emphasized engineering education to promote persistence and success in engineering.Dr. Mehdi Khazaeli, University of the Pacific Mehdi Khazaeli is an Associate Professor in School of Engineering and Computer Science at University of the Pacific. He also serves as Director of Pacific’s Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TIE) Program. He teaches courses in Design and Innovation, Decision Making, Building Information Modeling and Data Analytics. He has consulted with and/or taught seminars to a variety of clients in R&D-based industries, research organizations and educational institutions.Mr. Jeremy S. Hanlon, University of the Pacific American c
manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the grant entitled Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by Utilizing Integrated Online Modules and Experiential Learning Opportunities. Through this grant entrepreneurial learning has been integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs. The survey instrument used to assess the entrepreneurial mindset of students and faculty was developed as a part of this effort. American c Society for
, 425–435.Duval-Couetil, N. & Wheadon, J. (2013). The value of entrepreneurship to recent engineering graduates: A qualitative perspective. in Proc. 2013 IEEE Front. Educ. Conf. 114–120.Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Routledge.Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine.Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (1), 218-232.Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (3), 501-519.Henry, M. A., Shorter, S
? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3): 223-231. 3. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, H. J., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 4. Bender, D. D., & Weimer, M. (2005). The phenomenology of change: How do individual faculty manage the instructional change process? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec. 5. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of
entrepreneurs' definitions, but mentioned only afew times throughout student interviews, for example, Participant 42 stated; "Entrepreneurialmindset is really just creating a new form of mental habits that will allow you to see the biggerpicture of things to make connections and values through what your work is." However, it seemsthat some of the more frequent codes such as Innovation and Business Skills were nothighlighted by entrepreneurs in previous studies. This could be due to students' lack ofexperience in the field and the fact that students are only learning about entrepreneurial mindsetin the classroom, as opposed to entrepreneurs who have real world experience with the benefitsof EM.Faculty in Zappe et al.’s study said that they believe that
collection. Through GORP, the observer can select codes forobserved classroom activity for both the instructor(s) and students. Observations are coded in 2-minute intervals until the class session is over. If the observer makes a mistake, they can note itduring the next interval, and adjust the data accordingly by hand, after class. Data isautomatically analyzed in GORP and can be exported to a spreadsheet for further analysis.The COPUS evaluation process was also part of the development of this Work-in-Progress. Wefollowed the clustering convention put forth by Stains et al. [86] in order to better capture thebroader types of instructor and student behaviors that we were interested in at this stage in thestudy -- who's talking, who's working, who's
collaboration, and (v) the following steps if they want to participate. Once interestedEEP teams approach the instructors, and then the teams are selected as potential sponsors basedon three primary criteria:(1) Need of the ECE skills to create the product for the EEP team’s product idea.(2) Scope of work and technical feasibility for ECE SD team to finish in one year,(3) Quality of EEP team’s market & customer study and business plan.Selecting the ECE team as design and implementation engineers (Second semester)Selected EEP team/s are invited to participate in the “pitch your project” event with all otherexternal sponsors in the following spring semester to the ECE SD class. ECE SD team membersare provided information about the EEP team (but not
el ut od O M s es on
, “Entrepreneurship Education, and Training: A Survey of Literature,” Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 1s, 2014. 2. The Kern Family Foundation, “Engineering Unleashed,” https://engineeringunleashed.com/, 2021, (accessed January 2021). 3. A. R. Peterfreund, E. Costache, H. L. Chen, S. K. Gilmartin, and S. Sheppard, “Infusing innovation and entrepreneurship into engineering education: Looking for change as seen by ASEE Members,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, June 2016. 4. W. F. Massy, T.A. Sullivan, and C. Mackie, “Improving measurement of productivity in higher education,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, 15–23, 2013. 5. S. R. Brunhaver, J. M. Bekki, A. R
g s ce re e b rt ce rin rit dg ai Jo fo ilu en lG
has also worked extensively with high schools to advance student learning success. Malshe’s notable honors include: Membership in the National Academy of En- gineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufacturing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories- In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Oscar” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3
one another’s work and provide constructive feedback in both in-person and remote learningclasses. In addition, the course professors commented that the workshop helped to reinforce theconcepts that their students had been learning before the workshop. These promising resultsencouraged us to adopt our other workshops (e.g., Design Thinking Workshop and Idea Sprints),which were also originally designed for in-person instruction, for remote learning.AcknowledgmentThis research is sponsored by the VentureWell Faculty Grant ( #17926-18). Any opinions andfindings expressed in this material are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe VentureWell.References[1] A. Konak, S. Kulturel-Konak, and W. Cheung Gordon, "Teamwork
