, “Mindfulness, anxiety, and high- stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom,” Conscious. Cogn., vol. 37, pp. 123–132, 2015.[23] R. Senkpeil, Understanding and Improving the Non-cognitive Factors that Affect First- year Engineering Performance. Dissertation, Purdue University, 2018.[24] N. B. Honken and P. Ralston, “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, 2013.[25] C. P. Veenstra, E. L. Dey, and G. D. Herrin, “A model for freshman engineering retention,” Adv. Eng. Educ., 2009.[26] J. Bean and S. B. Eaton, “The Psychology Underlying Successful Retention Practices,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–89
: 0.4Conclusions:The results of this study show that the Mini-Golf design project meets all of the learningobjectives in the minds of students including collaboration with peers, Excel, statistics, andtechnical communication. It is noteworthy that there is a measureable difference in student’sself-reported feelings of comfort with working with their peers. Specifically, two metricsshowed statistically significant improvements related to peer relationships including: (1) thelearning objective metric: To establish a solid relationship with engineering class peers andwork collaboratively and (2) How comfortable to you feel with your class peers? And while astudent’s individual sense of belonging can be evaluated by other metrics as well, this ismeaningful to the
, but predominantly believed that engineering matched 13their interests (41%) or that they were either good at or interested in math, science, computerscience, or problem-solving (30%). Eighteen of these 25 students also responded to the question“If your interests have changed, what did you learn about engineering that changed your mind?”Eleven students (61%) indicated that the work was more difficult than expected and seven students(39%) indicated that they discovered engineering is not what they thought it was and is not thecareer for them. Additionally, 14 of the 25 students who indicated having academic difficulty inboth math and chemistry (56
AC 2008-2281: LIVING WITH THE LAB: A CURRICULUM TO PREPAREFRESHMAN STUDENTS TO MEET THE ATTRIBUTES OF "THE ENGINEER OF2020"David Hall, Louisiana Tech UniversityStan Cronk, Louisiana Tech UniversityPatricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyMark Barker, Louisiana Tech UniversityKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Page 13.855.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Living with the Lab: A Curriculum to Prepare Freshman Students to Meet the Attributes of “The Engineer of 2020”AbstractA project-based, freshman engineering course sequence has been developed and implemented forall new freshman engineering students with support from
Paper ID #23392Bridges and Barriers: A Multi-year Study of Workload-related Learning Ex-periences from Diverse Student and Instructor Perspectives in First-year En-gineering EducationMs. Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto Darlee Gerrard is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. from the University of Toronto, B.Ed. from Brock University, and Masters degree from Memorial University. She coordinates leadership and community outreach programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include STEM
Paper ID #13336A reflection on the process of selecting, developing, and launching a new de-sign project in a large-scale introduction to engineering design courseMr. Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor and Associate Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research Assistant Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes
Education, 2018IntroductionIn 2013, the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan launched the CommonReading Experience (Edington, Holmes Jr., & Reinke, 2015). This program was developed forincoming first-year engineering students with three goals in mind: 1. Students build and develop a sense of community (including a sense of belonging and engineering student identity) 2. Students broaden their thinking about the skills (both technical and non-technical) that they need to be a successful engineer in the 21st century 3. Model intellectual engagementThroughout the history of the Common Reading Experience (CRE), program evaluations havebeen compiled annually. However, to determine if the program was meeting its
Page 25.46.13implied, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.Bibliography1. Phase 1 Report, Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systemic Innovation in Engineering Education.Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education, June 2009. < http://www.asee.org/about-us/the-organization/advisory- committees/CCSSIE/CCSSIEE_Phase1Report_June2009.pdf >.2. Piechota, Thomas C. et al, Project-Based Learning in a Freshman Engineering Course: University – High SchoolPartnership. Las Vegas, Nevada, 2003.< http://faculty.unlv.edu/piechota/proceedings/piechota-asee-psw-2003.pdf >3. Bransford, John D., Ann L.Brown, and Rodney R.Cocking, editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School: Expanded Edition
there was less live attendance in online SI sessions, and somestudents expressed negative feelings about attending SI online [14]. Keeping these pastexperiences with online SI in mind, we explored the effectiveness of our online SI offerings.Study contextFirst-year engineering students entering Northeastern University in September 2020 encountereda profound change in instructional strategy compared to previous years in which all classes wereoffered in-person: during the Fall 2020 semester classes were offered under a hybrid learningmodel in which a limited number of students could attend each class meeting in-person and theremainder would attend only remotely, based in part on student preferences. This study focusedon assessing consequences of
mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify software improvements. Mark has a BSS from
Paper ID #22007Work in Progress: Institutional Context and the Implementation of the Red-shirt in Engineering Model at Six UniversitiesDr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Research Associate at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United States. Emily earned a
