Paper ID #40028Engineering Global Competencies through Study AbroadDr. Patrick Tunno, Pennsylvania State University Patrick Tunno is the inaugural Director of Penn State’s Center for Global Engineering Engagement and an Associate Teaching Professor. He has overseen and continues to lead the development and expansion of diverse international initiatives. Under his leadership, the college has established an award-winning Global Engineering Fellows Program, launched Penn State’s first 3+1+1 program for international stu- dents to pursue a one-year master’s degree, and initiated new interdisciplinary faculty-led study abroad
the recognition of the dignity of the profession of EngineeringEducator.In this paper, the international credentialing functioning is described as well as the roadmapof competencies development to the systematic improvement proposed to the engineeringeducators to build up as faculty to achieve the profession high-level quality global recognition.The bridge with the recognized international accreditation of engineering education programsis also shown to have a symbiotic effect with advantages for the universities and their faculty.1 - IntroductionEngineering education is a crucial aspect of the engineering profession and plays a vital rolein shaping the future of the industry [1]. Engineering educators are the backbone of thisprocess and are
Competence for Engineering Formation (Work in Progress)1. IntroductionThe purpose of this project is to determine to what extent global engineering competence can bedeveloped in engineering students through the use of four minimally to moderately intensiveglobal engagement interventions. The specific global engagement interventions evaluatedinclude the use of international engineering case studies in a quantitative analysis course, theintentional formation of multinational student design teams within a capstone design course, aCollaborative Online International Learning (COIL) research project in a fluid flow (transportphenomena) course, and an engineering short course coupled to a community engaged project.The specific
, point to the efficacy of short-term internationalresearch opportunities as learning, perspective altering, and motivating experiences forundergraduates who identify with underrepresented groups and for undergraduates in general.1. IntroductionThe impacts of short-term study abroad programs are considered in the literature [1, 2, 3, 4] butinformation regarding mentored undergraduate research in STEM disciplines completed throughtwo-week international programs is limited as is material regarding impacts of suchprogramming for students identifying with underrepresented groups. Outcomes from two short-term international programs in STEM, one offered in the Yucatan in collaboration with Mexicanuniversities and the other in Belize, are considered
we will propose appropriate supports, such as workshops andgroup activities, to help international students in engineering adjust to the gender-related culturein the U.S.IntroductionInternational graduate students in engineering are a significant presence in the U.S., with manyof them hailing from countries with distinct cultures from that of the U.S. The Institute ofInternational Education reported that 385,097 international graduate students were enrolled inU.S. higher education during the 2021-2022 academic year [1]. In addition, 54% of internationalstudents pursued degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields,with a majority of them enrolled in engineering and computer science programs [1]. In terms ofthe
faculty and improvement of curriculum and researchin academic institutes of other member countries.Keywords: Fulbright, Fulbright Scholar Award, Council for the International Exchange of Scholars.INTRODUCTION US Congress in 1946 approved the Fulbright program, which later proved to be a beacon forinternational understanding and collaboration [1]. The Fulbright Scholar Program wasadministered by the Council for International Exchange of Scholars (CIES) a non-profitorganization that was founded in 1947. Later in 1996, the Fulbright Scholar Programadministration transferred to the Institute of International Education (IIE). The Fulbright U.S.Scholar Program offers over 800 awards for US citizens to teach, conduct research and carry
resultantsacrifices. We hope this paper not only provides an overview of some of the unique challengesfaced by international women of color, but also drives more interest in better understanding thisoft-overlooked group in engineering.Introduction "Intersectionality is a lens through which you can see where power comes and collides, where it interlocks and intersects. It’s not simply that there’s a race problem here, a gender problem here, and a class or LBGTQ problem there. Many times that framework erases what happens to people who are subject to all of these things" - Kimberley Crenshaw [1]Bi-directional ignorance of and lack of intentional training on working with people of differentbackgrounds, gross unfamiliarity of the
internationalstudents around the globe. Despite a decrease in the enrollment rate of new international studentsby 34% for undergraduates and 45% for graduates compared to 2019/2020, close to 1 millionstudents still chose to come to the US for their education [1]. More than 80% of these students arepursuing advanced degrees in STEM [2]. Why has the US been able to attract so many internationalstudents into STEM for higher education? Several reasons have been suggested in the literature -the availability of state-of-the-art research labs, opportunities to embark on ground-breakingresearch, the presence of highly qualified researchers, and the benefits of working withintellectuals from other parts of the world [3]. It is humbling to observe from the literature
