Conference Session

Public Policy in Engineering Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David A. Koonce, Ohio University; Jie Zhou, Ohio University; Cynthia D. Anderson, Ohio University; Dyah A. Hening; Valerie Martin Conley, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

education and occupational codes.2. BackgroundIn this paper, definitions for STEM fall into one of two domains: education or occupation. Thespecific discipline categories used in the education domain are derived from the National Centerfor Education Statistics Classification of Instructional Programs 20008 and the Classification ofInstructional Programs 19909. The standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system is used inthe occupational domain.CIP and CIP CodesThe National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), of the U. S. Department of Education,developed the Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP). CIP includes all the disciplinesoffered in academic institutions and universities in the United States. For each discipline, there isa

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rylan C. Chong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dennis R. Depew, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ida B Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Melissa Jane Dark, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

, the issue of distributing electricityaccess to rural communities. The boundaries on this issue can range from access to academicopportunities, improvements and/or creations of newer innovations, to access to economicopportunities and/or improved medical care, where these arguments are made either in thecontext of present day inequalities or put in the context of historical and ongoing inequalitiesfaced by citizens in rural communities. Another challenge stems from the relative value of theitem to individuals. The policy debate that arises is grounded in how much relative value will bederived from the individual(s) receiving the item(s). Sticky questions often arise as to whether aparticular group needs one item more than another (e.g., access

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

strategic decision made by the Central Commit-tee of CPC and the State Council of PRC. Over the past four years, it has shown unique characteris-tics different from previous higher educational policies. The Diffusion of Innovation Theory, tosome extent, can be introduced.2.2 Analysis model of the diffusion of “Double First-rate” InitiativeFrances S. Berry and William D. Berry (1990) integrated the internal decision-making model andexternal diffusion model, and proposed an integrated diffusion of innovation model. The modelhas become a mainstream model of diffusion of innovation in the West for a long time. This re-search revises the Berry’s diffusion of innovation model, expands the connotation of influencingfactors and mechanism factors, and tries

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Murphy, Dublin Institute of Technology; Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

in industry, while Pavitt (1998) describes such research as “augmenting the capacity of business to solve complex problems.” See N. Rosenberg, and R. R. Nelson, “American universities and technical advance in industry,” Research   Policy,   23:323-348, 1994. See also K. Pavitt, “The Social Shaping of the National Science Base,” Research  Policy,  27:793-805, 1998. 34Y. S. Lee, “The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration,” Journal   of   Technology   Transfer, 25(2), 2000. 35Bronwyn Hall, “University-Industry Research Partnerships in the United States,” Kansai Symposium Paper, February 2004. 36Some analysts point out, however, that not all universities are structured

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John R. Reisel P.E., University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

/politics/2019/05/28/gop-lawmakers-extending- university-wisconsin-tuition-freeze/1227519001/ (accessed December 2020).[8] University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents. https://www.wisconsin.edu/regents/meetingmaterials/ (accessed December 2020). Note: the annual data for the previous year typically appears in the December meeting material for the Business and Finance Committee.[9] ASEE online profiles of Colleges. https://www.asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/college-profiles#Online_Profiles (accessed December 2020).[10] University of Wisconsin-Madison Student Enrollment. https://uwmadison.app.box.com/s/d7901sp12wp0zxclyc9hpm2wrspfxf99/file/639595697 808 (accessed December 2020).[11

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amro El Badawy, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Marie Yeung, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; James L. Hanson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Nazli Yesiller, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

assisted with laboratory experiments essential for accomplishing the curricularintervention described in this study.References[1] C. J. King, “Restructuring Engineering Education: Why, How And When?,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Jan. 2012.[2] J. Mendoza-Garcia, I. B. Ngambeki, L. J. Behbehani, D. Evangelou, S. C. Rao, and M. F.Cox, “Defining the Knowledge and Skills that Enable Engineers to Participate in Public Policy,”in Proceedings of the 119th American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio TX, USA, June 10-13, Paper ID 4262, 2012.[3] N. Yesiller, J. L. Hanson, A. Sohn, S. Tjan, “Emissions of Trace Gases from Landfills,” inProceedings of the 19th International

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deanna H. Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University; H. Scott Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

. Allen, B. Allenby, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, H. S. Matthews, “Sustainability in Engineering Education and Research at U.S. Universities”, Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43 (15), pp. 5558– 5564, 2009.[6] M. Bilec, C. Hendrickson, A. Landis and H. S. Matthews, ‘Updating the Benchmark Sustainable Engineering Education Report – Trends from 2005 to 2010’, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 26-29, 2011, 7 pages.[7] H. S. Matthews, C. Hendrickson, and D. Matthews, Life Cycle Assessment: Quantitative Approaches for Big Decisions, http://www.lcatextbook.com/, 2015

