Conference Session

Faculty Development Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kent A. Crick, Iowa State University; Elise A. Frickey, Iowa State University; Lisa M. Larson Ph.D., Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Mack Shelley, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Paper ID #29438The Role of Teaching Self-Efficacy in Electrical and ComputerEngineering Faculty Teaching SatisfactionMr. Kent A. Crick, Iowa State University Kent Crick is currently in his third year as a graduate student at Iowa State University. He is currently a PhD candidate in Counseling Psychology and conducts research in self-determination as it relates to student and faculty motivation and well-being. Prior to attending Iowa State, he obtained a Master’s Degree in Clinical Psychology from the University of Indianapolis. He then worked as a research coordi- nator for the Diabetes and Translational Research Center

Conference Session

Evidence-based Practices in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Julia A. Maresca, University of Delaware; S. Ismat Shah, University of Delaware; Sheldon Allister Hewlett, University of Delaware; Jenni M. Buckley, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

no effect on faculty members’ self-efficacy related toculturally responsive classroom management (CRCMSE) and engineering pedagogy (TESS).Faculty reported moderately high self-confidence on all CRCMSE measures (range: 2.06-2.50 on0-3 pt Likert), and there were no statistically significant gains in these measures from pre- topost-workshop. Similarly, faculty also had moderately high self-confidence on TESS measures(range: 3.33-4.72 on 0-5 pt Likert); and pre- vs. post-workshop gains were reported for two of 15survey items. Specifically, faculty reported gains in confidence related to their ability to guidestudents in the engineering design process or scientific method (d=1.15, p=0.009, n=18) and self-confidence in encouraging critical

Conference Session

Learnin' Lessons about Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Daniel Galvan, California State University, Los Angeles; Jianyu Jane Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Lizabeth L Thompson P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

encountermultiple barriers that prevent them from achieving their academic goals. Although they oftenhave good intentions to help students succeed, faculty often attribute the academic barriers to thestudents’ lack of preparation, motivation, or effort to learn. Research studies [1] showed that thisdeficit mindset of instructors negatively impacts the students’ self-efficacy and hinders theiracademic growth. A recent report from the National Academies [2] highlighted the need to createa learner-centered culture that “meets students where they are.” This raises an important yetchallenging question for faculty development: “What can be done to help transform facultyperception to achieve such cultural change?”As a Very High-enrolled Hispanic Serving

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cassondra Wallwey, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, “Teacher and Student Attitudes Toward Teacher Feedback,” RELC J., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 38–52, 2007.[4] E. Ekholm, S. Zumbrunn, and S. Conklin, “The relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: writing feedback perceptions as a mediating variable,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 197–207, 2015.[5] R. Yoshida, “Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types,” Lang. Aware., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 78–93, 2008.[6] O. H. A. Mahfoodh and A. Pandian, “A Qualitative Case Study of EFL Students’ Affective Reactions to and Perceptions of Their Teachers’ Written Feedback,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 14–25, 2011.[7] T. Ryan and M

Conference Session

Research! Research! Research! in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicole McIntyre, University of California, Berkeley; Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jeffrey Bokor, University of California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

. King Liu, “Examining the self-efficacy of communitycollege STEM majors: Factors related to four-year degree attainment,” Community CollegeJournal of Research and Practice, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1111–1124, Dec. 2015.[13] D. Shapiro, A. Dundar, F. Huie, P.K. Wakhungu, X. Yuan, A. Nathan, and Y. Hwang,“Tracking Transfer: Measures of Effectiveness in Helping Community College Students toComplete Bachelor’s Degrees”, National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA,Sept. 2017.[14] J. A. Smith and M. Osborn, “Interpretive phenomenological analysis,” in QualitativePsychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage, 2003, pp. 51-80.[15] S. Stemler, “An overview of content analysis,” Practical Assessment, Research &Evaluation

Conference Session

Faculty Development Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Fethiye Ozis P.E., Northern Arizona University; Kyle Nathan Winfree, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

] M. Demir, S. Burton and N. Dunbar, "Professor–Student Rapport and Perceived Autonomy Support as Predictors of Course and Student Outcomes," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 22-33, 2018.[17] M. Komarraju, "Ideal Teacher Behaviors: Student Motivation and Self-Efficacy Predict Preferences," Society for the Teaching of Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 104-110, 2013.[18] M. M. Handelsman, W. L. Briggs, N. Sullivan and A. Towler, "A Measure of College Student Course Engagement," Journal of Educational Research, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 184-191, 2005.[19] C. M. Estepp and G. T. Roberts, "Exploring the Relationship between Professor/Student Rapport and Students' Expectancy for Success and Values/Goals in College of