engineering subdiscipline, identifying a relevant physicalconcept, and designing a lab activity to test that concept—will hopefully facilitate the process ofsyllabus creation.References[1] S. F. Freeman, C. Pfluger, R. Whalen, K. S. Grahame, J. L. Hertz, C. Variawa, J. O. Love, M. L. Sivak and B. Maheswaran, "Cranking Up Cornerstone: Lessons Learned from Implementing a Pilot with First-Year Engineering Students," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, 2016.[2] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.[3] L. Santiago, "Retention in a First Year Program: Factors Influencing Student Interest in Engineering," in ASEE Annual Conference and
/43551172.[4] R. V. Adams, and E. Blair, “Impact of time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, Jan. 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824506.[5] C. Engstrom and V. Tinto, “Access without Support Is Not Opportunity,” Change, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 46-50, Feb. 2008. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40178285.[6] B. Verplanken, and S. Orbell, “Attitudes, Habits, and Behavior Change,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 73:327-352, pp. 327-352, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- psych-020821-011744.Appendix IThe following subsections outline different sections and their purpose and provide a visualreference.Yearly and Weekly Overview
, R1institution. All three sections had different instructors and a class size of around 50 students. One of thethree sections implemented a technology that allowed students to connect to a teammate’s computer andshare control of keyboard/mouse, enabling real-time collaborative programming in a normallyindividual programming environment. The other two sections were control sections with no specificimplementation differences. A survey instrument grounded in Burch et al.’s conceptual framework wasdeveloped and distributed at strategic times to measure students’ engagement with their team and in-class programming tasks. Results presented include a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) that supportsthe factor structure of the student engagement survey and an
Paper ID #38510First-year Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging: Impact of COVID-19and Efficacy as a Predictor of GraduationBreanna Graven, University of Louisville PhD candidate in curriculum and instruction with focus on informal science education. Graduate research assistant for the First-Year Engineering department studying ways to improve student retention.Dr. Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the
,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 90–115, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615.[2] P.-S. Seow, G. Pan, and G. Koh, “Examining an experiential learning approach to prepare students for the volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) work environment,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 62–76, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.001.[3] H. Nolte and C. McComb, “The cognitive experience of engineering design: an examination of first-year student stress across principal activities of the engineering design process,” Design Science, vol. 7, p. e3, ed 2021, doi: 10.1017/dsj.2020.32.[4] A. Saterbak, T. Volz, and M. Wettergreen, “Implementing and Assessing
/writing/guides/engineer/Monash University LearnHQ. (2022) Engineering: Technical Report.https://www.monash.edu/learnhq/write- like-a-pro/annotated-assessment-samples/engineering/engineering-technical-reportParadis, J.G. & Zimmerman, M.L. (2002). The MIT guide to science and engineeringcommunication (2nd ed.). MIT Press.Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). Writing in Engineering.https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_engineering/index.htmlReynolds, J. & Vogel, S. (2007). Precisely! A Writing Exercise for Science and EngineeringClasses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 30–33. 8Rosenberg, B. (2005). Spring into
. FPD 6: Course Content and Educational Strategies, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 15-18, 2014. Indianapolis IN, USA.[5] C. L. Dym et al., "Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 103-120, 2005.[6] S. A. Ambrose and C. H. Amon, "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, pp. 173-181, 1997.[7] L. Gentiles, L. Caudill, M. Fetea, et al. "Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries in the First Year: A New Introductory Integrated Science Course for STEM Majors." Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 41, pp. 44-50, 2012.[8
. Web Accessed 3/24/24.[3] B. Kort, R. Reilly, and R.W. Picard. “An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion.” In Proceedings IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies. pp. 43-46, August 2001.[4] J. Borders, G. Klein and R. Besuijen. “An operational account of mental models: A pilot study.” In the International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making. 2019[5] Y-Y. Tan and S-L. Yang. “Assessing student calculus learning using the Mental Model Matrix.” Poster presented at the AAC&U Conference on General Education, Pedagogy, and Assessment From Reflection to Imagination: Making Excellence the “NEW Normal”, San Diego
theCATME evaluation (13% in each year). However, all enrolled students were included in thestudy as CATME ratings from their teammates were still available.Description of teamwork assignmentsStudents were placed into teams of 4-5 members based on responses to the CATME teamformation survey. For the first team project, each team chose one of the 14 Engineering GrandChallenges [8] and were tasked with researching the challenge. The purpose of the project was toinvestigate the societal problem(s) the Challenge seeks to address and to identify recentengineering advances that address their chosen Challenge. Teams were instructed to create awritten report and a short (3-4 min) video to share their findings with the rest of the class.In Fall 2022, the
