calls help me feel connected tothe field by hearing about others’ projects, papers, and degree progress. As a student in anengineering education department, it is easy to become absorbed in a single view of the field; thepeer group assists in maintaining a broad view of engineering education research. Beyondbuilding connections, other valuable aspects of the program are accountability and peer review.Discussing research, teaching, service, and personal goals are often items that do not combine inother spaces. The peer-mentoring group has helped me set clear proximal goals as a developingprofessional. Our group reminds and motivates me to focus on the goals that can be overlookedand celebrate their achievement. Our group uses peer review to have
- System Architecture 3CIT 672 - Advanced Database Administration 3CIT 696 - Best Practices in Information Technology Seminar 3MBI 650 - Information Technology Project Management 3The first two classes from this category give an in-depth perspective on the CIT field in two veryimportant areas: systems architecture and databases. Both of these classes cover an advanced setof concepts, and the students are expected to have the relevant background experiences necessaryfor applying these concepts in practice as well as contributing to insightful classroomdiscussions. The third class constitutes the capstone experience for a MSCIT graduate
many university and community boards and advisory committees. Springer is internationally recognized, has authored numer- ous books and articles, and has lectured on software development methodologies, management practices, and program management. Springer received his bachelor’s of science in computer science from Purdue University, and his M.B.A. and doctorate in adult and community education with a cognate in executive development from Ball State University. He is certified as both a Project Management Professional (PMP) and a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR).Dr. Gary R. Bertoline, Purdue University, West Lafayette
AC 2010-918: PH.D.S IN ENGINEERING: GETTING THEM THROUGH THEDOOR AND SEEING THEM GRADUATE- FACULTY AND INDUSTRYPERSPECTIVESMonica Cox, Purdue University Monica F. Cox, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She obtained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the
Evaluation Implications 10 Mid semester Slump and nap 11 “Old School” vs “New School” Teaching 12 Technology & Online Learning +Social Networking 3 Research to Practice for Innovative Teaching 14 Projects + Workshop Design 15 Wrap Up Other Threshold Concepts possible Intrinsic Motivation topics Engineering & Engineering EducationIII. Suggested assignments a. Development of a Teaching philosophy Page 24.1000.7 b. Construction of an E-portfolio documenting teaching experiences and the student online
manages the day-to-day administrative and program functions of the graduate traineeship in rural resource resiliency for food, energy and water systems.Prof. Matthew R. Sanderson, Kansas State University Matthew R. Sanderson is the Randall C. Hill Distinguished Professor of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work and Professor of Geography and Geospatial Sciences at Kansas State University. Currently, he is working on several projects that examine co-evolving relations between humans and ecosystems.Dr. Rebecca Cors, Wisconsin Center for Education Research Rebecca Cors is a researcher and evaluator with the Wisconsin Center for Education Research, UW- Madison, who focuses on science and nature learning, which often happens
fund two new faculty members was referred toas initial phase I funding. What was important in securing approval of the new doctoral programwas faculty strength and program support, and the phase I plan was initiated prior to externalreview of the proposed program. With this donation, the corporation requested the universityprovide a phase II project proposal, after the program was approved, that would facilitate itsrapid implementation.An objective and independent external evaluation committee was sanctioned by the SBOE. Thiscommittee evaluated a number of factors critical to the success of the proposed program andunanimously agreed that the college was well positioned to move to the doctoral level. Thecommittee provided a number of excellent
Paper ID #27188Capturing the Experiences of ESL Graduate Students in Engineering Educa-tionMs. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in differently
STEM degrees and enter the workforce. The SIIRE project addresses NSF’sprogrammatic goal by integrating external (industry supported) intern or co-op experiences ofstudents with ongoing on-campus engineering research activities to provide a guided pathway toa graduate engineering degree. Scholarship funds defray student educational costs during theirsophomore, junior, and senior years of undergraduate study and during 1.5 years of theirgraduate studies.The goal the SIIRE project is to increase the number of students that complete a B.S. degree inengineering and then pursue and complete an M.S. degree within engineering by providing astructured pathway to graduate studies through integrated industry-based work experiences anduniversity-based
or figure atany stage of the process. The work is projected on the screen so that the whole group can view ittogether. If it is writing, line numbers are used to make it easier to reference. Usually, the studentreads it aloud, paragraph-by-paragraph, pausing after each paragraph or set of paragraphs forverbal feedback from the group, depending on the focus of the feedback and type of work. Theuse of the projector and read-aloud keeps group members focused. The feedback is discussion-based and all activities take place within the meeting time. No work is reviewed outside of thegroup meeting. The group verbally gives feedback as requested by the presenter while thepresenter takes notes or revises, often co-constructing these revisions with the
in writing, to both technical and non-technical audiences.There are no quizzes or exams. Every effort is made to create an atmosphere in which studentsand the instructor work together to improve communications skills. The students do a semester-long project that requires a written report and a final oral presentation. Throughout the course,students are assigned a series of short essays and presentations, receive detailed feedback, revisethe written assignments, and use comments on oral presentations to improve their performancethe next time.Since this paper is about peer review of oral presentations, the focus will be on two of the oralpresentations assigned in NUCL 580 and peer review of those presentations. The followingparagraphs will
