Wakabayashi, Bucknell University Kat received his bachelor of science in both chemical engineering and materials science and engineering from University of Pennsylvania, and he has a PhD in chemical and materials engineering from Princeton University. After a Postdoc position with John TDr. Kelly Salyards P.E., Bucknell University Dr. Salyards is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Bushnell University. She has BAE, MAE, and PhD degrees in Architectural Engineering from The Penn- sylvania State University. She joined Bushnell in 2007 and ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Integration of ethics in sustainability in a first-year
Paper ID #39493Work in Progress: Development of an Integrated Place-Based LearningCommunity for First-Year Precalculus-Level Engineering StudentsProf. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl serves as professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College in northwest Washington state. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been an active member of ASEE since 2001. He was the recipient of the 2008 Pacific Northwest Section Outstanding Teaching Award and currently
Paper ID #37596Work in Progress: Integrating Engineering Design Projects into EarlyCurricular Courses at a Hispanic-serving InstitutionDr. David Hicks, Texas A&M University-Kingsville David Hicks is an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Before joining TAMU-K he served as Associate Professor and Department Head at Aalborg University in Esbjerg, Denmark. He has also held positions in research labs in the U.S. as well as Europe, and spent time as a researcher in the software industry.Dr. Michael Preuss, Exquiri Consulting, LLC Michael
produce them. Dr. Newell is a passionate instructor working on integrated systems thinking in course design and outreach-based student projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Analysis of Student Motivation in an Introductory Engineering Technology Gateway CourseAbstract Student motivation has a large impact on information retention levels and overall studentlearning. Previous studies have demonstrated the higher a student’s intrinsic motivation, themore successful the student will be in the learning process. At the post-secondary level, studentinterest is often tied to expected career pathways and outcomes. This work explores studentmotivation in
are prepared to work in ourincreasingly global society [10]. A characteristic that describes global engineers is their ability totranslate engineering work to a business context which can be done with an EM.The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) is here to meet this need. KEEN is apartnership of engineering faculty across the nation dedicated to integrating the EM intoengineering coursework [11]. Within KEEN, an EM is achieved through Entrepreneurial MindedLearning (EML) and applies what are known as the 3Cs: Curiosity, Connections, and CreatingValue. Since joining KEEN in 2017, The Ohio State University College of Engineering hasintegrated EML into the standard and honors course sequences of its First-Year EngineeringProgram
Paper ID #39098Data-driven Strategy for Maintaining an Effective Team Collaboration ina First-year Engineering CourseDr. Rui Li, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Dr. Rui Li earned his Master’s degree in Chemical Engineering in 2009 from Imperial College of London and his Ph.D in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2020 from the University of Georgia, College of Engineering. He is currently an industrial assistant professor, who works in General Engineering program at New York University. He taught first-year engineering course as well as vertically integrated project. He has strong interests in
Hopkins. K. Hands-On Design Activities for Introduction to Engineering Courses to Accommodate Students of Varying Backgrounds; ASEE 2022 17. Aurand, J. and Adolson,D. “Ten Years and Ten Lessons Learned: Design of an Introduction to Engineering Course in a Nascent School of Engineering’ ASEE 2021. 18. Quallen, M., Crepeau, J., Will,B., Beyerlein,S. and J. Peterson “Transforming Introductory Engineering Courses to Match GenZ Learning Styles’ ; ASEE 2021. 19. McNeil, J. and Thompson, A. Enhancing Curriculum in a First-Year Introduction to Engineering Course to Assist Students in Choice of Major”, 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; New Orleans, July 2016. 20. Birch,D.; Integrating MS Excel in Engineering Technology
Paper ID #38521The Evolution of an Interdisciplinary Case-Based Learning First-YearCourseDr. Rea Lavi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Rea Lavi, PhD, is lecturer and a curriculum designer with the New Engineering Education Transformation program and with the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and with the, both in the School of Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA. He also advises the MIT Abdul Latif Jameel World Education Lab on educational projects. Dr. Lavi teaches a case-based course open to all first-year students at MIT on approaches for tackling
