and professional identity: navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 79– 89, Jan. 2020.[3] M. J. Grant and A. Booth, “A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies,” Health Inf. Libr. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 91–108, 2009.[4] B. Fraser, Cognitive disability aesthetics: Visual culture, disability representations, and the (in)visibility of cognitive difference. University of Toronto Press, 2018.[5] S. Wendell, “Unhealthy disabled: Treating chronic illnesses as disabilities,” Hypatia, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 17–33, 2001.[6] O. Barden and T. Cook, “Learning difficulties: Histories and cultures,” J. Lit
assessments will be needed to validate these initial findings.Future WorkThe authors plan to deliver a second iteration of the class with updated curricula based onstudents’ recommendations and instructors’ experiences.ReferencesAbr`amoff, M. D., Roehrenbeck, C., Trujillo, S., Goldstein, J., Graves, A. S., Repka, M. X., and Silva III, E. [U+FFFD]2022). A reimbursement framework for artificial intelligence in healthcare. NPJ digital medicine, 5(1):72.American Association of Colleges and Universities (2022). Value rubrics - global learning.Bielefeldt, A. R. and Canney, N. E. (2016). Changes in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students over time. Science and engineering ethics, 22:1535–1551.Braveman, P., Arkin, E., Orleans, T
Batanero etal.’s platform [13]. A different approach towards circuit diagrams is the work by Zapirain et al.[19], which presents an open source algorithm integrated in a tool compatible with Open Office.This algorithm applies digital image processing and computer vision techniques to any schematiccircuit included in the document. The algorithm also provides an intelligent and automatictextual description of both the sequence of electronic components and their position in theschematic in order to make it accessible to students with BVI. The work was done for electronicsengineering, but this device could be used for any engineering student taking a circuits course.Graphs are an essential part of computer science and materials science education. A
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.684.1-22.684.21. Accessed: May 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/exploding-pipelines-mythological- metaphors-structuring-diversity-oriented-engineering-education-research-agendas[4] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and M. M. Camacho, “Beyond pipeline and pathways: Ecosystem metrics,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 32– 56, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20250.[5] S. Lancaster, Connect! Blink Publishing, 2022.[6] A. L. Pawley, “Universalized Narratives: Patterns in How Faculty Members Define ‘Engineering,’” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 309–319, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01029.x
, or stretch, assignments are critical levers of mobility [1].Organizations and managers curate and allocate these types of assignments informally, usingthem as a means to develop leadership skills, identify people ready for promotion and the “fasttrack”, and build succession plans [2], [3]. Software engineering managers in Tobias Neely etal.’s [1] case flagged that stretch assignments need to have an element of building new skills andcapacities (stretches were routinely described as “getting out of your comfort zone”) and anelement of visibility in the organization and to managers and leaders. Career advancement forthese engineers, in other words, revolved around proving competence in novel areas that hadstrategic importance to the business
members play an integral part in creating organizational change in graduateeducation; thus, their readiness for change can greatly impact the success of the change initiative.Change readiness can be defined as an individual’s or organization’s ability and willingness tosuccessfully undertake and adapt to change [39], [40]. Change readiness has been studied at boththe individual and organizational level [41]. According to Rafferty et al.’s [40]MultilevelFramework of the Antecedents and Consequences of Readiness for Change, individuals areready for organizational change if they believe that 1) change is needed, 2) the individual ororganization can undertake the change, and 3) there will be positive outcomes from the change.Most literature is
to help practitioners navigate their careers, help practitioners betterunderstand their students and colleagues, and help administrators/mentors develop an asset-basedand systemic-based understanding of neurodivergence.References[1] H. B. Rosqvist, N. Chown, and A. Stenning, Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.[2] A. Cuellar, B. Webster, S. Solanki, C. Spence, and M. A. Tsugawa, “Examination of Ableist Educational Systems and Structures that Limit Access to Engineering Education through Narratives,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2022.[3] T. Sorg, “Where are We, and Where to Next? ‘Neurodiversity’ in
in class greatly improved their ability to comprehend course material. Moreover, thestudents gained a stronger understanding of engineering in general, while developing self-confidence needed to excel in engineering related fields. Others felt valued by being treated asstudents in top tier institutions, while a few mentioned the rigor of the course is needed to ensurethe quality of education. These results were also reflected in student responses from the tier-oneinstitution.REFERENCES[1] Alon, S., 2007. The influence of financial aid in leveling group differences in graduating fromElite institutions. Economics of Education Review 26, (3), in press.[2] Bidwell, C. E., & Kasarda, J. D. (1980). Conceptualizing and measuring the effects of
-time full-time first year students who complete a certificate or degree withinthree years) were in the single digits or low teens.At Wright College and its larger system, these failings – particularly of student success – werewell known for decades. Through a comprehensive series of reforms and changes implementedover five years, rates began to improve. Among the many changes were the implementation ofguided pathways, targeted completion programs (College Completes), customer business models,predictive scheduling, revisions to developmental education, and more [14]. None of these changeswere unique; all were drawn from research on best practices. High level, the community collegesystem followed many of the reforms advocated in Bailey et. al.’s
Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. pp 1-11. 10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011[2] Bajwa, M. (2014). Emerging 21(st) Century Medical Technologies. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 30(3), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.303.5211[3] Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT Press.[4] Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004, 2004/01/01). Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(1), 30-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259190[5] Cutting, K., & Hedenborg, E. (2019). Can Personas Speak? Biopolitics in Design
domain. We captured how marginalizing narrativescan hinder one’s developing a strong practice-linked identity. We plan to make furthercontributions by suggesting how the design of learning environments can facilitate students’(re)negotiation with their practice-linked identities.References [1] National Academy of Engineering, Diversity in Engineering: Managing the Workforce of the Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002. [2] S. Secules, “Making the familiar strange: An ethnographic scholarship of integration contextualizing engineering educational culture as masculine and competitive,” Engineering Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 196–216, 2019. [3] J. Trevelyan, “Reconstructing engineering from practice,” Engineering
academic major. Further research is necessary to determine ifreceiving social support while reporting a lower sense of belonging is enough to improvestudents’ persistence and graduation rates in engineering programs, particularly for HLX+students.References[1] National Science Board, “Science and Engineering Indicators 2012,” National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01), Arlington, VA, 2012.[2] S. Cheryan, V. C. Plaut, P. G. Davies, and C. M. Steele, “Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1045–1060, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1037/a0016239.[3] C. Good, A. Rattan, and C. S. Dweck, “Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in
space to choose whether to revealtheir identities or a safe space to interact with their identities, such as having their cameras off inonline spaces or discussing identities in a supportive manner (Mohammed, T. F. et al., 2021; vonVacano, C. et al., 2022). One paper discussed how underrepresented students connect better witha human centered approach to engineering problems (Rodriguez, S. L. et. al., 2020). Three papersdiscussed the importance of focusing learning on the skills groups of students need to acquirebased on the content (Nasri, N. et al., 2021; Scutt, H.I. et al., 2013; Furner, J. M., & Duffy, M. L,2022). In general, the papers cover the importance of focusing teaching the students present asopposed to a general body of students
-YearExperience & Students in Transition.[8] S. Ahmed. On being included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. North Carolina:Duke University Press, 2012.[9] C. Brammer. Communicating as Women in STEM. London, UK: El Sevier, Academic Press,2018.[10] A. Sithole, E.T. Chiyaka et al, “Student attraction, persistence, and retention in STEMprograms: Successes and continuing challenges,” Higher Education Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017,46-59.[11] J. Wyn, H. Cuervo et al, “Gendered transitions from education to work: The mysteriousrelationship between the fields of education and work,” Journal of Sociology, vol., 53, no. 2,2018, 492–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317700736[12] P. Bourdieu. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction”, in Power
, and what you think a more positive interaction might have looked like.Participants in this study were LAs who consented to have their responses used as part of thisanalysis. Table 2 details the participants involved in this study. Fifty responses were analyzed.Table 2. Participant information. Private Public Number of LAs 24 26 Discipline(s) Chemistry, Biology, Chemical, Biological, and Chemical and Biological Environmental Engineering Engineering, Mechanical
generate anawareness among faculty of the power they possess and the impact of their work, not only inresearch settings, but in the classroom, too.References[1] S. Ambrose and M. Norman, “Preparing engineering faculty as educators.,” Natl. Acad. Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, p. 25, 2006.[2] S. Baum and M. McPherson, “Improving teaching: Strengthening the college learning experience,” Daedalus, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 5–13, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1162/daed_e_01757.[3] D. M. Riley, V. Henry, and L. C. Leighton, “What makes faculty adopt or resist change in engineering education?,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, p. 23.1367.1-23.1367.20. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org
Director of Mississippi Stateˆa C™s Building Construction Science (BCS) program. Dr. Ford has 15 years of industrial experience including corporate work, and 16 years of teaching experience at the post-secondary level. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Teamwork Perception in Engineering Programs through the Lens of Gender and Race Raheleh Miralami, Saeed Rokooei, Tonya Stone, George FordAbstract Teamwork skills are increasingly gaining importance in graduates’ qualifications in engineering programs. The interconnected systems of the workflow of engineering products and projects necessitate certain technical and managerial
technology-focused approaches.References[1] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017,” National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Arlington, VA., Special Report NSF 17-310, 2017. [Online]. Available: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.[2] NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2013.[3] S. L. Pruitt, “The Next Generation Science Standards: The Features and Challenges,” Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 145–156, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10972- 014-9385-0.[4] S.-A. A. Allen-Ramdial and A. G. Campbell, “Reimagining the Pipeline: Advancing STEM
