Paper ID #32460Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Online Graduate EngineeringEducation: Learning-Centered Vision, Administration, and Course DesignDr. Andrea Gregg, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Gregg is the Director of Online Pedagogy and an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Penn State Me- chanical Engineering department. She facilitates faculty development to maximize teaching and learning efficacy throughout the ME curriculum, with a primary focus on online learning. She is also respon- sible for leading quality instructional design for residential and online offerings; facilitating an activity community
(electricalengineering) and Car Design (mechanical engineering).Although the chief goal of this project is to produce scientists, engineers, and secondarymathematics and science educators who are experienced in developing and implementingauthentic educational practices, the secondary goal is to impact student learning by relatingSTEM content to urban city issues through the use of hands-on, technology-driven, inquiry-based projects that relate to the desired curriculum. Students need an understanding of STEMand the reasons to pursue STEM careers; over 3,000 students have been exposed to STEMlessons in the past three years with Project STEP. Teachers of these students are involved in thisprocess as well, and 36 different teachers have participated in the STEP
[32]; forexample, Clemson University has an ePortfolio program that is used to track student learning asthey progress through their undergraduate degree [44]. Badging is a more recent type ofcredentialing (e.g., Credly) that provides visible proof of participation, such as completingselected parts of the ePortfolio process[45].Promoting Feedback and Assessment ePortfolios can be used to provide both formative and summative assessment to graduatestudents. A “meta-rubric” evaluating integrative learning is one assessment method thatuniversities can adapt to fit their own needs[46]. Formative assessments can be provided via peerreview, which allows fellow graduate students to give feedback and observe elements in otherePortfolios that they
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Danielle earned her B.S.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Michigan. She is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow and an Illinois Mavis Future Faculty Fellow; her dissertation research focuses on improving the understanding of branched polymer dynamics via single molecule experiments. Danielle is an active member and current speaker coordinator of the Graduate Committee of the Society of Women Engineers (GradSWE).Elizabeth Horstman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Elizabeth Horstman is a third year graduate student from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign pursuing a Ph.D. in
priority.Accordingly the collaborative endorses systematic development of engineers through a skilldevelopment structure from entry level to chief engineer level that will ensure the necessarycapacity of appropriately skilled engineers is available. It further endorses integrating advanceduniversity graduate studies with experience and the practice of engineering to better facilitatefuture technology development. This would involve nonresearch based advanced degreeprograms that include such topics as strategic thinking, leadership of multidisplinary teams,system thinking, innovation in engineering, as well as specific technical subject matter expertise.Creation of a national network of universities delivering such a life-long learning curriculum isessential
skills are formallyassessed, universities will not fully understand the consequences of their curriculum.This student poster presentation will present the results of a study on the impact of provingpublic speaking opportunities in the engineering curriculum. The presentation will summarizethe roadblocks to improving student skills and possible solutions to these roadblocks.Key Words – public speaking, communication skills, leadership, teamwork, engineeringeducation.There is a NeedCurrent ABET accreditation requirements emphasize the importance of ―soft‖ skills in planningand achieving excellence in engineering education. Criterion 3 under Program Outcomes states:―Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain (g) an ability to
focusing on two primary questions: First, can an effective system of professional engineering graduate education be created in the United States for developing our engineering talent in industry so that the continuing future of engineering practice for creative technology development & innovation in this country may be assured for economic competitiveness and national security purposes? Second, how can this system of professional engineering graduate education be implemented across the United States using the combined resources of universities and industry to ensure world-class engineering leadership for innovation so that each state and region can prosper over the long-term?This paper looks primarily at the
