Paper ID #14907Neuroscience 101: Might Your Teaching and Their Learning Benefit?Dr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, and F.NSPE (stuwalesh@comcast.net, www.helpingyouengineeryourfuture.com) is an author; teacher; and an independent consultant providing leadership, management, and engineering services. Prior to beginning his consultancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a project engineer and manager, department head, discipline manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and dean of an engineering college. Walesh’s technical
emphasized engineering education to promote persistence and success in engineering.Dr. Mehdi Khazaeli, University of the Pacific Mehdi Khazaeli is an Associate Professor in School of Engineering and Computer Science at University of the Pacific. He also serves as Director of Pacific’s Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TIE) Program. He teaches courses in Design and Innovation, Decision Making, Building Information Modeling and Data Analytics. He has consulted with and/or taught seminars to a variety of clients in R&D-based industries, research organizations and educational institutions.Mr. Jeremy S. Hanlon, University of the Pacific American c
Paper ID #14474Entrepreneurship Education for Women in Engineering: A Systematic Re-view of Entrepreneurship Assessment Literature with a Focus on GenderChristina S. Morton, University of Michigan Christina S. Morton is a doctoral student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan. Christina has professional experience in Academic and Student Affairs, serving as an Academic Success Coach at Johnson C. Smith University and a Residential Direc- tor at North Carolina State University. Her primary research interests are in the motivation and persistence of
conferences and published The Journal of Electronic Commerce. He was also a Vice President at the First National Bank of Chicago, where he founded and managed the bank’s market leading professional Cash Management Consulting Group, initiated the bank’s non credit service product management organization and profit center profitability programs and was in- strumental in the breakthrough EDI/EFT payment system implemented by General Motors. Dr. Ferguson is a graduate of Notre Dame, Stanford and Purdue Universities and a member of Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Page
Paper ID #24668EML Indices to Assess Student Learning through Integrated e-Learning Mod-ulesDr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of four grants related to the development of an entrepreneurial mindset in students by utilizing integrated e-learning modules and experiential learning opportunities. Through these grant entrepreneurial thinking is being integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs, and 75 engineering and computer science faculty at 53 other
Paper ID #14885Integrating e-Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop an En-trepreneurial Mindset in StudentsDr. Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven Nadiye O. Erdil is an assistant professor of industrial engineering and engineering and operations man- agement at the University of New Haven. Her research interests include use of statistical methods and lean tools for quality and process improvement, and use of information technology in operations management. Her work is primarily in manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean
her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Singapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross-disciplinary ed- ucational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran has served as the Dean of the
holds a PhD in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from UC Davis and is a UC Davis Graduate School of Management Business Development Fellow as well as an NSF IGERT fellow. His dissertation focused on the effect of hydrogen enrichment on landfill gas-fired IC engines. In 2016 Kornbluth received the University of California President’s Office Faculty Climate Champion award for his novel project–based courses and applied research focusing on Zero-Net-Energy and Cli- mate Neutrality. Kornbluth specializes in novel environmentally sustainable technology in the energy and agriculture sectors applicable in the developed and developing world.Dr. Michael S. Isaacson, University of California, Santa Cruz Michael Isaacson
. References[1] N. Duval-Couetil, E. C. Kisenwether, J. Tranquillo, and J. Wheadon, “Catalyzing the adoption of entrepreneurship education in engineering by aligning outcomes with ABET,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2014.[2] J. Gandhi and D. S. Deardorff, “An Implementation of Innovative Thinking in The Entrepreneurship Cur- riculum for Engineers An Implementation of Continuous Improvement in Instilling Innovative Thinking in The Entrepreneurship Curriculum for Engineers,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2014.[3] J. F. Sullivan, L. E. Carlson, and D. W. Carlson, “Developing Aspiring Engineers into Budding Entrepreneurs : An Invention and Innovation Course,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October
enhance theseintrinsic motivators.2.2 Resiliency5Globalization, competition and existing dynamic market conditions require engineers toconstantly innovate, to work and adapt under uncertain conditions and to quickly learn andrecover from mistakes and fails. This requires a high level of “resiliency” defined as theability to overcome and rise above adversity and difficult situations. Page 26.89.3Resiliency describes one´s ability to move forward with optimism and self-confidence evenwhen we are immersed in adversity. It is a mental state motivated by our thoughts, which arein part formulated by our success and our interpretations of past and current
