Page 24.211.3production and distribution, media business models and management, media ethics, and newmedia law. The New Ventures cluster is based in the College of Business. This cluster focuses ondeveloping the business skills required to create, develop, and manage entrepreneurialcompanies. Some of the skills taught include opportunity recognition, resource acquisition,marketing, finance, and new product development. Furthermore, students will have theopportunity to select coursework which will enable them to become more familiar with the legaland ethical aspects of owning and managing a small business. The Social Entrepreneurship cluster is based in the College of Engineering. Thecoursework in this cluster overlaps with the
solving, (4) product development, (5),team building, (6) sales, (7) marketing and branding (brand awareness), (8) consumer productpurchase patterns and understanding the consumer, (9) technology change and management, (10)intellectual property and law, (11) finance, (12) valuation of new technology, (13)commercialization planning, and (14) technological ethics. The most important modules,according to the IDeaLaboratory focus team, are problem solving and creative thinking (Refer toFigures 1 and 2). The basics of innovation are perceived third in significance (Refer to Figure 3).Almost 86% believe that valuation of a new emerging technology is “somewhat important” and7.1% perceive it to be “very important.” Slightly over 70% perceive technological
communicating (within a team and with the customer), timemanagement, and engineering ethics. Table 1 – Results from surveys in IE 212 (N=51) Question Pre-module Post-module P-value Significance survey survey Importance of investigating the market 2.4 ± 1.1 2.7 ± 1.0 0.02 Yes Identify an opportunity 2.0 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 1.0 0.01 Yes Analyze solutions 2.4 ± 1.1 2.5 ± 1.0 0.12 No Identify supply chains and distribution 1.9 ± 0.9 2.3 ± 0.9 0.004 Yes opportunities Evaluate technical feasibility 2.1 ± 1.1 2.3
, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability.”• (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context.2Some of the ABET criteria are proposed for revision in 2016-2017, but the following draftdefinition of “Engineering Design” shows ABET continues to continue the connection betweenengineering and public policy: Engineering Design – Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, specifications, codes, and standards within constraints such as health and safety, cost, ethics, policy, sustainability, constructability, and
communication skills, teamwork andunderstanding ethics and professionalism, and awareness skills which include engineering withina global and societal context, lifelong learning and knowledge of contemporary issues.3 It alsostates that some of these skills can certainly be taught and assessed.3NAE says that the engineer of 2020 is a person with strong communication skills, and that theengineers will have to deal with interdisciplinary and globally diverse teams, public officials anda global customer base.4 In its report titled The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century, NAE says: “…. It is our aspiration that engineers will continue to be leaders in themovement toward use of wise, informed, and economical sustainable development
2020 points out the need for leadership training for engineers in order to bridgepublic policy and technology, as well as to encourage engineers to take on roles that they havetraditionally been reluctant to take.3At Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, the faculty have responded to these needs by adoptingundergraduate student learning outcomes across the institution; these six outcomes (available athttp://www.rose-hulman.edu/reps/) include communication, teamwork, global and culturalawareness, and ethics, outcomes that are also part of the ABET Engineering Criteria. Adoptionof these outcomes has required curriculum changes to ensure that each undergraduate student hasthe opportunity to develop his or her skills before graduation. Although not
and written andoral communication skills by reporting progress through presentations and reports. They practicecreative problem solving, developing ethical standards, and analyzing ideas or solutions. Becauseof this, the learning outcomes of engineering design courses typically mirror – or are the same as– outcomes identified for engineering students in general,3,31,32 such as those defined by theEngineer of 2020 report,1 listed in Table 2. Table 2. Engineer of 2020 outcomes. Attributes of the Engineer of 2020 Definition Strong analytical skills Applying math science, and design principles; consider social
Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assess- ment processes, and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern University, where he currently teaches first-year programming and user interface design courses, and also serves on the col- lege’s Capstone Design Committee. Much of his
) law. He is the Director of the Entrepreneurship Clinic at IU-McKinney where he also teaches Patent Law and Patent Prosecution. Additionally, he teaches a three-course sequence in engineering where students learn about IP law as it applies to engineering design and engineering careers.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering Education, a Master of Science in Civil Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
), humility (pride), kindness (envy), patience (wrath), and temperance (gluttony).The virtues form a bridge between the individual and the community because they regulate howthe individual should behave toward the others in the community. For example, charity andgreed describe how one should treat resources, either sharing them with others or hoarding themfrom others. Chastity and lust describe intimacy between the individual and others, particularlysexual intimacy, though not limited to this aspect.The virtues thus appear to be a valuable tool to explore the relationship of the entrepreneur asindividual and the entrepreneur at the nexus of a community network. Although their primarypurpose is to encourage ethical and moral behavior (and we do not
