responded to the survey call and those who participated in focus groups;your thoughts were invaluable, and your openness appreciated. Thank you to the MontanaEngineering Education Research Center and NACOE Offices for help with dissemination of thesurvey. References[1] B. Boquet and N. Lerner, "Introduction to ATD Special Issue on WAC and high-impact practices," Across the Disciplines, vol. 13, no. 4, 2016.[2] "Writing Across the Curriculum: An Introduction," in Purdue Online Writing Lab, ed, 2017.[3] M. Eodice, A. E. Geller, and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project. Boulder: Utah State University Press, 2016.[4] "NSF Statistics," Bachelor's degrees awarded, by citizenship, ethnicity, race, sex, and field
AC 2012-5146: A METRIC-BASED, HANDS-ON QUALITY AND PRODUC-TIVITY IMPROVEMENT SIMULATION INVOLVING LEAN AND SIGMACONCEPTS FOR FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING LAB STUDENTSDr. Yosef S. Allam, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Yosef Allam is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aero- nautical University. He graduated from the Ohio State University with B.S. and M.S. degrees in industrial and systems engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Allam’s interests are in spatial visualiza- tion, the use of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first
2006-1882: ABET OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT THROUGHTHE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSE IN AN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMShantha Daniel, Iowa State University SHANTHA DANIEL is pursuing her doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering at Iowa State University. She has served as a graduate assistant in teaching as well as research including objective evaluation and outcome assessment.Devna Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University DEVNA POPEJOY-SHERIFF is pursuing her master degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies with an emphasis in Student Affairs. She currently serves as the Academic Advisor for IE undergraduate students in IMSE Department.K. Jo Min, Iowa State University K. JO
College Ethan Baxter is a sophomore studying for his undergrad at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College for Computer Science in the engineering department. He has been a part of multiple research opportunities on his campus since he started in summer of 2018. He is experienced in developing Simulations and Games in different software suites, and 3d printing practices. With passion for the university he has held positions in both the National Association of Computing Machinery chapter at Behrend and a position in the Game Developers Club at Behrend. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Multiplayer Physical and Virtual Reality Games for Team-based
aquality management system (QMS), where a QMS is defined as “coordinated activities to directand control an organization with regard to achieve quality objectives,” where quality is definedas “the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfills a need or expectation.”[7] Theadoption of a QMS helps an organization improve its overall performance and provides a soundbasis for sustainable development initiatives. Quality Management is an area within theIndustrial Engineering Body of Knowledge [13] and often a required topic in industrialengineering curricula. Most engineering education articles and research on EC 2000 havefocused on the assessment of outcomes a – k, designing courses to satisfy EC 2000, or the impactof EC 2000[12, 14, 17
AC 2011-93: DESIGN PROJECTS WITH OUT-OF TOWN COMPANIESLizabeth T Schlemer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth Schlemer has been teaching at Cal Poly, SLO for 18 years. She is a graduate of Cal Poly herself, and she holds a Masters in Industrial and Systems Engineering and an MBA from University of Southern California, and a PhD in Educational Research from University of California, Santa Barbara. She has 10 years of work experience at Unocal Corporation where she held positions of increasing responsibility. Most of her current research activities center around engineering education and enhancing engagement through valid contexts like project based learning and community service. She
Paper ID #18013Industrial Engineering Beyond Numbers: Optimizing under EthicsDr. Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech Dr. Alejandro Salado is an assistant professor of systems science and systems engineering with the Grado Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on unveiling the scientific foundations of systems engineering and using them to improve systems engineering practice. Before joining academia, Alejandro spent over ten years as a systems engineer in the space industry. He is a recipient of the Fabrycky-Blanchard Award for Systems Engineering Research and the Fulbright
increase the teaching efficiency such that these topics arecovered and opens space to promote research and self-learning.The PBL environment designed for the linear programming course have some opportunity areasbut, in a general sense, the results shown that is close to impact all the participants in a positiveway, developing modeling skills, interactive learning and self-confidence to making decisionsusing the results provide for a mathematical model. Also, the course format allows to openopportunities to assess and improve soft skills such as communication skills, team work,leadership and citizenship.Even though this research found very useful the use of PBL environment, it is important toremark the time required to prepare, design and manage