Differences on Student Innovation Capabilities,” in ASME International Design and Engineering Technical Conferences, 2014.[3] T. C. Kershaw et al., “A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Examination of the Development of Innovation Capability in Undergraduate Engineering Students,” in Volume 3: 17th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 12th International Conference on Design Education; 8th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices, 2015, p. V003T04A008.[4] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, and N. W. Sochacka, “A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 123–148, 2017.[5] M. Kouprie and F. S. Visser, “A framework for empathy
learningmathematics and English on the cost effective 25 USD ‘Akash’ tablets. We explained the following four principles of developing innovative entrepreneurialcompetencies [13]; (a) The competencies can be developed, b) Diversity is the key, c) Start bychoosing a challenge, d) RBIS (Research-Based Instructional Strategies) catalyze development ofthe competencies. In the rest of the document, entrepreneurship would mean innovative entrepreneurship,wherein one solves problem(s) in an innovative way and makes cost-effective and ethicalsolutions available to people who are facing the problem(s). We then identified broad challenge areas such as education, health, energy, security,efficient enterprises, urban infrastructure, environment, and
collection. Through GORP, the observer can select codes forobserved classroom activity for both the instructor(s) and students. Observations are coded in 2-minute intervals until the class session is over. If the observer makes a mistake, they can note itduring the next interval, and adjust the data accordingly by hand, after class. Data isautomatically analyzed in GORP and can be exported to a spreadsheet for further analysis.The COPUS evaluation process was also part of the development of this Work-in-Progress. Wefollowed the clustering convention put forth by Stains et al. [86] in order to better capture thebroader types of instructor and student behaviors that we were interested in at this stage in thestudy -- who's talking, who's working, who's
g s ce re e b rt ce rin rit dg ai Jo fo ilu en lG
. Page 26.1658.12ReferencesAnthony, S., Johnson, M. W., Sinfield, J., & Altman, E. (2008). The innovator’s guide to growth: Putting disruptive innovation to work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Bilen, S. G., Kisenwether, E., Rzasa, S. E., & Wise, J. C. (2005). Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 233–243.Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero, CA: K & S Ranch.Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.Duval-Couetil, N., Gotch, C. M., & Yi, S. (2014). The
ecosystem.Reference[1] Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494.[2] Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. The art and science of entrepreneurship. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 3-23.[3] Arruda, C., Nogueira, V. S., Cozzi, A., & Costa, V. (2015). The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of startups: an analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil and the perceptions around the Brazilian regulatory framework. In Entrepreneurship in BRICS (pp. 9-26). Springer, Cham.[4] Clark, B. K., & Bruno-Jofre, R. D. (2000). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organisational pathways of transformation
. Merrill, "CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment," Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 2, no. 3, 2008.3. C. Charyton, and J. Merrill, "Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 2, 2009.4. M. Perl, "Developing creativity and innovation in engineering and science," Inter. Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, no. 27, 2008.5. H. S. Fogler, S. E. LeBlanc, B. Rizzo, Strategies for Creative Problem Solving, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, 2013.6. T. Simpson, R. Barton, and D. Celento, "Interdisciplinary by design," Mechanical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 9, 2008.7
has also worked extensively with high schools to advance student learning success. Malshe’s notable honors include: Membership in the National Academy of En- gineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufacturing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories- In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Oscar” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3
), 1st-generation status (a student whose parent(s) did notcomplete a four-year college or university degree) and finally by responses based on scoring on theengineering self-efficacy scale (threshold value of 4.0 out of 5 set as high-ESE).Thirty-two females completed the survey and twenty-four males, one student identified as genderqueer ornon-binary. This data point was not considered when comparing differences in gender due to the smallsample size but was considered for analysis of 1st-generation and low- vs. high-engineering self-efficacy.Eighteen students reported being 1st-generation, thirty-nine were not. Twenty-one scored 4.0 or greater onmeasures of engineering self-efficacy, thirty-six scored below 4.0.To examine the reliability of the
, marketing strategy, marketing, and public pol- icy. She has published research in Organization Science, International Journal of Engineering Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, and Journal of Business & Management. She employs project-based learning and multi-method research in many of her courses. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Developing Intrapreneurship in the Next Generation of Engineering Innovators and LeadersabstractThis National Science Foundation Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) project responds to agrowing disparity among technology firms and the number of under-represented people inmanagerial and