Center led by North Carolina State University. For her individual and collaborative contributions to engineering education, she has received several university and national. She is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. She has held several leadership positions in the American Society for Engineering Education, including president in 2010-2011.Ms. Carolyn A Vallas, University of VirginiaDr. Meghan McGlinn Manfra, North Carolina State University Dr. Meghan McGlinn Manfra is an assistant professor of social studies education at North Carolina State University. Her research focuses on digital history, technology integration, and action research for the professional development of teachers. She is a
persuasive thesis proposal Writing and defending a compelling thesis Preparing an academic curriculum vitaeStudents are expected to read 400 pages in an assigned text. The course recently began using thetext [1] Scientific Writing and Communication: Papers, Proposals, and Presentations, byAngelika H. Hofmann, Oxford University Press, after the previous text [2] by Perelman went outof print. The Hofmann text covers such basic writing mechanics as word choice and wordlocation, sentence structure, and paragraph organization before moving into citations, figures andtables, and manuscript and proposal planning and organizational strategies. Guidance forcomposing scientific documents and presentations then follows. Other materials are provided bythe
, University of Virginia Sarah Lilly is a PhD student in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Special Education at the University of Virginia. She holds a B.S. in Mathematics and English and an M.A.Ed. in Secondary Educa- tion from The College of William and Mary. Her research centers on STEM education, particularly using qualitative methods to understand the integration of math and science concepts with computational mod- eling and engineering design practices in technology-enhanced learning environments. Prior to beginning doctoral work, she taught secondary mathematics for four years as well as created and implemented an interdisciplinary, project-based mathematics, science, and principles-of-technology
the premier place in the world to innovate.” Rising Above the Gathering Storm Committee - 2006 National Academy of Sciences AbstractThis is the first of four invited papers prepared for the special panel session of the ASEE-NationalCollaborative Task Force for Engineering Graduate Education Reform. This paper presents an overviewof the initiative. The paper reaffirms the National Collaborative strategy that the present and futureindustrial strength of U.S. technology for economic prosperity and national security is ultimately reflectedin the strength and
; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 221.[19] J. Gilmore, D. Strickland, B. Timmerman, M. Maher, and D. Feldon, "Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors," International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13-28, 2010.[20] J. C. Bean, Engaging ideas : The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom, 2nd ed. (The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2011, p. 360.[21] C. M. Anson, "In your own voice: Using recorded commentary to respond to writing.," in Writing to
communications.4 Participating inundergraduate research is also a proven strategy for recruiting and retaining students fromdiverse backgrounds into STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) fields.5–9Well-structured undergraduate research programs provide opportunities for students to engage inknowledge discovery, production and meaning-making.10 Undergraduate research programs canalso promote what Hodge, Baxter Magolda, and Haynes11 have described as an engagedlearning approach: “Guid[ing] students to develop an internally defined and integrated belief system and identity, which prepare them personally and intellectually for lifelong learning. Actively engag[ing] students in discovering new knowledge in a sequenced
also describe the evolution of this ethics lesson from an earlier classroom activityinvolving precision and accuracy in data measurement, which has been used in high school,college and continuing education settings for more than two decades. This paper describes thedevelopment of the curriculum; lessons learned from the classroom; and an analysis of studentartifacts from the most recent offering as part of an engineering undergraduate research programat Michigan State University. The lesson materials are provided in appendices, in order to allowother educators to adapt these materials for their own classrooms.Background: Ethical Practices in ResearchKenneth D. Pimple summarized the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as the search for“truth
Wilkinson is a lecturer in the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto, where she coordinates communication in Chemical Engineering, and teaches core communication courses at the undergraduate and graduate level. Lydia’s current research investigates interdisciplinary skills trans- fer with a specific focus on humanities integration for engineers.Dr. Jonathan Turner, University of Toronto Jonathan Turner is a Career Educator who specializes in working with graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. He co-founded a Canadian community of practice for career and professional development prac- titioners, and as an executive he launched a monthly article series, effected changes to a national survey of