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

: http://www.science-engage.org/index.html. [Accessed April 26, 2018]. [7] J. Hempel. “The Zuckerbeg hearings were silicon valley’s debut.” [Online]. Available: Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/the-zuckerberg-hearings-were-silicon-valleys-ultimate-debut/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[8] D. MacMillan, and R. Winkler. “Silicon valley to washington: why don’t you get us?” [Online]. Available: The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/silicon-valley-to-washington-why-dont-you-get-us- 1523451203. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[9] March for Science. [Online]. Available: https://www.marchforscience.com/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[10] S. Khimm, and A. Rafferty. “Pruitt makes EPA science board more industry friendly

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Angela Goldenstein, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David Allen Evenhouse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

of faculty in the establishment of MEERCat and how faculty-led researchprojects can contribute to informing both policy and practice at the department level. Thenarratives provided details on the history behind the development of these research projects, thelarge data collection efforts involved, and the collaborations inside the University that help theprojects function smoothly. Faculty who engage in course innovation or education research canuse this paper as a case study of how to get actively and collectively involved in influencingdepartment-level practices at their respective institutions.References[1] J. L. Melsa, S. A. Rajala, and J. P. Mohsen, “Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Xiangyu Zhou, Zhejiang University; Lina Wei, Zhejiang University; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

, 2006, 170(3):971-986. [3] Thursby J G , Kemp S . Growth and Productive Efficiency of UniversityIntellectual Property Licensing[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(1):109-124. [4] Kao C , Hung H T . Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empiricalstudy[J]. Omega, 2008, 36(4):p.653-664. [5] Liu wei , Cao jianguo, Zheng linchang, et al. Evaluation of scientific andtechnological innovation capability of Chinese universities based on principal componentanalysis [J]. Research and development management,2010(06):125-131. (in Chinese) [6] Dong yelu. Evaluation of scientific and technological innovation ability ofChinese universities based on factor analysis [J]. Research on scientific management,2015(6):32-34. (in Chinese) [7] Guo

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Mendoza-Garcia, Purdue University and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Ida B. Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Lamis J. Behbehani, Purdue University; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette; P. Suresh C. Rao, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

, procurement, and/or regulation thatthe government provides”. Myers 20 includes in the definition “decisions”, “commitments” and“actions”. In addition, it includes not only the government but also the interpretation of the Page 25.383.4government’s positions of authority interpreted by “various stakeholders” 20 . Myers also addsthat a public policy “affect[s] the daily lives of the government citizens” 20, “our lives including,but not limited to, federal, state and local governments. Public universities, its utilities, andNGOs may also be included.”14.History and role of engineers in Public PolicyIt is also helpful for engineering students

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy R.B. Taylor P.E., University of Kentucky; Johne' M. Parker, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

have identified a gap in the type of information that Congressreceives on science and technology (S&T) matters and recognize the importance of includingthose with technical expertise in the conversations surrounding science and technology policy.Policymakers have found that a lack of information is not the problem; rather, the difficulty mostlegislative branch decision-makers have in fully understanding the large amounts of informationand advice received on a daily basis and appropriately assessing the validity, credibility andusefulness of that information. The follow policy maker quotes illustrate this point: "If we want good public policy, it has to be made by those who understand the issues ... sadly, few elected officials have

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie J Newman, Louisiana Tech University; Mary E Caldorera-Moore, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

top researchers across the country. It is preciselythis type of success that ADVANCE grants like ours are designed to foster. Supporting thesuccess of women faculty increases the success of us all. We are thrilled to have been one ofthe catalysts of this effort.” It is the hope that the events that have been created will serve asa model for students, new faculty, and other universities to pursue their passion, collaboratewith colleagues across departments, and engage with the community to create a rich,dynamic, and energizing academic culture.References:1. Anderson, W.A., U. Banerjee, C. Drennan, S. Elgin, I. Epstein, J. Handelsman, G. Hatfull, R. Losick, D. O'Dowd, and B.M. Olivera, Science education. Changing the culture of

Conference Session

Topical Public Policy Issues

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Devon, Pennsylvania State University; Elizabeth Kisenwether, Pennsylvania State University; Richard Schuhmann, Pennsylvania State University; Robert Pangborn, Pennsylvania State University; Kim Barron, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

