sufficientlyflexible to adequately meet the needs of the 21st century engineers” (Source: Engineering2020 Report, 2004)In June 2006, the American Society for Engineering Education launched an initiative to promotebroad-based discussions within the society on the role and importance of educational scholarshipto ensure the long-term excellence of U.S. engineering education. Those discussions led to aproject which began in October 2007 with support from ASEE and the National ScienceFoundation. The project represents an important step by ASEE to enable even broaderconversations across the American engineering education enterprise on creating a vibrantengineering academic culture for systematic and scholarly engineering educational innovation;these efforts hope to
/technology courses designed Page 15.15.5 to build students’ skills, improve their analytical abilities, and stimulate interest in math, science and technology. The program was piloted in 2007 and 2008. • Traineeship Experience Program. A 5-week mentored summer traineeship program for MACILE students who have completed at least 10th grade. Learning through research and discovery is the main focus. An aim is to engage students in relevant and interesting projects, showing the roles of engineering and technology in improving human lives. Other aims are to: o Improve understanding of the scientific
submitted at least oneassignment, 2,417 took the final exam. 1303 earned the regular certificate (acompletion rate of 2.1%). Of the 145 students submitting a final project, 107earned the programming (i.e. 'with distinction') version of the certificate.There was a note the Coursera certificate, which stated that the online offering ofthis class does not reflect the entire curriculum offered to students enrolled at theUniversity. This statement does not affirm that this student was enrolled as astudent at the University in any way. It does not confer a grade, credit, or degree,and it does not verify the identity of the student.As Coursera courses are self-enrolling and often require no prerequisites, it couldbe possible that students are not matched
fry, has horizontal and vertical panes; to simulate finbehavior, with the same dimensions, exposed to a high temperature fluid. Page 12.318.11Figure 7. A presentation slide concerning the French fry study.Every two weeks students, previously (and almost routinely) organized in groups of two orthree, had to give the whole class a presentation. This regular activity proved to be anexcellent choice to bring down the stress levels. In the end, the last version of the presentationwas the assignment which was handed in and evaluated, not only as a final project but also asthe result of continuous learning and assessment. It was used as a way to foster
3 Technical Elective 3ES 222 Technical Drawing II 3 Arch. Design Project 4 Total: 18 Total: 19 Page 14.883.7AcknowledgmentThe authors thank the Ministry of Higher Education, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, the USAgency for International Development, and the World Bank for their financial support in fundingthe partnership
6 Oral Communication Skills, Scientific Writing 3 Working with Projects 1 Media, E-Learning, Computer Aided Technologies 2 Elective Credit Points 2 Electives 2 In Total 20 Page 14.786.56. ConclusionThe program has been designed in order to fit the necessities of professionals and
sharpen their knowledge inunderstanding wireless applications of the sensors and actuators. Students must take at Page 14.1376.3least 6 hours of internships during the last two semesters before graduation. Project orinternship experience will be designed by the student to meet their career goals. There isno specific outline for this course. Students will accomplish the following: a. Work within the biomedical industry for no less than 180 hours. b. Set and pursue goals and objectives in coordination with an industry mentor and the course instructor. c. Prepare and present written and oral reports.The undergraduate bioengineering
campuses in regions such as thePersian Gulf will lead to growing competition for students, creating a pressure to lowerstandards for admission. 8Another concern is that most agreements to construct and operate a foreign campus arereached at the highest levels of the offering university, often involving the president. Butsuccess requires the active involvement of faculty members who will design and delivercurricula, collaborate on research projects, and vote degrees. Without faculty support, auniversity will not be able to deliver on its promises of an American style educationalexperience. 9In addition, other countries frequently embrace cultures and business practices that wouldnever be tolerated in the US. Americans take for granted religious
in equipping our students with the “tools of the trade” thenwe need to alert our graduate students( the future engineering teachers) to the need ofdeveloping proper and enduring connections with industries in their locale, andeventually have a mutually beneficial relations with the industrial sector; not so muchto supplement their income; but, principally, to be able to reach the broader goal, i.e.,to gain valuable experience and be truly involved in real engineering.iii) Third, reaching out to the industrial sector and engineering services in the Region,and striving to form symbiotic partnerships between local industry and academiathrough: capstone projects, theses work with practical overtones, and applied researchprojects in selected
opportunity for the CQU students to experience a different mode ofinstruction and interaction, but a mode that is common in the US. Moreover, the format can helpstudents be more self-directed and take greater responsibility for their learning than traditionalface-to-face courses (Ruey, 2010; Wuensch et al, 2008). Since the students will be coming to theUS for the last two academic semesters, providing this experience before they arrive was seen ashelpful to their development and future success in the US. In particular, practice at conveyingthoughts through writing will help these students in their senior design projects and othercoursework.Lessons LearnedBased on this experience, the following lessons learned are provided to assist others who mightbe
teaching experi- ence, he also has performed extensive research and published numerous technical papers. He has secured more than $1 million in the form of both internal and external grants and research funding. Foroudastan is the faculty advisor, coordinator, and primary fundraiser for EVP teams entering national research project competitions such as the Formula SAE Collegiate Competition, the Baja SAE Race, the SolarBike Rayce, the Great Moonbuggy Race, and the Solar Boat Collegiate Competition. For his concern for and ded- ication to his students, Foroudastan received MTSU awards such as the 2002-03 Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005-06 Outstanding Public Service Award, and the 2007 Faculty Advisor of the Year
partnerships between local industry and academia through: capstoneprojects, theses work with practical overtones, and applied research projects in selected domains,is extremely desirable and beneficial. Today, with the engineering profession undergoingdramatic changes on many fronts - there is real need, for faculty and students, to becomeinvolved with practical problems and to share in providing solutions. We owe it to our studentsto prepare them to meet the challenges ahead by focusing on real issues derived from tangiblesituations. The surest road to having a working college-industry relation is to come to a mutualunderstanding that both parties would gain from such a relationship.The discussion noted above may remain academic, difficult to
& M University. Professional Experience: 1960-1969 in Industry; 1974-1980, Assistant Professor, Lamar University; 1980-Present, Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Page 11.481.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Differences in Cultural Expectation between Faculty and Students in an International CollaborationAbstractThere have been various attempts in the field of engineering education for international teachingteams to work together. Some projects saw successes and others found difficulties. This paperdiscusses a case study in developing
applicability and competitiveness of university graduates.Concrete projects and collaborations have already commenced. In October 2006 during theGlobal Colloquium on Engineering Education held in Rio de Janeiro, a Memorandum ofUnderstanding was signed that greatly expanded EftA partnerships and effective reach into theengineering education processes of the Americas. Together with ASIBEI, LACCEI, IFEES,ISTEC, ASEE, and OAS, Engineering for the Americas agreed to leverage activities and seekmutual benefit in improving the state of engineering and engineering education in the region.For example, through partnership with LACCEI and INTEC, EftA helped develop a jointproposal to the InterAmerican Development Bank’s Regional Public Good solicitation
. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 207–212.15. Madsen, J.N., Bales, R.A., & Hynds, D.L. (2010). Role of scholarships in improving success rates of undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) majors. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 458–464.16. Nasor, M., Imran, A., & Hayati, F. (2011). Achieving enhanced performance in undergraduate biomedical engineering program. ICIE (Germany) conference on ‘Excellence in Education 2011: Giftedness-Creativity- Development’. Turkey, pp. 93.17. Ragusa, G., & Lee, C.T. (2012). The impact of focused degree projects in chemical engineering education on students’ research performance, retention, and efficacy, Education for
Science from Santa Clara University in 1982. His 34 years of professional career covers: teaching at undergraduate and graduate level, planning, developing and managing project in the areas of Telecommunications and Information Systems. His research interest include embedded systems, digital programmable devices and computer communications. He is a member of IEEE, ASEE and ACM. Page 23.825.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Introduction of New Technologies in the Engineering Technology CurriculumAbstractClosed-loop feedback control system is an important component of a
Technical Elective 3 Urban Planning II 3 Arch. Design Project 4 Total: 18 Total: 19 Page 24.278.6Materials and EquipmentArchitectural engineering program of Herat Engineering Faculty received assistance from manydifferent organizations including: • Scholarships funded by the World Bank and USAID through the University of Hartford. • Drafting equipment for 120 students were funded by USAID through the University of Hartford and shipped with assistance
involves collaboration between Purdue and the University of Karlsruhe in Germany,Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China, IIT Bombay in India, and Monterrey Tech in Mexico.Participating students study and intern abroad, and work on team projects with students atpartner schools. Yet as programs like GEARE develop and mature, questions remain about whatspecific skills and competencies participating students can and should develop. There is also theissue of finding the most appropriate and effectives assessment mechanisms, to insure studentsare achieving these outcomes.One of the more common anticipated outcomes for global engineering education is enhanced
Budapest (2000) stock exchange and was purchased by Nemetscheck Gmbh (Germany) in 2007. Mr Bojár remains Chairman of Graphisoft's board of directors. In 1996, Mr. Bojár founded a real-estate development company to re-cultivate a run down industrial site on the bank of the river Danube and to turn it into a state-of-the art science park, accommodating the research units of corporations including Microsoft, SAP, Apple Servier and others, becoming Budapest's prime revitalization project and the recipient of several awards and recognitions. Mr. Bojár was distinguished by numerous national and international awards for scientific and business excellence, including Szechenyi Prize (1997), Order of
business sectors. The quality assurance inengineering education is a systematic project, facing a special internal and external policyenvironment. At present, engineering education accreditation has become the main qualityassurance mechanism for higher engineering education, and has promoted the formation oftwo major engineering education accreditation systems: Washington Accord (WA) andEuropean Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education (ENAEE). The globalengineering education accreditation presents the result-oriented, international connection,continuous improvement and industry-university cooperation trend [1]. Under this framework,colleges and universities in various countries and regions have tried to explore the path ofquality