in their curriculum for a long time now, such practice in engineeringeducation is not a common practice. In the globalized economy of 21st century, the corporationsare seeking a specialized expertise in their employees, which cannot be acquired throughtextbook only. It requires a lot of hands-on skills that normally come through industry projects10.This paper has presented a case study of a project based residency course that is being offered inone and only online executive MID program at the main campus of Texas A&M University inCollege Station, TX. It provided an in-depth review of the various learning approaches forstudent learning such as topic based, problem based, and the project based approaches. Thesurvey results of former
fell in the middle of education and engineering students in all ofthe lifelong learner comparisons. Low reliability of the lifelong learner items (see Table 2)mitigates the impact of these findings, and further analysis is needed. Also, as a role “lifelonglearner” may be complicated in that it is an integrated role in professional careers while moreexplicit and separable as “student” in graduate school.Current and Future Role AlignmentThe analysis of the alignment questions also produced interesting results. First, we see that thereis no statistical difference between any of the groups in terms of (a) what they want to do andwhat they are actually doing now (p = 0.260) with an overall mean of 5.220, (b) what theybelieve is expected of them and
Graduate Teaching Fellowship Program. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2008.2. Torvi, D.A., Engineering Graduate Teaching Assistant Instructional Programs: Training Tomorrow’s Faculty Members. Journal of Engineering Education, 1994. 83(4): p. 2-5.3. DiBiasio, D., J.E. Miller, and J.E. Groccia. Managers of the Learning Process: Preparing Future Faculty to Teach Productively. in 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 1996.4. Dziedzic, M., P.R. Janissek, and M.J. Tozzi, A Graduate Course in Faculty Development, in 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2007, Milwaukee, WI.5. Kane, R., et al. An Integrated Approach to Teaching Assistant Training and Orientation. in 2007
School to France, Switzerland, Italy, and Ecuador to study different higher education systems around the world. Seyam is also a Fellow of the Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence, and he earned the Graduate Certificate of Preparing Future Professo- riate in 2016.Ms. Chelsea R. Corkins, Virginia Tech Chelsea is currently an Agriculture Extension Specialist at Virginia Tech. She works closely with two extension programs - one adult and one high school level - through program development, curriculum design, and outcome assessment. Chelsea holds a BS and MS degree from Kansas State University both in Biological and Agricultural Engineering and will be rejoining the graduate student world by begin- ning a second
to pursue a PhD have the opportunity to obtain a masters that will give them thescience and business skills they desire to be successful in an industry setting.Program DescriptionWhen the MSPS program was first established, it had three concentrations: Biostatistics,Biotechnology, and Healthcare Informatics. Due to the undeniable success it has generated, itnow contains six different concentrations: Biostatistics, Biotechnology, Actuarial Science,Geosciences, Healthcare Informatics, and Engineering Management.5 All concentrations requirethe same business courses, but have their own specific core curriculum. Each individualconcentration has a designated advisor that assists students in creating schedules, obtaininginternships, and
Japan and Norway. The results of this survey were then compared to the resultsof a similar survey taken by domestic engineering graduate students and international engineeringgraduate students studying in the U.S. Findings indicate that there are statistically significantdifferences between U.S. domestic engineering graduate students with international engineeringgraduate students for most of the engineering writing attitudinal factors studied, indicating thatinstructors should begin to tailor approaches differently for individual students. From a researchperspective, we will continue to use these findings to investigate and illuminate cultural variationsthat can influence the writing process.IntroductionWriting is an integral aspect of
that lasts a full semester and is followed by a second semester- 3long component in the fall. In addition, the model includes continued opportunities for students toincorporate their skills into their programs of study and dissertation research. By moving awayfrom the ‘sole’ bootcamp-style program, spacing the learning opportunities over time [19]-[20]and integrating learning opportunities into their programs of study we hope to achieve moreeffective outcomes. FIGURE 2. GS LEAD Training ModelImplementation of the training model began in summer 2016 with the first cohort of GS LEADparticipants entering the GS LEAD Summer Academy. The Summer Academy was an immersiveeight
overall career training for Ph.D.students at many other institutions.IntroductionThe Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) in Engineering program at the University ofCincinnati (UC) was originally established in 1999 to carry out the goals defined by thenational PFF program1, i.e., to prepare Ph.D. students to teach and to provide them withmultiple mentors. At the time, there were many job opportunities for engineering facultyin general and for computer science faculty in particular. Thus the UC PFF program2,3focused on providing information on modern teaching techniques, some practicalteaching experience, and basic information on how to be successful in an academic jobsearch. An integral part of the UC program, as with all PFF programs, has
representative on the Haas Technical Education Council, which is committed to developing manufacturing expertise at the high school, trade school, and university level. He received a BSEE from Purdue University in 1992, and a MS in Engineering Education in 2019. He has over 15 years of industrial experience, specializing in manufacturing and electronic controls, for which he holds 3 patents. Eric’s industrial experience includes positions at Toyota, Cummins, Woodward, and TRW Automotive. He is currently pursuing his PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue, with an expected graduation date of Aug 2020.Prof. David F Radcliffe P.E., Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Radcliffe’s research
programming. Her research and evaluation has focused on educational programs, outreach and collective impact activities that foster inclusion and equity in computing and engineering. College student development and faculty career development are central themes across her body of work, which focuses on focus on capacity building in research and evaluation, organizational change in STEM education, and integration of computing into pedagogy.Dr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. Dr. Pugalee has published works on STEM teaching and learning
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Domestic InternationalWhen looking specifically at what percent international applicants were represented in thesecategories, no overall growth was seen. The percentage of international PhD applicantsremained between 71% and 73% from 2016/2017 to 2019/2020. Likewise, the percentage ofinternational admitted applicants held steady from between 45% and 53%; and the percentage ofmatriculants between 53% and 57%.DiscussionRecognizing that a flourishing PhD program is an integral component of an institution’s researchenterprise and overall reputation, the
Masters program. He currently works as a Digital Electronics Engineer at Northrop Grumman Corporation.Dr. Wagdy H. Mahmoud, University of the District of Columbia Wagdy H. Mahmoud is an Associate Professor of electrical engineering at the Electrical Engineering Department at UDC. Mahmoud is actively involved in research in the areas of reconfigurable logic, hard- ware/software co-design of a system on a chip using reconfigurable logic, application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), digital logic design, image compressions, digital signal processing, computer architec- ture, embedded systems, system on a chip, and renewable energy.Dr. Nian Zhang, University of the District of Columbia Research Interests: Dr. Zhang’s
experiences that caused them to see themselves as differentiated from the broader group ofresearch engineers. This within-group differentiation appears to be grounded in fairly routine experiencesas a member of an under-represented group in a STEM field. Ironically, despite the clear disempoweringimpact that these experiences can have, there is also some evidence that they may promote thedevelopment of alternative value structures and feelings of purpose related to STEM fields for membersof underrepresented groups. 15ReferencesAlexander, C. (2011) Learning to be lawyers: Professional identity and the law school curriculum. Maryland Law Review, 70(2), 465-483.Ancis, J. R., & Plillips, S. D
students enrolled in fall 2015. The followingexamples show how peer review of oral presentations can be adapted to various situations and besubmitted in written, oral, or electronic form. In addition, each instructor asked her students toprovide some feedback on the peer review process, and this information is presented as well.Table 1 provides an overview of the types of peer review used in each context.Table 1: Comparison of Peer Review in Three Engineering Contexts Dedicated Communications Integrated Course Workshop Assignment Feedback written online written/oral Channel Anonymity single-blind single-blind
enhance students’ critical thinking capabilities. Page 14.253.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Assessment of Engineering Education based on the Principles of Theodore Marchese Mysore Narayanan, Miami University, Ohio.AbstractAssessment is a process in which rich, usable, credible feedback from an act of teachingor curriculum comes to be reflected upon by an academic community, and then is actedon by that community, a department or college, within its commitment to get smarter andbetter at what it does (Marchese, 1997, page 93). All of which is to say, assessment ismore than data