efforts to integrate entrepreneurship into the Sophomore Engineering Clinic,presenting projects that support the design and communication goals of Sophomore EngineeringClinics, and increasing the interest in the existing entrepreneurial program. It details two specificassignments that challenge students to generate ideas for new products and research theirfeasibility: a semester-long entrepreneurial design project and a white paper. The paperdiscusses how these entrepreneurial activities lay the groundwork for more students to pursueentrepreneurial Jr/Sr Clinic projects, while also providing an excellent mechanism for achievingthe primary educational objectives of Sophomore Clinic.II. The Engineering Clinics at Rowan UniversityRowan University
related to market analysis, technology commercialization, business communication, orinternships within start-up companies.15 Another study found that participating in an engineeringentrepreneurship program had a positive impact on retention, GPAs, and entrepreneurial activity.Data collected from alumni found that, relative to a control group, graduates of the program were73% more likely to have started a new company, 23% more likely to have created new productsor services, and 59% more likely to have high confidence in leading a start-up.17Approaches to Teaching InnovationResearch related to developing curriculum for and assessing innovation education mirrors that ofentrepreneurship, which has been characterized as relatively new and fragmented
stages, rather than designing an entire product first andthen building it. Since Rube machines are typically dynamic artistic creations that undergo manychanges during their cycle of development due to practical realizations, this model lends itselfnicely to the Rube environment.Second, the mantra “if it doesn’t work, fix it or cut it” was used in order to guide the team andbring them back to the reality that the machine needed to work in the end. This often led tomultiple iterations of step designs and implementations, but as the contest time grew closerseveral steps were cut due to both space constraints and reliability concerns.Finally, testing played an integral role to improving reliability. The mantra “test until it works,and then test
Doctor of Management with George Fox University.Dr. Donald Ken Takehara, Taylor University Don Takehara was Director of the Center for Research & Innovation (CR&I) and Associate Professor at Taylor University for 9 years. With responsibility for leadership and overall success of the CR&I, Don developed/implemented an integrated program of research, entrepreneurship, and business assistance. During these years, research grant funding tripled, over 20 new companies were launched/assisted, and consultant services were provided to 100+ companies/organizations. Don also taught classes in engi- neering, physics, and chemistry and performed research in STEM Education (high altitude ballooning), biomass
programs and was instrumental in the breakthrough EDI/EFT payment system implemented by General Motors. Dr. Ferguson is a graduate of Notre Dame, Stanford and Purdue Universities and a member of Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr Wendy C. Newstetter is the Director of Educational Research and Innovation in the College of Engi- neering at Georgia Tech.Dr. Eden Fisher, Carnegie Mellon University Eden Fisher is the Director of the Masters Program in Engineering and Technology Innovation Man- agement (E&TIM) and Professor of the Practice at Carnegie Mellon University. She earned an AB in Chemistry from Princeton University and a Ph.D. in Engineering & Public Policy from Carnegie
factors with some terrific strengths in its societal culture: Confucian work ethics,propensity to save, entrepreneurial orientation, and the capacity to engage in risk-takingventures.Taiwan has a vast overseas diaspora in the US and it attracts great venture capital streams to itsindustries, so there ready capital for infrastructure investment and business development. It has ahighly educated population and an international perspective, which make it easy for foreigners towork and establish business relationships. It has great supply of high-tech managementprofessionals who have many years of experience in manufacturing.There is close collaboration between high-tech companies and universities in Taiwan.Universities integrate their curriculum into
mindset and hence through longitudinalstudies measure the potential impact of curriculum and co-curricular activities on changingmindset. This paper compares and contrasts two relatively new tools for assessment ofentrepreneurial mindset: (1) Entrepreneurial Mindset Profile (EMP), which has origins back to2010 at Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida, and (2) Entrepreneurial Profile 10 Index(EP10), by Gallup with underpinnings in 2009. Both are web-based surveys.For this research, 70 undergraduate students majoring in math, science, or engineering completedboth instruments. Forty students were enrolled in an Introduction to Entrepreneurship course,with the remainder enrolled in an Introduction to Engineering Management course. Theinstruments
thenature of the problems assigned, a stronger intuitive understanding of mechanical engineeringfundamentals irrespective of GPA, and an ability to abstract models to describe the real systems they wereanalyzing. When asked “What aspects of their education helped to nurture their creative problem-solvingskill?”, in truth, they had difficulty identifying anything. In the end, it was our belief that nurturingstudents to be creative problem solvers, capable of creating new ideas and validating their creations withmodels based upon engineering fundamentals was to be the goal of our course. In addition, a larger goalwas that this approach would also be integrated into the courses preceding our capstone modeling course.This realization has prompted us to
educated population and an international perspective, which make it easy for foreigners towork and establish business relationships. It has great supply of high-tech managementprofessionals who have many years of experience in manufacturing.There is close collaboration between high-tech companies and universities in Taiwan.Universities integrate their curriculum into the high-tech industry needs through the relationshipsof the schools with the high-tech parks. The science-based knowledge and education of theTaiwanese is a good fit with technology and problem-solving innovation. Taiwan’s strong workethic and its highly skilled, quality-driven workforce is a major competitive advantage. Thecountry has focused step-by-step to develop high-tech
