCollege of Technology. This document formed the underlying vision and detailed plan forcreating preeminence in defining and developing the 21st Century Technologist; this, throughreinvention of the College of Technology at a tier 1 research intensive university. Subsequentconversations to advance this objective yielded the collection of thought reflected in this paper. Page 25.217.12Bibliography1 Zakaria, F. (2011). Innovate Better. Time Magazine. June 13.2 Lohr, S. (2011). When Innovation, too, is Made in China. New York Times
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not reflect the views of DHS.Bibliography:1. Patrick S. Roberts, “What Katrina Means for Emergency Management”, The Forum, Volume 3, Issue 3, Article 2, 2005.2. Jeremy I. Levitt and Matthew C. Whitaker, Hurricane Katrina: America's Unnatural Disaster, University of Nebraska Press, 2009.3. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Fundamentals of Emergency Management, Emergency Management Institute, Independent Study 230 (a), 2010.4. George D. Haddow, Jane A. Bullock, and Damon P. Coppola, Introduction to Emergency Management, Elsevier Science, 2010.5. Emergency Management Institute, Introduction to Community Emergency Response Teams, Department of
the School. It should be stressed that thetechnology professor teaches engineering concepts to the students and is explicitly notattempting to “steal” engineering students.3.2 Data collectionData were collected for six years in three forms: transcript information, number of majors, andbrief in-class surveys. The six years involve twelve semesters: six fall semesters and six spring Page 25.1421.4 semesters. Here, a semester is referred to as the academic year with a “F” or “S” for fall orspring; e.g., the last semester examined was the spring of the 2010-2011 year, or “1011S'”.The transcript information was collected for EGR120 students from
. Page 22.1458.8 2011 ASEE Conference, Vancouver, BCReferences[1] Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010. Occupational employment projections to 2018. Retrievedfrom Academic Search Premier database.[2]Carrigan, S., 2008. Formula Funding, the Delaware Study, and the University of NorthCarolina.. NEW DIRECTIONS FOR INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, no. 140, Winter 2008[3] Doyle, W. and Delaney, J., 2009. Higher Education Funding: The New Normal. ChangeJuly/August 2009.[4] Electronic Design, 10/22/2009, Vol. 57 Issue 22, p22-29.[5] Fabrikant, G., 2010. Yale Endowment Gained 8.9% Last Year.. New York Times, 9/25/ [6] 2010 Fairleigh Dickinson University, School of Engineering and Engineering Technology,(2010). Retrieved on November 25
teaching approach for engineering in conjunction with architecture and construction with solar decathlon project, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.3. Chuku, A.U., Oni, B., Amstrong, D, Safavi, M, and Burge, L., Integrated engineering education through multidisciplinary nationally relevant projects: the solar decathlon project, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.4. Marshall, P., Click, D. and Craft, S., The Solar Decathlon and ABET EC 2000, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.5. Rayl, J. and Brownson, J., Integrative Awnings in the Natural Fusion Home: Solar Decathlon 2009
LABORATORIES,”Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, McNeese State University, March 24-26, 2010,Lake Charles, Louisiana.[2] D. Gurkan, F, Attarzadeh, M. Moges and V. Gallardo, “Results of an Innovative approach to Learning Via peer-to-Peer Undergraduate Mentoring in Engineering Technology laboratories”, NSF Grantee Presentation, Proceedingsof 2009 ASEE annual conference and Exposition, June 14 – 17, 2009 Austin, TX, USA.[3] F, Attarzadeh, D. Gurkan, M. Ramos, M. Moges, V. Gallardo, M. Mehrubeoglu, R. Talusani, S. Karulkar“Perception of Undergraduate Freshman Students on Role Models and Correlation with Their EducationBackground”, Proceedings of 2009 ASEE annual conference and Exposition, June 14 – 17, 2009 Austin, TX, USA
