theeducation [10]. Jefferson believed that the U.S. could not become a democracy without aneducated citizenry. The framers of the land-grant bill believed that there needed to be a focus onintellectual effort for the improvement of industry and agriculture. State universities, withmodest tuitions and a mandate to educate all who could benefit from it, have produced one of thebest citizenries in the world. The support of academic research has delivered prosperity,security, and health as well as a graduate education system that is one of the most highlyregarded in the world. Higher education is the key to enhanced socioeconomic attainment,freedom and independence of individuals and hence countries.A similar trend is being seen in India lately. While the
, recognizing the importance of technology in the progress of underdeveloped regions,and understanding the role of the future engineers in the advancement of technology, it wassuggested to offer a workshop as a forum for exchanging best practices, creating networks forinternational engineering educational experiences involving the Americas (research projectcollaboration, design projects collaboration, entrepreneurial project collaboration, andinternational internships) and sharing resources for promoting engineering design, innovationand entrepreneurship in the engineering institutions of the Americas.Workshop ProgramThe NSF sponsored workshop entitled The Global Engineering Education Challenge for theAmericas was held in Tampico, Mexico May 29 – June
engineering experience to mirror a team research anddesign environment as opposed to the lecture/lab environment found within most study abroadprograms world-wide. The team-based structure also best allows the transfer of ideas andperspectives among the students. To accomplish this, the summer design experience wasconstructed as a program made up of multidisciplinary teams not only based on educationaldiversity but also including cultural and gender diversity. The instructional staff for the summerprojects selected a broad program theme, but individual teams were given the freedom to pursuea project topic of interest within that theme. For the 2014 program, the theme was visible light(wavelength) communication systems (VLC). Within this theme, the
has pursued research in design tools and processes, team management, and new mechanism technologies. He teaches design at the graduate and undergraduate level and is interested in educational partnerships with industry and international issues in design. As Associate Dean of undergraduate studies, he has promoted and supported the structuring and expansion of international programs. He is an active member of ASME and ASEE.Dr. Brent E. Nelson, Brigham Young University Brent Nelson is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Brigham Young University and Program Head for the Computer Engineering program there. He received his Ph.D. in computer science in 1984 from the University of
Engineering has alsocalled for better preparation of engineering graduates for the practice of engineering exemplifiedin capstone courses18,19. These courses have improved and expanded to better prepare studentsfor the practice of engineering through the involvement and support of accreditation agencies,the National Academy of Engineering, industry, and educational leaders along with professionalorganizations’ research into the technical and pedagogical content, assessment, and execution ofengineering curriculum15,16.Design and manufacturing of products and services is already a major focus of many capstonecourses, it seems that these courses are ideally situated to include elements of globalizationwithout compromising their current learning outcomes
studying the changes inpopulation, human resource flows (migration), the changing distribution of design andmanufacturing/construction work, urbanization, diseases, resource management, environmentaldegradation, economic integration, knowledge dissemination, information technology,biotechnology, nanotechnology, conflict, and governance.2 Therefore, the best way to conciliateboth pro and against positions is to understand the unavoidable changes and take the necessarysteps in minimizing their impact in the society.These rapid changes in the world entail a change in the role of engineers in the global economyand, as a consequence, in the engineering education. There is an increasing perception of theneed to educate competent engineers for the global
approaches for designing and operating re- silient and smart urban water infrastructure. This research has received more than $15 million in funding and produced more than 75 peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Burian’s enthusiasm for student learning has led to teaching awards and service assignments as assistant mentor and mentor at the American Society of Civil Engineers ExCEEd Teaching Workshop. He has also developed a variety of teaching and cur- riculum development workshops, including the Wasatch Experience Sustainability Teaching Workshop at the University of Utah. Steve has participated in the ASEE Annual Conference every year since 2007, co-authoring 14 papers and presenting 12. At the 2011 conference his paper was
