professional engineering environment [11]. All other opportunities provide“at best, a simulation of engineering practices” [11, p. 2].Program Outcomes A student’s completion of coursework requirements is no longer the primary measure foracademic success; it is now measured by achievement of program learning outcomes [5].Assessment on achievement of learning outcomes has been adopted as a method to evaluateoverall program effectiveness and improve student learning. Program outcomes provideexpectations for the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA) that students should possess bycompletion of their undergraduate program. Proficiency in these KSA is vital to future successfor graduating students [4]. The ABET Criterion 3 (a-k) Student Learning
material. They are to determine as best as they can from the testing they perform. This means that a lab session must be reserved for students to perform part testing. • Once the students determine the type of material, they need to defend their decision with sound engineering logic and with the results of their testing. Their testing results are to be compared and matched to material data from matweb.com. Students were also graded on their ability to organize their data. • Students were to describe the type of failure the part underwent: impact, tensile, fatigue, compression, shear, creep, or vibration. Also, students were to determine whether the part suffered a brittle
Page 13.140.1 Teacher Award for his performance in Fort Hays State University's College of Business and Leadership. He served as the chair of the department of Management and Information Systems at National University (2002 – 2004.) Dr. Farahani’s research interests are in optimization theory and algorithm design. He is also interested in mathematics and computer science education© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 focusing on innovative integration of technology to enhance teaching and learning.Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Applied Engineering and Lead Faculty for Engineering Management and Homeland
taught and developed courses in the computer engineering technology area at the University of Cincinnati and Michigan Technological University. Alaraje’s research interests focuses on processor architecture, system-on-chip design methodology, field- programmable logic array (FPGA) architecture and design methodology, engineering technology educa- tion, and hardware description language modeling. Alaraje is a Fulbright scholar; he is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), a member of the ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineering Division, a member of the ASEE Engineering Technology Division, a member of Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of the Electrical
of consensus codes and standards thatprotect property, and eliminate injuries or deaths due to fire, electrical and related hazards.Jurisdictions worldwide adopt these codes and standards for incorporation into building andsystem design, operational best practices, or standards on equipment. Those that graduate with adegree in engineering technology need to understand the impacts of codes, standards andregulations within their particular industry. By having undergraduates participate in the research,application, and evaluation of these standards, undergraduates will be better prepared to enter theworkforce and provide valuable insight to their employers. This project, utilizing anEVALUATION OF SOLID FUELSundergraduate researcher to provide
the attitude of students. Thus, a larger difference represents higher impact oftraining program on student’s thinking. A copy of the survey is attached in the Appendix.VII. Delivery Method The course is instructor-led classroom training combined with in-class simulationexercises designed to invite class participation. This approach aids in the individualizedinstruction given to the participant. Instructional methods include facilitated discussion,hands-on simulation of production, and on-the-job practical applications. PowerPointpresentations are used to deliver the course, supplemented by a series of videotapes fromSociety of Manufacturing Engineers and Productivity Inc. Students are encouraged toparticipate in the Lean implementation
and practice from mathematics, science,and technology. The term “design” is used because problem solutions typically require thecreation or modification of artifacts or procedures used by humans in dealing with the physicalenvironment.One common method in engineering design courses is Problem Based Learning (PBL) approach.PBL is a teaching method in which complex real-world problems can promote student learningof concepts and principles as opposed to direct presentation of facts and concepts. In addition tocourse content, PBL can promote the development of critical thinking skills, problem-solvingabilities, and communication skills. It can also provide opportunities for working in groups,finding and evaluating research materials, and life
