Engineering from the University of Michigan.Mr. Jacob Frederick Fuher, University of Michigan Jacob Fuher is an engineer working in the automotive industry. His academic and research interests in- clude Data Analysis, Optics and Network, Communication and Information Systems, as well as education. He plans to further explore engineering education research throughout his career. Jacob Fuher has earned a B.S.E. in Electrical Engineering at the University of Michigan and is currently pursuing a Master’s in Electrical Engineering at Purdue University.Ms. Heydi L. Dominguez, New Jersey Institute of Technology Heydi Dominguez is a fourth-year undergraduate student pursuing her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and minoring in
faculty) and amultidisciplinary technology development team of 6 undergraduate engineers(coached by engineering faculty). The technologies under development areselected from UF faculty inventions ready for commercialization. The facultyinventor serves as an extended team member for the virtual company. The CEOleads the company in the creation of an alpha system prototype and collateral Page 12.853.3materials such as a business plan and presentation for entry in academic businessplan competitions. “Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2007, American Society for Engineering
theraw research. The next phase of the project is to create multidisciplinary Venture EnhancementTeams (VETs). The VETs use parallel business and engineering courses to simultaneously createa marketable prototype and a sound business plan. The next phase of the program is todemonstrate the new product and business plan to industry professionals, venture capitalist, andother interested parties via a business plan competition and senior design conference.Products that are not ready for a commercial market, but have shown potential forcommercialization can be assigned to another Venture Enhancement Team the following year.Finally, products that are ready for commercialization are awarded space in our businessincubator. This collaborative process
semester, more facets of the E4 Model are realized. As support from the Page 13.483.2private sector continues to expand with each interaction and presentation that is made, thesame comments are put forth by companies interested in supporting the E4 Initiative.These are: 1. Who is the customer? 2. How will the product be manufactured, distributed sold and supported? 3. Is there a marketing or business plan available?In response to these encouragements, the EET/TET Programs worked through its contactswith the Center for New Ventures and Entrepreneurship (CNVE) in the Mays School ofBusiness to identify faculty and undergraduate students
Page 14.1054.2with the client, finalizing the design, testing and implantation of the heir projects and reportingthe results.Course AssessmentThe school of engineering has implemented a formal course assessment plan for every course inthe curriculum, every semester. Although overall the students were meeting the learningobjectives of the two courses, course assessment as well as student feedback indicated a need torevise the course offering structure and sequence. Three issues were apparent after the initialcourse assessment data was collected, and reaffirmed with student evaluations: first, the coursesequencing was not appropriate second, the project needed to be expanded beyond a single clientand third, the courses needed to be offered in
ProgramEntrepreneur Scholars (E-Scholars) is a select group of undergraduate students who create newbusiness ventures or develop and implement strategies to improve existing enterprises. Studentsin the E-Scholars program develop their entrepreneurial mindset. They learn how to come upwith innovative ideas and develop realistic business plans around them. Through requireddomestic and international travel they also learn how to do business anywhere in the world.E-Scholars commit to an academic curricular program, taking three three-credit entrepreneurshipcourses during their junior year. Students apply during the fall semester of their sophomore yearthrough a process that requires references, interviews and an essay describing the mutual benefitof their
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competitive Activities on Engineering Students’ Entrepreneurial IntentionAbstract:An increased number of technological innovation and entrepreneurial competitiveactivities have been organized in engineering schools and beyond to raise students’entrepreneurial awareness and cultivate relevant skills. In this study, a mixed method researchbased on Planned Behavior Theory is being used to explore the outcomes of innovation andentrepreneurial competitions, in particular the influence of engaging in these competitiveactivities on engineering students’ entrepreneurial intention. This work-in-progress firstreports the construction of a customized survey, in particular the process of identifying