participation in engineering byopening up more perspectives of what is engineering using diverse contexts.References[1] M. Knight and C. Cunningham, “Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a Tool to Investigate Students’ Ideas about Engineers and Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2004.[2] L. Berthoud, S. Lancastle, M. A. Gilbertson, and M. Gilbertson, “Designing a resilient curriculum for a joint engineering first year,” in Annual Conference Proceedings for the 2021 European Society for Engineering Education, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361461385[3] J. R. Morelock, “A systematic
the United States. For instance, the PENG Instructional and Outreach Program (Pre-IOP) was developed to increase the number of skilled high-tech professionals, particularly among historically underrepresented groups (minorities and women). A thorough communication campaign promoting the benefits of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) introduced a PENG curriculum in middle and high schools to achieve this goal [20]. The integrated Teaching and Learning (ITL) Program at the University of Colorado at Boulder created a PENG outreach program for K–12 instructors and students to inspire students about the benefits of PENG topics. Program effectiveness was evaluated based onparticipants' feedback, long-term
engineering. This way ofteaching has changed my opinion because I have learned that there is much more to engineeringthan just doing what you are told to do.”“It exposed me to a broader mentality.”“This experience has really opened up my view of how things are designed and the thought ofadvancements in this world.”“Learning about the interdisciplinary approach of integrating the entrepreneurial mindset,STEAM, and bio-inspired design showed me very interesting aspects of engineering that I neverreally thought of.”“Where once I would have seen just an ordinary object, I now find myself looking for where theinspiration could have come from.”“This newly developed curriculum has changed many things in my path in life.”“I started to think about things in a
comparisons in STEM education.Miriam Marie Sanders, Texas A&M University Miriam Sanders is a PhD student studying Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Mathematics Education at Texas A&M University. Through her research she seeks to address issues of equity and diversity in STEM education with a focus in mathematicsAaron E. Kidd, Texas A&M University Aaron Kidd is a doctoral candidate at Texas A&M University and the Program Coordinator for an NSF grant-funded program in the Department of Integrative Biology at Oklahoma State University. His re- search interests revolve around teacher-specific behaviors that drive science instruction and the prepara- tion of new science teachers to integrate such
course are taking Calculus I for the first time, so integration islikely a relatively new topic, and performing numerical integration in a spreadsheet is a new skillrequiring transfer of knowledge from a math course to an engineering course.Based solely on fraction correct, additional statistical analysis generally confirms the division ofsections into three categories. Performing ANOVA to compare sections within a single categoryshows statistical similarity for both General Skills (F(5, 2496) = 1.2, p = 0.29) and Functions(F(3, 1566) = 2.2, p = 0.09). Thus, the challenge activities within these categories can be inferredto have the same average difficulty. On the contrary, the four sections deemed Advanced Skillsshowed varying fraction correct
Paper ID #38624First-Year Students in Experiential Learning in Engineering Education:A Systematic Literature ReviewDr. Gerald Tembrevilla, Mount Saint Vincent University Gerald Tembrevilla obtained his PhD in science (physics) education at the University of British Columbia. He served as a postdoctoral fellow in the Faculty of Engineering at McMaster University. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor at Mount Saint Vincent University in Halifax, Canada and teaching and doing research on 1.) the integration of learning technologies to improve hands-on science, scientific argumentation skills, and 2.) examining the
caused different levels of EM understanding by students, separate from the standardizedcourse curriculum. Our use of the verbiage “Engineering Mindset” in the assignment prompt alsopresents a limitation in that it differs from the verbiage that is explicitly used in KEEN’s EMLframework, thus limiting this work’s direct integration with other EM concept map studies in theliterature.Assessing EM depends on more facets than those of just the classroom. Students who attend ouruniversity have diverse backgrounds, coming from different races, genders, socioeconomicbackgrounds, and different levels of high school preparation. As a result, a generalized plan fordeveloping an EM could result in certain groups missing out on some of the proposed benefits
