the quality of institutional management, additional factors have been found thatinfluence students' academic performance in STEM degree programs. For example, Russell& Zafonte [5] report that first-year students have valuable skills that enable them to succeedin their careers, such as critical thinking. Nevertheless, this study argues that studentsconsider writing skills and collaborative work less important for their career development.Regarding those mentioned above, it has been widely documented that university studentsrequire a broad set of skills to be successful in their careers. For example, it has been shownthat collaborative work helps students to promote conceptual learning, developcommunication skills, foster interdependence
Paper ID #37333Work in Progress: Exploring the Use of Faculty and Peer Mentoring as aTool to Support Engineering Transfer Students’ TransitionDr. Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the
socially constructed nature of identity in the threeoverlapping dimensions of competence, performance, and recognition. Hazari et al. [14] thenbuilt upon the framework from Carlone and Johnson [13] by adding interest to physics identitydrawn from Social-Cognitive Career Theory [15]. These dimensions were defined as “(i) interest(personal desire to learn/understand more physics and voluntary activities in this area), (ii)competence (belief in ability to understand physics content), (iii) performance (belief in ability toperform required physics tasks), and (iv) recognition (being recognized by others as a physicsperson).” Godwin et al. completed a structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis of engineeringidentity to predict choice of
university courses, regardless of the academic major, could play a significant role insolidifying the career preparedness, academic motivation, persistence, and foundationalprofessional skills of undergraduate students to satisfactorily navigate their academic programsand professional careers [2] [3]. Given the evidence-based research on the impact ofinterventions that support undergraduate students’ persistence and academic success, thecurriculum design of an introductory course in Leadership and Engineering Education programwas modified in this study. This study reports the impact of professional competency workshopsand peer-to-peer mentorship to transform the first-year experience of our engineering students.The Center for Research in Engineering
their work on public welfare and society,especially in the context of creating a more equitable and inclusive society. Recent research hasshown that student interest and commitment to social responsibility declines as students’progress through their academic career [2] [17]. Furthermore, although the majority ofengineering curriculum includes considerable and meaningful ethics education, it often excludesdiscussion and connection to larger societal issues and social justice content [18].The importance of social justice has been echoed by many engineering organizations,corporations, and businesses through their mission statements, core values, diversitycommitments, and strategic initiatives. ABET has recently revised their criteria for
Paper ID #38553WIP Striving towards Equitable Team Dynamics in First-Year EngineeringDesignDr. Evelyn Walters, Temple University Associate Professor of InstructionCory Budischak, Temple University Cory is a teacher and researcher who strives to reduce the harmful effects of energy production and use. Teaching has always been his central passion. He started as a group tutor in college, which led him to his full time career as an Assistant Professor ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Striving towards Equitable Team Dynamics in First-Year
.091engineering research.I feel included by people who conduct .688 .187 -.031engineering research.My parents and relatives see me as someone who .747 .156 .249can become an engineering researcher.My teachers and mentors see me as someone .840 .149 .168who can become an engineering researcher.My friends see me as someone who can become .761 .135 .256an engineering researcher.Doing research aligns with your cultural values. .175 .058 .923A career in research with your cultural values. .209 .039 .916Use academic literature to understand an .170 .833 .124engineering research project.Generate an engineering
,expectations of workload in engineering undergraduate classes, process of choosing anengineering major, extent of career exploration, and influence from role models. From thissurvey instrument, four statements were sampled to measure perceived competence, three forengineering intrinsic value, four for belonging, and one survey statement for self-efficacy.The Pittsburg Freshman Engineering Attitudes Survey (PFEAS) was designed to assess and trackthe abilities and attitudes of engineering freshmen [13]. It measures several aspects of students’attitudes including their expectations of the engineering profession. For the purposes of thissorting procedure, 8 survey statements were sampled to assess engineering intrinsic value.In an evaluation of students