successfulenterprises on the campus. Although, this would not necessarily be an undesirable outcome, thegoal of the program is more in the realm of building a firm foundation. That being said, start-upsprovide the laboratory for a variety of learning experiences, which is difficult to simulate in theclassroom. We will discuss the aspect of nurturing start-ups later in the body of this paper.The Marketing Plan for the Certificate Program to the StudentsThe Certificate Program was marketed initially by writing and printing a brochure that succinctlydescribed the requirements and benefits of the program. The program was then presented througha variety of means. The program was primarily marketed by “word of mouth”. Briefpresentations were given to students
, planning, marshaling, implementing people and implementingfinance) with our two independent variables (gender and family role model). Our results showthat overall, students with an entrepreneur in their family reported higher ESE for all the fiveconstructs than students who did not have an entrepreneur in their family. However, statisticallysignificant differences and interactions with gender were found for only searching, marshalingand implementing finance constructs. For searching, both the independent variables (family rolemodels and gender) were noted as significant predictors. In contrast, only presence of family rolemodels was found to be a statistically significant predictor for marshalling. Similarly, onlygender was significant predictor
meetings with eitherinternal or external clients. The engineering students also begin developing a business planusing a template from a business plan competition as a guide. Regional economic developmentoffices help the team with rudimentary business plan development. In our region the ArrowheadGrowth Alliance – a consortium of various governmental and business groups – offers assistanceto the student teams in the development of the business plan15. Through weekly reviews andexternal advice, the student team moves the concept through technical and business developmentcycles that culminates in a submission to a business plan competition. In our region, our targetbusiness plan competition is the Minnesota Cup's student division16
look into theinherent value of STEM learning and provided them the opportunity to engage in businessdevelopment activities such as idea generation, fast pitch, design thinking and business planning.In addition, lean start up approach provided students ways to interview potential customers andquickly make pivots in their plan for delivering a product or solution to potential customers fastand efficiently. According to data collected in the project, such entrepreneurship practices wellenhanced the overall STEM learning experiences of students. As a design and development project, research questions in STEM-Inc frame formative datacollection and analysis to address aspects of the design that worked and others that requirerevision. Summative
, innovation, tolerancefor ambiguity, creative problem solving, critical thinking, and business skills (marketing,financial analysis, and strategic planning). This skill set embraces the entrepreneurialmindset as defined by the KEEN network, but is uniquely defined as the programoutcomes for University students. In addition, each of those skills is further refined intomeasurable student learning objectives which also support ABET Program Outcomes forthe engineering programs. The student learning outcomes are listed in Table 1. Page 12.426.5 Table 1: Student Learning OutcomesSkill Upon completion of the program, a
familiarize themselves with Clarity and CVC before the in-class casepresentation by visiting http://www.csr.com/products/cvc.htm.A handout the students are given in preparation for the case study is provided as Appendix A.Ray Gunn Case: Course IntegrationThe nature of the technical content in this case relates closely with content we normally cover ina Mechanical Measurements course (although many institutions refer to their similar course asInstrumentation). Our Mechanical Measurements course covers a variety of transducers andsignal processing techniques used to analyze the resulting data, making for a good discussion asto how this case study relates to the course content. In addition, we are planning to add a labdemonstration of the directional
business or anexisting business (intrapreneurship). In the Engineering Department, we have allied ourselveswith Business Department faculty such that all engineering students develop business plans fortheir projects. Furthermore, business students in an upper-level strategies course work withspecific engineering design teams. This year we have also begun an emphasis on identifying thecustomer and responding to the customer’s needs. Alumni, Business Department faculty, andEnterprise Center personnel are involved in assessing the initial ideas that each senior designteam is proposing. In addition, specific lectures have been prepared and given to the class thatintroduce the concept and value of having an entrepreneurial mindset.This paper will
experience in planning andlaunching ventures. Second, most regions suffer from inadequate hands-on, seed capitalresources willing to invest early in the life of a new technical venture. These voids in a region’sventuring ecosystem discourage many technologists within universities, and other institutions,from embarking upon the commercialization of innovations.Given these impediments, to achieve their most effective role in the innovation economy,research universities require new, more aggressive models of commercialization. Traditionalmodels of Intellectual Property (IP) licensing are insufficient alone to unlock the untappedcommercial opportunities stemming from scientific and technical discoveries on campus.One of the most promising paths forward