literature. One researchinvestigation explored the links between gender, connection and conception of authority in acollege classroom, while another used stories to demonstrate how connection is central to thecanvas of leadership 43, 44. Recent work indicates that connection is integral for both women andmen in the evolving theory of leadership 45. There is also an approach to organizationalaesthetics that is based in the idea that connection 46 and sensing connection is part of oursocial/organizational instincts to be part of a collective of some sort 47. There has been little workexploring the felt sense 48 of connection. Relevant here is what has not been explored—how theleader senses connection, engages knowingly, and translates that into
the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook.Dr. Doug E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery
potential current or future career choice.’Hulsey et al. (2006) have broken further down the second thrust above in terms of: 1. Integratingentrepreneurship within regular academic programs and curricula and, 2. Providing co-curricularand other activities and initiatives that support and develop the entrepreneurial interests ofstudents. Wilson et al. (2014) have coined the term ‘pracademic’ to highlight the importance ofthe integration of practical and academic components into entrepreneurship education.A number of studies and reports have focused on the key question of ‘What Does It Take ToBecome An ‘Entrepreneurial’ University or College?’ In their 2012 report, the EuropeanCommission proposed a list of seven (7) features that characterize
, “Developing and Assessing Students’ Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind-set,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 94 (2), pp. 233-243. 3. MW Ohland, SA Frillman, G Zhang, CE Brawner, and TK Miller III, “The Effect of an Entrepreneurship Program on GPA and Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, 93 (4), pp. 293-301. 4. Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network website. Online: https://engineeringunleashed.com. Accessed October 15, 2018. 5. C Korach and J Gargac, “Integrating Entrepreneurial Mindset into Freshman Engineering Curriculum through Active Learning Exercises,” submitted to Proceedings of the 2019 American for Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. June 16
to return. The different meanings culturesassign to emotion inform varied responses to beginning entrepreneurial work in and beyond thevirtual classroom [40].Student stories in our study revealed little pleasurable engagement in the virtual classroom.Regardless of the excitement and hope for happier times with an in-person classroom, studentstories predict an adjustment period: “Everyone is shy and nervous about meeting each otherafter the pandemic. Many are still wearing masks.” Similar to recovery from post-traumaticstress disorder (PTSD), the uncertainties associated with the pandemic makes integrating atrauma into one’s identity difficult [41]. Thus, students and faculty working together in classesand on innovative projects, may need
–PolarityManagement2and Creative Problem Solving3 – have been adopted in combination with BlueOcean Strategy.In the remainder of the paper, we describe each of the three tools (Blue Ocean Strategy, PolarityManagement and Creative Problem Solving) in more detail. Additionally, we describe theprocess that our College used to combine the tools in an integrated strategic planning process andthe approach that our College used to implement this strategic planning process through thecareful formation of teams and the support provided to these teams.2. The Tools: Blue Ocean Strategy, Polarity Management and Creative Problem SolvingBlue Ocean Strategy1A primary goal of the Blue Ocean Strategy is to identify and createuncontested market spaces—industries and offerings
Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general
Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof. Froyd is a
in basic humanneeds. Additionally, it is important to implement these innovations through social entrepreneurship andleadership efforts for achieving the desired societal impact. To apply the above principles effectively,students (especially the Gen-Z students) need to have a skill set in understanding the role of engineeringinnovations in a globalized society with an attitude of leadership to serve society [16], which was themotivation behind this class. Selected successful social innovations across the world were studiedthrough the lens of fundamental science and engineering along with the societal impact. At the sametime, students also reflected on how the innovators applied/integrated leadership skills/approacheswith social
discussion,particularly when they can speak and hear their own words. Visual learners like words,pictures, symbols, flow charts, diagrams, and reading books. Sequential learners prefer linearreasoning, step-by-step procedures, and material that comes to them in a steady stream. Globallearners are strong integrators and synthesizers making intuitive discoveries and connectionsto see the overall system or pattern26. Both innate personality traits and prior experiences mayinfluence preferences on each of these scales.The Index of Learning Styles provides scores showing the strengths of an individual‘spreference for one category or the other on each of the four dimensions. The instrument is a44-item questionnaire4 that requires choosing one of two
development [17]Nonetheless, while innovation may be an indirect benefit of myriad engineering curricularefforts, instruction may be framed in such a way as to encourage [17] (or discourage [18,19])students’ development of innovative behaviors. Some scholars have emphasized innovation as adesirable outcome of instruction or learning environments [20,21], others as the demonstration ofcertain abilities [22], and yet others as appropriate conceptualizations [23]. As researchers, wemight ask how goals directed towards these distinct ends vary in terms of outcomes. It might bethat the ideal modality involves the integration of multiple efforts, as studies of expert innovatorssuggest that they demonstrate and deploy a variety of approaches and mindsets
(“Interdisziplinaritaet”), and transfer to theworld of work (“Transfer in die Arbeitswelt”). The aim of the educational contribution of coursesaccording to the VIA-concept is to provide an understanding of engineering professionalism thatrequires technical knowledge and social competencies to develop innovative technical solutions.Furthermore, understanding autonomy and responsibility to act in a way that balances the interestsof the employing firm with the general society is an integrated aspect of professionalism andneeds to be included as well “to develop an understanding of how to act within the specificprofession, the culture and the ethical rules as well as understanding the consequences of onesactions are important parts of the professional development
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and his M. S. in Civil Engineering in 2015. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy within engineering. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineering Education PhD undergraduate student at Purdue University. Previously a high school educa- tor for six years with a masters in education curriculum and BS
industry ties to develop a deep understanding of intrapreneurship and develop collaborative intrapreneurship end-to-end education (IE3) curricula that will enrich the student learning experience Employs intercollegiate student projects (ISP) that are impactful and multi-disciplinary, with diverse student teams as a central element of an exciting new intrapreneurial cultureThe IE3 curriculum development will be led by two of the institutions (Baylor University andUniversity of Detroit Mercy) and will consist of: An in-depth study of intrapreneurship Development of three modules on innovation in a corporate context Creation and presentation of a seminar series, and An intrapreneurship-focused
importance of Bloom’s Taxonomy and have tried to changetheir teaching styles to create a learning environment. Teachers have recognized that the studentsmust be provided with an opportunity to develop their problem-solving skills in addition tomastering a particular body of information. Furthermore, many of our educational institutionshave tried to move away from emphasizing the establishment of strong knowledge-base. Themodern trend is to develop an interactive problem-solving pedagogy that encourages thedevelopment of learners’ creativity, understanding, and written and oral communication skills.In a learning paradigm, it is observed that evaluation is holistic, and student success outcomesare what is measured. Many scholars have recommended and
Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and
Paper ID #11383Car Storytelling and Interaction DesignProf. Barbara A. Karanian A., Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, previously visting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group, helps teams discover yet to be satisfied customer needs with her proven methods- from a theoretical perspective of both socio-cognitive psychology and applied design thinking - that she has developed and refined over the past few decades. In addition to helping a team uncover this information, the companies she has worked with eventually have an easily deployable tool kit
engineering programs as a strength of their curriculum but is often not assessed for itsefficacy in teaching transferable skills. More work is needed to determine the connection between high-impact practices in the design classroom with direct evidence of students’ demonstrated learning [6]. Thisresearch aims to evaluate engineering self-efficacy in students who conducted rapid prototyping in designclassrooms. The assessment of engineering self-efficacy can help elucidate concepts of confidence intechnical skills, motivation, and mindset towards building activities.There are several different ways to introduce rapid prototyping into an engineering design classroom.Depending on the type of engineering being taught (e.g. electrical, mechanical or
attitudes appear to make an impacton behavior including the ability to identify opportunities, make connections, and create value.These specific changes in attitudes and behavior point to the development of an entrepreneurialmindset. This experiences overall had a major influence on all three students’ career aspirations.None of these students had entrepreneurial-related intentions prior to college, which makes thefindings all the more interesting.Literature Review The reason for the strong interest to integrate entrepreneurship into engineering educationis it is widely believed entrepreneurship education can lead to the development of knowledge,skills, and attitudes that are in alignment with the ABET E2000 standards (Shuman, Besterfield
move forward instarting a business based on those technologies. The NSF I-Corps™ site featured in this study,located at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM), brings together diverse teams fromregional academic institutions to complete an abridged I-Corps™ curriculum. To date, 73 teamshave completed the I-Corps™ training process at this site; these teams have achieved variouslevels of success in completing the process and moving beyond it in commercializing their work.Along the way, anecdotal evidence has suggested that individual characteristics, teamcomposition, and team interactions are key factors in the success or failure of I-Corps™ teams,but until now, these hypotheses have not been investigated in detail. Our first aim in
member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the SAFE Association. Prior to receiving his Ph.D. in 1983, Dr. Nelson worked as a design engineer in industry and taught as an adjunct professor at the University of Houston and Texas A&M University at Galveston. In industry he was primarily involved in design of floating and fixed structures for the offshore petroleum industry. After receiving his Ph.D., Dr. Nelson joined the civil engineering faculty at Texas A&M University. He joined the civil engineering faculty at Clemson University in 1989 as Program Director and founder of the Clemson University Graduate Engineering Programs at The Citadel and became Chair of Civil Engineering in 1998. In