Belonging and Peer LeadershipAbstractThis Complete Research paper describes efforts to support students entering an undergraduateelectrical and computer engineering (ECE) program from diversified matriculation pathwaysthrough a peer mentoring program embedded in the first-year curriculum. The myriad entrypoints to this specific engineering program (changes in major, transfers, career changes, stop-outs, etc.) punctuate that first-year-in-engineering may not be synonymous with first-time-in-college. As enrollment patterns continue to change across higher education, it is imperative thatengineering programs are prepared to support students and the variety experiences and needsthey bring to the classroom. In this work, we
of 2023, and the total number of students who havedropped out of the program by the end of the third semester were considered. This researchwill provide the basis for developing models that facilitate identifying factors that may have ahigh impact on student dropout upon entering the School of Engineering. This allows for earlydetection of student groups that may be prone to dropout, enabling intervention to supportstudents according to their specific needs, whether financial, employment, study methodologyactivities, or career guidance.The methodology implemented for developing the predictive model is detailed in thesubsequent sections. Section II comprehensively describes the procedures, data analysistechniques, and criteria for
college-level academics, study habits, and evensocial challenges [2], [3]. In these situations, students seek out informal peer advising fromfriends and upper-class students at their institution. [2]. Informal peer-to-peer advising occursacross campus: in the residence and dining halls, in classrooms, or even at the gym. Sometimes,this informal advising provides students with incorrect information or a false sense of security,which eventually adds stress and struggle to their academic career [4].Official peer advising programs are comprised of students who have received formal training,ensuring that information is accurate and resource referrals are appropriate. These programs arealso supervised by professional academic advisers, adding an extra
Rubric (See Figure 3). As a formative assessment tool, the final 1-6 rating thatstudents assigned themselves was less important than the concrete references they made to whatthey had done during the semester that supported their ratings.Figure 3. Composite self-ratings with evidence of beginner vs informed design thinking The use of design thinking in career planning (see [20]) was emphasized at various pointsof the course, and used as a transfer task [15] where students used similar practices to solveanother ill-defined, open-ended problem. For instance, problem framing was likened to choosinga major in engineering or other field in college. Connections were made to the Friday lectureswhen they focused on different engineering careers
in theIntroduction to Engineering I course to all students. Therefore, the students who are not in thehonors section also got a chance to get introduced to the LinkedIn Learning platform and have acertificate they can display on their LinkedIn account. Also, we partner with the College ofEngineering career services in spring semester during Introduction to Engineering II classes toemphasize professionalism. This includes developing a resume, updating LinkedIn account, anduniversity’s career connections account, and participating in mock interviews.Results and DiscussionIn Fall 2023, 185 honors first-year engineering students enrolled in Honors Introduction toEngineering I course and were required to complete the LinkedIn Learning pathway
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education focuses oneducating future generations to be successful in their professions. A decline in STEMproficiency has been reported in America, leading to significant regression from its position asa global leader in math and science. Debbie Myers, general manager of DiscoveryCommunications in STEM Diversity Symposium concluded: "International comparisons placethe U.S. in the middle of the pack globally." For the United States to achieve a competitiveadvantage, there is a need to encourage young people to develop a passion for learning andspecifically encourage minorities and females to pursue STEM careers [1]. Another report named "Rising above the Gathering Storm" indicated that the U.S. is
-understanding and promoting “understandingof the appeal of academic and career options indicated as congruent by interest measures” [2, 3].For these reasons, it is common for employers to use these types of tests for pre-employmentassessment, team-building, personal development, and coaching [4]. The Jung Typology Test™(JTT) is a free version of the test that is “based on Carl Jung’s and Isabel Briggs Myers’personality type theory” [5].Given the applicability and reliability of strength and personality assessments for personalunderstanding and development, this study aims to investigate two research questions: 1) Is therea significant relationship between the students’ strengths or personality types and the engineeringdiscipline they choose to pursue