(as well as with Japan and South Korea), both for importing inexpensivemanufactured goods that lowers U.S. inflation, and for return flows of dollars that finance theU.S.’s federal deficit. U.S. corporations, like those of other countries, have also been quick tosee value in investing in China’s manufacturing base and pursuing opportunities in its domesticmarket.9A further corrective to the alarmist view was recently published in a well researched report byGereffi and Wadha at Duke University, “Typical articles have stated that in 2004 the United States graduated roughly 70,000 undergraduate engineers, while China graduated 600,000 and India 350,000. Our study has determined that these are inappropriate comparisons. These

Conference Session

Impacts of Public Policy on Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zarjon Baha, Purdue University; Bahawodin Baha, University of Brighton

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

been recognised that the establishment of Engineering and TVEinstitutions is vital for the reconstruction and future development in the country. Therefore,recommendations are made as to how TVE and Engineering education in Afghanistan maybe re-established to meet international standards and to address local needs.1. IntroductionAfghanistan was a stable country during the period of the early 1930’s to the late 1970’sand had a relatively established educational system in the country. Although education wascompulsory in the country at the primary level where such facilities were available, theliteracy rate was still very low. The country was progressing well towards democracy andthe people in general were realizing the importance of education

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University; Daniela Faas, Harvard University; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Diane L Peters P.E., Kettering University; Rebecca M. Reck, Kettering University; Mary C. Verstraete, The University of Akron; Deborah J. O'Bannon P.E., University of Missouri, Kansas City

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering

, Susan; Wiens, Gloria J.; Kazerounian, Kazem; Allen, Janet Katherine; and Jacobson, Kathy. Broadening Participation: A Report on a Series of Workshops Aimed at Building Community and Increasing the Number of Women and Minorities in Engineering Design, .Mechanical Engineering Conference Presentations, Papers, and Proceedings 2013, Paper 11.3. Williams, W. M. & Ceci, S. J. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 5360-5365, doi:10.1073/pnas.1418878112 (2015).4. Hager, M. A., Engagement Motivations in Professional Associations. Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol 43 (2S), Pg. 39S-60S (2013).5. Parker, M., Welch

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Efrain O'Neill-Carrillo P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez ; James D. McCalley, Iowa State University; Anne Kimber, Iowa State University; Robert Haug, Public Power Services

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kacey D Beddoes, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN.7. Orr, M. K., Ohland, M. W., Long, R. A., Brawner, C. E., Lord, S. M., and Layton, R. A. (2012). Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models. Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.8. McLoughlin, L. A. (2009). Success, Recruitment, and Retention of Academically Elite Women Students without STEM Backgrounds in US Undergraduate Engineering. Engineering Studies 1, no. 2: 151-168.9. Valian, V. (1999). Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press10. Slaton, A. E. (2010). Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line

Conference Session

Assessment and Evaluation of K-12 Engineering Programs

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gisele Ragusa, Ph.D., University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. Page 22.1370.6Gibbons, B. A. (2003). Supporting elementary science education for English learners: A constructivist evaluation instrument. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 371-380.Kirpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491-530.Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Literacy skills in science performance among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80(6), 651-671.Moll, L. C. (1990).Vygotsky and Education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (New York: Cambridge

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1: In the Classroom

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rylan C. Chong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Melissa Dark, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dennis R. Depew, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ida B. Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

Conference Session

Impacts of Public Policy on Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering; Kamyar Haghighi, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

engineering education research is provided by the EngineeringEducation Program. However, that source is limited to approximately $9 million which is alsoshared with the CAREER awards funded by NSF ‘s engineering directorate. A search of theNSF awards database (searching on program element 1340) shows fewer than 50 awards housedin the engineering directorate and devoted to engineering education research (80 other awardsare housed in other divisions and were co-funded). As the number of engineering educationresearchers grows, the strain on this limited supply of funds will become increasingly significant.The other major concern is how well the engineering education research community is able tonegotiate both establishing itself as a free-standing

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Diane Stine, Carnegie Mellon University; Deanna H. Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University; Nichole Hanus, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

Help-Seeking for traumatic syndrome? Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression.” Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015.14Personalized What policies can state and Chuong, Carolyn and S. Mead, “A PolicyLearning local policymakers take to Playbook for Personalized Learning: Ideas for enable personalized State and Local Policymakers,” Bellwether learning? Education Partners, June 2014.15Discovery What is the appropriate National Academies, Committee on Science, balance of funding between Engineering, and Public Policy, “Advanced engineering

Conference Session

The Role of Engineering in Public Policy

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Cady, National Academy of Engineering; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

with media characters. In Psychology of Entertainment, J. Bryant and P. Vorderer, Editors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ. p. 183-197. Page 14.449.64. Trepte, S. (2006) Social identity theory. In Psychology of Entertainment, J. Bryant and P. Vorderer, Editors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ. p. 255-271.5. Harris, R.J., Cady, E.T., & Tran, T.Q. (2006) Comprehension and memory. In Psychology of Entertainment, J. Bryant and P. Vorderer, Editors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ. p. 71-84.6. Baber, T. & Fortenberry, N.L. (2008) Engineering and the media: Building a new