Creating a "Global Algorithm" for Engineering EducationAbstractFor five generations American engineering education has rested upon a practical model ofdrawing a broad range of students with certain mathematical skills and wide technologicalinterests into a large-mouthed pedagogic funnel, gradually compressing their training into ever-narrower frames of specific, skill-sets and acumens. The result has been to standardize the end-products emerging from the apex of the educational funnel. Examinations and re-toolings ofengineering education have usually merely redirected the funnel with recommendations of newmethods and protocols for fine-tuning the relevance of contemporary technology to theclassroom and laboratory. One canon remains constant
and at the technology research center at The University of Texas at Austin. He earned his doctoral degree from Virginia Tech and authored numerous publications in Problem Solving, Sustainability, and Innovation.Dr. Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michael J. Dyrenfurth is a professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation in the College of Tech- nology at Purdue University. He is a member of the ASEE and he has served on the Board of the ETD and as program chair for the CIEC in New Orleans (2008). Previously he completed a four year term as Assistant Dean for Graduate Studies in Purdue University’s College of Technology. His scholarship agenda focuses on technological innovation
teaching and learning for engineering faculty. In his research Dominik May focuses, inter alia, on future requirements for science and engineering graduates, such as interna- tional competence, in order to become successful engineers in a globalized professional world. Therefore he designs and investigates respective educational strategies with a special focus on online solutions and the integration of remote laboratories. For his research and the development of several transnational on- line courses he benefits from his working experience in international companies and a broad international professional network. Furthermore Dominik May is founding member of both the Engineering Education Research Group at the Center
more pressing in countries like the DR where most of its young population is from marginal communities. Young people are the country’s most valuable resource. It will be difficult for the DR to emerge as an innovative player in the global economy without developing this wealth.In addition to resources and cost, lack of prior experiences in the country with programs likeMACILE has made the program design more challenging. Another limitation has been the lackof studies dealing specifically with the conditions of education in Ytabo or the socio-economiccharacteristics of the communities. Research works dealing with education in the DR have beenvery general. A study phase was necessary, as a result. This phase helped develop
problemthe cluster faces is the need for successful approaches for Asia. The reason is that efficientpractices for Europe had poor effect in Asia-Pacific as different intercultural aspects andvarious details had to be considered to ensure success.This paper describes new practices which have been implemented to solve this problem. First,a Russian research university engaged in research for the cluster was selected as a site whichhelps the cluster with challenging process of internationalization. Next, a representative officeof this Russian university was established in Vietnam to balance cultural, linguistic,psychological, and administrative issues. This office employs Vietnamese graduates of thisuniversity and coordinates cooperation between
practice of design and the resulting impact of engineering designs on society.The CoursesCourse InstructorsAs discussed earlier, the endeavor of teaching engineering as a sociotechnical discipline whileintegrating issues such as race, justice, and -isms can be a daunting task for instructors, and weare no exceptions. As the background and positionality of the instructor is critical tounderstanding the risks and rewards associated with these courses, this section briefly describeseach of the instructors who have taught or are currently teaching the course.J. A. Mejia self-identifies as Mexican American and his research investigates the funds ofknowledge of Latinx adolescents. He grew up in a binational setting where the majority of thepopulation
focuses on the analysis of designated andemergent leaders during the project26.Project-based learning is associated with increased student satisfaction, skills development, andlong-term retention of material27. In engineering education, it is an effective mode in which toteach design28 and can closely model engineering practice: in a typical course, teams ideate,design, and prototype an engineering product. The types of skills developed in project-basedcourses, including teamwork, communication, and self-directed research, are congruent withbroader professional goals for graduating engineering students. Finally, current accreditationguidelines for U.S. schools require a capstone design course for all engineering programs26.Therefore major U.S
learning objectives overall are centered in thepreparation of both business and engineering students (undergraduate as well as graduate) forstrong participation in and leadership of technology commercialization projects and processes,regardless of setting; i.e., corporate or start-up ventures. The design employed to achieve theseobjectives has two platforms – learning the keys to success for high-tech business ventures anddemonstrating that learning by applying all the keys to a real-world project for a company orinventor who needs their insights. This design readily incorporates the application and Page 13.1359.15assessment of the engineering
in a diverseclass containing freshmen through graduate students. Findings suggest that students develop agreater appreciation for language differences, see a connectedness between their engineeringwork and societal impacts, and draw connections more readily between theories presented inclass and practical applications on site. Not surprisingly, our findings also suggest that studentsare more likely to participate in a study abroad program when their class schedules are notadversely affected and when the topic relates to their major discipline.IntroductionStudying abroad at the post-secondary level is frequently advocated for because of the manypotential benefits to student learning1,2,3,4. However, these benefits are not uniformly
Paper ID #34334Collaboration Between ESPOL and Villanova University on the Developmentand Delivery of a Digital Literacy Program for Youth on the GalapagosIslandsDr. Pritpal ”Pali” Singh, Villanova University Dr. Pritpal Singh is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Villanova University. He re- ceived a BSc in Physics from the University of Birmingham, UK in 1978, and Masters and Ph.D. degrees in Applied Sciences/Electrical Engineering from the University of Delaware in 1981 and 1984, respec- tively. Dr. Singh teaches courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels in the areas of semiconductor
institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International Division of the American Society for Engineering Education and in the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institution (LACCEI).Prof. Jared Roberto Ocampo, Universidad Tecnol´ogica Centroamericana (UNITEC) Jared R. Ocampo is currently a researcher of the Faculty of Engineering at Universidad Tecnol´ogica Centroamericana (UNITEC) campus of San Pedro Sula and previously worked as Academic Head of Engineering, Mechatronics Engineering Coordinator and as an undergraduate and graduate professor. He also works as a private
thefaculty members to motivate the students to improve their higher-level cognitive skills (Rajuet al., 2000), the students experienced a realistic and complex scenario, learned aboutreal-world decision-making issues, and analyzed the case study and benefited greatlyaccording to the statements by the instructors.3 Research Review and Research Questions A suitable balance between technical knowledge and business knowledge need to becreated (Trauth et al., 1993; Kirsch et al., 2007) so that graduates gain not only strongleadership skills but also become proficient in information technology (IT) concepts(Glyer-Culver, 2003) and have strong soft skills and cognitive skills (Kirsch et al, 2007). It ismore difficult for students who lack context-based
education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context[4]. Global consolidation isin fact a necessity towards future prosperities. However, for the design and construction industry,globalization is a trend that specifically means two things: increased opportunity and competition[32] .While many might assume that only the largest corporations feel the effects of globalization, thisis not the case. Although companies like Bechtel’s, Kellogg Brown & Roots, or Foster Wheeler Page 25.674.2Ltd. may be international players in direct competition with foreign markets
to exclude their information.3.3 COVID-19 Setting To provide greater context to the setting in which this research was conducted, we mustacknowledge the COVID-19 pandemic and the situations in which that forced internationalstudents into. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, incoming international students were admittedinto a special virtual program designed to cater to their needs called Bound. This allowedstudents to take asynchronous classes while being in various time zones. While being at homewas safe and comfortable, it was also difficult for students to make connections with peers andparticipate in extracurricular activities. Despite the virtual nature of most meetings and events,being in a time zone more than 7 hours ahead made it
for the success of this practice as it has beenobserved by the instructors after nine years having this experience in the classroom. Therefore, itis of major interest to understand the effectiveness of the interaction among the students workingwith international teams during the collaborative design and its impact in the final solution.Consequently, this work presents an assessment instrument that has been developed to evaluatethe interaction among the students participating in a multinational collaborative design based onthe parameters of frequency of communication, and quantity and quality of the informationshared. The aim of this instrument is to determine the value of technical and social interaction inthe flow of the collaboration, and