undergraduate researcher at the Clemson University Institute for Engaged Aging. Here, she works under the SHARRP Lab’s Dr. Lesley Ross and Dr. Christine Phillips on studies involving healthy aging. Outside of research, she works as a certified nursing assistant and is currently training to be a registered behavioral technician in order to perform ABA therapy for children diagnosed with Autism. As a student hoping to pursue a future career in the medical field she enjoys being able to see how these studies directly affect those who participate in them. She believes that seeing participants take something new away from a research study is a reward in and of itself. After graduation from Clemson, she plans to attend medical
activities and interaction with peers, instructors, and academic advisors, on 4-point Likert-type scale from not at all to 5 or more times. • FYS objectives on 5-point Likert-type scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree; and changes in confidence and motivation in educational and career areas on 5-point Likert- type scale from decreased greatly to increased greatly. • Pre- and post-FYS major choice.Non-Student Stakeholder SurveyA short survey about the current and future options for FYS courses was administered to 38 COEnon-student stakeholders identified by the Penn State’s COE Taskforce on First-YearEngagement. Specially, stakeholders were asked about their initial thoughts regarding convertingthe current 1
Paper ID #37973Use of Transfer Student Capital in Engineering and STEM Education: ASystematic Literature ReviewDr. Kristin Kelly Frady, Clemson University Kristin Frady is an Assistant Professor at Clemson University jointly appointed between the Educational and Organizational Leadership Development and Engineering and Science Education Departments. Her research focuses on innovations in workforce development at educational and career transitions. The context of her research emphasizes three primary areas, specifically focusing on two-year college and secondary STEM and career education, educational innovations, and the
include encouraginglab assistants to attend engineering outreach events, and setting up one-on-one mentorshipsessions between experienced staff members and new hires. The lab also promotes collaborativeproblem-solving and peer-to-peer learning through team projects, which gives all the labassistants a chance at project management. By providing these opportunities, the makerspace isable to drive innovation and create a dynamic and thriving team of staff members.The Engineering Lab Team Lead ObjectivesThe Engineering Lab Team Lead for “program name retracted” at the College of Engineering isan exceptional career development position for a motivated undergraduate student interested indeveloping leadership skills in lab and personnel management. The
throughout the process. A previous assignment designed for thesepurposes required students to research teamwork and write a 5-page essay on it during the firstfew weeks of their college career. This assignment failed to convey the true importance ofteamwork skills and the relevance to their own teaming situation, resulting in the sense that itwas only busy work assigned to satisfy the general education requirement. The main objectivesof the new assignment are to improve both cognition, or the core mental processes required forproductive teamwork, and metacognition which involves empowering individuals and teams tomonitor, evaluate, and adjust their cognitive strategies; the result ultimately contributing to thedevelopment of effective team skills
from low-socioeconomic backgrounds leave the engineering pipeline at higher rates than their majoritypeers [5]. Reasons that these students report leaving engineering often include poor performancein introductory coursework [6], negative experiences with faculty [7], a poor sense of fit [8], andgenerally unwelcoming environments in their schools of engineering [9]. Conversely, whenunderrepresented students experience social support, encounter role models [10], and receiveassistance navigating the engineering curriculum [11], they experience positive engineering-related outcomes. One way to provide these beneficial layers of support for students who areearly in their academic careers is through the implementation of formalized peer mentoring
and money management, and actively participatedin the financial literacy course implemented for the introductory engineering class.IntroductionA solid working knowledge in financial literacy is a critical factor in students’ success, especially forunderrepresented minority (URM) students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)disciplines (see examples, [1] thru [4]). This is particularly important with the recent impacts of thepandemic on the national economy, the changing landscape of the job market, as well as the globaleconomic crisis. Students’ financial literacy will help them make sound decisions to succeed professionallyin their career paths. Unfortunately, traditional university curricula do not expose students
]. Metacognitive and self-regulation strategies can help students be moreeffective learners. The affective element of learning refers to student attitudes and mindsets thatcan influence their thinking and behaviors, ultimately impacting their learning and academicperformance.Learning and persistence in higher education, and engineering education specifically, areinfluenced by many internal and external factors [5], [6], [7]. For example, Geisinger and Raman[7] identify six factors driving students to leave engineering: classroom and academic climate,grades and conceptual understanding, self-efficacy and self-confidence, high school preparation,interest and career goals, and race and gender. The first three items are fundamental to theclassroom experience