Paper ID #10524Building a Community of Practice Among STEM Graduate Students to Fos-ter Academic and Professional SuccessDr. Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Renetta Garrison Tull is Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Student Development & Postdoctoral Affairs at UMBC and Director of the National Science Foundation’s PROMISE AGEP: Maryland Transforma- tion, a new AGEP-T project for the University System of Maryland. She presents across the U.S. and Puerto Rico on topics ranging from graduate school recruitment, retention, and dissertation completion, to faculty development. She serves as a
AC 2010-1957: DESTINATION UNKNOWN: GENDER DIFFERENCES INATTRITION FROM GRADUATE STUDY IN ENGINEERINGLisa Frehill, Self employed consultant Lisa Frehill is an evaluation consultant with more than a decade of experience evaluating educational programs. She earned her PhD at the University of Arizona in 1993, after which she was on the sociology faculty at New Mexico State University and then the PI for New Mexico State University’s ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation award. Current projects focus on: engineering workforce; gender and ethnic issues in access to STEM careers; and women’s international participation and collaboration in STEM.Amanda Lain, Freelance Consultant has an MA in
Paper ID #34925Engineering Graduate Education: An Overwhelming Journey ofFirst-Generation ImmigrantsDr. Hoda Ehsan, Georgia Institute of Technology Hoda is a postdoctoral fellow at Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing at Georgia Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests
relatively large margin.Master’s students are given the choice of pursuing a coursework, a special-research-project, or athesis curriculum. Most on-campus master’s students pursue a research-oriented curriculum.There is a fairly uniform distribution of tenure consisting of first-year, second-year, third-year,fourth-year, and fifth-plus-year students. There exists a variance in home country amongstudents, but the majority of students originate from the United States, South Korea, or Turkey. Page 11.130.3This program also has students from varied backgrounds; student undergraduate majors includeenvironmental engineering, chemical engineering, civil
knowledge and skills leading to advanced careers in management, supervisory, and otherprofessional positions.The PMT program was introduced at Kansas State University Polytechnic Campus (KSP) in 2012. Itoffers common core courses in professional skills such as leadership, project management,communication and teamwork in professional settings; and tracks in areas of emphasis such as Aviation,Engineering, Technology Management, and other disciplinary areas; and a capstone experience.One of the five core courses of the Professional Master of Technology (PMT) program at KSP isInformatics and Technology Management (COT 706). Through a modular format, the course aims toprovide tools in areas of statistics, research methods and data mining. The course
, many of the descendants of trust were interrelated (the levelof analysis of descendant “interrelatedness” varied by study). In several studies trust wasessential to mitigating conflict and enhancing communication and cohesion which in turnincreased the overall team performance27,28. Studies that observed the relationship between trustand knowledge sharing generally surveyed teams within industry. These teams required trustamong teams and companies in sharing pertinent project information.As noted previously, the most common antecedent of trust that was identified and measured wastransformational leadership. Transformational leadership is a leadership style defined by a leaderwho considers the input of her or his team members to identify where
-time research or scholarship[,]… [and it] is viewed as preparatory fora full-time academic and/or research career,” among others. Although this is what is typicallythought of regarding postdocs, a consistent definition of what a postdoc position actually is, isstill lacking, which makes studying the postdoc experience a challenge2.Possibly due to the lack of a consistent definition of what a postdoc appointment is, there can bemany different responsibilities that characterize postdoc positions. Akerlind3 writes that there is“substantial variation within postdoc roles and responsibilities, even within the same disciplinaryarea.” These responsibilities, as listed by Akerlind3 include: being completely in charge of aresearch project and all it
University and a Ph.D. from N.C.S.U.Kenneth Ports, QTS, Inc. Dr. Kenneth A. Ports is currently Senior Scientist at QTS, Inc. in Cocoa Beach, Florida. Until recently, Dr. Ports was a Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department and Associate Dean in the College of Engineering at Florida Tech. Prior to Florida Tech, Dr. Ports spent 25 years in the microelectronics industry in technical, management, staff and internal consulting roles. He led several corporate programs, including project management, product to market, technology roadmapping, and strategic planning. He was corporate director of University Relations, and his duties included overseeing the research pipeline. He has over
don’t take the time Page 14.1254.2to participate in the evaluation process.As students ourselves, the researchers on this project, were interested to see if a higher responserate would be given if the assessment mechanism was administered by a peer. The data gatheredclosely followed the model used by school administration, in order to have a reliable comparison.The responses to the student administered survey were analyzed to determine what areas studentshave the most concern in. Quantitative results will be given to administration and studentgovernance organizations, at the conclusion of the analysis, in an effort to demonstrate a
injection and gas liftfor selected wells to optimize reservoir production plateau and prolonging well’s economic life.Terra Tek, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, 1985-1987; Director of Reservoir Engineering; Responsible of con-ducting research for reservoir engineering projects, multiphase flow, well testing, in situ stress measure-ments, SCA, hydraulic fracturing and other assigned research programs. In addition, as a group directorhave been responsible for all management and administrative duties, budgeting, and marketing of theservices, codes and products.Standard oil Co. (Sohio Petroleum Company), San Francisco, California, 1983-85; Senior ReservoirEngineer; Performed various tasks related to Lisburne reservoir project; reservoir simulation (3
the night, they knew that I understand what it's like to be tired. When I try to get them to work through something, they'll usually at least make an effort, even if they were up half the night themselves.Some of her opportunities to connect with students came when discussing their future plans andaspirations, rather than current challenges. In the physics class, she was assisting them with abridge-building project, and was able to talk with students as she helped them glue toothpickstogether. Having a project like this also makes it easy to walk around and talk to the students, and see how they're doing in general. One very bright, ambitious young lady is planning to visit the colleges that have admitted her, so she can figure out
Engineering’s Leadership Minor at Purdue University. She also serves as the Executive Director of the International Institute for Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). She ob- tained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF
action to become a more intentionalleader in their workplace, their social environments and their families. There was excitement,high energy and serious commitment.Several of these students had completed approximately five other courses within their graduateprograms and were registered for the second of the series of LLL courses. In this second course,LLL-II, the students reviewed and measured their progress in all areas, adjusted their learningplans accordingly, expanded their leadership capacity building to include team effectiveness andorganizational influence.Students also identified a real-time action learning project to be undertaken within theircompanies. This team-led project was to be completed by the time the student returned for LLL
facilitator then guides students through the creation of amind map of the ASSIST center. Students work together to understand and graphically depictthe entire ASSIST system including the numerous connections between the center’s researchthrusts, individual research projects, industry partners, test beds, and how all of these fit into themission and vision of the center. Some outcomes of this activity are: • Knowledge and Skills: Systems level understanding of the center. Experience with mind mapping as a systems visualization tool. Mind mapping software skills. (Xmind). • Products: Systems level mind map of the ASSIST center showing relevant connections between projects, thrusts, test-beds, industry, etc. • Ideas: Potential
their training for the professoriate. • Dissertation Advisors: They guide the Fellows on their research project, monitor and evaluate their academic and research performance, provide career advice and serve as role models. • Teaching Coaches: Faculty from the universities who develop and deliver the teaching training program. They also serve as teaching mentors to the Fellows. • Community College (CC) Mentors: These are STEM faculty at community colleges who introduce the H-AGEP Fellows to the culture of the CCs, and help them recognize the challenges and rewards of academic careers at their institutions. They also mentor the students during the teaching practicum at the community college.4.2 Academic
discussinitiatives that can be carried out effectively by individuals or small groups, initiatives that canbe supported by industry and by other groups external to the university, and initiatives thatrequire institutional support. Not surprisingly, successful projects draw support from several ofthese groups. Major stakeholders who can affect graduate education at an individual institutioninclude individual graduate students, student organizations, and supportive corporate sponsors.Major stakeholders who could help with institutionalization include not only university andcollege administrators and engineering faculty but also government and nongovernmentalorganizations, as well as corporate sponsors. Our goal in this session is to offer specificexamples of
curriculum design project that students deliver both as a written document and as aposter presentation.Two major challenges have arisen in converting this course for an online audience. Onechallenge lies with the content itself and the second challenge lies in a core aspect of the teachingphilosophy.What about the content is challenging to convey online? The essence of ENE 506 is the abilityto align various aspects of curricular design into one unified whole. The goal is for students tosee how aspects of what is learned (content) map to how to measure learning (assessment) andhow students practice that learning (pedagogy). This process, which is at the heart of the course,is a very holistic, integrated, iterative process. However, the learning
B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from Clemson University. She has over ten years of construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as a project management consultant. Dr. Simmons has extensive experience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related re- search and outreach. She is a leader in research investigating the competencies professionals need to compete in and sustain the construction workforce. Dr. Simmons oversees the Simmons Research Lab (www.denisersimmons.com), which is home to a dynamic, interdisciplinary mix of graduate researchers and postdoctoral researchers who work together to
Programs” 2 for the 2007-08accreditation cycle stipulating that an engineering master’s degree graduate should satisfybaccalaureate curriculum criteria and demonstrate mastery of a particular subject and a high levelof communication through completion of an engineering project or a research activity.(Common ABET baccalaureate curriculum criteria include proficiencies in performing statistics,conducting experiments, and critically analyzing data.) It is implied that an engineering doctoraldegree graduate should satisfy the master’s-level criteria and demonstrate expertise in a subjectthrough an advanced research activity. Considering the growing necessity of graduate-levelengineering education and, subsequently, the research aspect of graduate