share a lot in common with all quick informal conversations that arecommonly known as an “Elevator Talk.” Thus, preparing students for these technical informalcommunications will also prepare them for other aspects of their careers as professionals.Manufacturing System Design CourseManufacturing System Design is a senior level required technical elective for IE students with aproduction emphasis. This course is taken in either the fourth or fifth year (many students takefive years to complete the program as many complete a co-op). The course covers the designand control of different manufacturing systems with a focus on automated systems. Labs consistof programming the control of a variety of automated systems. Category 0
changingconditions, and made decisions informed by constraints. Particularly, we sought to identifylearning frameworks that fit the data well and would help us improve the design and assessmentof the activity in later iterations. We found that the learning frameworks of metacognition anddiscrepancy resolution combined to explain most student activity relative to our learningobjectives, and these frameworks suggest several points of improvement for the design andassessment of the simulation game.IntroductionResearch shows a disconnect between academia and industry in terms of engineering educationand practice (Johri & Olds, 2011). In particular, early career engineers believe that “engineeringwork is much more variable and complex than most engineering
, and those thatare missing, in the problems that students solve, and are exhibited in the solutions they create.Then, we use the results to define a set of guidelines that would contribute to improve the realismof SDP’s, both in terms of their problem definition and of the evaluation and assessment ofstudents’ solutions.Introduction Research suggests that engineering education and practice are disconnected [1]. Inparticular, early career engineers believe that “engineering work is much more variable andcomplex than most engineering curricula convey” [2]. Successful engineering, in practice, isdriven by the skills necessary to solve open-ended, ill-structured problems, such as problemformulation, communication, people management
Editor for both the Engineering Management Journal and Quality Approaches in Higher Education. Prior to his academic career, Schell spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Writing as a Method to Build Better Engineers: Examining Faculty Perceptions of Writing’s ImportanceAbstractWriting is a critical skill for professional communication, providing a way to develop and examineideas, and a method to test learning. When perceived as meaningful by the writer, writing isfundamental for identity formation in disciplines, such as engineering. The
Behrend College. Dr. Ashour received the B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering/Manufacturing Engi- neering and the M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) in 2005 and 2007, respectively. He received his M.Eng. degree in Industrial Engineering/Human Factors and Ergonomics and the Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from Pennsylvania State University (PSU) in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Dr. Ashour was the inaugural re- cipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include applied decision making, modeling and simulation, and process improve- ment. He contributed
2020 terms. The survey consisted of twelve questions to determine the impact thatthe remote environment had on the course outcomes, the students' overall learning experience,and student preferences (see Table 2). Responses were collected using Likert scales, multiple-choice, and free-text formats. Table 2. Survey questions. Question Response Type Course Outcomes and Curriculum Q1. How relevant was this course in preparing you for a career as an Industrial Likert Scale Engineer? Q2. Which three Industrial Engineering
introductory IE course. Because lean thinking plays such a centralrole in many organizations today, we believed IE students should be given a holistic view of leanprinciples early in their academic careers. Another benefit is that management majors andengineers in other disciplines, who may take only one operations-focused course, can then alsohave exposure to these ideas.When companies embrace a lean philosophy, they generally train employees in lean principlesand associated tactics, often using classroom instruction supplemented with hands-on applica-tions, plant floor exercises, and live simulations. We adopted one of these simulations at Site 1,called Time WiseTM and developed by Time Wise Management Systems for use in corporatetraining (http
. The class also forces the students to work as a team on something that they could nothave possibly done alone at this stage in their career with the timeframe provided. The studentsare not only forced to propose complex modeling solutions to difficult supply chain problems;they are responsible for implementing the solutions that they propose. Throughout the semester,there is extensive interaction about the pros and cons of proposed solutions, whether or not thosesolutions will be efficient, and whether or not those solutions will be meaningful to a potentialuser of the system. Because these are the types of decisions that the students will be making intheir future work, the class prepares students to address those issues
. This also presents the greatest challenge for IE educators tomaintain a curricula core for the discipline and profession.End NotesThe views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official positionof the Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.References1. ALDRICH, J.G., 1912. “The Present State of the Art of Industrial Management,” Trans. of the ASME, Vol. 34, Paper 1378, pp. 1182-11872. BILLINGS, C., J.J. Junguzza, D.F. Poirier, and S. Saeed, 2001. “The Role and Career of the Industrial Engineer in the Modern Organization,” Ch. 1.2, Maynard’s Industrial Engineering Handbook, Ed. K.B. Zandin, Ch. 1.2, pp. 1.21-1.373. EMERSON, H.P. and D.C.E. Naehring, 1988 , Orgins of
stated that the federal government and its agenciesmust step forward to ensure the adequacy of the U.S. STEM workforce, and that all stakeholdersmust mobilize and initiate efforts that increase the number of U.S. citizens pursuing STEMstudies and careers.2In response to this, many efforts have been established to recruit students into the engineeringportion of STEM and to prepare students to successfully study engineering. These efforts haveincluded the development and implementation of freshman-level introductory engineeringcourses and programs at colleges and universities. The freshman year is very critical forengineering students. Less than half of the students who start in engineering as freshmeneventually obtain an undergraduate degree in
the history of engineering education.” Actions toattract and train technically active mid-career professionals as ABET evaluators would takelonger. The Participation Project and its successor, Partnership to Advance VolunteerExcellence (PAVE) continued the collaboration between member societies, volunteers, andheadquarters staff to advance ABET’s commitment to continuous quality improvement of itsvolunteer processes beginning in 2003. PAVE led to a program evaluator competency model,new experiential volunteer training, workshops on assessment, and a new volunteer managementtool. Further demonstrating commitment to continuous quality improvement, ABET wasformally recognized as ISO 9001:2008 certified in 2015.Engineering Criteria as a Quality
: Module 1. Enablers for Lean (12 hrs) Module 2. Lean Core Operations (44 hrs) Module 3. Business Core Operations/Support Functions (8 hrs) Module 4. Quality, Cost & Delivery Measures (12 hrs) Module 5. Business Results (4 hrs)Of the five modules, Lean Core Operations includes the topics that most IEs are likely to useearly in their careers, though each of the modules includes topics typically found in IE curricula(e.g. material management and the cost of quality). The appendix summarizes 69 specific topicsidentified in the BOK for Module 2. Most of the topics included in the 10 lean certificateprograms are contained in this module. Because of its relevance to applying lean principles
Page 23.93.5component tasks that are connected and help the solver step through the production of requestedresults. It may be chattiness, comfort-speech, weak academic humor, or attempts to makeconnections to a young person's sense of humor, curiosity, wonder, honesty, dignity, social life,future career, and/or passion for reform. It may call attention to the key concepts and tools neededto solve the problem. It may be embedded in the statement of the required tasks.A challenge is the statement of what the solver is required to produce. It may be formulated with orwithout scaffolding.A target is what the problem poser hopes will be accomplished when a learner engages with theproblem. This could be the exercise or development of any
real-world problems that are interdisciplinary in nature typicallyhave limited exposure, at an early undergraduate level, to tools and methods that are available forrigorously and systematically examining these challenges. The development of analytical skillsfor addressing such problems has been primarily offered in graduation education. However,undergraduate engineering students are increasingly interested in working on contemporarychallenges earlier in their careers. Students entering engineering programs today are more awareand better equipped for conducting sophisticated analysis due to their access to information,knowledge and tools that previously were not available to prior generations. It is thereforeimportant – both for retaining
successes as well as pitfallsencountered in the implementation process. Concepts that distracted students from the capstoneexperience were removed, and new concepts are being added where appropriate, such as the riskmanagement module discussed above. The authors hope that the lessons learned will benefitother engineering programs that leverage SE principles as they seek an appropriate level of SEeducation in their disciplines.Bibliography1. McGrath, Elisabeth, Susan Lowes, Chris Jurado, and Alice Squires. "SE Capstone: A Pilot Study of 14 Universities to Explore SE Learning and Career Interest through DoD Problems." Vancouver, BC: ASEE, 2011. 725.2. Defense Acquisition University. Systems Engineering Fundamentals. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense
Poly is given every quarter to students finishing their senior project.The exam for each major is typically offered as three different versions each drawing over 50questions from the ever-expanding bank of test questions that cover virtually all of the programoutcome areas and skills. Students are not advised to prepare for the exam, but they are notifiedthat a portion (usually 10%) of their senior project grade will be affected by their performance onthe exam. Thereby, skipping the exam or purposefully answering incorrectly (e.g., to get finishedsooner) is discouraged. Since the content tested typically spans their educational career, a score of50% or better is considered minimally acceptable from a program assessment point of view. Such
acombination program.The description of the MS in Technological Systems Management in Stony Brook falls into thecategory of technological management: Managing modern technologies calls upon a synthesis of tools drawn from many areas: science and engineering, computers and information, economics and regulation, psychology and community values, design and assessment. The Master’s Degree in Technological Systems Management provides professionals in all fields and people planning such careers with state-of-the-art concepts, analytical tools, and practical skills for managing specific technological systems and improving their performance.However, the two core courses involve elements of ISE and of systems theory. The
usage from going to conferences or reading suitable material. Results of our survey indicate that students believe these buzzwords are important in securing jobs and that employers value them. 2. From the long-run perspective of a student’s career, it is essential that the student recognize that the life of most buzzwords is limited and that it is more important to understand the underlying principle rather than the latest buzzword. Without this, the student may not be able to adapt to the new buzzwords of every generation. 3. Buzzwords that confuse students because of similarity with a buzzword of a similar meaning that was in use only a few years back should not be used. In other words, only
Design, 148, 1.14. McIntosh, N. (1996). Why do we lecture? . Jhpiego Corporation.15. Merrill, D. M. (2002). First Principles of Instruction. ETR&D, 50(3), 17.16. Michaelson, L. K., & Black, R. H. (1994). Building learning teams: The key to harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. State College, PA: National Center for Teaching and Learning Assessment.17. Price, D. A., & Mitchell, C. A. (1993). A model for clinical teaching and learning. Medical Education, 27(1), 6.18. Putnam, A. R. (2001). Problem-Based Teaching and Learning in Technology Education. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Career and Technical Education, New Orleans, LA.19. Ross, P. (2006
Paper ID #29436Applying Artificial Intelligence to the Beer GameDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Bosman has a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering. Her research interests include Decision Support Systems (e.g., solar energy performance, valuation, and management) and Engineering Education (en- trepreneurial mindset, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional develop- ment). She spent the first part of her career working as a manufacturing engineer for world-class compa- nies including Harley-Davidson, John Deere, and Oshkosh Defense and
the academic experience, although the student did think it willmake material more related across courses. Perhaps the most interesting comment was from asenior student, taking the course out of the typical sequence, who indicated that while doing thismake versus buy assignment he/she had a “full circle moment” by realizing the impact of all theskills and knowledge gained in all the courses that can be used when starting a career. Thispreliminary feedback suggests that the stated project goals were shared by student impressions.Future improvements to the case study in IE302 include the ability to present the assignment abit earlier in the semester and provide even more opportunity for students to explore the inputdata needed to answer the make
Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, DARPA, and the North Carolina Department of Transportation; among others. He primarily teaches courses in analytics, operations research, supply chain, and logistics.Dr. Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University Paul J. Kauffmann is Professor Emeritus and past Chair in the Department of Engineering at East Car- olina University. His industry career included positions as Plant Manager and Engineering Director. Dr. Kauffmann received a BS degree in Electrical Engineering and MENG in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State and is a registered Profes- sional Engineer in Virginia and North Carolina.Dr
Paper ID #25152Aggregating Industrial Engineering Concepts Through Cookie Manufactur-ingAimee T. Ulstad, Ohio State University Aimee Ulstad, P.E is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Integrated Systems Engineering Department at The Ohio State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Ohio State, Aimee was an industry professional in various field in engineering for over 30 years. Aimee received her degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Masters in Business Administration from Ohio State. She began her career as a packaging equipment engineer at Procter and Gamble, then moved to Anheuser-Busch where she worked for
value to product or service but are necessary for the delivery ofproduct or service. In order to improve a given process, we should emphasize value addedactivities, minimize non-value add essential activities, and eliminate non-value add activities. There is an urgent need for skilled engineers to transform the manufacturing industry.Successful organizational transformations depend on a better understanding of the capabilities andmethods that can help to deliver whole system change. According to the Manufacturing Institute,the manufacturing workforce is older and less educated relative to other sectors. U.S. dominanceis in jeopardy as relatively few young Americans choose a manufacturing career [2] as the U.S.manufacturing skill gap
External Objective Evaluation Outcome Internal and Improvement External and Revision Outcome Assessment Direction Direction of of Primary Primary Influence InfluenceFigure 1. Continuous improvement process for the program objectives and outcomes.The capstone design course in every engineering curriculum is the culmination of a student’sacademic career, and provides a logical and appropriate opportunity for
students. The first B.E.G. talk occurred onMonday, November 18th, 2013 outside of the regularly scheduled engineering economy classtime. The B.E.G. students hosted a member of the finance faculty from the school of Business atPenn State University Park. The talk covered various topics including completing a businessminor, M.B.A. after graduation, careers in finance and accounting, corporate finance, financialstatement analysis, stocks and business planning among other topics. The talk was optional andall undergraduate students from this department were invited to attend the talk. The studentsofficially kicked off their student group (B.E.G.) at this talk. Approximately 45 undergraduateindustrial engineering students attended the talk
method for understanding the successof LEP students prior to and after graduation and assess the distinct individuality (if it exists) ofthe LEP student in comparison to non-LEP students.The statistics that will be collected include: • A description of summer activities of each LEP graduate in the two prior summers • Job or career plans upon graduation • The number of post graduation offers (i.e. jobs, graduate programs, military, etc.) • Final Grade Point Average and change in grade point average since joining the LEP • The number of students receiving dean’s list honors or academic probation • The number and type of leadership positions held while at the universityPhase 2: Interviews with Capstone Advisors
Page 23.890.3American Society for Engineering Education started a report based on a year-long discussionswithin the Society on the role and importance of educational scholarship to ensure the long-termexcellence of U.S. engineering education. This report3, released in 2012, was entitled“Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation inEngineering Education” sought to catalyze conversations on creating an engineering academicculture for scholarly and systematic innovation to ensure that the U.S. engineering educationenterprise keeps pace with changes in the engineering profession and in the world. The reportrecognizes among many other topics that engineering careers have become increasinglycollaborative
honestly and fairly (Colby & Sullivan, 2008). As a result,multiple efforts in engineering education are geared towards incorporating ethics concepts inengineering curricula. Some of these efforts are described in the next section. In fact, someauthors suggest that ethics should be made a cornerstone element in engineering education(Moore, 2011). However, this has not been achieved yet and students lack the necessaryexposure during their education to navigate through the ethical conflicts they will face duringtheir careers (Herkert, 2002).This paper contributes to this body of work by blending ethics with traditional optimizationproblems in industrial engineering. The proposed approach enables incorporating ethics withoutincreasing or modifying
Paper ID #28954Creating a Community of Practice for Operations Research by Co-creatinga High Impact Executive Education Program in IndiaDr. Venugopalan Kovaichelvan, TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership, TVS Motor Company Ltd Dr. V. KOVAICHELVAN is the Director of TVS Institute for Quality and Leadership, the Corporate University of TVS Motor Company Limited, India. The Institute focus on holistic development of talent through career lifecycle of the employees with focus on functional & professional skills, cultural capabil- ities, collective capabilities, support business strategy and Corporate Social