College of Science and Engineering at Uni- versidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ. He holds a BS in Civil Engineering from USFQ, an M.Sc. in Construction Engineering and Project Management from Iowa State University as a Fulbright Scholar, a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, and two Graduate Certificates from Virginia Tech in Engi- neering Education and Future Professoriate. MiguelAndr´es’s research includes sustainable infrastructure design and planning, smart and resilient cities, and the development of engineers who not only have strong technical and practical knowledge but the social awareness and agency to address global humanitarian, environmental, and social justice challenges. For him, social justice
provided manyeducational benefits for all involved including understanding the fundamentals of energy, its usesand resources, exposure to international energy technologies, experience and understandingassociated with living and working in an international setting; and applied, interdisciplinarycourse experience that integrates the technical, social, and economic dimensions of aninternational setting. Seven students from each of the institutions were taught by a team ofinteruniversity faculty and learned via immersion about Costa Rican culture, history, geography,language and political affairs. Each JMU student was hosted by a Costa Rican family and thecourse included hands-on field trips to operational renewable energy projects and installations
between some Maturity Models for EducationStages Description Per Maturity ModelLevel 0 EMM: Not performed: Not done at all.Level 1 E-CMM: Initial: Ad-hoc Processes EMM: Initial: Ad-hoc Processes ERP Maturity Model on Education: Initial: Enterprise systems curriculum not well defined CEMM: Initial: Educational processes are informal and poorly controlledLevel 2 E-CMM: Independent: Basic education level processes are established. EMM: Planned: Clear and measurable objectives for e-learning projects ERP Maturity Model on Education: Repeatable: One or more courses are defined with ERP concepts CEMM: Repeatable: Planning and
AC 2009-690: BAJA SAE COMPETITIONS: MEETING AND INTERACTINGWITH INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS – EXPERIENCES OF STUDENT ANDUNIVERSITY PARTICIPANTSDavid Hallbach, Rochester Institute of Technology David W. Hallbach, Rochester Institute of Technology David Hallbach is a Fifth year Mechanical Engineering Technology student at the Rochester Institute of Technology. He has been an active member of the University's Baja SAE program, having held several leadership roles including team manager. He is currently working on several projects pertaining to manufacturing processes for which he is striving to obtain several patents. He is a recipient of the RIT Scholarship Award for his excellence in
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Epistemological Foundations of Global Competencies: A New Theory to Advance Research on Global CompetenciesIntroductionAround the world, many influential stakeholders are concerned with increasing globalcompetitiveness of engineering graduates by increasing their global competency. Recent booksfrom the US, Australia, and Europe attest to growing interest in global engineering.1 In sum, Whether working on multi-national project teams, navigating geographically dispersed supply chains or engaging customers and clients abroad, engineering graduates encounter worlds of professional practice that are increasingly global in character. This new reality
engineeringeducation is at its infancy stage. Researchers, academic institutions, and industry have employedmultifarious projects to understand and model globalization of engineering educationWe strongly emphasize that optimum work needs to be done to prepare upcoming U.S. studentswho will be competent in an increasingly demanding global work environment. In order toestablish new models, we made an attempt to understand and analyze perspectives of current(U.S. and non-U.S.) students, academic faculty, and engineering professionals currently workingin industry. One of the goals of this study was to test the hypothesis that the current U.S.curriculum do not adequately prepare engineering students to work, manage and communicateeffectively with engineers and
consistent process Engineering Level 2: management Disciplined Repeatable process Project Level 1: management Initial Figure 1: The Five Stages or Maturity Levels of the Capability Maturity Model7 Maturity Levels Process Capability Key Process Areas Goals Common Features Implementation or Key Practices Institutionalization
.19** University visits .569 Company visits .48*** .578 NON-SCHOOL Informal hands-on activities .447 EXPERIENCE .717 Interactions with engineers .688 .43*** Designed projects Teachers .753 PEOPLE ENGINEERING .987 Parents
mistakenly assume boredom or alack of engagement from the seemingly passive listening displayed as a mode of preferredlearning for an Auditory student. Likewise, the learning materials and activities that an instructormight generally utilize with success, such as projected presentation materials, handouts of lecturenotes, hands-on demonstrations or laboratory experiments, and assigned readings of textbookchapters, can be less meaningful for students who exhibit a monomodal preference for Auditorylearning.When faced with an increased proportion of students who exhibit a preference for Auditorylearning, instructors may find increased success in their teaching by ensuring that main conceptsfrom the course are specifically described verbally in detail
appropriatein this particular setting, with it’s own culture and history. Research is ongoing, usingqualitative inquiry and fourth generation evaluation which seeks to address theconcerns and issues of stakeholders. It is an illuminative evaluation project that seeksto allow senior management in the College see what is happening elsewhere andevaluate whether such methods might be appropriate in their own college.The focus here is on a literature review of academic change in Europe and the moveof some universities to become more entrepreneurial organisations. Changingacademic roles and structures are ongoing sources of tension for academic staff inEurope and there appears to be no panacea for successful change. Collegial andbureaucratic institutions are