administrators of the mechanical department and the EngineeringCollege did not pursue the proposal. It’s possible that such an arrangement would have createdmore problems than it solved and could have had a negative impact on the existing CETprogram.The reason for starting a CE program at our University has never been to increase studentenrollment. The motivation is simple and centered around how best to serve our primaryconstituents – the students. A CE program would provide a track for interested and capable CETstudents to pursue an ABET-EAC BS degree in civil engineering at our University. There areseemingly straightforward and compelling advantages of a CE program – elimination oftemporal and spatial licensure issues, easier graduate school
production design, the impact of technology paired with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Jeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Jeanne Christman is an Associate Professor and Associate Department Chair in the Department of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering Technology. She holds a BS in Electrical En- gineering, an MS in Computer Science and a PhD in Curriculum, Instruction and the Science of Learning. Utilizing her educational background, her teaching specialty is digital and embedded system design and her research areas include engineering education culture, equity in engineering education
curriculums are fundamentally designed to build upon skills gained from previouscourses. Student success in those courses basically depends on their academic fortitude, selfconfidence, and effective teaching. This approach will concentrate on the latter by suggesting anapproach that deliberately integrates IT into the classroom which negates impacts that stiflesstudent learning.We propose a four step IT integration framework as a guide for all IT into course work. Thisapproach provides not only a deterministic model for adding technology to courses but alsoincludes an assessment vehicle that measures the effect of technology on students’ confidenceand their grades. We will use a required IT course, IT305 – Theory and Practice of IT Systems,as an
Paper ID #12318The Engineering Technician and Technologist WorkforceMr. Daniel Peter Kuehn, The Urban Institute Daniel Kuehn is a Research Associate I in the Urban Institute’s Income and Benefits Policy Center and a doctoral student in American University’s Department of Economics. He has eight years of experience conducting and managing research on the economics of education and training, the science and engineer- ing workforce, human capital, and impact analyses of labor market programs. He has published numerous peer reviewed articles, book chapters, reports, and policy briefs, and presented his research to academic
State University. She leads a comprehensive research agenda related to issues of cur- riculum and instruction in engineering education, motivation and preparation of under served populations of students and teachers and in assessing the impact of operationalizing culturally responsive teaching in the STEM classroom. As executive director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, she collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiatives through NASA MUREP, NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education and NSF DUE . Araceli holds Engineering degrees from The University of Michigan and Kettering University. She holds a Masters degree in Education from Michigan
, Fiber Optic Communications, Technology and Society, and Project Management. He also advises students on their senior design projects. He is author of “The Telecommunications Fact Book, 2E” and co-author of “Technology and Society: Crossroads to the 21st Century,” “Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century,” and “Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond.” He is a member of ASEE, and a senior member of IEEE.Amin Karim, DeVry University Amin Karim is the Director of Technology Programs at DeVry University. In this capacity, he is responsible for leading DeVry’s undergraduate and graduate programs in engineering technology, information systems, telecommunications
“ComputationalThinking Using Hands-On Activities” such as introduction to Excel, PowerPoint, Robotics, and VisualProgramming. These K-12 outreach activities are supported through a project titled - STARS (Students& Technology in Academia, Research & Service) Alliance. The primary objective of the STARS projectis the broadening of participation in computing through best practices and community building.Provisions will be made for visits to these and other K-12 schools to advertise the program and makepresentations on Cyber Security. We plan to make few of the Cyber Security courses and modules onlineto K-12 schools teachers, local two year and four year college teachers and others interested in CyberSecurity education and awareness
the course can help students to understand and gain further insightinto the theoretical lectures. According to the study [4], data communications and networkingcourses are divided into three categories: (1) The fundamental and general topics of computernetworks using some practical examples, (2) Internet protocols, and (3) A set of programming andproject assignments. The traditional approach to teaching data communications consists of lecturescovering theoretical information and mathematical basis, and of laboratory sessions where studentscan understand better the communication process and how to program a communications protocol.It is very crucial to keep up in classrooms with today's industry requirements for graduates in termsof both
