Paper ID #14875Converting Traditional Engineering Physics Laboratories into Self-DesignedStudent ExplorationsDr. Amy Biegalski P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Biegalski is a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals Program at The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the CASE School of Engi- neering. She worked as a consulting structural engineer before joining UT. Her research interests include engineering fundamentals courses and project based learning; abiegals@utk.edu.Dr. Kevin Kit, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Kevin Kit is Director of the
she worked closely with engineering faculty engaged in research projects. Throughout her career in academia, Ruth has worked primarily with first-year students, initially as an instructor of English composition and later as a first-year seminar professor. Her work in the classroom continues to inform her research, which is focused on first-year students, students in transition, and, most recently, first-year STEM students. Her research interests also include the use of technology in the composition classroom, first-generation students, and students in transitions beyond the first year of college.Dr. Nirmal Trivedi, Kennesaw State University Dr. Nirmal Trivedi is the Director of First-Year Seminars and Assistant
academia after a 22-year engineering career in industry. During his career, Dr. Hamrick served in a broad range of positions in- cluding design, product development, tool and die, manufacturing, sales, and management. His teaching style brings practical, innovative, experience-based learning to the classroom, where hands-on projects that reflect real-world applications are valued by students. His teaching interests include active learning, robotics, and study abroad.Dr. Lizzie Santiago, West Virginia University Lizzie Y. Santiago, Ph.D., is a teaching assistant professor for the freshman engineering program in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources. She holds a Ph.D. in chemical
that apply to multiple areas ofengineering (e.g., that students will understand the engineering design process), each section ofthe course may take different pedagogical approaches to achieving those outcomes. In addition,each professor selects his/her own topic and adds specific student learning outcomes to thecommon outcomes that are related to his/her area of disciplinary expertise. The sections of thecourse that serve as the foundation for the work presented in this paper are taught by facultymembers in chemical engineering, civil engineering, and mechanical engineering.The authors are motivated by a desire to understand how the different approaches faculty used inthis introductory course impact student learning. In a pilot project in fall
’ experiences and develop a futureprotocol and establish a baseline of identity and community development for FYE students. Thesurvey is part of a multi-year project, and this initial understanding will shape future interviewsallowing the impact of the FYE experience to be further explored. Ultimately, the larger studyseeks to understand the impact various decisions made regarding FYE have on community andidentity development as student move through multiple pathways. The baseline survey will guidethe development of future aspects of this project while providing insights about FYE students’communities and views of themselves.IntroductionOver the last several years, there have been calls for changes to engineering education in order toensure that
theDepartment of Engineering Technology (which offers degrees in Mechanical EngineeringTechnology, Civil Engineering Technology and Electrical Engineering Technology). The twocourse sequence, Exploring Engineering and Technology I and II, involve the five departmentsin teaching at least one five week module in each of the two courses. Each department generallyinvolves the students in a basic design project related to its discipline.The freshman course sequence has provided an excellent opportunity for the BCET to interactwith first year engineering students to address the issues related to student retention and allowsthe division to provide student guidance in determining the appropriate major that best satisfiestheir individual needs in choosing a
(TIGER) at the University of Colorado, Boulder. TIGER is part of the national Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) network, which is dedicated to the development of the next generation of STEM faculty. Blanford worked with the TAR fellows to facilitate the development and execution of the Teaching-as-Research projects referred to in this study.Ms. Corrina Ladakis Gibson, University of Colorado, BoulderMr. Eric Donnelly Kenney Page 25.851.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Introduction to Engineering: Preparing First-Year
leadership rolesin either industry or academia. The program is held during the spring semester where theundergraduate students complete a one-credit pass/fail seminar course in which they learn abouta variety of research practices and opportunities, become familiar with the graduate schooladmission process, meet industry professionals, and tour college research laboratories hosted byfaculty members. In addition to the seminar, undergraduate mentees are paired with a graduatementor to complete a hypothesis or objective-based, level-appropriate project during the samespring semester. To gain further information on student attitudes, undergraduate studentscomplete several surveys to gauge their excitement and interest in engineering prior to
