the ethical principles andfederal regulations for the protection of human subjects approved by the UCSD InstitutionalReview Board. Some of the data was compared between three quarters: Fall 2019 for in-personteaching, Spring 2020 when the class was taught remotely for the first time and which presentedthe most challenges, and Fall 2020 when the class was taught remotely for the second time,implementing the changes developed during summer 2020. A. Student performance and instructor observationsClock ProjectThe final deliverables of the clock project assess Cognitive Learning Objectives 1 and 4.Students from both the in-person and remote quarters demonstrated a high level of proficiencywith hand-sketch graphics and CAD modeling for the clock
studentswithin the classroom if multiple paths are made available to help master the content of thecourse. On the simplest level, this may take the form of asking students what content was unclearat the end of a lecture, and sharing responsibility for the learning of the material by spending afew minutes clarifying those concepts before the period ends. An examination of the function of content suggests that it is ethical to teach less contentin favor of spending a small portion of student energy on self-reflection, helping them to developas learners. When tangential conversations occur about the applications and implications ofcontent in a lecture, instructors recognize these conversations for the valuable learning momentsthat they are, while
tools and skills in software engineering, such as versioncontrol and software architecture design.1. Goals. As a result of successfully completing SoftDes, students should be able to: - Write intermediate-level code in Python using functions, classes, and external libraries as appropriate. - Design and implement a simple software architecture (a few hundred lines at most) of a few components that interact to achieve a specific purpose. - Use version control, documentation, and unit tests to aid in the long-term maintenance of their software projects and allow others to extend or build on their work. - Use clear, precise, and well-reasoned arguments to reflect on the ethics of the use of software in different
are introduced to success strategies, including time management, study skills, learning styles, and test-taking strategies. There are engineering projects designed to motivate students to become active learners, responsible students, and ethical engineering professionals. Each student will learn what to expect from his/her studies as an engineering major. All Engineering LLC scholars are enrolled in the same section that includes students in the general FAMU and FSU population. From 2015-2018, the students were enrolled in the faculty liaison’s section of the course. This allowed students to interact with the faculty in a formal academic setting, as well as the informal academic setting during the
incredible benefit of research experience, and will often volunteer to work in a research lab, however volunteer students will often lose interest and/or prioritize other tasks ahead of volunteer lab work, so we do recommend paying research students. o Lab equipment – this could be as basic as protective eyewear and lab coats, and as expensive as outfitting a dedicated work station for the student researcher. o Training – students will need to be trained on everything from how to clock in and out, to safety procedures, to keeping a log book, to using specialized equipment in the lab, to research ethics. Most, if not all, of the required training may be viewed as not
abandoned mines. The launch video and design briefincluded information on the more than 15,000 abandoned mines in New Mexico that threatensafe access to water, how acid mine drainage occurs, a brief history on why mining wasbeneficial to the state, and how mining disasters have had and continue to have myriad negativeconsequences for people and the environment.Students were guided to conduct research on the problem and existing solutions, as well asresearching ways to engage with communities that might be mistrustful of outsiders. We felt thiswould provide them an opportunity to reflect on engineering ethics. They gave 5-minute pitchesof their solutions, following similar guidelines for the previous pitch.Data collection and analysisStudents
, studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, and exploring ethical decision-making in engineering students. She also has established a national presence in engineering education; she is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and past chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is an Associate Professor of Materials Science at the Franklin W. Olin college of Engi- neering. Her education-related research interests include self-efficacy, design, intrinsic motivation, and gender. She speaks and consults on curricular design, student
vision for the engineering field and to predict the work environment Page 13.855.4 of an engineer in 202017. The report resulting from Phase 1 of this work identified ten keyattributes to support the relevance of the engineering profession in 2020 and beyond. Theseattributes are presented in Table 2.Table 2. Key attributes that the “Engineer of 2020” should possess17No. AttributeA1. Strong analytical skillsA2. Practical ingenuityA3. CreativityA4. Good communication skillsA5. Lifelong learnersA6. Dynamic, agile, resilient and flexible characteristicsA7. High ethical standardsA8. Leadership skillsA9
approaches consistentwith autoethnography, specifically Anderson [8]. Each person individually and criticallyreflected on their experiences and documented these reflections in narrative reports. In terms ofhandling the data, the research team used a protocol informed by theory in order to focus thesereflections so they could be collectively and collaboratively evaluated. We workedcollaboratively on the analysis to develop the results giving participants a chance to respond tothe analysis process and findings as they emerged. The study secured ethical clearance from theInstitutional Review Board (IRB).LimitationsA limitation of this work is that one author, Holly, has administrative responsibility for thecourse sequence within the department. While
Paper ID #28692Building Toys for Children by Applying Entrepreneurial-Minded Learningand Universal Design PrinciplesDr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded
related to self-understanding (personal strengths [8], values, ethics and social identity).Students completed eight reflection assignments, based on the lecture and discussion topics.Prior to Fall 2018, course evaluations for ENGR 110 consistently indicated that some studentsdesired more exposure to careers within the engineering field, while other students needed moresupport leveraging academic resources and integrating into the engineering communitysuccessfully. Many students indicated that their primary motivation for enrolling in the coursewas to determine which major to pursue and had limited interest in other topics provided by thecourse. In an effort to improve student engagement and motivation across a range of needs, weintroduced student
, dominant, and autonomous (9).Bradley and Lang claim that valance and arousal responses to most words is strong, while thedominance emotional response is “less-strongly related”. ANEW2017 does not specify how theoverall sentiment is calculated. ANEW2017 is simply a lexicon for use with other algorithms.Typically, the ANEW2017 lexicon is used in a simple average methods like AFINN andTextBlob.APPROACHThe authors teach an introductory course in electrical and computer engineering which wascreated to specifically address (1) provide an orientation and early success skills for universitylife, (2) introduce ethical considerations in engineering, (3) introduce the profession ofengineering, and specifically, electrical engineering and computer engineering
course that brings exciting, newtechnologies and skills to a first-year PBL course with the aim of enhancing engagement andproviding an authentic multidisciplinary, creative design process that includes student-proposedprojects. At the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, a large R1 research institution, an effort todevelop engagement, community and connections between freshmen and faculty began with thedevelopment of a required, one-credit first semester course. This course covers topics importantto all new university students – selecting a major, exploring extracurricular opportunities, writinga resume, appreciating diversity and understanding ethics – and for three years it was expandedto add a faculty co-instructor, who led a small
. On-campus housing is provided to the Scholars. A resident coordinator is present at all times to handle logistical, operational, and emergency matters. Multifaceted daily activities are administered, including lectures on mathematics, science, communications, social justice and ethics (e.g., construction of racial identity, identifying inequalities), workshops on technical writing, coding, robotics, and resume building, hands-on team challenges (projects), professional tours, social and shopping trips, and personal time. All projects are team-based where two to three Scholars collaborate under the guidance of ambassadors. Each project is a challenge for which each team must
notanalyzed quantitatively.Example Fall 2018 Projects All OEPs participated in a presentation competition at the end of the semester toshowcase their project. Each member of the top two teams won an award of $200 for theirefforts. Predefined projects also compete in a separate competition so that those students have asimilar incentive for not just completing their project but to go above and beyond in creativityand work ethic. The first OEP team was “PepperPet,” a holographic digital pet that acts as atalking companion. The team designed all the pets themselves and used a free API to helpgenerate the animation from the static images. These images would be displayed based on howthe user interacted with the display and buttons
, the student would probably be looking at this conference from an engineering point of view. Taking an engineering oriented topic, like drones, and addressing it holistically should help the student expand their engineering identity to look at engineering problems from an ethical, historical, person based perspective.Developing Non-Engineering IdentityThis vector focused on internal and personal development. Identity is a particularly trickyconcept to define. Chickering defined identity as being secure in one’s sense of self; comfortwith one’s body, gender, sexuality, culture, and place in the larger community. Because of this,LGBT/Queer community seminars, as well as discussions having to do with relationships andsexual
College in the Spring of 2015 with a B.S.E. concentrating in Mechanical Engineering. Experiences during his undergraduate years included a semester in Spain, taking classes at the Universidad de Oviedo and the Escuela Polit´ecnica de Ingenieria de Gij´on, as well as multiple internships in Manufacturing and Quality Engineering. His current work primarily investigates the effects of select emergent pedagogies upon student and instructor performance and experience at the collegiate level. Other interests include engineering ethics, engineering philosophy, and the intersecting concerns of engineering industry and higher academia.Mr. Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University Graduate Research Assistant at the School
communication, ethics,professionalism, and an introduction to engineering design.Similar to first-year courses at other engineering schools1-3, the various disciplines have typicallybeen presented to the students through department seminars in which faculty from each of theengineering departments give presentations to students. Our department is currently re-vampingthe Introduction to Engineering course and has added some activities to see if it would helpstudents decide their choice of major within the first semester or year rather than later in thestudent’s engineering program. In addition to department presentations, 24 engineeringcompanies were invited to the school through a unique collaboration with the Engineering Co-opand Career Development
; Project Lecture 2.1 Assign Project 2Week 6 Project Lecture 2.2 Project Lecture 2.3Week 7 Project Work Quiz 2Week 8 Second Competition/Demo Presentations Session 3: Industrial Engineering (Production Systems) Tuesday ThursdayWeek 9 Technical Writing 2; Ethics; Assign Project 3 Communication 2Week 10 Project Lecture 3.1 Project Lecture 3.2Week 11 Project Lecture 3.3 Project WorkWeek 12 Quiz 3 Third Competition/Demonstration (Report Due) Session 4: Electrical