simulated extraterrestrial terrain. The simulated terrain contains 5-15-inchboulders, a 6-inch-deep gravel bed, and erosion grooves and crevasses that vary in depths andwidths [1]. The standard for each competition includes both a male and female driver. During the1/2-mile terrain competition, teams earn points based on stages successfully passed, within an 8-minute time limit. Points are also earned through pre and post challenges that depend on theassembly of the vehicle, and the design of the rover. To add more complexity to the race, andencourage students to think critically, they are required to carry the un-assembled vehicle to thestarting line and are evaluated on assembly time. The competitors also get two attempts at thecourse with the
toward implementing active learning strategies. At a high level, case studiesacross Botswana (Tabulawa, 2003), South Africa (Harley et. al, 2000; Nykiel-Herbet 2004), andTanzania (Vavrus, 2009) highlight four salient barriers to curricular change: 2 1. Educators’ training on and personal experiences in learner-centered approaches is often limited (Coultas and Lewin, 2002; Schweisfurth, 2015); 2. A lack of available resources in physical learning environments can inhibit implementation of learner-centered approaches (Schweisfurth, 2015) 3. Cultural expectations at the institutional and national level (eg., appropriate educator
Education, 2023 Workshop on Global Engineering Design for Low-Resource SettingsBackgroundGlobal engineering is becoming more prevalent as technology increases communication andcollaboration worldwide [1]. To keep up with the ever-evolving society, global engineers mustwork on cross-cutting issues and bring a diverse mindset to work nimbly across differentenvironments with changing resources [1,2]. This adaptability requires being comfortable withdesign skills and being open to new ideas and international relations [3]. The design process iscrucial for students to experience and understand how to meet a population’s needs and iteratethrough feasible and culturally appropriate solutions.Undergraduate engineering curricula have significantly
non-IVE teams from An-Najah.The evaluation in this study focused on (1) global competencies, (2) value of the experience, and(3) team dynamics.The influence of the experience on the global competencies of the students in IVE and non-IVEteams was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively using pre- and post-program surveys basedon the Stevens Initiative and RTI International’s Common Survey Items as well as survey itemsdeveloped for this IVE to measure whether the program promotes gender equity. The value ofthe project experience for all students (i.e., IVE and non-IVE) was evaluated using a mixedmethods assessment based on the “value-creation framework” of Wenger-Trayner et al. Fourcycles of the value-creation framework were included in this
critical contributor towards the development of aglobally competent scientific and engineering workforce. The Open Doors report published bythe Institute of International Education, the leading not-for-profit educational and culturalexchange organization in the United States has shown that over the decade pre covid-19 therewas a steady increase from 273,996 students participating in Study Abroad in 2010/2011 to347,099 in 2018/2019, a 27% increase in the number of US studying abroad. The percentage ofSTEM students have also increased over that period from 19.0% in 2010/2011 to 26.8% in2018/2019. All minority students and STEM students accounted for 28% and 25% respectively,in 2015/2016, and increased to 30.9% pre pandemic [1]. The 2023 Open Doors
Innovation:Course Vision: Our Global Engineering course is deeply rooted in the vision and values of theSchool of Engineering at the University of Mount Union. The School of Engineering is committedto providing a holistic engineering education that prepares students for the challenges of aglobalized world while fostering their leadership and communication skills. Our institution's visionfor engineering education is encapsulated in our four pillars of engineering education, which areguided by the National Academy of Engineers' principles [3] and Mount Union's tradition as aliberal arts institution. These pillars are: 1. Providing Extensive Hands-On Real-World Engineering 2. Nurturing Global Engineering Competence 3. Integrating Engineering
accreditation for theirengineering programs on both local and global scales.Program Accreditation and AssessmentWorldwide, multiple accreditation systems and procedures are in place, with a predominantfocus on outcomes-based models. For example, in India, the National Board of Accreditation(NBA) evaluates the qualitative competence of engineering programs by emphasizing outcomes-based education (OBE) [1]. Another significant system, the EUR-ACE, is described as “aframework and accreditation system that establishes a set of standards identifying high-qualityengineering degree programs in Europe and beyond” [2]. Additional systems include theEngineering Council (EC) in the UK, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) NationalAccreditation Board