Cobb paradox – why projects fail. The Standish Group, “Unfinished voyages”, 1996. 4. S Robbins, “Understand what motivates your boss”, Harvard Business School Working Knowledge, May 13th 2006. 5. “Skills needed to get hired” Video from NSF-sponsored project, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A42Tab_bu6A Page 22.342.10
management,quality management, software ergonomics, and systems engineering.[2]As of 2004, the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics counts 760,840 software engineers holding jobsin the U.S.; for comparison, in the U.S. there are some 1.4 million practitioners employed in allother engineering disciplines combined.[3] The term software engineer is used very liberally inthe corporate world. Very few of the practicing software engineers actually hold engineeringdegrees from accredited universities. There are estimated to be about 1.5 million practitioners inthe E.U., Asia, and elsewhere. SE pioneers include Barry Boehm, Fred Brooks, C. A. R. Hoare,and David Parnas
future engineers willalso think more green energy efficient in the original designs they perform since they will nowhave the tools to evaluate options and present the long term savings of a greener energy designthat might have a slightly more initial cost. It is hoped that more programs will find room intheir programs for a similar course to the one presented in this paper.Bibliography1. Capehart, B. L., Turner, W. C. & Kennedy, W.J., (2008). Guide to Energy Management Sixth Edition, Fairmont Press , ISBN 978-1-4200-8489-4.2. Doty,S. & Turner, W. C. (2009). Energy Management Handbook Seventh Edition, Fairmont Press, ISBN 978-1- 4200-8870-0.3. U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2010, DOE/EIA
modeling methods also improved.These proxies for the understanding of design intent all improved after the course. This resultedin spite of the students having significant experience and confidence in using other higher-endCAD tools prior to their experiences in this course.Bibliography1. D. A. Field, "Education and Training for CAD in the Auto Industry," Computer-Aided Design 36 (14), 1431- 1437 (2004).2. S. D. Eppinger and A. R. Chitkara, "The New Practice of Global Product Development," MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (4), 22-30 (2006).3. B. Caldwell and G. M. Mocko, "Ttite," in ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences (Brooklyn, New York, 2008
MaximumLeast MostNot significant Most SignificantNot Relevant RelevantNot Applicable ApplicablePart One: Please answer the following questions by ranking them 1. Rate your experience/exposure to the resources of the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) website. 1 2 3 4 5 2. The product idea was based on developing a solution to a problem. 1 2 3 4 5 3. The product idea was based on fulfilling a specific need. 1 2 3 4 5 4. The patent search (PS) made the team more aware of the potential
runs.References1. Felder,R.M, and R.W. Rousseau, “Elementary Principles of Chemical processes”, Wiley, NJ, 2005, 3rd Edition.2. Seider, W., J.D. Seader, D.R. Lewin, and S. Widagdo, “Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis,Analysis, and Evaluation”, Wiley, NJ, 2009, 3rd Edition.3. Cheng, H.C. and Luyben, W.L., “Heat-Integrated Distillation Columns for Ternary Separations”, I&EC Process Page 22.30.10Design and Development, 24, 707, (1985).