"Helping people in undeveloped nations become more advanced and 3underdeveloped modern."nations &rural areasLeaders "Engineers play roles throughout all aspects of society. Engineers, due to 1 their work ethic, can become leaders of companies or businesses due to their ability to manage and organize large projects. Also, engineers of individual disciplines contribute new ideas and technologies to advance society as a whole. "Working in teams "Engineers are all over, they are looking for new ways to fix old problems. 1 For example, They are always teams doing work on buildings. Mechanical
’ grades, work ethic, teamwork, attitudes,etc. in the respective courses.Lessons LearnedMany of the lessons learned about the class related to the material presented and betterconnection to Pre-Calculus. Although the material from the Studying Engineering6 book wasdiscussed throughout the semester, there were many times the students were disconnected fromthe concepts and felt it did not apply to them. To try and remedy this issue, the class structurewill allow the students to take more control of the activities while also learning about positionsthey may hold in a student club. An example is that a group of students would be on a socialcommittee. This group would then be in charge of any social activities involving the ENGR 204class, such as
Framework for First-Year Engineering Courses in the contextof a specific first-semester introductory course as part of a large first-year engineering program.The course covered topics in the following main content areas: mathematical modeling, dataanalysis with Excel, design, teamwork, technical communication, ethics, sustainable energyconcepts, information literacy, and information on engineering programs.Methodological Framework: Design-based ResearchThe design and development of the framework is an iterative process. Hence, we are usingdesign-based research (DBR)41 to systematically study the framework and its appropriate uses.The DBR approach involves iterative cycles of testing and research-informed revisions which areespecially suitable for
, thosestudents were not part of this study as they are not Engineering majors. This course introducesstudents to the field of engineering, the design process, and communication of ideas with graphics.Includes team design projects, drawing instruction and assignments, the role of CAD, introductionto the engineering disciplines, engineering history, ethics and case studies of engineering featsand failures, and how things are made. This course has a class capacity of 48 students and offered5 times throughout the academic year.Whatcom Community College:Whatcom Community College (WCC) is a two-year community college that offers a range oftransfer-oriented degrees and professional-technical training programs. The college servesapproximately 11,000 students
,yet, it is clear the model is applicable among many disciplines. Part 1 of the model specifies thefive-core components of interdisciplinary collaboration: 1) interdependence, 2) newly createdprofessional activities, 3) flexibility, 4) collective ownership of goals, and 5) reflection on theprocess [17]. Part 2 outlines the influences on interdisciplinary collaboration: professional role,structural characteristics, personal characteristics, and a history of collaboration [17]. Figure 1describes Bronstein’s [17] model and serves as the framework for the remainder of this paper. Professional Role Structural Characterisics - Holding values and ethics specific to each - Manageable
. Solicit (at least 3) and answer questions at the Town hall meeting 10 Judges Rubric of Final Project and Presentation expectations high/ low/ neutral / moderate Missing excelle poor fair /good ntClarity of Theme 0 1 2 3 4(addresses ethics/3Ps)Educational Quality of Exhibit 0 1 2 3 4(clear take away objective )Overall Quality of
Engineering andDesign (ENGR 104) course is a project based class that introduces students to the engineering design processand explores the role of creativity in design, team dynamics, 3D visualization, diversity of perspective, globalimpact of design, and ethics. All engineering and design students are required to take ENGR 104 as pre-majors, prior to applying to major. The majority of students take the course during their first year at WWU.The course is taught by a variety of instructors and has a class capacity of 50 students.The three interventions embedded into the course were 1) a collaborative activity establishing classroomnorms, 2) a mid-quarter activity engaging students with the concept of growth mindset, and 3) instructorconnection
large number of plagiarism cases, thereare fewer easy to use or well understood tools and interventions available to instructors of thesecourses. This paper describes a sequence of plagiarism cases in a large first-year computerprogramming course for engineers, and how the course was adapted in order to address theprevalence of these cases. Part of the issue with plagiarism in computer programming is a lack of consensus on what isand is not ethical to copy and use without acknowledgement when it comes to computer code.Many programmers gladly share code openly, and being able to find examples of code that canhelp you write a program can be a valuable and valid skill for a programmer. However, whencourses are tasked with teaching and assessing
AC 2007-2930: A SCHOLARSHIP RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION STRATEGYTHAT SUCCESSFULLY ATTRACTS DIVERSE AND ACADEMICALLYTALENTED FRESHMENChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos is Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering and Mechanics at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He is the PI of the UWM Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics > Scholarship Program. His teaching and research interests are in engineeing mechanics, structural stability, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is a recipient of the 2006 Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnston, Jr. Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award through the Mechanics Division of ASEE.Karen
. Online Traditional Assignment Mean Mean P-value Unit 1 - Introduction 95.7% 100.0% 0.13349 Unit 2 – Teamwork/Basic Excel 93.8% 80.5% 0.00933 Unit 3 – Writing/Design Cycle 88.4% 76.6% 0.13740 Unit 4 – Drawing/Intermediate Excel 89.5% 78.4% 0.04184 Unit 5 – Transferring/If Statements 89.6% 58.7% 0.00578 Unit 6 – Resumes/Graphing 93.4% 75.7% 0.01944 Unit 7 – Ethics/Algorithms 81.4% 59.6% 0.10376