. A binary logistic regression wasapplied to assess the significance of sustainability knowledge in relation to the students’educational level. The results exhibit statistically significant differences between sustainabilityknowledge scores and the semester enrolled in the program.Higher educational levels are associated with a higher likelihood of obtaining a better overallsustainability knowledge score. The probability of achieving higher overall sustainabilityknowledge scores is approximately 20% as industrial engineering students advance in theprogram. In addition, in the logistic regression model, confidence intervals can be calculated forthe odds, where it is seen that the influence of the educational level can range from 1% to 43%.This
an engineering disciplineand a second language and spend their senior year abroad studying and interning as a mandatorypart of their program, then return to campus as part of their 5th and final year where they takecapstone courses in their respective engineering disciplines and the highest sequence of secondlanguage, culture, and literature courses.Research question 1: Which changes in students’ intercultural development were measured bythe IDI assessment?Research question 2: Which individual factors impacted changes in professional, personal andlife skills development during a year of studying and interning abroad?Literature review In previous influential scholarship, Byram [1], Deardorff [2] and Bennett [3] haveoutlined conceptual
a global and multilingual scale is a critical need incontemporary higher education. In 2009, The Newport Declaration—resulting from the NSF(National Science Foundation) funded National Summit Meeting on the Globalization ofEngineering Education—stated that the globalization of engineering education is urgentlyneeded [1]. Additionally, engineering students with international experience are increasinglybeing sought by engineering firms [2]. To meet this demand, universities in the United States,including the University of Rhode Island, Valparaiso University, the University of Georgia,and many others, have developed international engineering programs that include earningundergraduate degrees with an engineering major and a foreign language
Division of Technology DeVoe School of Business, Technology, and Leadership Indiana Wesleyan University AbstractAs the globalization of higher education continues to thrive, American universities have becomehubs of cultural diversity, attracting a significant population of international students seekingquality education. Teaching international students on an F-1 visa in this environment, particularlya Data Analytics graduate program, presents many challenges and opportunities. This researchpaper explores the multifaceted landscape of educating international students in American highereducation institutions, delving into their unique challenges and the
, and work-life balance challenges hinderwomen's participation and advancement in engineering. The paper discusses research-informedrecommendations to promote greater gender diversity and gender equity among engineeringfaculty and university faculty, hence contributing to the broadening of the participation ofwomen faculty in engineering and Ethiopian higher education.Keywords: engineering education, faculty, diversity, mixed methods, gender bias, culturalbeliefs, Ethiopia 1Introduction & BackgroundGender diversity in academic institutions, particularly in engineering, is increasingly concerningworldwide [1], [2], [3]. Achieving gender equality
) thatoverall productivity decreases because of tariffs due to decreased international trade does emergefrom the game.IntroductionCourseThe Global Engineering Course has been a required component of the engineering curriculumsince the inception of Engineering at the University of XX in 2010. Except for the Spring 2020and 2021 trips, which were cancelled due to COVID, every cohort has worked on an engineeringproject in an international setting for at least a week in countries such as Belize, Nigeria, and theUnited Arab Emirates [1], [2].In addition to the engineering field experience, students have sixty-five minutes of lecture andsixty-five minutes of lab per week during a 15-week spring semester. Each of the two modulesdescribed in this paper are
) byapplying a text-mining technique. The results conclude that this methodology is useful not only for graspingthe effectiveness of PBL program contents from a cause-effect perspective but is also applicable to othernonstandard teaching methods that cannot be quantitatively assessed with conventional exams.1. Background and problem statement1) Learning outcomes from techno-socio PBLsTechno-socio Project-Based Learnings (PBLs), which are designed from the combination of social issuesand technology-based solution developments through collaborations amongst public sectors, educationalinstitutions, and industries, are a very effective teaching approach for nurturing engineering skillsets andmindsets for those who will become professional engineers in the
International Women of Color.Importantly, our narratives challenge the traditional notion of IWoC as a monolithic identity. Thetopic is important as it highlights the unique challenges faced by this group and the need forstructural and mentorship support and resources to facilitate their transition as the individualsevolve. The findings have implications for policy and practice, particularly in the areas ofsupport services and resources for international Women of Color students. Also, our research hasdirect implications for mentorship strategies and faculty development.Keywords: international Women of Color, Collaborative Autoethnography, navigating US highereducational and workforce development, equitable education.1. IntroductionIn the United States