betweenengineering and other majors can leave students inadequately prepared for their careers, whenthey will be working with others from a variety of backgrounds.A culture of “engineering for everyone” can help bridge that gap. This idea has beenimplemented in various forms at other universities. The University of Dayton developed anengineering course, “Technology and the Engineering Method for Non-Engineering Students”,that introduced non-engineering students to engineering tools and methods [5]. It fulfilled ageneral engineering requirement but only for non-engineering students. Miami University tookthis concept one step further by implementing a series of general education courses that attractedboth engineering and non-engineering students [6]. These
Technology Program for 2018-19 and 2022-23. Dr. Johnson was the recipient of a 2001 U.S. National Science Foundation ”Early Faculty Career Devel- opment (CAREER) Award,” the Junior Research Prize and Medal from the International Association for Structural Safety and Reliability (2005), and an Outstanding Recent Alumnus Award (2003) and a Dis- tinguished Alumni Award (2016) from the University of Illinois. He is a senior member of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), and a member of both the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Dr. Johnson has served as the Chair of the ASCE EMI Technical Committee on Structural Health Monitoring and
’ success, including the challengesassociated with adapting to a new campus environment and the potential loss of academic creditsduring the transfer process. Conversely, alternative studies indicate that transfer students whoeffectively integrate into their new educational environment, receive appropriate support, andpossess well-defined academic and career objectives can achieve similar, if not superior, levels ofretention and academic success in comparison to traditional students.Peer mentoring presents an invaluable opportunity for first-year engineering students to establisha meaningful connection with experienced upperclassmen who can provide guidance onnavigating the challenges associated with coursework and the adjustments encountered
when a mentor and a mentee are atapproximately at the same level of their personal, professional, or academic path [1], [2], [5], [6].Peer mentorship has been shown to introduce a level of reciprocity, mutuality, and interpersonalcomfort that may not be available in traditional mentorships, allowing for trust and credibility tobe built in the two-way relationship [1], [2], [5]–[7]. This is due in part to their developmentalneeds, whether that is in career or academic aspects, unfolding at similar times [6]. Identity,belonging, student experience, and emotional competency have all been shown to haveimprovements when in a positive peer mentorship as well as increased retention, particularly forthose who are underrepresented or in the first year
times during the term: Goal Setting, Student Involvement Fair, Mid-terms, End of Semester 2. Faculty Interview: each student selects a faculty member in area of interest to interview and present to the class 3. Advising Portfolio: review core curriculum and create a list of potential courses for the next term 4. Career Exploration and Alumni Field of Interest Interview: complete a career/interests inventory and conduct a group interview with an alumni who works in a field of potential interest 5. My Improvement/Implementation Plan: review and reflect on the first semester, explore two possible majors and two possible career area of interests and lay out future plan for improvement and explorationWith
self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 8, no. 1, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40561-021-00168- 5.[19] L. Carroll, C. Finelli, and S. DesJardins, “Academic Success of College Students with ADHD: The First Year of College,” Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, Feb. 2022[20] S. Qiu et al., “‘All Together Now’ - Integrating Horizontal Skills in Career Technical Education Classes with Making and Micromanufacturing,” in American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/all-together- now-integrating-horizontal-skills-in
scholarship program. The project builds on prior research suggesting thataffective factors including sense of belonging, identity, and self-efficacy play important yet notfully understood roles in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’academic persistence and successful progression toward careers, and that these factors can proveparticularly influential for individuals from groups that have been historically marginalized inSTEM [1]-[6]. Prior studies conducted as part of this research project have demonstrated impactsof Scholars’ math-related experiences on their developing identities [7] and found that structuresassociated with the scholarship program helped support Scholars’ developing sense of belongingdespite the shift