/9780813125763.003.00086. Cornford, F. M. Microcosmographia Academica. Politics (Cambridge University, 1908). at 7. Menand, L. The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University (Issues of Our Time). (WW Norton and Company, 2010).8. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E. & Hall, T. S. Diffusion of engineering education innovations: a survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. J. Eng. Educ. 99, 185–207 (2010).9. Henderson, C., Beach, A. & Finkelstein, N. Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 48, 952–984 (2011).10. Foote, K. T., Neumeyer, X., Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H. & Beichner, R. J
(2011, January). Afterschool innovations in brief: Focusing on middle school age youth. Report, Afterschool Alliance. 2. American Association of University Women (AAUW) (1992). How Schools Shortchange Girls. Emeryville, CA: Marlowe and Co. 3. Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, May 2013, 3-9.4. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499.5. Kerr, B. S. (1997). Smart Girls: A New Psychology of Girls, Women and Giftedness. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology.6. Langdon, D.; McKittrick, G.; Beede, D.; Khan, B.; & Doms, M. (July 2011). STEM: Good jobs
Gilmore and Baylee Houldson with the College of Engineering at XXX.Thank you to our clinical sponsors, Matt Solomito and Drew Cohen at Connecticut Children’sMedical Center for their technical support and lab demonstrations for the students.References[1] J. Perry and J. M. Burnfield, " Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic and rehabilitation principles," in Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, 1992, p. Ch 13.[2] T. Marasovic, M. Cecic and Z. Vlasta, "Analysis and interpretation of ground reaction forces in normal gait," WSEAS Tansactions on systems,, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1105-1114, 2009.[3] S. Gandhi, M. Jimmy and S. Taghazadeh, "A comprehensive review of entrepreneurship course offering in engineering programs," in
on three criteria, per established guidelines of critical incident technique [27]: 1. Detailed description of an experience or series of experiences that are directly attributable to the aspect(s) of their way of understanding or approaching innovation. 2. Description or demonstration of one or more aspects of understanding or approaching innovation. (Note: Direct connections to innovation were preferred, but this connection could be inferred from a participant’s way of experiencing innovation (as seen in the previous study [9]) or contextual cues in the excerpt or elsewhere in the interview.) 3. A clear change, refinement, or crystallization in one’s view of innovation, especially as it addressed aspects of
traditional, with lowcommitment to research and development. Internally, there have been difficulties incommunicating the project goals and orientations. The project seems huge and with a not clearset of priorities. Finally, hallways and informal talks mention that faculty leaders are seen asbelonging to a clique close to the top administration, which risks the wide adoption of theprogram.The Clover 2030 Engineering Strategy: A joint venture between UC and UTFSMNew Engineering for 2030 has been the opportunity that UC-Engineering was expecting tovalidate its efforts to create world-class education in Chile. Along CORFO' s intention totransform Chilean engineering schools towards national competitiveness and productivity, UC-Engineering had already
(Lichtenstein & Plowman, 2009;Sullivan & Pines, 2016). It is a shared discipline of collective action. As participants follow thesesimple rules, new interactions take place and new outcomes emerge. Using simple, but not easyquestions, participants develop both a shared outcome and a project to move toward theiroutcome. The project represents a short-term experiment. Participants learn whether they canmove toward their shared outcome through the collective action they design. The process isiterative: as they learn, they move forward to complete some projects, adjust others and keepgoing, and take on new projects to reach their identified strategic outcome(s). Given thealignment between this approach and the complex nature of the university
theworkforce [6]. There are many explanations of individual excellence and entrepreneurialmindset [7,8, 9] and multiple studies about engineering students [10,11,12] with an emphasison a high need for achievement and potential for break-through innovation [13]. Since the late1990’s engineers and designers have been exploring moods and feelings and their connectionto better solutions [14]. And while research links entrepreneurial status to personality theory[15] and personality to leadership [16], few studies focus on the impact of emotion oninnovative success. This paper aims to begin filling that gap with a preliminary experiment toshow how students experience a story of innovation. The experiment is inspired by Radcliffe President Mattina
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and his M. S. in Civil Engineering in 2015. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy within engineering. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineering Education PhD undergraduate student at Purdue University. Previously a high school educa- tor for six years with a masters in education curriculum and BS
–154 (2012).4. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E. et al. Essential factors related to entrepreneurial knowledge in the engineering curriculum. In 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (2012).5. Purzer, Ş., Fila, N. D., & Nataraja, K. M. Evaluation of current assessment methods in engineering entrepreneurship education. Advances in Engineering Education, 5, 1-27 (2016).6. Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., Merrill, J. A., Clifton, W. & DeDios, S. Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment. J. Eng. Educ. 100, 778–799 (2011).7. Genco, N., Hölttä-Otto, K. & Seepersad, C. C. An experimental investigation