), 1st-generation status (a student whose parent(s) did notcomplete a four-year college or university degree) and finally by responses based on scoring on theengineering self-efficacy scale (threshold value of 4.0 out of 5 set as high-ESE).Thirty-two females completed the survey and twenty-four males, one student identified as genderqueer ornon-binary. This data point was not considered when comparing differences in gender due to the smallsample size but was considered for analysis of 1st-generation and low- vs. high-engineering self-efficacy.Eighteen students reported being 1st-generation, thirty-nine were not. Twenty-one scored 4.0 or greater onmeasures of engineering self-efficacy, thirty-six scored below 4.0.To examine the reliability of the
, marketing strategy, marketing, and public pol- icy. She has published research in Organization Science, International Journal of Engineering Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory, and Journal of Business & Management. She employs project-based learning and multi-method research in many of her courses. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Developing Intrapreneurship in the Next Generation of Engineering Innovators and LeadersabstractThis National Science Foundation Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) project responds to agrowing disparity among technology firms and the number of under-represented people inmanagerial and
Expositions, June, 2014, Indianapolis, IN.[7] M. V. Huerta, J. S. London, A. Trowbridge, M. A. Avalos, W. Huang, and A. F. McKenna, “Cultivating the entrepreneurial mindset through design: Insights of thematic analysis of first-year engineering students’ reflections,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2017, Columbus, OH.[8] M. J. Jensen and J. L. Schlegel, “Implementing an entrepreneurial mindset design project in an introductory engineering course,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2017, Columbus, OH.[9] A. Ferrar and D. Roberts, “Sustainable senior design: MVP engine,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions, June, 2019, Tampa, FL.[10] A. Ali, D. M
Paper ID #33968Mass-scale Online Synchronous Entrepreneurship Education for EngineersProf. Ranji K. Vaidyanathan, Oklahoma State University Dr. Ranji Vaidyanathan is presently the Varnadow Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the Helmerich Research Center at OSU Tulsa. He was previously the Director of the New Product Develop- ment Center (NPDC) and the Inventors Assistance Service (IAS) at Oklahoma State University. Dr. Vaidyanathan has eighteen U. S. patents and twenty-two pending patent applications. He has de- veloped six different products from concept stage to commercial stage including a product
literature alongwith research study outcomes, and address the need to use an intersectional lens when exploringthe experiences of racially minoritized populations. 5 MethodsThis review uses a combination of pre-established methods. We used a method adapted fromFerrari [23] which focuses on conducting narrative style reviews. Also, we used Borrego’s [7],[8] methodology for conducting a systematic literature review in engineering education in sixsteps: (1) deciding to conduct a systematic literature review, (2) identifying the scope andresearch question(s), (3) defining inclusion criteria, (4) finding and
(value) and variation were brought up again.The follow up report constituted addressing the following tasks: • Providing a description of the case including background, important factors, critical measures, etc. • Determining each design’s performance with regards to the quality measure(s) identified • Recommending which design that the company should continue with for further advancement based on both technical feasibility and economic value analysis • Providing statistical justification to all responsesAll the information necessary to conduct a technical feasibility analysis using statistical toolswas available in the materials covered during the lectures; but the students had to research togather more information to
. 738–743.[4] L. J. Shuman, C. Delaney, H. Wolfe, A. Scalise, and M. Besterfield-Sacre, “Engineering attrition: Student characteristics and educational initiatives,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, 1999, pp. 1–12.[5] S. P. Nichols and N. E. Armstrong, “Engineering entrepreneurship: Does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering education?,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 134–138, 2003.[6] P. Shekhar, A. Huang-Saad, J. Libarkin, R. Cummings, and V. Tafurt, “Assessment of student learning in an entrepreneurship practicum course,” 2017.[7] T. P. James, E. Rose Morehouse, and T. P. James, “Employer Perceptions of Undergraduate Student Entrepreneurial
to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Intro. by H. S. Pritchett, 2009.[8] "Engineering for the Conceptual Age," UTEP College of Engineering Lecture Series [Online] Available: engineering.utep.edu/engineeringlectureseries [Accessed: Nov. 11, 2020].[9] C.W. Clough, et al., "The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," Washington D.CDCational Academies Press, 2004, pp 28-29.[10] L.R. Lattuca, P.T. Terenzini, J.F. Volkwein and G. D. Peterson, "The Changing Face of Engineering Education," Reforming Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 2, 1996.[11] S.C. Florman, The Introspective Engineer, New York: Thomas Dunne, St. Martin's Press, 1996.[12] "Engineering for the Conceptual Age," UTEP
world, connections from sources to gain insight and assess risk, andcreating value in a prototype through unexpected opportunities [2].The agriculture sector is a highly technical field that offers many open-ended problems forstudents to explore. The farming industry has gone away from manual labor and embracedtechnology, oftentimes being a leader [3]. John Deere was an early adopter of precisionagriculture by implementing GPS on tractors in the mid-1990’s [4]. Recently, John Deereannounced a sprayer that acts as an inkjet printer for precision spraying of plants [5]. Automationcan monitor water usage and ensure plants are receiving the correct amount of water [6]. Dronesalso have many uses in the agriculture sector from mechanical to