the competitive position ofthe college for applied research opportunities in the current environment for research anddevelopment; promote the general economic development of the region; expedite and simplifythe acquisition and utilization of research contracts; improve technology transfer; and linkapplied scientific research and technological advancements to economic development of theState.The Mining Engineering Technology (MIET) baccalaureate program has been a serving themining industry profession at the college since 1972. A bachelor’s degree in mining engineeringtechnology will qualify the graduate for mining industry entry positions in production,construction, preparation, equipment sales, and environmental controls and in assisting
larger campuses or theory-based programs. • Emphasize the junior year as the start of a new curriculum and help all juniors to feel part of the same cohesive cohort. • Add distance courses to enable remote students to complete the curriculum Student Learning Outcomes for the Bachelor Degree Option Graduates of the Computer Systems Technology option will demonstrate: • An ability to identify and apply current technical concepts and practices in the core computer systems technologies of database management, web technology, computer programming, digital media, and network/system administration. • An ability to analyze, design, implement, test, and maintain complex computer
Paper ID #34207Focused Curricular Activities Designed to Improve Student Competency inData-driven Process ImprovementMr. Clayton J. Hahola, Montana State University Clay Hahola is currently an Operations Engineer at Go Fast Campers in Bozeman, Montana. He is an Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Masters graduate from Montana State University with a Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering Technology from the same institution. He has worked as a Teaching Assistant for ETME 415, the course this paper references, for three semesters over the tenure of his MS and has had past experience in teaching and grading MET
Engineering Students,” ASEE AnnualConference, 2016, New Orleans, LA.[8] Wright, L.A. and Moskal, B., “Including Children with Learning Disabilities in STEM: AnOutreach Program for Dyslexic Students (Research to Practice),” ASEE Annual Conference, 2014,Indianapolis, IN.[9] Meyer, R., “Frontloading the Core Curriculum,” Don Johnston Inc., 2006.[10] Inquire, “Pre-teaching,” National Council for Teachers of Mathematics, 1980.[11] Adams, J., “Frontloading-Increasing Critical Thinking and Focus,” Adams EducationalConsulting, October, 4, 2012.[12] Wilhelm, J., “Frontloading: Assisting the Reader Before Reading,” Commonwealth ofAustralia, 2002.[13] Van Note Chism, N., Douglas, E., and Hilson Jr., W., “Qualitative Research Basics: A Guidefor Engineering
Manufacturing Resource Forum - She is dedicated to researching and issuing action-provoking reports on advanced manufacturing trends, workforce development and disruptive technologies.Dr. Teresa A. Johnson, Ohio State University Teresa A. Johnson, Ph.D. is an assistant director and the Coordinator for Assessment and Curriculum Design at the University Center for the Advancement of Teaching at The Ohio State University. She earned a doctorate in Microbial Ecology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has taught in the sciences at Butler University and at the College of Wooster. Her pedagogical research has focused on classroom assessment techniques and impacts of prior knowledge on student learning in the
knowledge inthe electromagnetic principles help students understand how the machines work. But in theworkforce, graduates will need to understand how to choose a given motor for a particularapplication. This means answering questions such as: Which type of motor is the most appropriate for the given application? At what speed(s) should be motor be operating? What torque is required for the application? What environmental issues need to be considered in selecting the motor?An initial foray into motor selection was briefly discussed as part of a larger discussion involvingworking with industrial partners [10]. In that project, a capstone design team of MechanicalEngineering Technology (MET) and Electrical
Paper ID #32327Developing an Equally Effective Alternate-access Plan forVision-impaired and Blind Students Enrolled in Mechanical EngineeringTechnology CoursesDr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Nancy E. Study is an Associate Teaching Professor in the School of Engineering at Penn State Behrend where she teaches courses in engineering graphics and rapid prototyping, and is the coordinator of the rapid prototyping lab. Her research interests include visualization, standardization of CAD practices, design for 3D printing, and haptics. Nancy is a former chair of the ASEE Engineering Design Graphics Division