Paper ID #6188STEM inSight: Developing a Research Skills Course for First- and Second-Year StudentsDr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational
.[8] D. E. Graff, et al. (ed.), Research and Practice of Active Learning in Engineering Education, Pallas Publication in Leiden University Press, Amsterdam, Nederland, 2005.[9] D. Paulson and J. Faust, “Active Learning for the College Classroom,” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 3-24, 1998.[10] P. Pheeney, “Hands on, minds on: Activities to engage our students,” Science Scope, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 30-33, 1997. Page 23.264.14[11] S. Burd, et al. (ed.), “Virtual Computing Laboratories: A Case Study with Comparisons to Physical Computing Laboratories,” Journal of Information Technology
AC 2010-1265: USE OF METACOGNITION STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTLEARNINGQuamrul Mazumder, University of Michigan - FlintAnita Ainsworth, University of Michigan-Flint Page 15.1306.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Page 15.1306.2Page 15.1306.3Page 15.1306.4Page 15.1306.5Page 15.1306.6Page 15.1306.7[5] Black, M. (1959). Critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experienceand school. (p.20). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.[6] Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbalmaterials, Journal of Educational
major they earned their degree in, as well as how other factorsmay have influenced their completion of their initial declared major.Study ParticipantsAll students enrolled in the first-semester introductory engineering courses in the fall of 2007and 2008 were administered the survey the first day of class. Students who declared majors inany of the engineering fields including those with a declared major of Engineering Undecidedwere required to take the courses. 1559 students completed the survey. Students were told toselect their chosen major on the survey based on what they felt best represented their selection ofmajor at that time in case they declared a major during initial enrollment, but changed (or made-up) their mind over the
the National Academyof Engineering as well as the interdisciplinary nature of engineering. Students were introducedto the design process, and faculty came into the class to talk about their research with twothoughts in mind. The first was to talk about the different kinds of engineers who work on thesame research projects and to identify the role of each major. The second was to address howthey use the design process in their research. Faculty interactions occurred both through labtours and through classroom presentations. The final project for the course was to incorporatethe design concepts discussed in class by designing a new technology that would help solve asmall and focused piece of a grand challenge of their choice. At the
Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Implementing an Industrial Mentoring Program to Enhance Student Motivation and Retention AbstractA new industrial mentor program at our university connects practicing engineers with “FreshmanInterest Groups (FIGs)” of 6-8 students. Far too many talented young minds walk away fromengineering thinking, “I don’t want to work calculus problems in isolation the rest of my life, soI’m changing my major!” Face-time with practicing engineers, we believe, helps dispel manymisconceptions plaguing the future of our profession. In a casual setting, first semester studentscan get answers to questions such as, “What do you actually do? Should I pay attention inCalculus
Paper ID #25985A Qualitative Investigation of Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in a Spa-tial Visualization CourseMrs. Adetoun Yeaman, Virginia Tech Adetoun Yeaman is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). She received her MS degree in 2013 in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering and her BS degree in Biomedical Engineering in 2011, both from Virginia Commonwealth University. She is currently a Graduate Teaching Assistant. Her research interests include empathy, design education, spatial visualization and multimedia learning. Address: Virginia
describe the expected assessments.Research QuestionsIn the 2015-2016 academic year, engineering faculty at the University identified a need to helpstudents prepare for their first engineering courses as sophomores. The ideal solution wouldprovide course preparation by reinforcing background information and introduce topics to becovered in the first few weeks of the fall semester. In addition, the preparation was intended tobe voluntary and accessible to any student who chose to participate. The material is offered at noadditional cost to the students. Students also do not receive academic credit. With this in mind,we identified the summer as an ideal preparation time for students, much like the summer bridgeprograms that exist at many universities
fromgroups typically underrepresented in engineering are still less likely to persist. We seeintroductory-level engineering courses as having the potential to play a critical role atuniversities like ours that serve a large percentage of such students. With this purpose in mind,we redesigned an introductory chemical engineering course at a research university that isminority-serving. Participants included students enrolled in two sections of the original course(n=117) and one section of the redesigned course (n=53). Data include pre/post surveys ofstudent beliefs about design and interviews. We coded student responses and interviews tounderstand how they perceived the original and redesigned course. We conducted a repeatedmeasures ANOVA to examine
Paper ID #11891A First-Year Attrition Survey: Why Do They Say They Are Still Leaving?Mr. Jeff Johnson, LeTourneau University Jeff Johnson is an Assistant Professor at LeTourneau University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology from LeTourneau in 1994 then proceeded to spend 16 years in industry focusing on machine and civil design as well as project management. In 2010 he began his teaching career at his alma mater to share his experiences with engineering and technology students. He earned a masters in Engineering Project Management from Eastern Michigan University in 2014. He is currently a co-PI on