+3. To help develop the "e" spirit +4. Building organizations for the future +5. Addressing social issues +6. OthersWhat part did the case play in the course? 20Case outputs: Class presentations, role play & research papersCase Name: Santa FeSchool: Vanderbilt UniversityTitle: Dore to Door ConsultingCase summary: Page 12.1010.9The students of Dore to Door Consulting, proposed to revitalize and redevelop downtown Athensby implementing a plan that focused on bringing in a major retailers and chain restaurants inaddition to revitalizing existing landmarks. The plain includes placing a Wal-Mart Super centerin the heart of downtown and targeting
opportunity evaluation and venture planning course/workshop called Corporate Intrapreneurship Training (CIT).The ISP features the development, piloting, and assessment of three types of student projectstructures and will be led by the other two HHDN institutions (University of Dayton andVillanova University): Identical projects run in parallel at each participating school Projects where the team members themselves are distributed Projects that distribute tasks among teams at each schoolTogether, these objectives cover most of the experience of turning an unrecognized market needinto a product within an established company. In particular, they impart in the students the skillsassociated with need identification, ideation
development). These projects have included Robotics Platforms, Planning, Monitoring and Control algorithms, Sensor Interface, User Interfaces, Wireless communication, Signal Processing, etc. All of this involves direction and teaching teams to use the required tools and apply en- gineering skills to transform a concept into a product. She also manages interdisciplinary senior design projects in collaboration with other engineering departments such as Textiles Engineering, mechanical en- gineering, etc. Beyond senior design, she has also created and teaches undergraduate and graduate-level classes in ECE (Python in Engineering, Practical Engineering Prototyping (PrEP). She also has designed and taught ECE Robotics summer
promote students’ learning andperformance, and to help students develop increasingly higher levels of development andsophistication, entrepreneurship programs must organize their curricula, programs, andservices to create a coherent, meaningful, powerful educational experience for students.This paper provides a research-based approach, plan, and process for helpingentrepreneurship programs make the vision become a reality at their institution.Introduction Building a successful entrepreneurship program involves more than creating anddelivering a series of courses that meet accreditation or institutional requirements.Programs focused on teaching entrepreneurship demand and require students to developsophisticated skills and abilities that
Project Planning and Development 4. Learning from failure* 5. Establishing the cost of production or delivery of a service, including scaling strategies* Project Management and Engineering Economics 6. Determining market risks* Applied Engineering Statistics Transport Operations II Mechanics and Structures Lab 7. Designing innovatively under constraints Software Project Analysis and Design Junior Design Laboratory Fundamentals of Mechanical
in the business world, the use ofentrepreneurial internships to help students gain experience beyond the classroom,the presence of entrepreneurial societies or clubs, the importance of businessknowledge, and learning from the advice of practicing entrepreneurs. In addition,each school uses different methods of teaching creative thinking. This competencyis one which is difficult to teach in traditional curricula.Baylor University: • Through the entrepreneurship program at Baylor University, students are able to take a hands-on approach to learning entrepreneurship. • Through the Venture Assistance Program, student help with pre-venture planning, start-up problems, consulting on operation problems, product and
Engineering and industry in the State of Maryland. Initialprograms included: • On-campus incubator opened in temporary buildings and moved to a permanent building in 1998 • Program to establish industrially oriented laboratories • Manufacturing extensionIn 1987, a new program was added to facilitate R&D projects for Maryland companies, carriedout on campus by faculty and graduate students – Maryland Industrial Partnerships (MIPS).Since 1999, Mtech’s entrepreneurship programs have evolved significantly with the followingtimeline:1999 Hinman CEOs residential program for juniors and seniors2001 Technology Startup Boot Camp University of Maryland Business Plan Competition
that could serve as guidance forsubsequent development of new models; [2] production system: design of a complete factory forserial manufacture of commercial telepharmacy workstation products; [3] business: design of aviable business enterprise that could operate the designed factory and manufacture and distributethe workstations. The entire project was subject to explicit cost and time-to-market constraints. In parallel, student recruiting was launched. The original plan called for a team of sixstudents: one undergraduate each from Manufacturing Engineering, Industrial Engineering andManagement, Computer Engineering and Electrical Engineering, plus one graduate student eachfrom the Master of Business Administration and Doctor of Pharmacy
