Paper ID #37076Preliminary assessment of ”ECE Engineering Laboratory” course for aredesigned first-year engineering curriculumDr. Federica Aveta, Wentworth Institute of Technology Federica Aveta received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electronic Engineering from La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy, in 2012 and 2016, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Oklahoma (OU), Tulsa, Oklahoma, in 2020. Before joining Wentworth Institute of Technology, Federica worked as an Optical Engineer where she designed, built, and tested optical fiber lasers for medical applications
Paper ID #44278Work in Progress: Engineering Analysis Laboratory Courses ComplementFirst-Year Physics and CalculusBryan Ranger, Boston College Bryan Ranger is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at Boston College. He earned his Ph.D. in Medical Engineering and Medical Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and M.S.E. and B.S.E. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. His research interests include medical devices and instrumentation, ultrasound, global health, AI/machine learning for image analysis, healthcare innovation, and biomedical engineering education.Dr. Avneet
) share some of the best practicesadopted by the instructors to ensure rigor and consistency of the coursework at the regionalcampus.The curriculum for the two courses covers the fundamental concepts and provides an opportunityfor students to explore the applications of circuits in the real world. In a normal learningenvironment, these courses tend to be difficult due to higher expectations for problem-solving,math, and scientific concepts, and adding external factors such as the pandemic adds morecomplications. The focus of this research work is to study the first- and second-year engineeringcourses and present the challenges associated with the delivery of the course content, teachingengineering concepts and applications and laboratory
University to redefinethe way engineering mathematics is taught, with the goal of increasing student retention,motivation and success in engineering.First implemented in 2004, the Wright State Model involves the introduction of a first-yearengineering mathematics course, EGR 101 Introductory Mathematics for EngineeringApplications (now running under semester course number EGR 1010) [1]. Taught byengineering faculty, the EGR 101 course includes lecture, laboratory and recitationcomponents. Using an application-based, hands-on approach, the EGR 101 course addressesonly the salient math topics actually used in the core first and second-year engineering courses.These include the traditional physics, engineering mechanics, electric circuits and
, et al. [2]. The study examined models ofexperiential learning from six pioneering experiential engineering programs including theUniversity of Cincinnati Professional Practice Program; the Harvey Mudd College Clinic; theKansas State University Mechanical Engineering Design Laboratory; the Worcester PolytechnicInstitute PLAN; the West Virginia University PRIDE (Professional Reasoning Integrated withDesign Experience); and the University of Massachusetts ESIC (Engineering Services forIndustry and Community). Over the last forty years, the use of experiential learning inundergraduate engineering education has increased exponentially; concurrently a significantbody of pedagogical research has been presented in the literature. The present article
experience is how individuals interpret and act on that information” [8]. Adeserved criticism from industry, where most students go after graduation, is that most universityengineering programs do not incorporate enough hands-on activities (experience) with actualequipment. This is referred to as “practical intelligence” [9]. U.S. undergraduate engineeringeducation has a heavy emphasis on theory with much less emphasis on practical applications[10].Wankat and Oreovicz write, “Despite almost universal agreement on the importance of designand laboratory work, there is a tendency to cut these programs since they are expensive, messy,hard to teach, time-consuming, and not connected to the university’s other mission – research”[11]. Laboratories play an
themost viable one based on viability and usability criteria; this stage is described in a shorttechnical report with the delimitation of the problem and the study of the solution'sviability.Since the students are newcomers, a report model is provided along with the rubric (Table2) containing the evaluation criteria. The assessment here is purely formative, with no"grade" given, serving only to guide students in conducting and describing their work.It is also proposed that students be able to realize and demonstrate their ideas, so in thePrototyping stage, students used the institution's facilities (laboratories, FabLab, projectspaces) to model, assemble, and test prototypes.The results of this phase of the work were presented in the form of
Neuroimmunology Nurse Practitioner in the Multiple Sclerosis Center at UConn Health. She has been engaged in translational public health efforts throughout the COVID19 pandemic to improve outcomes for her immunosuppressed patients by reducing exposure to infectious and non-infectious air pollution in public schools and community spaces throughout the State of Connecticut. She founded and is the director of the UConn Indoor Air Quality Initiative, a cross-campus, multidisciplinary team of scientists and clinicians studying low-cost air purifiers in both laboratory and real-world settings. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024GIFTS: Project-Based Service-Learning for First-Year Engineering
an engineering technology introductory foundations course. The course is requiredfor all students in the engineering technology department and is recommended for studentsexploring the engineering technology discipline, creating a unique culture within the classroom.The course includes two lectures, one recitation, and a two-hour hands-on laboratory summingup five hours of class time in a 4-credit course. The course has a total enrollment of over 300undergraduate students from more than twelve different majors. Students enrolled in the coursecompleted a set of surveys based on the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) which is based onSelf Determination Theory and is designed to measure perceived interest, intrinsic motivation,and other
training, and athleticcompetition. Acceptance rates are low, around 12% [12], but graduation rates are high,approximately 80-85% [13]. Unlike many other academic institutions, incoming USAFAstudents are not accepted to a college or school associated with a major’s program (e.g., Collegeof Engineering). USAFA has nine institutional outcomes, and one is devoted to all graduatesbeing able to apply the engineering method. To meet this outcome, all students take fiveengineering courses as a part of the general education curriculum regardless of their major. Theearly general education engineering courses present an opportunity to recruit undeclared studentsinto engineering during their first year.Field Engineering and Readiness Laboratory ContextIn
of Connecticut conducted a PBSL experience where approximately 400first-year engineering students designed and built Corsi-Rosenthal (C-R) boxes (DIY AirPurifiers) that trap 56-91 % of respiratory aerosols and improve indoor air quality. The C-Rboxes were built for a nominal cost of $60 per box, using a 20” box fan, four 20”x20”x2”MERV-13 filters, the box from the fan, and duct tape. The project was carried out by smallgroups (3-4 students) working in the First-Year Design Laboratory over four weeks. At the endof the project, the C-R boxes were distributed to the local elementary schools. During the pandemic, these first-year engineering students had completed their final yearin high school remotely, under lockdown. Thus, this C-R box
development strategies in software design,” Des. Stud., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 567– 589, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.003.[8] A. Cherns, “The Principles of Sociotechnical Design,” Hum. Relat., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 783– 792, Aug. 1976, doi: 10.1177/001872677602900806.[9] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x.[10] M. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 540–573, 2011
Biomolecular Engineering, University ofConnecticutCameron Hubbard is a 4th year Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Undergraduate Studentat the University of Connecticut. He is the head teaching assistant for ENGR 1166 and supportsstudents, faculty, and staff through project management and organization, prototype, document,video creation, and inventory management. Cameron does research in the process systems andoperations research (PSOR) laboratory, focusing on improving cancer drug delivery using insilico tumor models.Kathrine Ionkin, School of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Manufacturing Engineering,University of ConnecticutKathrine Ionkin is a senior Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Student at the University ofConnecticut. She helps to maintain
. Gregory L. Long Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gregory L. Long, PhD is currently the Lead Laboratory Instructor for NEET’s Autonomous Machines thread at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has a broad range of engineering design, prototype fabrication, woodworking, and manufacturing experiNathan Melenbrink, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Amitava ’Babi’ Mitra, The Pennsylvania State University Amitava ’Babi’ Mitra linkedin.com/in/babimitra|+1-617-324-8131 | babi@mit.edu Dr. Amitava aˆ C˜Babiˆa C™ Mitra is the founding Executive Director of the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023The
disciplines at the university level.Utilizing a visual medium such as picture books and graphic novels can make scientific conceptsmore accessible and memorable [1]. One example of this is the use of storytelling in nursingprograms [2,3], utilizing a method that mirrors the way the nursing students will receiveinformation from future patients. In a science course, Crocetti and Barr examine the use ofstorytelling and graphic novels to deliver science literacy concepts [4]. In the engineering field,digital storytelling has become a tool to use the digital medium to convey technical information ina more accessible way to non-technical audiences [5], to learn technical information in a civilengineering laboratory setting [6], and to develop engineering
paper will frame a typical CS1 problem – calculating the price of abusiness transaction and subsequently accepting payment and providing change to the customer –through the familiar scenario of buying donuts at a local donut shop. Students are provided withsuch artifacts as the donut shop’s menu, government publications for calculating sales tax, anddonut shop photos. Students are primed for success through preliminary laboratory assignmentsseparately focusing on the professional responsibilities for calculating sales tax, making change,and formatting monetary output while emphasizing the importance of breaking problems downinto their components. This approach has successfully been used as our first “major” CS1programming assignment, as
engineering,familiarize them with different areas of engineering and build foundational skills needed to besuccessful in college. There is a lecture and laboratory component for the course that are not co-requisite of each other and can be taken in any order. This unit of study is in the lecture portionof the class. Between lecture and laboratory, there are about 19 sections offered to serve the 956first-year students in the college. The course is part of a larger university-wide effort to enrollstudents in first-year experience courses in their college.Motivation- CurricularThe unit of study met various external demands on the curriculum: the university, college, anddesires to standardize practice. The course this unit is completed during is under
in a First-Year Design Course," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[4] A. Phillips, K. M. Kecskemety, and D. A. Delaine, "First-year Engineering Teaching Assistant Training: Examining Different Training Models and Teaching Assistant Empowerment," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[5] L. B. Wheeler, C. P. Clark, and C. M. Grisham, "Transforming a Traditional Laboratory to an Inquiry-Based Course: Importance of Training TAs when Redesigning a Curriculum," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 1019-1026, 2017/08/08 2017.[6] C. Robinson and J. Collofello, "Utilizing undergraduate teaching assistants in active learning environments," in 2012
skills beyond a single use normally requires feedback, which in-person lectures oronline videos rarely deliver. 1The master-student demonstration framework for spreadsheet training is also employed in manyengineering courses [9]. For example, sessions held in computer labs involve a professor orteaching assistant demonstrating spreadsheet skills or techniques that can be mimicked bystudents. While instructors can give real time feedback in computer laboratories with smallnumbers of students, measuring students’ spreadsheet skills at scale is quite difficult.Alternatively, multiple choice tests can assess spreadsheet skills [10]. Now, web-based platformscan deliver interactive content delivery and
report that showcases the brainstormingprocess and end result.IntroductionThe course is a required 2-credit hour course for engineering and computing majors, typicallytaken by first year students in their first semester. The course meets twice weekly for a total of 4hours each week and is intended to be an active learning/laboratory course to introduce studentsto disciplines (by department) in our college, as well as engineering basics and orientation tocampus resources. An emphasis on group work pervades the course. Students are assigned toteams of 4 in the second week of the term and work with the same team throughout the semester.The first activity discussed below is intended to be a fun, team-building activity that introducesthe notion of
Paper ID #44370GIFTS: Templating Circuit Sub-Systems to Improve Outcomes in a First-YearCircuit Design ProjectBrian Scott Krongold, University of Melbourne Brian Krongold received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering in 1995, 1997 and 2001, respectively, from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and worked there as a Research Assistant at the Coordinated Science Laboratory from 1995-2001. From December 2001 to December 2004, he was a Research Fellow in the ARC Special Research Centre for Ultra-Broadband Information Networks in the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the
Traditional Laboratory to an Inquiry- Based Course: Importance of Training TAs when Redesigning a Curriculum," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 1019-1026, 2017/08/08 2017.[6] C. Robinson and J. Collofello, "Utilizing undergraduate teaching assistants in active learning environments," in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25.1455. 1-25.1455. 11.[7] T. A. Pinder-Grover, S. M. Kusano, and G. Agresar, "Work in progress: Engineering student instructors, What are their needs and how can we best prepare them?," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[8] G. Agresar, S. M. Kusano, and T. A. Pinder-Grover, "Assessing Inclusive Teaching Training of Graduate
schools throughout. Completed middle school education via correspondence with The Calvert School in Baltimore, Maryland. Returned to the US for three years of high school. Completed MS degree in physics at the University of Kentucky in 1999, including stipendium at the Ruprecht-Karls University in Heidelberg, Germany. Graduate work included two research appointments in Japan. Completed a Ph.D. in materials physics at Penn State University in 2001. Completed postdoctoral research in the Molecular Biophysics Group at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands; thereafter established a nanophysics laboratory in the Physics Department at the University of Virginia (UVa). Appointed Program Manager and division
University and her M.S. and Ph.D. at East Carolina University in Biological Sciences specializing in coastal ecology. Currently, Deborah is a Instructional Consultant in the Foundational Course Initiative in the Center for Research in Learning and Teaching. While completing her doctoral studies, she redesigned the second-semester introductory biology laboratory, integrating authentic research experiences using citizen science. After joining the University of Delaware in the Interdisciplinary Science Learning Laboratories, she continued developing authentic learning experiences for students in her integrated biology and chemistry course. Deborah has also created pedagogical training programs for graduate assistants
means to study andwork as a civil engineer.The syllabus states “Through a series of hands-on laboratory experiments, students will developworking knowledge in the use and application of modern engineering tools and techniques requiredfor engineering practice.” The syllabus is admittedly too vague and was partially adapted from aprevious version of a first-year engineering course. The authors will revise the course objectivesfor future versions of the course to be more in line with the three goals listed above.Design of CourseTo meet the three course goals described above, we used the following simple approach to designthe course modules: 1) identify a subdiscipline of civil engineering, 2) identify a physical conceptthat is relevant to that
sociologist, associate professor in the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, and affiliated faculty in the Department of Human-Computer Interaction within the Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering in Indianapolis.Dr. Stephen J. Spicklemire, University of Indianapolis Has been teaching physics at UIndy for more than 35 years. From the implementation of ”flipped” physics class to the modernization of scientific computing and laboratory instrumentation courses, Steve has brought the strengths of his background in physics, engineering and computer science into the classroom. Steve also does IT and engineering consulting.Dr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis Kenneth Reid is the
2006 JEE special reports ”The National Engineering Education Research Colloquies” and ”The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education.” He has a pas- sion for designing state-of-the-art learning spaces. While at Purdue University, Imbrie co-led the creation of the First-Year Engineering Program’s Ideas to Innovation (i2i) Learning Laboratory, a design-oriented facility that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the-art engineering education focused facility; the largest educational building in the state. Professor Imbrie’s expertise in educational pedagogy, student learning, and
makerspaces also offer greatpotential in serving broader goals of education [36, 40-42], such as the critical goal ofaugmenting first-year engineering retention. Some institutions utilize makerspaces as a means tooffer training and/or teaching new skills and/or knowledge [43]. For quite some time now, manycolleges have provided makerspace-analogous functionalities, including assembly/testing areas,machine shops, Computer Aided Design laboratories, and/or classrooms. What universities oftenlack is the inclusion of all of these elements in one location [44]. For campuses that doimplement such centralized accommodations, the majority of these makerspaces are utilizedpredominantly for informal settings rather than as a required program course.However, in
Fall 211 5 2023 Spring 156 5Course Goals and StructureThe course goals are for students to learn: (1) to analyze data in the context of engineeringproblems, (2) programming using MATLAB, (3) to work effectively in teams, (4) to prototypeusing hand tools, basic CAD, and 3D printing, and (5) to articulate differences and overlapsbetween engineering disciplines and practices. These course goals are stated on the syllabus.Students in ENGR 130 meet in two 75-minute laboratory sessions and a single, combined 75-minute lecture per week. In the lab, students complete two-week modules that combineMATLAB programming and hands-on design projects, working in teams of three or
ASEE Midwest Section Conference, September2021. 10.18260/1-2-1153-38321[15] Mosier, R.D., Adhikari, S., Ramming, C. and Agnew, R.J. “Student Post-PandemicPerceptions of Supplemental Instructional Videos.” Paper presented at 2022 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, June 2022. https://peer.asee.org/40506[16] Kirkmann, M. and Mosier, R.D. “Using tools and lessons from online learning to enhancein-person Soil Mechanics Laboratory experiences.” Paper presented at 2022 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, June 2022. https://peer.asee.org/40461[17] Nulty, D.D. (2008). “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: WhatCan Be Done?” Assessment and evaluation in higher education V.33. N.3. pp. 301–314.