engineering courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Lessons Learned: Implementing Equitable Teaming Practices in first-year GE CoursesBackground and MotivationAspiring engineering students at Virginia Tech initially enroll in a General Engineering programduring their first year of the curriculum. In this program, students are expected to develop, alongwith other skills, professional teamwork strategies in an engineering setting through asemester-long team project. These types of team projects have been shown to influence students'sense of belonging as they begin their studies, something that can be a factor in retention andsuccess in an engineering program. Many instructors
world.ePortfolios have become more prevalent in higher education as a tool to encourage studentreflection across all aspects of their lives [16]–[18]. A campus-level platform allows universitiesto support and integrate reflection at different levels: individual course assignments, curriculum-wide reflection, and inclusion of other university experiences, such as athletics, career services,and student organizations. This multilevel integration is crucial for achieving the full benefits ofreflection in education [19]. The use of digital platforms may enable new kinds of reflectivethinking [20] as students creatively curate different media types, including text, images, video,concept maps, and social media. Students develop their ability to integrate a
from OSU in Electrical and Computer Engineering with research focus in integrated nonlinear optics. His engineering education research interests include Teaching Assistants (TAs), first-year engineering, systematic literature reviews, personality theory, and instrument validation. As a TA he has taught first- year engineering for 10 years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 GIFTS: Exploration Activities for Just-in-Time Learning in a First-Year Engineering Robotics Design-Build Project Abstract This GIFTS paper will provide an example of how Just-in-Time (JIT) learning can be used as a technique in a first-year
professor of engineering and a professor ofcommunication, working in tandem to provide comprehensive, industry-reflective designexperience to students over the course of a year. In the course students work in teams to deliverprogress reports and presentations on a design they formulate and build at facilities available oncampus. Their progress presentations and reports are modeled after those seen in industry.In Fall of 2021 two of this paper’s authors sought to mirror this paired instruction in the students’first year. They created a “cornerstone” course by combining an early curriculum CAD designcourse, EGR 201, with a technical writing course, COM 221 [1]. The two courses werescheduled back to back on MWF, which created a 2 hour and 40-minute
the new curriculum on student understanding of social justice and students’ perceptionof the relevance of social justice to the profession. Student evaluations and written reflectionswere also examined to gauge how students perceived the integration of social justice into anintroductory engineering course. Survey results indicate that student awareness of the relevanceof social justice to the engineering profession increased over the course of the quarter. Inaddition, findings indicate an increase in understanding of social justice concepts along with anincrease in ability to identify social injustice. As seen through course evaluations and writtenreflections, student response to the course has been positive and most students are receptive
Engineering Ethics for First Year Engineering StudentsThis Work-in-Progress paper stems from an NSF-sponsored project in which a series of game-based activities have been developed for the purpose of enhancing instruction in engineeringethics. These activities have been integrated into first year engineering courses on severalcampuses. One of these activities is called Toxic Workplaces. In gameplay, the students arepresented with scenarios that involve ethical dilemmas. Each scenario comes with severalpossible responses. The game involves the student/player attempting to rank these possibleresponses in order of popularity. Thus, players do not necessarily need to take a position on whatthey themselves would do, but rather are attempting to match the
some of the desired changesto the schedule and curriculum lagged, such as the integration of multiple disciplines into thiscommon first-year plan, they did introduce methods of grouping students together to allow themto familiarize themselves with their peers and build relationships [3]. An example is the conceptof block scheduling, where students would register for defined set of classes, meaning theywould consistently be surrounded by their peers taking the same courses. While they did alsoprovide non-blocked schedule options for non-traditional students, the focus on building peer-to-peer relationships was more heavily emphasized on the block-scheduled courses [3]. Studentscould be introduced to topics in a more comfortable and familiar
explanations about how it canbe adapted to self-referent domains of an individual is discussed. The distinctions between theterms posed in this study are then used to identify which sub-constructs are most pertinent formeasuring self-concept in engineering education.Identifying the variables (sub-constructs) within self-concept has beneficial applications in first-year engineering education due to the noted levels of attrition in the first two years of anengineering curriculum [6]. Building a scale and consequent interventions to influence those sub-constructs will help improve student retention due to the direct relation of self-concept withacademic achievement; less importantly in terms of high grades but more so as an activecontributor to human
it’s viewed as being integral tothe success of the course, in that an assignment must be accessible, engaging, challenging onlywith respect to the material it is intended to teach, and be worthy of the time and effort invested[3]. Additionally, a 2001 study on factors contributing to the success of students in introductorycomputer science courses concluded that the best predictor of success was the students’ comfortlevel and recommended that instructors should provide a welcoming environment [4]. A 2017literature review on students’ misconceptions in introductory programming provides an additionalperspective: that an ability to apply effective instructional approaches and tools in addressingstudents’ difficulties is vital to successfully
startingpoint, we have conducted a series of in-depth interviews with UMAs to explore their individualexperiences, the mentorship phenomenon, and makerspace community formation.References[1] M. Cooke et al., “Models for curricular integration of higher education makerspaces,” in Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Academic Makerspaces, 2018, 22 pp. 1-12.[2] J. E. McMordie, M. D. Kohn, D. W. Beach, and J. C. Milroy, “Coaches and Their Impact: One Model for Empowering Teaching Assistants in an Academic Makerspace,” in Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Academic Makerspaces, 2016, pp. 118-122.[3] D. Roberts and J. Buckley, “Case Study: Maker Space Management by Minions,” Adv. Eng. Educ., 2020, Accessed: Sep. 27, 2021. [Online]. Available
Paper ID #37973Use of Transfer Student Capital in Engineering and STEM Education: ASystematic Literature ReviewDr. Kristin Kelly Frady, Clemson University Kristin Frady is an Assistant Professor at Clemson University jointly appointed between the Educational and Organizational Leadership Development and Engineering and Science Education Departments. Her research focuses on innovations in workforce development at educational and career transitions. The context of her research emphasizes three primary areas, specifically focusing on two-year college and secondary STEM and career education, educational innovations, and the
inengineering [2] [4] [5]. Critical thinking involves identifying, analyzing, and testing informationat a high cognitive level [5]. Developing the art of critical thinking in students is a persistenteffort in an engineering curriculum. Students are encouraged to exercise this by identifying theproblem, making accurate and reliable judgments, and implementing logical and dependablesolutions to real-world problems. Issa et al. studied a significant difference in student learningbetween conventional and project-based learning strategies [5]. Students understand the needs of their community through PBSL. Studies as early as1994 by Batchelder et al. demonstrated that PBSL positively affects students’ psychological,social, and cognitive development
tacklethe “messiness” of open-ended design problems.[1] Particularly in large first-year courses,implementing and assessing these open-ended design problems is difficult due to resource(space, staffing, time, financial, etc.) constraints. Finding an appropriate balance betweenconcrete and open-ended design projects is critical to maximizing students’ learning.ENGGEN 115: Principles of Engineering Design is a required first-year course in the Faculty ofEngineering at the University of Auckland. The course was re-designed in 2022 to emphasizedesign process over technical engineering, promote creative problem solving, and to test aconcrete/open-ended balance that might work for the combination of curriculum, student cohort,and faculty arrangement in
to increasethe participation of students from diverse backgrounds in engineering majors. Additionally, theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology recently made a commitment to diversityand is considering changes to curriculum criteria which would require engineering programs todemonstrate a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion [1]. In alignment with USAFA’sstrategic plan and the anticipated accreditation criteria, the authors are developing a newfoundational engineering course as one element of an institution-wide effort to improve students’sense of belonging, make engineering majors more accessible to a wider audience, andultimately increase diversity among engineering graduates.In addition to exploring best practices from
Paper ID #37282Assessing Various Pedagogical Features of Remote Versus In-PersonIterations of a First-Year Engineering, Makerspace CourseDr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville Brian Robinson is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of Louisville. His primary research focus is in Engineering Education, with highest interest in first-year (and beyond) engineering retention & the effects of value-expectancy theory on student persis- tence.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens