2006-2218: TEACHING ETHICS SPECIFIC TO ENTREPRENEURSHIPJune Ferrill, Rice University June Ferrill, PhD, founder of ChangeMakers, Inc., developed an entrepreneurship program for undergraduates at Rice University that includes a course entitled "New Ventures Communications," an entrepreneurial club, and mentoring from Rice alumni and others. She teaches workshops on entrepreneurship as well as ethics within senior engineering design courses; in addition, in the Engineering School, she teaches “Ethical Decision-Making for Engineers.” She has provided consulting to Bank of America, Siemens, Ernst & Young and Texas Society of Professional Engineers, among others. Previously, she worked
AC 2007-1971: THE ETHICS, LEADERSHIP AND ENTREPRENEURSHIPSEMINAR: HELPING STUDENTS TO BECOME LEADERSJoseph Morgan, Texas A&M University JOSEPH MORGAN joined the Department of Engineering Technology at Texas A&M University in 1989 and is currently the Associate Department Head. His current areas of interest included radar systems, data acquisition, and control systems. He received the MS degree in industrial engineering, and the D.E. in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University.Jay Porter, Texas A&M University JAY PORTER joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently the Program Coordinator for
technological solutions that focus heavily onstudents’ technical skills. However, for innovations that create an impact, it is essential tolink this technical knowledge to societal considerations. This paper describes a problem-centered approach towards introducing mechanical engineering students to sustainable,ethical and collaborative innovation, through an analysis of student work and feedbackgathered from a ten-week long pilot conducted as part of a compulsory, Master’s level,academic year-long Mechanical Engineering course.During the pilot, student groups worked on broadly phrased challenges derived from anongoing EU project on developing societal applications for technology, choosing one ofseven challenges ranging from changing rain patterns in
Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and
motivated efforts to expand the definition of student outcomes across countries. By the mid-1990s, ABET anticipated this need by shifting the accreditation basis toward outcomes ratherthan inputs, affecting engineering programs’ practices in the U.S. and in other countries, includedAustralia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom2. These criteria, widelyknown as EC2000, specified 11 learning outcomes (see Appendix 3)16: a) Five technical skills: Related to the development of students’ mathematical, scientific, and technical knowledge. b) Six professional skills: Those that emphasize communicating and working effectively on teams, besides the awareness of ethical and contextual
Design Sequence Weeks Project Topic Entrepreneurial Topic 0 Project Proposals Brainstorming 1 Team Definitions Customer Needs 2-4 Specifications Project Management 5 Design Constraints Ethics 6 Alternate Solution Analysis Patents 7-8 Design Proposal Business Plans 9 - 12 Critical Design Business Practices 13 - 26 Project Implementation Professionalism 27 - 28 Project Evaluation Starting Your Own Business 29 Project
ABET Outcomes and Sandbox Outcome Sandbox Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, (a) science, and engineering X X Ability to design and conduct experiments, as (b) well as to analyze and interpret data X X Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic (c) constraints such as economic, environmental, X X social, political, ethical, health and safety
afirst-year engineering curriculum at Arizona State University. The class was a multidisciplinaryexperience with a maximum of 40 students enrolled in a section. The goal of these cards was tocover a wide variety of entrepreneurial mindset outcomes without relying on a single project.The four topics selected were engineering economics, customer awareness and stakeholders,engineering ethics, and value propositions and supporting data. Two of the four lessons weretaught as a supplement to the existing class project, but could be used either with any classproject or as stand-alone modules in classes without a project. A summary of each card isprovided below. These cards were implemented into the curriculum in the Fall 2018 semesterwith a class size
steel bridge design. Winning and placing second inconference competitions qualified two of BSC teams to compete in national ASCE competitionsin Denver, CO and San Diego, CA in recent years.Competitions described above enhance the Institutional Mission by recognizing that the missionof the college is to provide students an affordable, geographically and electronically accessibleopportunity for public higher education. The School demonstrates its commitment to thisundergraduate education mission by providing an experienced, dedicated faculty and staffdelivering quality Engineering Technology programs. The SET programs are designed andoperated to promote BSC students’ intellectual, personal, ethical, and cultural development.The School and its
University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Eunjeong Park, The Ohio State UniversityAlexia Leonard, The Ohio State University Alexia Leonard is a second year PhD student in the Engineering Education program at The Ohio State University. She is currently working as a Graduate Teaching Associate for the First Year Engineering program within the Department of Engineering Education.Jack DeLanoDr. Kai Zhao, Florida State University Kai Zhao is a research faculty
the Chinese nation in the cultural andspiritual path. Among them, the ethical culture of Confucianism constitutes the core oftraditional culture and is an important pillar of life and spiritual order. For example,Confucianism advocates “exercising benevolence”. The cultural intension of this kind ofbenevolence is manifested in the spirit of practicing, caring about society, and activelyjoining the society (ru shi). The Taoist thought advocates “inaction” or “do-nothingness” (wuwei) to express the heart of salvation. Among them, the dialectic thought that “being andnot-being grow out of one another” (you wu xiang sheng) in Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching hasimportant implications for entrepreneurial activities, such as starting a business from nothing