and undergraduates. Webrainstorm how engineering educators can build deeper understanding of these organizationalprocesses into everyday classes and programs. We consider the need for more research onworkplace practices that frame and stratify early-career engineers’ experiences, and moretranslation of those findings to day-to-day “toolkits” for new engineers.1. IntroductionEngineering students, especially those without internship, co-op, or industry job experience buteven those with that experience, may have limited knowledge about workplace procedureinvolving management, reporting, and advancement. Brunhaver et al.’s [1] findings suggest thatfew recent engineering graduates report having knowledge of organizational practices at thepoint of
. Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, 2014.[4] C. McCall, L. D. McNair, and D. R. Simmons, “Advancing from outsider to insider: A grounded theory of professional identity negotiation in undergraduate engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 393–413, 2021.[5] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, 2012.[6] Y. M. Xu and B. Gravel, “A case study: Making facilitates an engineering student’s (re)negotiation with her disciplinary relationships,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland, 2023.[7] A. Calabrese Barton, H. Kang, E. Tan, T. B. O’Neill, J. Bautista-Guerra, and C. Brecklin
/sunday/the- asian-advantage.html[2] D. E. Naphan-Kingery, M. Miles, A. Brockman, R. McKane, P. Botchway, and E. McGee, “Investigation of an equity ethic in engineering and computing doctoral students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 337–354, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20284.[3] National Science Board, “The State of US Science and Engineering 2022,” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, 2022. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/indicators[4] L. D. Patton and S. Bondi, “Nice white men or social justice allies?: using critical race theory to examine how white male faculty and administrators engage in ally work,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 488–514
://magazine.scienceforthepeople.org/vol22-1/lessons- from-the-long-sixties-for-organizing-in-tech-today/.Arcia, A., Suero-Tejeda, N., Bales, M. E., Merrill, J. A., Yoon, S., Woollen, J., & Bakken, S. (2016). Sometimes more is more: iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1), 174-183.Atman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121–132.Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert
, interest, and capability of faculty to teach a course.That said, even when a more diverse instructional team is assigned to teach a course, there arechallenges to be overcome which may prohibit instructors from trying new teaching methods orcourse structures.The first challenge to changing teaching methods and course structures is a two-pronged issue:there is an expectation and momentum towards keeping things the same as years past, as well asthe large amount of work to overturn the traditional teaching methods. In each of the examplesthat were given in this paper, the instructor(s) invested no small amount of effort in revising thecourse(s) to suit their designs. The time and energy required to do these revisions is not alwaysavailable to faculty
strategies must be based in thecontext of these strategies, a one-size-fits-all approach would decontextualize the curriculum andwork against successful incorporation of social impacts into technical courses. Concurrentdevelopment of curriculum and accreditation assessment assignments will decrease overhead forcourse design and improve quality. This may be done during initial course design or at any stageof revision or improvement. Limitations to this work include a small sample size of facultyparticipants and continued program rollout.References[1] E. O. McGee, Black, Brown, bruised: How racialized Stem education stifles innovation.Harvard Education Press, 2020.[2] Y.-J. Chang, T.-Y. Wang, S.-F. Chen, and R.-H. Liao, “Student Engineers as Agents
they had and some points they wanted to focus on. They were mostly satisfiedwith ChatGPT’s generated outlines, though they both decided to finetune them on their own.ChatGPT as a Tool for Equitable Access Based on the aforementioned case studies, I believe that I successfully presentedevidence of ChatGPT being leveraged by students to gain more equitable access to courses. Allof these case studies contained evidence of instructors observing how students used ChatGPT toimprove their individual learning and course experiences. Although this is true mostly forinternational students, I also gathered evidence of domestic students using ChatGPT to gainstronger access to course materials and succeed in classes. I draw upon Lalueza et al.’s [42
timepoints: beginning of Batch 1’s firstsemester (September 2022), end of Batch 1’s first semester (December 2022), and start of Batch2’s first semester (January 2023). They will be referred to as pre-survey (2022), post-survey(2022), and pre-survey (2023) in this paper, respectively. Note that the data from Batch 1includes both Engineering and Non-Engineering students, as all students were required to takethe Principles of Design course, whereas data from Batch 2 only includes Engineering students,as their survey was administered as part of the Introduction to Engineering course. Based on anintention to not overburden the students, each construct was captured using a set of three to sixquestions, hence a total of nine to thirteen Likert scale
).[3] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development andOffice of the Under Secretary, “Advancing Diversity and Inclusion In Higher Education,” 2016.[4] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology,” American Society of Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2021.[5] Q. Ketchum, “Indigenizing ASABE: Why We Should, and How We Can,” ResourceMagazine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 19–22, 2021.[6] G. S. May and D. E. Chubin, “A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success forUnderrepresented Minority Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 1, pp.27–39, 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00735.x.[7] A. Rattan, K. Savani, M. Komarraju, M. M