performance of managers or employees.• Illegal conduct.• Violations of university policy by student managers or employees.• Alienation of students whose new business proposals were not approved.• Alienation of customers and the campus community due to poor service or products.Since these risks will never go away, they must instead be managed. Strategies for mitigatingthe major risks include:• Building support in different administrative offices throughout the University. • Establishing clear policies governing conduct. • Hiring capable and ethical students. • Dealing with disciplinary problems immediately. • Establishing procedures for removing managers who violate policies. • Removing temptation by minimizing use of cash. • Closely supervising
to analyze and interpret data X X Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic (c) constraints such as economic, environmental, X X social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. (d) Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams X X X X Ability to identify, formulate, and solve (e) engineering problems X X X Understanding of professional and ethical (f) responsibility
7. Convey engineering solutions in economic terms 8. Discern and pursue ethical practices 9. Contribute to society as an active citizenThe problems discovered in developing technologies for rural, base-of-the-pyramid communitymembers tend to be complex and require a multi-dimensional, systems approach to determining asolution as opposed to simply a technological solution. In preparing for their visits to thecommunities, the students were taught some basic interviewing skills and had to apply them asthey stayed overnight in the rural communities. They also needed to observe the daily routinesand work habits of the people living in the communities. They discovered a number ofproblems/opportunities through these in-field observation
and process development and 15 years of teaching experience at the secondary and post-secondary levels.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter P.E., Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and the founding Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning. He conducts funded pedagogical research and development projects, has published numerous engineering education papers, and provides faculty development workshops on effective teaching. In 2006, the Kern Family Foundation named Dr. Carpenter a
-building activities will be developed and managed forprogram students. Through live companies, courses, seminars, workshops, competitions, andvolunteerism, students will be part of a special experiential learning model. While providingentrepreneurship and innovation education and helping teams to start and operate ventures areimportant, a continuum of hands-on mentoring will be provided to help students not yet engagedin founding and managing start-ups to develop their entrepreneurial skills. The valuableresidential experience is complemented with the central offices of program staff. In this way,students can easily visit staff offices to discuss their latest new venture idea or to tackle a toughlegal, financial or ethical question.This Honors
Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute and an Adjunct Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leader- ship and Communication at IUPUI. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role in engineering and design; designing STEM ethics curricula; and evaluating learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability. Previously, Justin worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Wel- don School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University where he created and refined ethical theory and learning modules to improve engineering students’ ethical reasoning skills and dispositions. Justin
introduce anentrepreneurial mindset among our faculty members, and to motivate them to teach theseconcepts to their students.ICE WorkshopsStudents will not develop an entrepreneurial mindset unless they see it first in our faculty. Topromote this among we have done a number of activities. The KEEN network has created anumber of workshops called ICE. This stands for Innovating Curriculum with EntrepreneurialMindset. They have had a number of short meetings on one topic. We have had faculty attendworksops on: • Materials engineering • Engineering mechanics • Engineering ethicsThe first author made a presentation at the engineering ethics meeting8.The network is now sponsoring multiday ICE workshops on entrepreneurial minded learning,active and
Milking the Rhino Innovation Showcase maintains a playlist of all student videosfor each year of the contest. All videos are publicly available for 2009, 2010, and 2011.In this paper, I analyze five videos from the 2011 Milking the Rhino Innovation Showcase.These videos received the top monetary awards available. I selected these videos because theoriginal judges thought these videos best responded to the challenge of the Milking the RhinoInnovation Showcase. The Milking the Rhino Innovation Showcase has five learning domains:1) Appreciation of Indigenous Knowledge, 2) Ethics Education, 3) Non-Travel Based GlobalExperience, 4) User Centered Design, and 5) Frugal Innovation and Entrepreneurship.33 The useof the Milking the Rhino documentary to
noted for each assessment exercise. Page 12.679.7Table 3: Summary of Assessment Exercises by Outcome and Recommended UsageExercise (Area) ABET Outcomes Recommended UsagePersonal Growth (PC) o 3g Communication (written) o Formative: midway in project o 3i Lifelong learning o Summative: end of projectProfessional Practices o 3f Professional & ethical o Formative: midway in project(PC) o 3g Communication (written) o Summative: end of projectTeam Member o 3d Teamwork o Formative: (2x) early in projectCitizenship (TP
, time, and performance and; 5. Become aware of ethical and societal concerns relating to the problems being solved.Using ABET’s concept of outcomes based learning, there should be learning outcomes that aremeasurable and targeted to help the students in reaching the stated objectives. The learningoutcomes for the workshop are listed below.The student will: 1. Apply the Lean LaunchPad process to engineering design; 2. Analyze a problem, and identify and define the requirements appropriate to a solution; 3. Design, implement, and evaluate an engineering design to meet desired needs; 4. Function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal; 5. Understand professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and