campus.Goal 5: To partner with academic, professional, and governmental organizations tosecure long term viability of the program.The key strategies for sustaining the program are curricular integration ofentrepreneurship, institutional budgeted support, endowed faculty, a broad and expandedstudent base through cross listed courses, multidiscipline capstone experiences, fundedstudent and faculty activities, and an established passionate community of entrepreneursand university constituents.Program Student Learning OutcomesThe student learning outcomes are the measurable skills for students involved in theprogram. Those skills are communication, teamwork, leadership, ethics and ethicaldecision-making, opportunity recognition, persistence, creativity
interests while publicly owned firms will tend to give tosocial entities that act as a clearinghouse for many social entities. The service learning in SIFE is designed to incorporate the students’ educational trainingwith a passion for their community and complementing these with proper facultyoversight and resources. One excellent example of this is the Monster’s Inc. project thatis designed to provide a forum for discussion of corporate ethics at various levels ofprimary and secondary education. This particular project exemplifies the characteristicsof a sound service learning environment as recommended by Giles & Eyler3.The initial stage of the project requires the students (team of three) to meet with the hostteacher (K-12th grade) and
. Jordan, Baylor University William Jordan is the Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in metallurgical engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, a M.A. degree in theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A&M University. He teaches materials related courses. He does work in the areas of entrepreneurship and appropriate technology in developing countries. He also writes and does research in the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education.Dr. R. Radharamanan, Mercer University R. Radharamanan is currently working as professor of industrial engineering and Director of Mercer Cen- ter for Innovation and
thecourse agree that it is an important addition to the course schedule. We shall be offering it again,but the proof will be in the enrollment.For a complete copy of the syllabus, please send an email message to macb@wpi.edu. Appendix: Course Topics and ReadingsEthics and ValuesTDMBA: Ethics (including SOX), pp 60-70VPMBA: Labor Laws, Torts, White Collar Crime, and Ethics, pp 160-168; SOX, pp 193-202Wicks, Andrew C. “A Note on Ethical Decision-Making” Darden Business Publishing (handout)Case: Ethics of Offshoring: Novo Nordisk and Clinical Trials in Emerging Economies, KlausMeyerRaynor, Michael, “That Vision Thing: Do We Need It?http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V6K-46BJR7K-4-1&_cdi=5817
enrolled as college freshman—as well as other freshman engineering students.Engineering and business faculty members, along with a focus group of entrepreneurs,were involved in the course’s development. At the beginning of the course, the designcycle for product and process innovation, as well as problem definition, was described.A number of outside business speakers provided insight into the world ofentrepreneurship, including teamwork, intellectual property, business and marketingplans, international and social entrepreneurship, and ethics. The students engaged incritical thinking exercises and worked on projects to develop marketing and businessplans for projects based on inventions. Examples of course curriculum, and retention andrecruitment
Entrepreneurship Skills Assessment InstrumentAbstractLawrence Technological University has implemented a required four year leadership curriculumfor all undergraduate students. Because of the consequential overlap of leadership andentrepreneurial skills, the curriculum also addresses many aspects of the “entrepreneurialmindset” which includes communication, teamwork, ethical decision-making, opportunityrecognition, persistence, creativity, innovation, creative problem solving, and critical thinking.Individual components of the curriculum will be assessed as well as the curriculum as a whole.As one part of the assessment, a Leadership Self-Perception Assessment Instrument wasdeveloped. The instrument will aid in answering the
brokerage and a biotech firm. Ms. Pyle holds a MBA degree from Averett University, a MEd. from the University of Houston, and a BA in Geology from Cedar Crest College. She has served on various boards including the Board of Directors for the Charlottesville Venture Group where she chaired the Business Plan Review and Annual Business Forum Committees. In addition, she has served on the Charlottesville Business Innovation Council and as a founding Director for the Business Growth Network. She also served on the board of the Division of Professional Affairs Advisory Council for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Known for her candor and high ethical standards, positive energy and astute people skills, she has
performing than the other labs. The disparitybetween Q&P, SDP and the remaining labs was quite large in the first major category, withboth of them scoring high in opportunity, design, and impact.Additionally, with the exception of the Artificial Muscle lab, all got a majority of points inthe communication category and, with the exception of the SDP, most labs scored low pointsin the final major category, ‘Collaboration, ethics, and professionalism.’Curiosity, Connections, and Creating ValueAs seen in Table 1, most labs fell short in the Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Valuecategory, the foundation of the KEEN program, while the Software Design Project (SDP),Quality and Productivity (Q&P), and Wind Turbine performed slightly better
of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data Page 25.666.3 (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad
been shown to helpthe student connect theory with a practical application that increases the relevance of thepotential solution8. Case-based instructional methods have long been used in engineeringeducation, almost exclusively in the context of ethics where “there is widespread agreement thatthe best way to teach professional ethics is by using cases.”9Less common is the use of the case study method to integrate business learning, specificallyentrepreneurship concepts, with core engineering curriculum. Weaver and Rayess,10 on behalf ofthe KEEN Network, have developed a series of short case studies across a variety ofentrepreneurial situations that are incorporated into various engineering courses. Garcia et al.11tested an entrepreneurial case
defined parameters similar to those given in theirassignments and exams, they become flustered when pushed beyond those comfort zones. Somehave argued that this kind of curriculum not only fails to foster creativity, it actually stiflesingenuity1, inhibiting innovation to solve the world’s greatest problemsWe sought to reverse this negative association between creativity and engineering education bymotivating a large engineering class with a combination of Ethic of Care2,3,4 andentrepreneurship. Ethic of Care is a concept grounded on value-guided practices to meet theneeds of those receiving the care, within a framework of justice and rights5. By incorporating awider view of stakeholders and their relationships in the engineering design process
Leadership Skills and Incorporation of a New Leadership CourseAbstractAs one part of a larger required leadership curriculum, a new course covering leadership modelsand practices was developed and administered. The course addresses many of the aspects of theentrepreneurial mindset including communication, teamwork, leadership, ethics and ethicaldecision-making, opportunity recognition, persistence, creativity, innovation, creative problemsolving, and critical thinking. Through in-class activities and games, as well as assignedcollaborative work, the course explores the various theories on leadership including relational,shared, global, and organizational models. Along with these models, integrity, character,diversity
) assets are important to a company’s valuation and its stakeholders • Employ methods to protect valuable trade secret and confidential information IP assets • Use trademarks, industrial designs, and copyrights to protect brand value • Describe how to file patents Resolving Ethical Issues • Assess, and later reassess, your position on an ethics scale • Define ethics in the context of professional settings • Explain why ethical behavior and the trust it engenders are essential for all engineers especially entrepreneurial engineers • Analyze ethical dilemma case studies and explain who resolved them and how • Apply three methods for resolving ethical dilemmas Generating new ideas based on societal needs and business opportunities • Differentiate
recognition of this need, Olin College, chartered in 1997 by the Olin Foundation andlocated adjacent to the entrepreneurial Babson College, was charged with “exploring,testing, and implementing innovative engineering curricula and addressing…systemicissues with existing engineering education. It is significant that they the following threemajor dimensions: (1) superb engineering, (2) a strong emphasis on art, design, creativity,and innovation, and (3) basics in business, entrepreneurship, ethics, and a spirit ofphilanthropy13.The Lehigh Model embraces this vision, and includes the following basic tenets of thismind set: 1) Innovation fueled by creativity is this generation’s economic development engine. In the slightly modified words of
have a greater level of confidence (and certainty) in assessing them. Third,unlike “hard” skills (e.g., thermodynamics) which are taught primarily through coursework,professional skills (e.g., ethics and teamwork) are likely to be acquired or influences both insideand outside of the class room. In addition, their acquisition may be enhanced throughexperiential learning and activities such as internships, coops, service learning and study abroadprograms. Page 24.265.8Table 1: ABET Criterion 3a-k according to Shuman, Besterfield, & McGourty (2005)Student Outcomesa an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering
the project work. Examples of class activities included developing ascoring model to evaluate alternative solutions related to the entrepreneurial project, analyzingthe market potential of the chosen product or service identified by the team and preliminaryfinancial analysis.The third phase of the course incorporated guest speakers regarding funding opportunities suchas debt financing, equity financing including angel investors, and intellectual property. Thisphase also included discussions on ethics, building teams and teamwork, change management,elevator pitches and presentation techniques. The elevator pitch class period consisted of eachteam developing an elevator pitch, selecting one team member to present the pitch, and receivingpeer
the areas of engineering ethics and engineering education. Page 22.583.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Engineering Education and the Entrepreneurial Mind at Baylor UniversityAbstractOur current economy is facing many new challenges, including the challenge of technologicalcompetition from other countries. Engineering educators face the challenge of how to motivateour students to become competitive in a global marketplace. The challenge is how to bringinnovation back into the engineering disciplines, when many of our faculty have never worked inindustry, and so are not necessarily
customers. At the junior level, students continue to expand upon their EM through project-based learning in multiple discipline-specific courses. Leadership, teamwork, and ethics are alsoexplored in an interdisciplinary, active and collaborative learning- based course. Finally, thisentrepreneurial thread culminates in the senior capstone experience in which students apply theirengineering skill set while exercising their EM in a year-long, real-world design project.This paper describes the work done to determine the effect of the EM-focused engineeringcurriculum sequence on developing the entrepreneurially-minded engineer. While multiplemethods were used to assess EM in a sample of undergraduate students, the bulk of this workfocuses on the data
valuedMaintain high ethical standards Demonstrates high ethics in their interactions and fairness in their decisionsTo augment the KEEN [2] definition and give multiple perspectives on Maker characteristics, theFive Roles framework [3] is also used. It was selected due to it being constructed from behaviorsEntrepreneurs reported doing. Table 2 shows an excerpt from the Five Roles framework [3], thefull framework is shown in Appendix 2.Table 2: Five Roles Framework [3]Roles Attributes DefinitionFraming the Challenge Performance Orientated Sets high standards of(specifying highly challenging