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Judy L. Cezeaux, Western New England University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

sabbatical will be integrated into the biomedicalengineering curriculum to make students aware of their ability to shape the medical deviceregulatory process and serve as a voice for the field.References1. “And Now for Something Completely Different.” Ian MacNaughton (Director). Columbia Pictures (USA), 1971. DVD.2. National Academy of Engineering, “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century.” Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005.3. “Quality System Regulation.” Title 21 CFR Part 820, 2014.4. “Animal Welfare.” Title 9 CFR Subchapter A, 2013.5. “Protection of Human Subjects.” Title 5 CFR Part 46, 2009.6. “Institutional Review Boards.” Title 21 CFR Part 56, 2014.7. W. R. Hendee, S

Conference Session

Engineering, Engineers and Setting Public Policy

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Douglas Sicker, University of Colorado at Boulder; Tom Lookabaugh, University of Colorado at Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

) but we hoped to remove thissource of bias in the subsequent, anonymous survey stage. 1. Do you believe that learning about public policy as it relates to your discipline will be valuable to your career as an engineer? 2. How many SFTP conferences have you attended and when? How did you attend them (in person or through distance education)? 3. What is your background (education, professional)? 4. What did you expect to get out of the conference(s)? Were your expectations met? 5. Was the conference an efficient use of your time? Would there be any way to make it more efficient? 6. How relevant was the conference to your education at CU and to your anticipated career? How well did the conferences tie into

Conference Session

Topical Public Policy Issues

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carole Womeldorf, Ohio University-Athens

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

, many students will have the chanceto put their work where their heart is. There is a lot of work needed by our society in the areas ofinfrastructure, energy generation, health and environmental safety, to name just a few.Engineering graduates who possess the technical knowledge, a willingness to tackle toughquestions, and improved awareness of themselves and the world around them are our best hopefor the future. REFERENCES1. Gunn, Alastair S., and Vesilind, P. Aarne, HOLD PARAMOUNT: The Engineer’s Responsibility to Society, Brooks/Cole-Thompson Learning, Pacific Grove CA, 2003.2. Wyatt, Sarah, “Extending Inquiry-Based Learning to Include Original Experimentation,” THE JOURNAL

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1: In the Classroom

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reza Kamali, Utah Valley University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

Hall, 2004. 9. Black, B.A.; Dipiazza, P.S.; Ferguson, B.A.; Voltmer, D.R.; Berry, F.C., “ Introduction to Wireless Systems” Prentice Hall, 2008. 10. www.abet.org/defining-student-outcomes. 11. Kamali-Sarvestani R., "Spectrum engineering and private frequency utilization in wireless communications education," Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 2013 10th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on, June 2013. 12. Christopher S., and Kittross J. M., Stay Tuned: A Concise History of American Broadcasting, 2nd Ed., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1978. 13. Barnouw E., A Tower in Babel: A History of Broadcasting in the United States. vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Kacey Beddoes, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

(AAEE) Annual Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 2009.[18] S. Ihsen, et al., "Diversity of Didactical Approaches to Foster Diversity of Engineers," presented at the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) Annual Conference, Trnava, Slovakia, 2010.[19] B. K. Jesiek and K. Beddoes, "Diversity in Engineering (DinE) Bibliography Report," Engineering Studies, Forthcoming 2013.[20] B. K. Jesiek and K. Beddoes. (2012, Diversity in Engineering (DinE) Bibliography. Available: http://inesweb.org/dine/[21] D. Martinez, et al., "Work In Progress – Recruiting Initiatives for Hispanic, First-Generation Students," presented at the Frontiers in Education (FIE) Annual Conference, Washington, DC

Conference Session

Aspects of Public Policy in Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Pringle, Central Washington University; William Bender, Central Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

WorkUnfortunately this work did not adequately address the impacts to student learning by changingfrom a five to four day weeks. A complete analysis that measures outcomes of the same classesoffered five or four days a week would provide data to form an analysis on the impact to studentlearning. Page 15.438.13ReferencesBibliography1. Durst, S. L. (1999). Assessing the effect of family-friendly programs on public organizations. Review of PublicPersonnel Administration 19(3).2. Facer, R. L., Arbon, C. A., Wadsworth, L.L. (2009). Cities Leading the Way: The Use of Alternative WorkSchedules. Investment Management Consultants Association Publication. www.imca.org3