development. Here, it is important to remember that theentrepreneurial mindset focuses on one’s mental attitude and belief system, which is acquired andnurtured over time with continued practice, reflection and feedback. As explained by Carol S.Dweck, a change in mindset requires effort, practice, and challenging tasks [7]. Regardless ofwhether it is the entrepreneurial mindset or the growth mindset, practice and more practice canchange one’s beliefs and attitudes, which in return can instill and reinforce the entrepreneurialmindset. Common methods for integrating practice, reflection, and feedback into the curriculumcan be through semester-long scaffold projects, journaling, peer feedback, and formativeassessments.#4: Curriculum Design for Best
energy to produce or manufacture. In thismodule students will be introduced to environmental impact measures, industrialstandards and guidelines, and decision-making strategies that can be used for materialselection.Module 4: Process design and improvement - Another common challenge faced inindustry is to reduce the environmental impact of an existing manufacturing process.Students will be introduced to methods of identifying the most damaging part of theprocess flow through material and energy balances. Common practices for reducingenergy consumption and waste will be discussed. In addition, strategies for productpackaging and delivery will be presented.Module 5: End-of-use strategies - This module begins with a lecture on Green Chemistry.It
12.211.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 An Industrial Engineering Body of Knowledge?AbstractCivil engineers have a defined Body of Knowledge. Mechanical engineering currently has aBody of Knowledge task force focused on the future of mechanical engineering education. Canwe agree on an industrial engineering Body of Knowledge, or at least agree on outcomes thatdistinguish industrial engineering (IE) from other engineering disciplines? The ABET programcriteria for industrial engineering state only that “The program must demonstrate that graduates have the ability to design, develop, implement, and improve integrated systems that include people, materials, information, equipment, and energy. The program
is arequirement for all ABET accredited programs within the Engineering AccreditationCommission (EAC1 ). The IE department from Universidad del Norte is committed toproduce highly skilled competent engineers to the society and considers that the designcompetence is essential for the students to be employable upon graduation. To develop thiscompetence, the IE program has developed learning strategies in different courses acrossthe curriculum that culminates with the major design experience in Capstone Design. The Page 26.310.2Productive System Design (PSD) course, is the first course at the junior level that allowsstudents to develop a complex
Paper ID #16120Ergonomics Topics for the Undergraduate ClassroomDr. Terri M. Lynch-Caris, Kettering University Terri Lynch-Caris, Ph.D., P.E., is a Professor of Industrial Engineering (IE) and Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Kettering University in Flint, Michigan. She earned her Ph.D. at the University of Michigan, holds an MS Degree from Purdue University and a BS from Kettering University, formerly GMI-Engineering & Management Institute. She teaches courses in Work Design, Ergonomics, Statistics and various other Industrial Engineering classes. Her research is in the
-basedProcess Asset Libraries (PAL) to store software engineering best practices, implemented as awiki and improves the use of agile processes. Greer[12] addressed a range of research areasincluding the application of agile methods to safety critical software development, therelationship of agile development with user experience design and how to measure flow in leansoftware development. Similar research is done by Gary et al.[11] on the basis of agiledevelopment process. Procter et al.[26] used a case study of a project to create a Web 2.0-based,Virtual Research Environment (VRE) for researchers to share digital resources in order to reflecton the principles and practices for embedding eResearch applications within user communitiesusing agile
engineering (mechanics and computer programming – to classes ranging in size from 20 to 500+), sophomore and junior level courses on mass and energy balance applications to biological systems engineering, numerical methods, electric power and electronics for technology students, senior design, as well as a long-standing residential/online graduate course on the fundamentals of biorenewable resources and technology. He believes well trained, curious, thoughtful people are crucial to a university’s research effort, and similarly to the function and survival of society. For this reason, the overarching goal of his teaching is to impart the core content needed by the students, and to do so while encouraging inquisition and
research, the course of Measurement and Evaluation Techniques in Industrial Engineering(IT 507 graduate level, 3 credit course) was assessed. The course description for the IT507 is:“This course covers applied statistical techniques and design of experiment in solving andanalyzing industrial problems. It focuses on measurement and evaluation strategies in theindustry.”This study was conducted across two semesters (each semester had 16 weeks, class size of 8students) for the same course: in the spring of 2017 for a lecture-based classroom course and inthe spring 2018 for a mix of lecture-based and problem-based classroom course. The facultyadministering the courses in spring 2017 and 2018 was the same. The instructor has taught thecourse for two
experience8. Deliberatepractice, practice with the intent of developing a specific ability, contributes to effective learningexperiences7-8. The medium from which students receive deliberate practice is in fact coursedesign and instructor assistance8.In addition to the need for changes to be made in course delivery to help improve engineeringstudent learning experiences, research has shown that more emphasis needs to be placed oneffective learning activities that best prepare students to solve problems in the real world.Research performed by Sheppard, Macatangay, Colby, and Sullivan9 at several United Statesengineering institutions found that current curricula are over-emphasizing analytic skills and notputting enough emphasis on professional skills
first decade of this century. A systems engineer is acutely aware of this issue when considering every aspect of managing a business and designing a product. For managing a project, system engineering forces the manager to define the goals and objectives of the project. The project manager with an understanding of the systems viewpoint is capable of knowing the difference between the long-term goals and short-term goals, and can focus on the long-term goals when making strategic decisions. Indeed, the issues of life cycle development are prominent within the literature on project management, and hence they have had an impact on systems thinking by project managers. Another important focus of systems in engineering is from
out how the professional uses the specific method beingcovered in class. Essentially, they are asking, “How do you do this at General Motors?” as anexample. After each of the five conference calls, the student group writes a reflective paperabout what they have learned. This method differs from the traditional case study approachbecause the students do not just read what is written, but can ask initial questions and ask follow-up questions to get a better understanding of what is important by the inflection of the mentor’svoice and hearing the mentor convey it in his/her own words.This research is for the purpose of sharing best practice with other instructors and understandingthe key factors to the program’s success. With this preliminary
the the Systems Development and Maturity Laboratory (http://www.SysDML.com/), which seeks to advance the state of knowledge and practice in how we manage system lifecycles. He teaches courses in Project Manage- ment of Complex Systems, Designing and Managing the Development Enterprise, Advances in System of Systems Engineering, and Systems Thinking. In addition, he is a National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration Faculty Fellow, Editor-in-Chief of the Systems Research Forum, and Associate Editor of the IEEE Systems Journal.Dr. Brian Emery White, Complexity Are Us - Systems Engineering Strategies Brian E. White received Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in computer sciences from the University of Wisconsin, and S.M
evaluating the achievement of learning outcomes prior tostudent graduation. Direct measures are those that assess achievement by observation ofperformance rather than by soliciting opinion about the achievement of a particular outcome. Astandardized exam is a good direct measure. Others might include a third party evaluation ofstudent projects or a manager’s assessment of work done on co-op/internship. A standardizedexam may be the most tempting for busy faculty trying to assess their program because it isfairly easy to administer, the results are naturally quantifiable, and the program can more or lessguarantee a consistent rate of response. Such an exam, however, should be evaluated using apsychometric evaluation to study reliability, validity
2006-2554: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CURRICULUM TO INSTILLENGINEERING LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT SKILLS INUNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSAna Ferreras, University of Central Florida Ana Ferreras is a Ph.D. student at the University of Central Florida in the department of Industrial Engineering & Management Systems. She holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Florida Institute of Technology and a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Central Florida. Ana holds a 6-Sigma Black Belt certification from the Harrington Group, and she has worked as a Radio Frequency Design Engineer for almost two years. Her research focuses on Engineering Management, Quality
@uark.edu http://uark.libguides.com/ENGRMiss Lihua Yang, University of Arkansas Lihua Yang is a doctoral student in Educational Statistics and Research Method. She currently works as a teaching and research assistant at the University of Arkansas. She can be contacted at ly001(at)uark(dot)edu. Page 26.1222.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Perceptions and Misconceptions of Industrial Engineering from First Year Engineering StudentsAbstractPerception has a hidden importance in our society. It is what drives us to buy that namebrand product, move to a
development, effective modeling and training for decision making. His publications encompass the developing of decision support systems for supply chain design; manufac- turing, transportation and warehousing optimization, manufacturing capacity modeling and forecasting, simulation, scheduling, inventory policy, and process design and optimization. He got his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering at Arizona State University in 1999 with a Fulbright-Conacyt scholarship.Dr. Yueqing Li, Lamar University Yueqing Li is an associate professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Lamar University. His research focuses on human factors & ergonomics, human-computer interaction, and driv- ing safety.Maryam
the fall semester of 2010, Stephen developed and taught a cross-listed undergraduate and graduate level course on simulation- based modeling and design using computational fluid dynamics. Prior to being at South Dakota State University, Stephen worked with the Simulation, Modeling, and Decision Science Division at Iowa State University’s Virtual Reality Application Center. His research while at these institutions included modeling complex multiphase fluid flows and systems of models to optimize engineering designs of energy systems. Stephen has been a coordinating instructor for undergraduate engineering laboratories, including fluid mechanics and heat transfer laboratories. Also, Stephen is actively involved with
presented the results of a survey of engineering study abroad programs thatgave light to some best practices and assessment methods of undergraduate internationalexperiences. Lohmann et al.9 described a quasi-experimental research effort to measure theeffectiveness of study abroad programs using an instrument developed by the InterculturalCommunications Institute10. The Handbook of Intercultural Competence11 acknowledges,however, that developing reliable instruments for this complex construct is challenging due tothe influence of so many external factors and recognizes the efforts of few institutions, includingLohmann et al.9, in measuring impact. Further, Deardoff11 is an advocate of triangulation inwhich assessment instruments are complemented by
education has started to focus onoffering courses, concentrations and degrees in engineering systems. MIT’s ESD program is aconcerted effort in this direction.ESD’s vision is to advance research in these areas and to also simultaneously impart knowledgeof established methods and approaches to our students for tackling such problems. To date, theseefforts have primarily been conducted at the graduate level, where a strong student response andinterest in our programs indicates a good measure of success (see Fig. 1). More broadly, outsideof MIT, many engineering systems educational initiatives are focused at the graduate level.5Similarly, there are numerous examples of junior or senior-level design courses that draw onsystems-based approaches, often
approach that integrates project management methods andtools with Lean-Six Sigma methods. An additional objective of this research is to develop abetter understanding of the unique aspects of the engineering problem solving process. Weassessed the student’s problem solving strategies, products, and design process reflections usingWolcott’s “Steps for Better Thinking” rubric 1.IntroductionCapstone courses give students the opportunity to solve large, unstructured problems in aclassroom setting. These team-based projects mimic the industrial setting that most students willenter upon graduation. Throughout the capstone experience students find themselves faced withcomplexities not found in a traditional course, especially when the projects are
a teaching assistant for four semesters of a programming fundamentals course. She is a strong proponent of fomenting divergent thinking in the engineering curriculum specifically by leveraging the arts.Ms. Andrea Essenfeld, University of Florida Andrea Essenfeld is a recent graduate from the University of Florida’s, earning her bachelor’s degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering in December 2020. Her undergraduate research focuses on creativity tests and divergent thinking. She is passionate about how the mind learns and expresses itself, and thus has been working most recently in the engineering education domain.Dr. Jade Williams, University of Florida Dr. Williams is a Lecturer in the Dial Center for Oral
be characterised by a sound knowledge and application of regulations and publicsafety. The graduate capabilities profile for this degree is divided into several areas in whichthe degree programme should contribute to the profile: 1 Knowledge of Engineering Sciences. 2 Analysis and Problem solving. 3 Design and Synthesis. 4 Investigation and research. 5 Risk Management. Page 25.553.6 6 Team Work. 7 Communication. 8 The Engineer and Society. 9 Management and Financial. 10 Practical Knowledge.These areas of learning are noted in brackets in the following two papers.Engineering Management 1Learning OutcomesOn