18 sections of the course and each section has 40 students. The objective of the course is toexpose students to design thinking concepts and enable them to solve various design challenges.The pedagogical framework of the course is focused on collaborative learning in a project-based,active learning environment. Student teams participate in various activities in class designed topromote creative and innovative thinking. The major learning outcomes focus on 1) writing anarrowly focused problem statement addressing open-ended or ill-defined global challenges; 2)applying ethnographic methods to understand technological problems; 3) developing a searchstrategy, access technical data bases and evaluate results and source quality; 4) creating
thinking, guide development of aresearched writing piece, and as a rubric instrument to assess student critical thinking throughwriting. Student oral communication is another key outcome. A subjective rubric has beenreplaced with a transparent, straightforward, binary check sheet rubric.Another signature assignment in the course is a team-based design challenge. Evaluation ofstudent performance was difficult and subjective. Through continuous improvement built onstudent feedback we developed a transparent method of evaluating the design challenge. Wedemonstrate the effectiveness of a simple check-sheet style rubric for evaluation of demonstrateddesign thinking and project management skills in the team-based design challenge.Results of this 6-year
Paper ID #20525An Integrated First-Year Experience at ECST (FYrE@ECST)Dr. Gustavo B. Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering Department at CalStateLA. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has focused on improving student success and has participated in sev- eral teaching workshops, including one on ”Excellence in Civil Engineering Education” and another in ”Enhancing Student Success through a Model Introduction to Engineering Course.” He is currently the PI of TUES project to revamp the sophomore-year experience at the college of engineering
semester, began modifying ChE 2213 Chemical EngineeringAnalysis (hereafter referred to as ―Analysis‖). Originally offered to mid-/upper-level chemicalengineering students subsequent to the traditional Mass and Energy Balances course, the coursewas re-examined as a vehicle for engaging students in a variety of topics and activities inaddition to the original scope of the course—namely numerical and statistical techniques usingMicrosoft Excel and Visual Basic. Topics including team-building, engineering problemsolving, and project design and development have been added. An interesting feature of thecourse was the addition of LEGO NXT robotics systems with a growing cache of chemicalengineering applications. Such an addition has energized student
application of those fundamentals in solving engineering problems. Thus, wehave created a first-year learning community as a solution to low retention rates in engineering.In this learning community, the first-year students take the following courses together: ● An interdisciplinary freshman experiences course, in which we teach the concept of "Design-Build-Test-Improve-Collaborate" to the students. The students take the ownership of their group projects, while working together and building friendships that last. ● An appropriate Math course (Calculus or Pre-Calculus), which is specifically designed to address the applications of math in engineering. ● An English composition class, which focuses on "Writing
. I anticipate technological developments by interpreting individual needs. I can identify new business opportunities. Q5: The following represent characteristics that some consider important for a professional career. Please provide your current opinion of how often these characteristics are likely to be important to a practicing ECS. (Never important = 1, Always important = 5) Apply mathematics to problem solutions Use computer programs to help design solutions Communicate with fellow professionals Communicate with clients Communicate with the general public Perform a business analysis related to a project or solution Be aware of news and current events Be able to clearly define projects in terms of creation of value for the
g)• Learn independently using a variety of commonly available resources (ABET i)• Use common engineering tools and software to solve engineering problems. (ABET k)In order to achieve those objectives, each instructor addressed the following course topicsthrough readings from a common textbook, homework exercises, and project application: Madison Engineering Succeeding in the Classroom Problem Solving Visualization and Graphics Computer Tools Engineering Ethics Units & Conversions Mathematics Engineering Fundamentals.An interactive lecture format with application sessions was the predominant structure for eachsection, although teaching style and specific content varied at the