Foundation, Tennessee Department of Transportation, DENSO and ASEE (ETD mini- grants) and several other organizations for a total of more than $2 million. His current research interest focuses on rural community engagement for transportation projects, road user cost, sustainable design and construction for knowledge based decision making, and engineering technology education. He also con- tributed to data analysis methods and cost effective practices of highway construction quality assurance program.Dr. Uddin is a proponent of project based learning and developed innovative teaching strategies to engage his students in solving a real-world problems and prepare them with skills and knowledge that industry requires. Dr
mimics the progression students go through in highereducation: First we teach them how to Calculate; Second we teach them how to Analyze; and Page 14.1174.3Third we teach them how to Design. Having only three levels is easier to remember and use increating course materials. Figure 2.0, A Simplified version of Bloom’s Taxonomy.Program classes in the freshman and sophomore years often emphasize the Calculate aspect asthe students are still building their foundation of knowledge and tools. Senior level coursesshould be emphasizing the aspect of Design and decision making to prepare them for this finallevel before they graduate. In the middle is
, along with those administrative skills necessary for positions of leadership and responsibility. The management minor will allow students to function in a wide variety of organizational environments. • Business Administration Minor - prepares students to advance in a broad range of careers in the public and private sectors. Students are exposed to accounting and economic principles as well as management, marketing and finance. • Real Estate Minor - will enable students to develop practical skills in the area of real estate and investment.1 This minor would be beneficial for students interested in residential construction. • Occupational Safety Minor - designed to prepare students to meet safety
techniques. To support the abbreviated fielding cycles often associated with arctic research andpublic safety missions, ACUASI requires a practical means of creating UAS components for rotary-wing and fixed-wing platforms. While rapid prototyping is commonly used in making components forwidely popular rotary-wing UAS, much of this same technology may be harnessed and brought to bearon the design and fabrication of more complicated fixed-wing aircraft in order to satisfy a broader setof mission flight envelopes and payload requirements.Motivation.The desire for UAF to develop an organic fixed-wing UAS capability is motivated by several factors.From an academic perspective, students learn and develop best by doing. Students are most motivatedwhen
Johnson, Indiana University James Johnson is a graduate student pursuing his Master’s of Public Affairs from the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University, where he is concentrating in economic development. Prior to pursuing a graduate degree, he worked for the State of Indiana in the Department of Commerce. James has a research interest on the relationship between workforce development activities and economic development outcomes.H. Oner Yurtseven, Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis H. Oner Yurtseven is Dean in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. As the school’s chief executive officer, he oversees program and faculty development
Andy S. Peng is an assistant professor with Computer Engineering Program in Engineering and Technol- ogy Department at University of Wisconsin - Stout since January 2014. Andy S. Peng is also a systems engineer staff at Lockheed Martin MST since November 2005. From May 2003 to April 2004, Andy held a graduate research intern position with Aerospace Electronic System (AES) group at Honeywell Inter- national Inc. From July 1999 to July 2002, Andy held hardware design, sustaining, and test engineering positions at Dell Inc. In the summer of 1998, Andy was a summer research fellow with the Mayo Clinic. Andy S. Peng received the Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from University of Minnesota, in 2010 and
that will be impacted and the types of employers the students work for after graduation. These companies don’t typically know that they want these elaborate proposals, but the author has found success in the justification of a significant discount from a business standpoint. There were several times along the path that competitors were competing to award a discount or even donate a product to the laboratory after their management understood the position that this put them in with our students. 2. Repurposing equipment is an important lesson. One electrical control box in the laboratory would have cost $12,000 - $15,000 if it was purchased from a supplier. Instead an old robot control
Page 11.958.7 distance education. The university has created a high speed gigabit data network—as well as an administrative and instructional infrastructure—to ensure that partner businesses and students enjoy access to today’s best practices in research, applications, and learning communities. Current technologies for distance education include, streaming media applications and synchronous video conferencing on an ATM backbone.‚ Planned Technologies: Over the last couple of years, Virginia Tech. is moving towards implementing an IP based Videoconferencing solution. One of the primary advantages of deploying an IP based videoconferencing is the ability to use the existing data network as the means of transport. This