Impact on Student Success in Engineering and Engineering Technology Education,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2017, Columbus, OH.[2] Kennedy, E. D., McMahon, S. R., and D. Reis, “Independence in the Making: Using Makerspaces Experiences to Build Foundational Entrepreneurial Competencies,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogies, 0(0) pp 1-18. 2020.[3] “NAE Grand Challenge Scholars Program”, National Academy of Engineers. Accessed Jan. 27th, 2020. [Online] Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/GrandChallengeScholarsProgram.aspx[4] “What Is KEEN,” Accessed Mar. 9th, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/what-is-keen[5] J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H
-Couetil, N., Dyrenfurth, M., Teaching students to be technology innovators:Examininng approaches and identifying competencies. ASEE 2012, San Antonio, TX.[3] Steuer-Dankert, L., Gilmartin, S., Muller, C., Dungs, C., Sheppard, S., Leicht-Scholten, Ca.,“Expanding Engineering Limits—A Concept for Socially Responsible Education of Engineers,”International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 1–16, 2019.[4] Brunhaver, SR, RF Korte, SR Barley, and SD Sheppard. April 13, 2018. Bridging the Gapsbetween Engineering Education and Practice. In R. Freeman, and H. Salzman (eds.), U.S.Engineering in the Global Economy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.[5] Gilmartin, SK, AA Antonio, HL Chen, SR Brunhaver, and SD Sheppard. April 13
them if theyare the right fit for them. Copyrights are limited to creative works (e.g., writings, music, lyrics,programming code). Protection time is the life of the creator + 70 years for new creations, whichtraditionally has generated and protected the family revenue of successful authors and recordingartists for generations[16]. To create a ‘notice’ for a copyright, the work must be accompaniedby any one of the flexible notice option examples shown below: • Copyright © 2021, , All Rights Reserved; OR • © 2021 ; OR • Copyright Note, the needs to reference the individual(s) or the entity (e.g., ABC LLC, etc.) thatowns the copyrighted work.Copyright flexibility has increased with the advent of ‘Creative Commons
toanalyze the origins, influences and implications s of entrepreneurial culture in higherengineering education in Chinese mainland through cultural speculation and historicalanalysis.3. Research methods3.1 Literature research methodThe research uses the literature research method to focus on the research materials andliterature results on the implementation of entrepreneurship education in colleges anduniversities, and to collect, sort, screen and analyze relevant data, fully interpreting thefactors affecting entrepreneurship education of Chinese colleges and universities from acultural perspective.3.2 Historical analysis methodThe research uses the historical analysis method to conduct in-depth examination of theChinese traditional culture
)K. Arrow, "Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention," 1962.L. Lee and P.-K. Wong, "Attitude towards entrepreneurship education and new venture creation," J. Enterprising Culture, vol. 11, no. 04, pp. 339–357, Dec. 2003.M. Feldman, J. Francis, and J. Bercovitz, "Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters," Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1. pp. 129–141, 2005, doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320888.P. Brown, "The opportunity trap: Education and employment in a global economy," European Educational Research Journal, 2003.N.Pasha-Zaidi, E., Afari, J.Mohammed, S. Cubero, A. Shoukry, and W., El-Sokkary. “Gender - Based teams: Perceptions of
Proceeding, AC 2009 - 570.11. A.Funai, A. Interrante, R. Reisberg, S. Wadia-Fascetti, B. Maheswaran, Connections Physics Review (CPR) Program, ASEE Conference Proceeding 2006 -1764.12. Henry Chesbrough, Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business Review Press; 1 edition (December 6, 2006).13. Steve Blank and Bob Dorf. K & S Ranch, The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, 1 edition (March 1, 2012)Appendix 1: GE2010 Sample Syllabus (five weeks) :Week Topics Assignments/Activities Week Engineering and Entrepreneurship Intro A1: SV Companies and Products 1 Why we are here
of the 21st century," IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 37, no. 1. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., p. 38, 2009, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2009.4804347.[2] D. H. Cropley, "Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education," Psychol. Aesthetics, Creat. Arts, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–171, May 2015, doi: 10.1037/aca0000008.[3] "Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education American Society for Engineering Education." https://www.asee.org/member- resources/reports/CCSSIE (accessed Feb. 26, 2021).[4] F. O. Soares, M. J. Sepúlveda, S. Monteiro, R. M. Lima, and J. Dinis-Carvalho, "An integrated project of
intellectual property of the students.Figure 3. Breakdown of student team outcomes categorized as high impact deliverables based on the ImpactInnovation Scale produced by the first cohort of IBL students during the academic year Fall 2019 to Spring 2020.Figure 4. The student outcomes for each team involved in the 2 nd cohort of the IBL classroom.Table 4. Calculating a Fall 2020’s Multidisciplinary score (total number of unique student disciplines per team) andan Institutional Score (number of universities/colleges students are attending from) per team show teams with aMultidisciplinary Score also seem to have a greater amount of end-of-semester high impact deliverables. Comparingthese scores to Fall 2019 shows an increase in Multidisciplinary scores