National Academy ofEngineering projects that, because of growing political and economic ties among nations,engineers will discover that their designs have much broader and more significant impacts thanthey once did. As a result, engineering practice will be driven by attention not only to thefamiliar topics of intellectual property, project management and cost-benefit constraints, as wellas multilingual influences, cultural diversity, moral/religious repercussions, global/internationalimpacts, and national security.1In 2000, Smerdon noted that, “Perhaps there is no single factor of greater importance in its effecton engineering education than the internationalization of engineering practice.”2 A recurringtheme Smerdon recognized is that engineers
engineering course instructors implemented thegrading rubric in all technical reports required.This paper presents the learning objectives and grading rubrics and describes the contentmodules developed through this project. The results of the assessment of student learning and ofthe development process are presented as well. Recommendations are made for additionalmodifications to more effectively prepare students to search and use information correctly andappropriately, giving them skills needed to succeed as a student and as an engineering Page 25.534.2professional.2.0 Integrating Information Literacy into the Freshman Engineering CourseThe targeted
the University of Alberta in engineering and is a registered professional engineer with APEGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta). Prior to her career at MacEwan, Shelley worked in industry as a research engineer and a consulting engineer for several years.Dr. Jeffrey A. Davis, Grant MacEwan University Dr Davis obtained his PhD at ETH Zurich specializing in multiphase flows and thermal hydraulics in nuclear reactors. With a passion for teaching, Dr. Davis’ research focuses on pedagogical topics such as student engagement, active learning, and cognitive development. Projects he is currently working on include ”Development of a risk assessment model for the retention of
components with compliant materials andflexible electronics [3]. The research area has several attributes that make it amenable toundergraduate participation. Soft robots can be made from common, low-cost materials [4]. Thenascent field allows for novel contributions from young students. The field is highlyinterdisciplinary, drawing on traditional mechanical and electrical principles to use new materialsfor human-centered, biomedical applications [5]. Students from many disciplinary backgroundscan bring their engineering foundation to the group and contribute in unique ways. Students in years one and two of the ARISE program, have not yet declared anengineering major. Soft robotics allows these students to experience hands-on projects
and Society” isused as a general introduction to the college of engineering, while also addressing socialchallenges and the values of problem solving from a multidisciplinary approach, by using thehuman centered design process. A team project based course, students are presented andencouraged to explore prototyping skills such as solid modeling, basic programming skills,electronics, sensors, data acquisition, power tools, and 3D printing [3]. It was clear that whatever an introductory engineering program’s structure, its success andoverall impact was dependent on the successful integration of multidisciplinary information andprinciples. This is for the intended purposes of providing first year students with the knowledgeto make an informed
some of these concepts, making their transition intosophomore year much more difficult. In order to help better prepare these students, facultymembers at Notre Dame developed a set of videos covering topics that students may needadditional guidance and practice. These videos were released to students before the start of thefall semester and were completely voluntary. This paper will review initial findings from thatrelease and detail some future directions for expanding this project as a first-year to sophomorebridge.In starting this video site, faculty members from a number of first-semester sophomore courses.were asked to provide guidance on what pre-requisite concepts students would need to besuccessful in their classes. In each case, the
students that had been exposedto the music performed much better as compared to students in the control group. This waswidely reported in the media, and led to a frenzy of activity in the media and social policyspheres, including the project to distribute a Mozart cd to every baby born in Georgia2.Subsequently, Davies3 reported a host of other academic benefits to music listening such as“music in the classroom reduces stress, increases productivity, regulates energy, and creates arelaxed supportive learning environment”. Davies also recommended playing songs withlyrics related to the subject being studied, as it led to establishing an enhanced learningatmosphere. Davies included a list of songs arranged by subject that could be used to