doing this, including the Ecodesign Strategy Wheel5 and LifeCycle Assessment.6The second category of instructional goals was to use the exercise to develop students’entrepreneurial skills and increase their awareness of the importance of these skills. Fivebehaviors were specifically targeted which support the KEEN Student Outcomes:7 Apply critical and creative thinking to ambiguous problems Construct and effectively communicate a customer-appropriate value proposition Effectively collaborate in a team setting Persist through and learn from failure Discern and pursue ethical practicesThe full set of KEEN Student Outcomes may be found in the appendix.The topic of sustainability provides excellent opportunities to
to theindividual students, but both of the winners spent time with all six teams during a classsession to discuss their entrepreneurial experiences. In addition, one of the winnersbecame actively involved in the E4 Initiative and his company is now a sponsor of a newE4 project. Both of these gentlemen were impressed by the cross fertilization that hascome from embedding business students into the capstone design teams.Another example of the synergy that has come from the embedded student pilot dealswith expanding the scope of the ELE Seminar Series. The Ethics, Leadership, andEntrepreneurship, or ELE, Seminar is part of the first course in the capstone designsequence. Student teams must identify, successfully invite, and host a leader from
engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience, with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in the engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and the B.S.E.E
, journals and funded projects. Engineering curricula are crowded, however, and leave little room for new courses. Beginning with the “writing across the curriculum” movement in the 1980’s, the literature reveals that many disciplines have mounted “across the curriculum” movements. These include writing, mathematics, critical thinking, citizenship, ethics and other fields. Given crowded engineering curricula, an “across the curriculum” approach is a logical means to address the need to add entrepreneurial thinking without adding additional courses. Measurement tools are a critical requirement to assess the efficacy or any curriculum intervention. This is especially true when dealing with a new and
with 4 to 6 oral presentations, with peer and advisory board review. h 2 Many students recognize of the need for an engagement in lifelong learning when they have to push the technical envelope during the product development phase of their product. i 2 Understanding their product could impact the professional, ethical and social responsibilities. j 2 Diversity and contemporary professional, societal and global issues are evident because student teams consist of
(“Interdisziplinaritaet”), and transfer to theworld of work (“Transfer in die Arbeitswelt”). The aim of the educational contribution of coursesaccording to the VIA-concept is to provide an understanding of engineering professionalism thatrequires technical knowledge and social competencies to develop innovative technical solutions.Furthermore, understanding autonomy and responsibility to act in a way that balances the interestsof the employing firm with the general society is an integrated aspect of professionalism andneeds to be included as well “to develop an understanding of how to act within the specificprofession, the culture and the ethical rules as well as understanding the consequences of onesactions are important parts of the professional development
Describe assemblies rules and behaviors that Create proper patterns contribute to engineering drawings effective to communicate a teamwork design Identify the “Explode” an relevance of assembly and to professional animate the explosion ethics in to show the intended project work
, wire the meters, programthe sensors and the meters, and test their completed total-izer baby, and to understand how and why they did so.That served as a superb buy-in ownership concept. Plusthe individuals cross-taught each other best practices.Figure 7: Students receiving & wiring their “babies.” In this mix were Chem E, Mech E, Bioscience & Physics students.A rich history of pedagogy exists re the “design” of a capstone design course.10 Under studentoutcomes (Criterion 3) for the accrediting board ABET,11 our capstone course like others satis-fies (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realis-tic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety
experiential, multidisci- plinary learning. Rogers co-developed the ABET approved year-long Capstone design experience. With a focus on pro- viding students with a broader experience base, the multidisciplinary program applies teams of engineers, business, design, and other students to work with Ohio companies to help them be more competitive and with local non-profits to help them become self-sustaining. Using a formal design process, teams develop new products to meet industries’ competitive needs or those of people with disabilities. Students learn to solve open-ended problems and gain skills in critical thinking, professional communication, ethics, and teamwork. Rogers recently expanded this one-year program to a
manner 11. Discern and pursue ethical practices 12. Contribute to society as an active citizenWe administered this questionnaire to 227 first-year engineering students at the University of NewHaven in 2014. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was first applied to analyze the collected data.The EFA results suggested that 27 out of the 37 items loaded on 10 factors should be retained inthis instrument and the item numbers in each of the factors should be adjusted according to thelevels of internal consistency and reliability [9]. Based on these EFA results a revised instrumentwas developed in the second design stage. The second questionnaire (Appendix 3) contained 50items with 49 loaded on 14 factors and 1 as the comparison indicator [12