tosuccessfully develop an application (app), one needs to learn at least three or four of the Page 24.910.3following: mobile application programming on one of two different platforms (Android andiOS), complementary data structures, user interface design, networking and communication, theuse of on-board sensors, and security. In order to successfully sell such an app, one needs to beentrepreneurial in analyzing the market need and its potential size, then construct a business plan,explore avenues for developmental funding and revenues, and design a marketing strategy. Inaddition, one also needs to hone one's soft skills such as presentation of ideas to
. Thestudents develop a new product idea and carry it through to a physical prototype. Theymust also formulate a business plan, marketing strategy, and an appeal for funding. Webring in guest speakers with expertise in intellectual property issues and severalsuccessful entrepreneurs (including former students from this class). In this paper, wediscuss the three versions of this class, and how they have evolved. We also discuss ourstudents’ successes, and some of the problems they have encountered in trying tocommercialize their ideas.Index terms - Creativity, new product development, entrepreneurship, distance learningIntroductionThe first version of our course Creativity and New Product Development was developedby Henry Bolanos and Dave Lewis. Henry
entrepreneuriallearning experience to a large number of students at all levels. This can only be achieved bydeveloping a “scalable” model to reduce teacher load in course creation and management, andstudent interaction. This paper describes a pilot experiment at State University, the first of a fourstage plan to make entrepreneurship education available to the majority of students in the US.To date 135 students developed entrepreneurial skills at State University using a unique problembased learning (PBL) approach with all course materials and grading managed on-line. The resultsof the pilot indicate that a problem based, on-line approach to learn entrepreneurship is viable withsignificant upside potential. Surprisingly, it was just as difficult for the faculty
students to haveextensive contact with his organization. The individual desired an EIR program that was morethan a one-time, passive interaction between a CEO and students. The Executive perceivedbreaking the status-quo as critical to success in business, and he spread that belief to the EIRprogram. The Executives that co-sponsored the ideation challenge in the following 2 years wereequally committed to this belief.As with the planning of every ideation challenge since, the key criterion for selecting the objectof the challenge is that it is relevant to college students. The inaugural ideation challenge forcedstudents to create an alternative design for the cardboard pizza box. The Executive neverintended to pursue the idea. It was merely a
Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN)Innovators program to help faculty learn the importance of the entrepreneurial mindset, not onlyin how they approach their vocation, but also in how they expose students to these sameattributes. We discuss the program design, its initial implementation, challenges faced, lessonslearned, and plans for the future.In the last fifty years, the emphasis in engineering education has been to equip our students withthe analytical tools thought to be needed for success in the workforce and/or graduate school.This is in contrast to the more hands-on educational model employed before the rapidindustrialization seen during World War II.1,2 In Friedman’s book, “The World is Flat,” andPink’s book, “A Whole New Mind,” although
. Fiveyears of implementation and continuous quality improvement following the inaugurationculminated with ABET accreditation in summer 2020. The degree plan features a four-year spiral curriculum. There is an iterative revisiting ofengineering topics, innovation and entrepreneurship subjects, business acumen, and leadershipengineering themes throughout the courses. The first year introduces core concepts in design,innovation, and entrepreneurship, the second year brings engineering modeling and simulations,and measurements to incorporate technical engineering practices, the third year focuses onentrepreneurship, people, and products, and the capstone year drives innovation in practice,through culminating team-driven projects. The
, Milwaukee School of Engineering LAWRENCE SCHMEDEMAN Larry Schmedeman is a Professor in the Rader School of Business at Milwaukee School of Engineering. He joined the faculty in 1982 and has taught a wide spectrum of courses ranging from economics, finance, management, international business, and business planning. He serves as the Program Director for the International Business bacheloriate program. Educational background: B.S. Education, Bachelor of Management, and MBA.Larry Fennigkoh, Milwaukee School of Engineering LAWRENCE FENNIGKOH, Ph.D. Larry Fennigkoh is currently an Associate Professor in MSOE’s Biomedical Engineering program where he teaches courses in