cancapitalize on students’ affinity for curiosity. First, recognizing that students are motivated andinterested when they are curious provides impetus to design projects and lessons to start withquestions or require students to ask questions about the topic through the Question FormulationTechnique [14]. In addition, our results showed that students often link Curiosity with the type oflearner they are, with doing hands on work, and trying new things. These relationships alsoprovide opportunities for project design. In the program at Rowan University we make aconcerted effort to engage these pieces of students’ curiosity through the projects in our first-yearengineering course. For example, we have a project during which students design and producetoys
Professorships, two national ASEE teaching awards, and is internationally recognized in his primary research field.Ms. Kristen Strominger, University of Cincinnati - School of Energy, Environmental, Biological and MedicalEngineering Kristen Strominger is the STEM Program Coordinator working under Anant Kukreti on the NSF Type 1 STEP Project in the School of Energy, Environmental, Biological and Medical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Cincinnati (UC). Kristen completed her master’s degree in Higher Education, Student Affairs at Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida previous to beginning her position at UC in July 2012. She plans, designs, evaluates and modifies programs supported by the NSF Type 1 STEP Grant in the
management.Motivated by a successful experience in a general chemistry course, we have implementedworkshops based on the Peer Led Team Learning (PLTL) model that engages every engineeringstudent enrolled in the introductory chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses through aguided-process and inquiry-based strategy utilizing small group settings. For this purpose wereplaced one hour of lecture with a two-hour small-group workshop. Workshops are guided byan advanced undergraduate peer leader who has successfully completed the course with a gradeof A or B. The courses included in this project are pre-calculus, general chemistry 1 and 2,mechanics, and fields and waves. We anticipate that the implementation of PLTL will result inimprovements in learning that
Electrical and Computer Engineering, Queen’s University Page 24.280.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Collaborative cloud-based documents for real-time bi-directional feedback in large lecture activitiesAbstractThis paper presents a pilot project that uses cloud-based documents to provide bi-directional feedbackon open-ended contextualized activities. The course setting is a first year engineering design andprofessional practice course of approximately 700 students, taught in three sections, at Queen’sUniversity, a medium-sized research-intensive
Instrumentation and Web Design-III – Final Project Assigned 7 Circuits and Engineering Math 8 Timers, Flip Flops and other ICS, Exam-II 9 Temperature Satellite and How Things Work Launching Temperature Satellite, Recording, Analyzing Data, and 10 Presentation of Final Project – Plane Flying EndsThis course structure was changed to incorporate the common book “An Inconvenient Truth”DVD, provide two new lectures and two new labs on global warming issues. In addition, thewriting intensive portion was changed to a focus on issues on global warming of interest toengineers. The revised course is presented in Table 2
(2015-2016) I have the privilege of being a Course Assistant for three classes at Stanford: (1) E14: Introduction to Solid Mechanics; (2) BIOE51: Anatomy for Bioengineers; (3) BIOE80: Introduction to Bioengineering and Engineering Living Matter. I also have pleasure of serving as the Safety and Operations Manager at the Volkswagen Automotive Innovation Laboratory, which includes managing the machine shop and teaching students how to use the machinery. In this role I am able to advise and educate students on design choices for their personal and research projects from ideation phases to functional products, with an emphasis on design and manufacturing techniques. c American Society for
(EngE). Studentstransfer from ENGE to eleven degree-granting departments as sophomores. The yearlyenrollment in GE has been about 1300 for the past decade. The department has beenemphasizing a hands-on approach to instruction with design as the central theme since about theyear 2000.2Providing meaningful hands-on experiences to a large number of engineering students is achallenge. Faculty, lab space, and money are always a consideration. Even the mechanics ofadding lab time to the students’ already tight schedules creates an immense hurdle. Thedepartment has been fortunate to receive significant funding support for student projects throughthe generosity of Virginia Tech’s Student Engineers Council (SEC). The SEC has provided thefreshman
eight TAs, 11 different factors regarding time, workload, training format, andtraining content were discussed that they felt either helped or hindered their training experience.Three factors, completing the open-ended project, face-to-face discussions, and face-to-facelecture discussed as main helpful factors. Major hindering factors were too much work and toomuch information.3. Helpful Factors related to TrainingThe completing the open-ended project for the semester was identified to be the most helpfulfactor on training participation, since three TAs (Piper, Gail, and Greg) explicitly discussed thisfactor. Piper mentioned completing an MEA and doing MEA grading prior to face-to-facetraining was helpful. Gail states that completing the MEA