. Instructors’ names were abbreviated asRR, MS, and SF. RR’s course evaluation methods include attendance and participation (Att&P),assignments and quizzes (A&Q), two term exams & a comprehensive final exam (E), groupproject (P). For fall 2017 on campus: Att&P 15%, A&Q 30%, E 40%, and P 15%. For fall 2017online: Att&P 10%, A&Q 35%, E 50%, and P 10%. For the fall 2019 online: Att&P 10%, A&Q30%, E 45%, and P 15%. MS’s course evaluation methods include attendance and participation(Att&P), assignments and quizzes (A&Q), mid-term exam & a comprehensive final exam (E),two group projects (P). For fall 2018 and 2019 on campus: Att&P 5%, A&Q 20%, E 45%, and P30%. SF’s course evaluation methods include
g r a m s .T w o - a n d f o u r - y e a r s c h o o ls h a v e e x p lo r e d v a r io u s c o n n e c tio n s . In S a m u e l, e t. a l. [ 9 ] th eu n iv e rs ity g a v e th e tw o - y e a r s tu d e n ts a c c e s s to th e ir e q u ip m e n t. T h is c o lla b o r a tio n a ls o h a din s tr u c to r s jo in tly c r e a te a m o d u le to b e u s e d in b o th c u r r ic u lu m s . H o w e v e r , th e s tu d e n ts o n lyw o rk e d w ith o th e r s tu d e n ts in th e ir p r o g r a m . T h e s tu d e n ts d id n o t w o r k to g e th e r a c ro s s s c h o o ls .A C a lifo rn ia c o lla b o ra tio n [1 0 ] re v is e d s e v e ra l c o u rs e s a t b o th th e c o m m u n ity c o lle g e a n d th eu n iv e rs ity to in c o r p o r a
when given data are the height, H (inches), time (seconds), volume, V (US gallons), and the important equations detailing the relationship between the volumetric flow, (Q, H, and Cw, as given by Equation #1, for an angle a of 30o: 6 ∆$ , Q= = C+ tan α 2gH 7 (Eq. 1) ∆%&'( -. 2) Fill-up the table presented below, and plot the y and z values as functions of x. For thisparticular exercise, the instructor asks students to pay attention to graph formatting, by showingthe graph title, axes, legend, and tick marks, etc.Figure 2: Example of Assigned
decide you wantedagreements with academic institutions in to study engineering?Qatar, I visited the College of North a) After joining the college 23% 29%Atlantic - Qatar (CNA-Q) to develop an b) In high school 46% 57%articulation agreement to provide students c) In middle school 15% 11% d) In elementary school 0.00% 4%a smooth transition from the CNA-Q e) Early childhood 15% 0.00%Diploma in Engineering Technologyprogram to my home university’s 6. Who had the most influence onrespective engineering technology your decision to study engineering
Guidebook provided a number of evaluation areas onthe basis of, not only cost, student and faculty use, but perceptions of OER (mainly focused onstudent perception). The Guidebook also provided a menu of survey questions that could directlybe provided to students to evaluate these areas. Thus, the Guidebook was selected as the primarysource of questions used to evaluate the “attitudes” of students regarding OER implementation inthe CON 357 course. The survey questions used are outlined in Table 4.Table 4. Survey questions for evaluation of impacts of OER implementation. Q# Question 1 In general, how often do you purchase the required texts for the courses you take? 2 How much do you typically spend on texts each semester? 3 For a typical
. ., Huang, J. C. H. ., Huang, A. Y. Q. ., & Yang, S. J. H. . (2017). Applying learning analytics for improving students engagement and learning outcomes in an MOOCs enabled collaborative programming course. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 220–234.Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889–896. http://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20090918Sadhasivam, J. (2014). Educational paradigm shift: Are we ready to adopt MOOC? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4), 50–55
.[10] Jovanovic V., Dean T., Considine C., Arcaute K., Katsioloudis P., Tomovic M., Stout T., Schwalm C., Michaeli J., Shen Y., “Pilot program for veterans transition to engineering fields.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education - Annual Conference, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, LA.[11] Palm J.W. III, “System Dynamics.” McGraw Hill[12] https://www.google.com/search?q=ship+rudder+photos&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ& sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjCj- jvuNHSAhWCMyYKHV2rB8QQsAQIGQ&biw=1417&bih=903#q=ship+rudder+photos &tbm=isch&tbs=rimg:CXxO7GGHWrnYIjhaX4XgpnP52nwDTEwfGEUojJW7LGRYH9 mTVtEkJ2Iw58yQjziHvs2VUEuO
will develop an understanding of the core concepts of technology 2 (Objectives M, N, P, Q, T, W, X, CC, BB)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the relationship among 3 technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study (D, F, G, H, J)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the cultural, social, economic, and 4 political effects of technology (D, E, H, I, K)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the effects of technology on the 5 environment (D, F, G, H, I)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the role of society in the 6 development and use of technology (D, E, F, G, J)Standard Students will develop an understanding