readiness, and itsultimate goal is increasing retention in this population [1], [2]. In addition to cohorting studentsin STEM courses, the GELC program requires students to co-enroll in a learning strategiescourse. The course is designed to develop self-regulatory, academic, and social-psychologicalcompetence for students through its three primary units: Habits of Professionals, Habits ofLearning, and Habits of Mind. An overarching goal of the course is to support students inbecoming successful STEM students and future engineering professionals. While the course is inits fourth iteration, the Fall 2020 semester marks the first use of the LASSI within the learningstrategies course. Our approach went beyond using the LASSI as a measure of
, mentioned gains from the modules and theopportunities to choose their own path through the course. These gains are expressed in terms ofachieving a deeper understanding of engineering and aligning choices to personal values andinterests. Both groups seem to gain a broad perspective of the different areas and dimensions ofengineering, as well as an understanding of the different Immersed Program opportunitiesavailable in the college. This broad perspective appears to support students who feel certainabout their interest by inspiring them to explore beyond their initial ideas and ‘remainopen-minded.’ The students who mention feeling uncertain, find in the array of modules areas ofengineering that appeal to their interests, skills and values, gaining
Paper ID #21161The Effects of Professional Development and Coaching on Teaching PracticesDr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. He also serves as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Academic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering
. Proposed MethodBecause introductory courses affect student retention and success significantly, it is paramount todevelop and implement new and novel teaching techniques that capture student interest, keeptheir attention, and ensure their active participation in the learning process. With this in mind, amulti-week collaborative project model has been developed to engage students from twodifferent universities, one with freshman engineering (Texas A&M University – Kingsville,TAMUK) and the other with engineering technology (Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi,TAMUCC), classes. The purpose of this project model is to create cooperative tasks amongstudents from different classes and universities in an effort to emphasize team and
Paper ID #21999Developing a Coding Rubric for Students’ Spatial Visualization StrategiesMrs. Adetoun Oludara Yeaman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Adetoun Yeaman is a second year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). She received here MS in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering and her BS in Biomedical Engineering both from Virginia Commonwealth University. She is currently a Graduate Research Assistant. In her first year, she taught two semesters of a freshman engineering course series, Foundations of Engineering. Her research
:“I chose the route of meeting with an academic advisor because I don’t feel like I know exactlywhat I would want to do quite yet. I have a general idea that I want to do entrepreneurship orfinance, but I don’t have a specific path in mind.”However, students who chose connecting with a student organization had a clearer idea about themajor/career they wanted to pursue and expressed a desire to explore those interests, whilegaining relevant experience for their future careers. One student said:“I chose this activity because I am interested in mechanical engineering and I wanted to join aproject team that would meet this interest.”Regardless of the chosen activity, many students indicated an interest in making connectionswith mentors and peers
next year.10) Overall, I benefited from being in a major-specific section of ASC 1000.11) I would recommend the General Engineering program to a new, incoming student.12) I would recommend the General Engineering program to a new, incoming student because of the collaboration between EGN 1000 and ASC 1000.13) What, if any, benefits do you feel you received from being enrolled in ASC 1000 with fellow General Engineering majors?14) What topics, if any, do you feel were covered in both EGN 1000 and EGN 1000? (Coverage of topics did not have to occur simultaneously.)15) Keeping the collaboration in mind, what would have been cool to see/do in either class?Questions 4-12 used a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to
Paper ID #25455Impact of a Modeling Intervention in an Introductory Programming CourseDr. Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Kelsey Rodgers is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. She teaches a MATLAB programming course to mostly first-year engineering students. She primarily investigates how students develop mathematical models and computational mod- els. She also conducts research around effective feedback and nanotechnology education. She graduated from the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University with
the course was very successful in increasing students’understanding of and commitment to the engineering andtechnology profession. During the focus group, studentshighlighted both the conventional aspects of ENGR1500 withcomments like “I’m a procrastinator. ENGR1500 really Figure 5. ROV competitionhelped me with time management skills” and “I thought Iwould just come to class and start out slowly. Then they[Career Development Center guest speakers and ENGR1500 faculty] told us that you have tostart thinking about finding mentors and internships and creating a resume….. from the verybeginning”, and the new aspects of the course, “I realized that doing the physical work ofengineering opens the mind,” one student commented. One of his classmates