experience with an interdisciplinary focus or takecourse(s) relating to a grand challenge theme (sustainability, security, health, or joy of living)[17].c. EntrepreneurshipGrand challenges scholars are capable of translating inventions and innovations into marketventures and future global solutions to benefit the public interest and private citizens. Thescholars must take advantage of approved entrepreneurial experiences or internships withsignificant entrepreneurial focus to complete this competency. Undergraduate researchexperiences with an entrepreneurial focus or course(s) focusing on entrepreneurship also satisfythis requirement. Scholars may choose to focus their research on this competency and presenttheir entrepreneurship research findings
of American College Health, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 165-173, 2000.[12] I. Prilleltensky, et al., "Assessing Multidimensional Well-Being: Development and Validation of the ICOPPE Scale," Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 199-226, 2015.[13] C. Esposito, et al., "The I COPPE Scale Short Form for measuring multidimensional well- being: Construct validity and reliability from US, Argentinian, and Italian large samples," Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 696-711, 2022.[14] D.S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, "Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed," Educational Psychologist, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 302-314, 2012
college and engineering graduation rates”,2022 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings[3] Sirhan, Ghassan. "Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview." (2007).[4] Collura, M. A., & Ciston, S., & Savage, N. O. (2011, June). “Effect of Freshman Chemistryon Student Performance in Sophomore Engineering Courses”. Paper presented at 2011 AnnualConference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC.[5] Zahner, Doris, Lisa M. Ramsaran, and Jeffrey T. Steedle. "Comparing alternatives in theprediction of college success." Annual Meeting of the American Educational ResearchAssociation, Vancouver, Canada. 2012.[6] Tucker, Leslie, and Oscar McKnight. "Assessing the validity of college success indicators forthe at-risk student: Toward developing a best-practice
code. In MATLAB with theimage processing toolbox loaded, that command is imshow(imagename) where “imshow” is thetoolbox command and “imagename” is the variable storing the data for the image that is loadedinto the MATLAB workspace.The first step in developing a method to separate background from object(s) of interest is to lookat the pixel values of different areas in an image. The imtool(imagename) in MATLABproduces an interactive version of the image that lets students see the values for the RGB (RedGreen Blue) levels as well as the X and Y coordinates of a pixel in the image. The figure belowshows an example image using imtool.Figure 2: An image of a glass of colored water against a white background. Using theimtool() command in MATLAB, the
motivation: Connections between first‐yearstudents' engineering role identities and future‐time perspectives," J Eng Educ, vol. 109, (3), pp.362-383, 2020.[13] D. Rae and D. E. Melton, "Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineeringeducation: an international view of the KEEN project," The Journal of EngineeringEntrepreneurship, vol. 7, (3), 2017.[14] J. Blake Hylton et al, "Working to instill the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum,"Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, (1), pp. 86-106, 2020.[15] R. S. Harichandran et al, "Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering StudentsUsing Integrated E-Learning Modules." Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, (1), pp. n1,2018.[16] D. R. Riley et al, "First-year
model to prepare students for interdisciplinary collaborationbetween engineers and other professionals.References[1] Raju, P.K., and Sankar, C. “Introduction To Engineering Through Real World Case Studies”. In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. Conference Proceedings, 2006. https://strategy.asee.org/671, retrieved on February 5, 2024.[2] Daniels, J., Sanlillan, S.T., and Saterbak, A., “Tracking skills development and self- efficacy in a new first-year engineering design course.” In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018. 8[3] Rippon, S., Collofello, J., and Hammond
interventions could be a useful considerationfor similar first-year introductions. The limitations of this study include the lack of a controlsemester before the interventions were introduced. Future research on additional coursesperforming the pre and post surveys in a semester with and without the design interventionwould help to identify the direct impact of the design interventions. References[1] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, (2010). “Measuring Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x[2] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and Leifer, L. J. (2005). “Engineering design
://www.suitable.co/products/guided-pathways (accessed 14 January 2024).[2] “Möbius MAA Placement Test Suite by DigitalEd”, Mathematical Association of America,https://maa.org/node/259 (accessed 14 January 2024).[3] J.L.M. Wilkins, B.D. Bowen, and S. B. Mullins, “First mathematics course in college andgraduating in engineering: Dispelling the myth that beginning in higher-level mathematicscourses is always a good thing”, Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 110, Issue 3,https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20411, 2021.[4] Daniel W. Knight, D.W., L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Staying in Engineering: Impact ofa Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention”, Proceedings of the2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual