with communication disorders. She is actively involved in the Society of Women Engineers and EPICS in IEEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Successes and Challenges of College-Wide Mentorship ProgramsAbstract This Complete Evidence-based Practice paper presents the analysis of data collected overa three-year period from a mentorship program and provides inferences and insights about itseffectiveness. Mentorship programs have been adopted by colleges of engineering in eitherformal or informal formats to support student success and transition to careers. The College ofEngineering at the University of New Haven initiated formal
, Auburn University - Samuel Ginn College of Engineering Jessica Bowers serves as the Manager for Career Development Content and Strategy in the Samuel Ginn College of Engineering (SGCOE) at Auburn University. In August 2018, Jessica joined the SGCOE to support the launch of the Office of Career Development and Corporate Relations (CDCR), charged with providing career development and graduation outcome support for 6,300 undergraduate and graduate engineering students. She provided leadership and strategic direction for establishment of CDCR career development and coaching services; leading recruitment, staffing, and operation of the career coaching team to provide one-on-one career coaching, workshops and programs
learning environments and supporting engineering students.Prof. Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education, University Faculty Scholar, and Executive Co-Director of the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the engineering design-based STEM integration in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Using Contexts Within Assessments to Increase Student Exposure to MicroelectronicsIntroductionThis First-Year Engineering complete paper describes a study using curricular context in arequired course to expose students to a specialized engineering career field
incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Dr. Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Nayda G. Santiago is professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM) where she teaches the Capstone Course in
confidence.1. IntroductionChoosing a major is a pivotal decision in a student's academic journey, setting the course fortheir future career and professional development [1], [2], [3], [4]. Engineering is a cornerstone ofmodern society, driving innovation, solving complex problems, and improving the quality of lifefor people around the globe. As a field of study covering a broad range of disciplines, includingmechanical, electrical, civil, and computer engineering, engineering offers diverse career pathsand opportunities. However, the decision to pursue a major in engineering is not one to be takenlightly, given its rigorous curriculum and the demands of the profession. As a result,understanding engineering as a major is paramount, not only for
an activity where students can explore the concepts of beauty andelegance and their relationship with engineering and the students' own interests. Part of thepurview of many first-year engineering (FYE) seminars and other introductory courses is to helpstudents understand the field of engineering in more depth and to help students appreciate howthey can connect with and be successful in engineering. Some incoming students viewengineering as job-focused and transactional or have been directed into engineering fields awayfrom career paths more traditionally associated with self-expression, to increase their futureearnings or career stability. The National Academy of Engineers’ Changing the Conversation [1]suggests that perceptions of
behaviors into their own teaching.Dr. Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez, Texas A&M University Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez is an associate professor at Texas A & M University in the College of Edu- cation and Human Development in the department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture. In her research, she is interested in assessing the effect of curricular interventions on student career development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 How much does readiness matter? An examination of student persistence intention and engineering identity Syahrul Amin, Miriam Sanders, Aaron Kidd, Karen Rambo-Hernandez Texas A&M UniversityAbstractThis
supplemental instruction sessionsstrategically designed to provide support in both their engineering and mathematics courses.These sessions were led by upper-level peer mentors. Students were connected with facultymentors in their discipline through lunches that the SSP faculty team provided each week. Theselunches helped reduce food insecurity while also providing an inviting atmosphere for interactionbetween peers and faculty. Lunches also offered an opportunity to have career discussions andbring in professional development speakers like student organization leaders and graduatestudents.At the start of the first quarter of their sophomore year, nineteen students were either still ontrack or just one quarter behind in their engineering curriculum
Ralph Coats Roe Awards. She earned her PhD from the University of Michigan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Designing good practices for recruitment, admissions and program structure of engineering outreach programs to increase access for marginalized and non-traditional higher education students (Evidence-based practice)AbstractEngineering outreach programs aimed at students in higher education play a key role inproviding pathways for students to access studies and careers in engineering. Marginalized andnon-traditional students may not have the resources to represent their skills, goals and fit in theparlance and format that best matches
required course for all engineeringmajors. As such, the faculty leading the program are still learning about the range ofbackgrounds, skills, and attitudes typical of their institution’s first-year students. The activitydescribed here serves two sets of intentions: 1) to collect baseline information for introducing students to engineering and buildingtheir confidence 2) to help instructors learn about their students’ backgrounds and attitudes to tailor thatintroduction from cohort to cohort.Speaking to the first motivation, new engineering students can be unsure about what anengineering career entails and are usually unaware of the breadth of available engineeringopportunities. Additionally, some first-year students have a narrow
network of university resources, and guide students in the exploration and selection of amajor and career direction.360 Coaching builds on the Advising-as-Teaching learner-centered approach to advising atNorthwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science [4], andsimilarly aims to leverage a naturally developing community within our first-semesterengineering design course, EGR 101L – Engineering Design and Communication. While manyof our 360 Coaches are involved with our first-semester design course as either an instructor or adesign team technical mentor, this is not universally true; some of our 360 Coaches are notinvolved in our first-semester course. This is a distinction between our 360 Coaching programand
significantly lower level of belonging than major level students, men, andwhite students respectively. By creating a more connected and authentic student communityearlier in their academic career, we aim to increase levels of belonginess among these studentgroups and encourage continued connection and empathetic engagement throughout the students’college and professional experience.Assignment Description & Implementation DetailsThe story sharing assignment is assigned during the second week of a ten-week quarter in anovel introductory engineering course focused on developing a socio-technical mindset [5]. This2-credit course, ENGR 101: Engineering, Design, & Society, is a graduation requirement for allengineering and design students at Western
human-centered engineers through advising,mentoring, and career exploration.Course planning and advising for prospective engineering students is complex at a liberal artsinstitution and often favors those students who are already at ease and comfortable withadvocating for themselves. While each first-year student at our institution is assigned anacademic faculty advisor, meetings with advisors are currently not mandatory. Thus, advising ishighly dependent on the random student-advisor pairings and a student’s initiative to seek outtheir assigned advisor’s help. In order to provide more equitable advising solutions for allstudents, advising will be built directly into our HCE course sequence, making it a mandatory(and thereby more equitable
Paper ID #37333Work in Progress: Exploring the Use of Faculty and Peer Mentoring as aTool to Support Engineering Transfer Students’ TransitionDr. Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the
their work on public welfare and society,especially in the context of creating a more equitable and inclusive society. Recent research hasshown that student interest and commitment to social responsibility declines as students’progress through their academic career [2] [17]. Furthermore, although the majority ofengineering curriculum includes considerable and meaningful ethics education, it often excludesdiscussion and connection to larger societal issues and social justice content [18].The importance of social justice has been echoed by many engineering organizations,corporations, and businesses through their mission statements, core values, diversitycommitments, and strategic initiatives. ABET has recently revised their criteria for
Paper ID #38553WIP Striving towards Equitable Team Dynamics in First-Year EngineeringDesignDr. Evelyn Walters, Temple University Associate Professor of InstructionCory Budischak, Temple University Cory is a teacher and researcher who strives to reduce the harmful effects of energy production and use. Teaching has always been his central passion. He started as a group tutor in college, which led him to his full time career as an Assistant Professor ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Striving towards Equitable Team Dynamics in First-Year
.091engineering research.I feel included by people who conduct .688 .187 -.031engineering research.My parents and relatives see me as someone who .747 .156 .249can become an engineering researcher.My teachers and mentors see me as someone .840 .149 .168who can become an engineering researcher.My friends see me as someone who can become .761 .135 .256an engineering researcher.Doing research aligns with your cultural values. .175 .058 .923A career in research with your cultural values. .209 .039 .916Use academic literature to understand an .170 .833 .124engineering research project.Generate an engineering
Belonging and Peer LeadershipAbstractThis Complete Research paper describes efforts to support students entering an undergraduateelectrical and computer engineering (ECE) program from diversified matriculation pathwaysthrough a peer mentoring program embedded in the first-year curriculum. The myriad entrypoints to this specific engineering program (changes in major, transfers, career changes, stop-outs, etc.) punctuate that first-year-in-engineering may not be synonymous with first-time-in-college. As enrollment patterns continue to change across higher education, it is imperative thatengineering programs are prepared to support students and the variety experiences and needsthey bring to the classroom. In this work, we
of 2023, and the total number of students who havedropped out of the program by the end of the third semester were considered. This researchwill provide the basis for developing models that facilitate identifying factors that may have ahigh impact on student dropout upon entering the School of Engineering. This allows for earlydetection of student groups that may be prone to dropout, enabling intervention to supportstudents according to their specific needs, whether financial, employment, study methodologyactivities, or career guidance.The methodology implemented for developing the predictive model is detailed in thesubsequent sections. Section II comprehensively describes the procedures, data analysistechniques, and criteria for
Rubric (See Figure 3). As a formative assessment tool, the final 1-6 rating thatstudents assigned themselves was less important than the concrete references they made to whatthey had done during the semester that supported their ratings.Figure 3. Composite self-ratings with evidence of beginner vs informed design thinking The use of design thinking in career planning (see [20]) was emphasized at various pointsof the course, and used as a transfer task [15] where students used similar practices to solveanother ill-defined, open-ended problem. For instance, problem framing was likened to choosinga major in engineering or other field in college. Connections were made to the Friday lectureswhen they focused on different engineering careers
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education focuses oneducating future generations to be successful in their professions. A decline in STEMproficiency has been reported in America, leading to significant regression from its position asa global leader in math and science. Debbie Myers, general manager of DiscoveryCommunications in STEM Diversity Symposium concluded: "International comparisons placethe U.S. in the middle of the pack globally." For the United States to achieve a competitiveadvantage, there is a need to encourage young people to develop a passion for learning andspecifically encourage minorities and females to pursue STEM careers [1]. Another report named "Rising above the Gathering Storm" indicated that the U.S. is
undergraduate researcher at the Clemson University Institute for Engaged Aging. Here, she works under the SHARRP Lab’s Dr. Lesley Ross and Dr. Christine Phillips on studies involving healthy aging. Outside of research, she works as a certified nursing assistant and is currently training to be a registered behavioral technician in order to perform ABA therapy for children diagnosed with Autism. As a student hoping to pursue a future career in the medical field she enjoys being able to see how these studies directly affect those who participate in them. She believes that seeing participants take something new away from a research study is a reward in and of itself. After graduation from Clemson, she plans to attend medical
from low-socioeconomic backgrounds leave the engineering pipeline at higher rates than their majoritypeers [5]. Reasons that these students report leaving engineering often include poor performancein introductory coursework [6], negative experiences with faculty [7], a poor sense of fit [8], andgenerally unwelcoming environments in their schools of engineering [9]. Conversely, whenunderrepresented students experience social support, encounter role models [10], and receiveassistance navigating the engineering curriculum [11], they experience positive engineering-related outcomes. One way to provide these beneficial layers of support for students who areearly in their academic careers is through the implementation of formalized peer mentoring
and money management, and actively participatedin the financial literacy course implemented for the introductory engineering class.IntroductionA solid working knowledge in financial literacy is a critical factor in students’ success, especially forunderrepresented minority (URM) students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)disciplines (see examples, [1] thru [4]). This is particularly important with the recent impacts of thepandemic on the national economy, the changing landscape of the job market, as well as the globaleconomic crisis. Students’ financial literacy will help them make sound decisions to succeed professionallyin their career paths. Unfortunately, traditional university curricula do not expose students
]. Metacognitive and self-regulation strategies can help students be moreeffective learners. The affective element of learning refers to student attitudes and mindsets thatcan influence their thinking and behaviors, ultimately impacting their learning and academicperformance.Learning and persistence in higher education, and engineering education specifically, areinfluenced by many internal and external factors [5], [6], [7]. For example, Geisinger and Raman[7] identify six factors driving students to leave engineering: classroom and academic climate,grades and conceptual understanding, self-efficacy and self-confidence, high school preparation,interest and career goals, and race and gender. The first three items are fundamental to theclassroom experience
’ success, including the challengesassociated with adapting to a new campus environment and the potential loss of academic creditsduring the transfer process. Conversely, alternative studies indicate that transfer students whoeffectively integrate into their new educational environment, receive appropriate support, andpossess well-defined academic and career objectives can achieve similar, if not superior, levels ofretention and academic success in comparison to traditional students.Peer mentoring presents an invaluable opportunity for first-year engineering students to establisha meaningful connection with experienced upperclassmen who can provide guidance onnavigating the challenges associated with coursework and the adjustments encountered
self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 8, no. 1, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40561-021-00168- 5.[19] L. Carroll, C. Finelli, and S. DesJardins, “Academic Success of College Students with ADHD: The First Year of College,” Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, Feb. 2022[20] S. Qiu et al., “‘All Together Now’ - Integrating Horizontal Skills in Career Technical Education Classes with Making and Micromanufacturing,” in American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/all-together- now-integrating-horizontal-skills-in
scholarship program. The project builds on prior research suggesting thataffective factors including sense of belonging, identity, and self-efficacy play important yet notfully understood roles in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’academic persistence and successful progression toward careers, and that these factors can proveparticularly influential for individuals from groups that have been historically marginalized inSTEM [1]-[6]. Prior studies conducted as part of this research project have demonstrated impactsof Scholars’ math-related experiences on their developing identities [7] and found that structuresassociated with the scholarship program helped support Scholars’ developing sense of belongingdespite the shift
engineering careers [3]. Respectfulteamwork can motivate, empower, and encourage students from all backgrounds to persistthrough challenges, and to continue pursuing engineering [4]. However, when teamwork andcollaboration is less respectful or inequitable, individuals (often women, racial minorities,members of the LGBTQ community, people with disabilities, etc.) may be discouraged tocontinue studying engineering due to the working environment [4]. Therefore, it is imperativethat early engineering classes foster inclusive and equitable standards of teamwork to ensurestudents of all backgrounds feel respected in academic collaboration. An environment of respectand inclusion is beneficial not only to the individuals in the team but also to the team as
leveraging the power of PBL inteaching practices and projects with a focus on DEIJ, engineering educators can create moreinclusive and empowering learning experiences through projects that help all students thrive intheir engineering education and future engineering careers by fostering innovation, creativity,and excellence. Creating an inclusive learning environment, ensuring equitable access andsuccess, and promoting diverse representation and perspectives in project-based classes withinfirst year engineering courses are essential for retaining and preparing engineers who areequipped to address the complex and grand challenges of the 21st century.ConclusionComing from civil and environmental engineering backgrounds, the authors initially taught