countries. 11. There is a certain degree of difficulty in joining consortia such as the Washington Accord; even more so for individual countries. 12. Various groups need to be educated on these issues.After a day of discussion, a document called The Turabo Declaration12 was created thatsummarized the conclusions of the participants: “Whereas there is a need for Quality, Consistency and Mobility among Engineers educated in the Region, we recommend to LACCEI the appointment of a Task Force to draft a first principles document of a Latin American and Caribbean Engineering Accreditation Agency (LACCEAA). Some first principles for design of this: a. Engineering Mobility (to be defined) b. Draw from best practices and
American students, it was excellent practice for technical language skills of the German students. The six American students were then teamed up with approximately 30 German first-year students; forming teams of 12 students with two Americans on each team. The teams were then released and taken to separate dedicated rooms, which they would use full-time for their project design work over the next 5 days. Student teams were closely supervised by a tutor from
Coordinator for the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab in the De- partment of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Johnny is also a Graduate/Teaching Assistant to the Grad School Certificate Program - Preparing the Future Professoriate. He has a Master in Educational Foundations and Management and a Bachelor in Sociology. His research interests include STEM edu- cation (policy and foreign-born students and workforce), migration and immigration issues in education; international higher education/international students; and quality assurance in higher education.Dr. Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Homero Murzi is an Assistant Professor in
MentorshipEngineering design Delta Design activity6activities Bottle rocket design competition Cellphone battery chargerStudent organization Goal setting for LSWE development Best practices for sustaining organizations Elections for LSWE officer positions Becoming a SWE sectionIn addition to the above activities, microSD cards were purchased and given to each of the camp participants. The microSD cards were loaded with the materials from the camp activities, as well as open source notes, textbooks, and materials related to the students’ university courses. The idea for these microSD cards was developed due to the lack of resources at the students’ respective
30 years. He has been the six-time elected as the Program Chair of the ASEE International Division for approximately the past 15 years. Three times as the Program Chair for the Graduate Studies Division of ASEE. Nick has had a major role in development and expansion of the ID division. Under his term as the International Division Program Chair the international division expanded, broadened in topics, and the number of sessions increased from a few technical sessions to over eighteen sessions in the recent years. The ASEE International Division by votes, has recognized Nick’s years of service through several awards over the past years. Nick has been the recipient of multiple Service awards (examples: 2013, 2010
issues are addressed, there remain important unanswered questions about how studentsperceive global engineering and global engineering education, including appropriate pathwaysfor attaining the kinds of competencies they will need to practice as global professionals.This paper is part of a larger study designed to examine how global educational experiences canprovide students with opportunities for transformative learning, thereby supporting attainment ofdesirable graduate attributes. Here we more specifically report on student perceptions of globalengineering attributes and related educational pathways. Our primary research questions include: • What global and professional attributes do engineering students perceive as desirable for
and development ofthe undergraduate engineering curriculum. The curricular experience documented here has beenshown to have a measurable and positive impact on development of global competencies.References 1. Del Vitto, C. (2008). Cross-Cultural "soft skills" and the global engineer: Corporate best practices and trainer methodologies. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 3, 1 Article Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol3/iss1/1 2. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Engineering. 3. Bennett, J. M. (2008). Transformative training: Designing programs for culture learning
abroad program. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(1), 1-31.9. Olds, B. M., & Miller, R. L. (2008). Using formative assessment for program improvement. In J. E. Spurlin, S. A. Rajala & J. P. Lavelle (Eds.), Designing better engineering education through assessment: a practical resource for faculty and department chairs on using assessment and ABET criteria to improve student learning. Sterling, Va: Stylus Pub.10. Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education. (p. 348)11. Green, J., Willis, K., Hughes, E., Small, R., Welch, N., Gibbs, L., & Daly, J. (2007). Generating best