degree program: a blocking factor score and a delayfactor score. The blocking factor score for Course A is the number of courses that a studentcannot enroll in (i.e., they are “blocked”) if the student does not pass Course A. The delay factorscore for Course A is the number of prerequisite courses in the longest prerequisite pathway thatincludes Course A. The cruciality of Course A within the degree program is found by addingCourse A’s blocking factor and delay factor scores. Figure 1 below depicts the blocking factor,delay factor, and cruciality of a course visually. Finally, a total score for the structuralcomplexity of the degree program is calculated by adding together the cruciality of all courses inthe most efficient pathway to completing
CSP framework. Secondly, a framework for the use of CSPin praxis and research within the SSA context is proposed drawing on Onwuegbuzie et al.’s(2012) methodology literature analysis. Findings present an adapted CSP framework for SSA,comprising 11 tenets for asset-based research. They highlight CSP’s adaptability across contexts,underscoring its importance in SSA STEM education.Keywords: culturally sustaining pedagogy, asset-based education, exemplary teaching,inclusion, transferability, Sub-Saharan AfricaBackgroundResearch shows that teaching practices that are more contextual and inclusive of students’cultural backgrounds and experiences enhance students' learning [1]. It is this awareness ofimproved learning outcomes that paved the way for
educational and research relationship that wasinitiated in 2017. This partnership had previously seen success through implementation of a3+1+1 dual degree program, permitting Chinese students to acquire an undergraduate degree inChina and a subsequent M.S. degree in the United States. Furthermore, a joint researchsymposium had paved the way for the establishment of a collaborative research center,complemented by several instances of faculty members teaching summer courses in China.In the spring of 2020, in furtherance of their enduring partnership, both institutions jointlysubmitted a proposal to the Chinese Ministry of Education, seeking to institute a Chinese-Foreign Cooperation in Running Schools (CCE) graduate program. This proposal
connectedness and interdependence ofworld cultures and economies. With the Information Age, globalization went into overdrive.Advances in computer and communication technology launched a new global era and redefinedwhat it meant to be “connected” [1]. Over recent years, the engineering field, among others, haswitnessed the power of connectedness as a catalyst for breakthroughs. Often these breakthroughsresult from cultural exchanges - the process of sharing and experiencing ideas, knowledge, andpractices across different cultures [2]. Specific to engineering, the cultural exchanges create amelting pot of ideas and influences from around the world through bringing togetherprofessionals from diverse backgrounds. Yet, bringing together individuals from
. in Educational Policy and Planning from UT Austin. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Navigating the Personal and Professional: How University STEM Mentorship Programs Support Women in Austria and Germany IntroductionThe underrepresentation of women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) fields isn't just a statistic – nor a debate – it's a persistent global issue [1]. Althoughsignificant progress has been shown to promote gender equality in society, women holdingpositions in the higher echelons of predominantly male-centric STEM fields remain a rarephenomenon [2]. Recent statistics support these findings, shedding light on the stark reality ofsuch
academic integrity arediscussed. It is important for institutions to be welcoming, agile and accommodating inproviding a quality student experience for a sustainable enrollment pipeline.1. Introduction 1.1. The Enrollment CliffConsistent enrollment or strategized growth is crucial for continuity of higher educationinstitutions. Enrollment defines their academic programs, their student experiences, and thefuture direction of the institution, specifically financial sustainability. Over the course of 2023,14 nonprofit four-year colleges announced closures and a handful of others announced mergersor acquisitions [1]. These are mostly small, private, tuition-dependent institutions with meagerendowments that have seen enrollment slipping for years
students to accommodate in classroom settings and curricula.Epistemology is defined as the theory of knowledge. Thus, personal epistemology is the theoryof knowledge based on personal beliefs and values that are backed up by evidence of their claims[1], [2], [3]. Personal epistemology is thus how the mind relates to knowledge and reality andperceives the past, present, and future. For instance, reading the morning paper and formingjudgments based on personal beliefs exemplify personal epistemology. The judgment in thissituation was based on the individual’s personal beliefs on the new knowledge gained from thepaper.Qualitative studies on epistemological beliefs remain unexamined thoroughly in the Middle East.Qualitative studies are essential