, but to also introduce them along the way to some basictheoretical knowledge needed to understand the complexity of the final product. The researchteam’s expectation was that exposing the participants to an introductory level of knowledge fromvarious fields will stimulate their interest and will help them identify engineering areas that areof specific interest to each of them. The workshops activities were split between hands-on, Q&Aand presentations, with the latest starting with a brief introduction to the theory of bio-inspiredrobot mechanisms, 3D modeling, animation, STL generation, slicing, G code generation, printingof the robot segments, and concluding with the prototype. The workshops focus was on theconnection between 3D computer
-organized; the instructor was very in depth and allowed for a ton of Q&A. Overall great information on the topic of the course” ● “Hands on labs” ● “It was beneficial to learn to use the software and be able to actually see the operation of several different 3-D printers” ● “Learning the history and the future of 3d printing. I didn't know there is different types and methods of 3-D printing. I thought it was helpful in knowing because it could be a business venture in the future”As we continue offering this course, we will develop new materials and modules to deliver to thestudents. We also plan to collect and publish more formal assessment data with a standardgrading protocol in future iterations of the lab activities to
INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO LOGISTICS EDUCATION," Transport Problems, vol. 12, pp. 23-34, 2017, doi: 10.20858/tp.2017.12.se.2.[16] P. Erdélyi and R. Rajkó, "Using Interactive Psychrometric Charts to Visualize and Explore Psychrometric Processes," Journal of Chemical Education, Article vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 391-393, 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00779.[17] K. Alvarez, E. Salas, and C. M. Garofano, "An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness," Human Resource Development Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 385-416, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1534484304270820.[18] R. Y. Zhong and G. Q. Huang, "RFID-enabled Learning Supply Chain: A Smart Pedagogical Environment for TELD," International Journal of Engineering
manufacturing, 13(3), 201-210.[2] van den Berg, J. P., & Zijm, W. H. (1999). Models for warehouse management: Classification and examples. International journal of production economics, 59(1-3), 519-528.[3] Chan, F. T., & Chan, H. K. (2011). Improving the productivity of order picking of a manual-pick and multi-level rack distribution warehouse through the implementation of class-based storage. Expert systems with applications, 38(3), 2686-2700.[4] Dhl, Picking: Fully autonomous self-driving robots.[5] Dadzie, K. Q., & Johnston, W. J. (1991). Innovative automation technology in corporate warehousing logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 12(1), 63.[6] Baker, P., & Halim, Z. (2007). An
T5552. The number of students who responded was 15 and 11, respectively. One ofeight questions in the course assessment related to the Amatrol T5552 is reproduced below: Q: The Amatrol T5552 process control system helped me understand P/PI/PD controllers. Strongly disagree (1), Disagree (2), Neutral (3), Agree (4), Strongly agree (5)According to the course assessment results shown in Table 8, students were receptive to learningabout understand P/PI/PD controllers using the alternative pedagogical method in Fall 2018.Students in Fall 2019 were even more receptive, as evidenced by the higher mean and narrowerstandard deviation. Thus, it proves that the Amatrol approach helps students understand P/PI/PDcontrollers and is an effective
Implementation of a Mechatronics Learning Module in a Large First-Semester Engineering Course. IEEE Transactions On Education, 53 (3), 445-454.7. Durfee, W. K. (2003). Mechatronics for the masses: a hands-on project for a large, introductory design class. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19 (4), 593-596.8. McLurkin, J., Rykowski, J., John, M., Kaseman, Q., & Lynch, A. J. (2013). Using multi-robot systems for engineering education: Teaching and outreach with large numbers of an advanced, low-cost robot. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 56 (1), 24-33.9. Nedic, Z., Nafalski, A., & Machotka, J. (2010). Motivational project-based laboratory for a common first year electrical
environment and energy management system for greenhouses. Elsevier Journal ofEnergy Conversion and Management, Vol. 51, Issue 1, pp. 155-168, ISSN 0196-8904.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.09.007.[4] Ma, D., Carpenter, N., Amatya, S., Maki, H., Wang, L., Zhang, L., Neeno, S., Tuinstra, M.R., Jin, J.(2019). Removal of greenhouse microclimate heterogeneity with conveyor system for indoorphenotyping. Elsevier Journal of Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 166, No. 104979,ISSN 0168-1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104979.[5] Li, L., Zhang, Q., Huang, D. (2014). “A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping”.Sensors, 14 (11) (2014), pp. 20078-20111, 10.3390/s141120078 .[6] Ramadan, K.M., Oates, M.J., Molina-Martinez