the Internet-controllable vortex tube consists of:̇ Source of compressed air (5HP electric compressor and air dryer unit)̇ Pressure transducers (Omega Dyne Inc; Model: PX209-200A5V)̇ Temperature transducers (Omega Engineering Inc; Model: TX91A-K2) Page 15.550.6 ̇ Vortex Tubė National Instrument-DAQ card (16 inputs, 16 bits, 200KS/s, Multifunction I/O for USB)̇ LabVIEW software and server (Host Computer, IP Address: 144.118.xx.xxx)̇ Client (PC downloaded with LabView Runtime Engine)̇ Network IP Camera (Toshiba, Model: IK-WB21A with 22 x optical zoom, pan, tilt features)̇ Flow Transducer
, Oregon, June 12-15, 2005, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=89639. M. Whitt, R. Handy and M. Ratcliff. "Technology students: Their role in the global economy". American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) 2006 Annual Conference, American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Chicago, Illinois, June 18-21, 2006, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=11023&pdf=2006Full2642.pdf10. Khan, S. and Kissick, B. "Beating the competition down with the stick of education: A winning strategy for a global world". ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2008, ASEE, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22-25, 2008, http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=934311. Committee on the Offshoring of
&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDkQFjAA&url=htt p%3A%2F%2Fifap.ed.gov%2Ffsahandbook%2Fattachments%2F0910FSAHbkVol2Ch1School.pdf&e i=ZRnCUt_INYmuyQHu54HACw&usg=AFQjCNG_lqxZvURlglb4- 01XQlI_kydtvA&bvm=bv.58187178,d.aWc 4. IUPUI Institutional Reports. (2013). Retrieved December 28, 2013, from http://reports.iupui.edu/render.aspx/INSTITUTIONAL%20DATA/RSPINC/IUPUI 5. Indiana Commission for Higher Education. (2013). Retrieved December 28, 2013, from http://www.in.gov/che/ 6. Pande, P., Neuman, R., and Cavanagh, R. (2002). The Six Sigma Way: Implementation Guide for Process Improvement Teams. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill 7
and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed? Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 67-81. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/ jiol/issues/pdf/4.2.1.pdf2. Bolkan, J. (June 24, 2013). Report: Students taking online courses jumps 96 percent over 5 years. Retrieved from http://campustechnology.com/articles/2013/06/24/report-students-taking-online-courses-jumps-96- percent-over-5-years.aspx.3. McSporran, M., & Young, S. (2001). Does gender matter in online learning? Research in Learning Technology, 9(2), 3-15. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/12024 doi:10.1080/09687760100902024. Beer, C., & Clark, K., & Jones, D
GR, Kuh GD. A Typology of Student Engagement for American Colleges and Universities. Research in Higher Education. 2005;46(2):185-209. doi:10.1007/s 11162-004-1599-0.9. Moore J, Lovell CD, McGann T, Wyrick J. Why involvement matters: A review of research on student involvement in the collegiate setting. College Student Affairs Journal. 1998;17(2):4-17.10. U.S. Department of Education. Nontraditional Undergraduates / Persistence and Attainment of Nontraditional Students. National Center for Education Statistics. 1994. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs/web/97578g.asp. Accessed December 23, 2013.11. Terenzini PT, Pascarella ET, Blimling GS. Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning
. S. Patent Awards so far. He received a masters degree in interdisciplinary engineering from Purdue University Calumet and graduated from Purdue University with a B.S.M.E.Prof. Gregory P. Neff, Purdue University, Calumet (Tech) Gregory Neff is professor of mechanical engineering technology at Purdue University Calumet. He is a Registered Professional Engineer, a Certified Manufacturing Engineer, and a Certified Manufacturing Technologist. Greg is active in ASEE where he won the Meryl K. Miller award in 1994 and in SME where he is education & certification chair and webmaster for chapter 112. He is faculty advisor and webmaster for SME student chapter 161 and advisor for Tau Alpha Pi. He is active in ASME
criteria to solve problems without to solve problems, but not without some problems, but the solution (s) contains to solve problems; solutions provided are any errors. minor errors and/or omissions. significant errors and/or omissions with totally inconsistent with the design respect to design parameters. criteria.Perform design/analysis of Provides ample evidence of Provides adequate evidence of Provides some evidence of application of Provides little or no evidence ofbeams for
theprojects. The position of technical advisor for each of the project groups is split among the EETfaculty, based on the faculty member’s area of expertise.The EET program has defined, with the approval of alumni and its industrial advisory board,sixteen Student Outcomes that students should achieve by graduation, labeled a) - p). Thesebegin with the ABET Criterion 3 Student Outcomes a) - k), and then add the Electrical /Electronic(s) Engineering Technology program specific requirements, and some universityrequired student outcomes, which are labeled l) - p). There are seven, of the sixteen total Student Outcomes, that are assessed by the Capstone courseinstructor and project technical advisors, based on the Capstone project work, both during