Engineering Education, Cross-Cultural Collaboration, Engineering DesignThinking, Global Context, UAEAbstract:Engineers have the ability and responsibility to design and develop solutions that can improvepeople's lives, solve pressing problems, and make the world a better place. Real-world challengesare becoming increasingly complex and global, and engineering projects often requirecollaboration between people from different cultures.Global engineering is a general engineering course required by all engineering students. Thecourse focuses on designing and developing engineering solutions to real-world problems in aglobal context. In spring 2024, the course was offered in an innovative way, with a lecture-basedpart and a hands-on laboratory part. The
dealing with architecture, structural engineering, sustainability, and humanitarianengineering. Some highlights include: MSU Denver study abroad course entitled Refurbishment of Structures hosted by UP in 2010 First UP visiting professor instructing at MSU Denver in 2011 English immersion program at MSU Denver in support of the Master’s in Architecture English-language program at UP in 2013 Collaborative development of an Architecture Minor at MSU Denver from 2013 through 2015 English immersion program for UP engineering faculty at MSU Denver in 2016 Collaborative Research on “Laboratory Testing of Timber-Concrete Composites Adaptable Architecture” from 2013 through present UP
Engineering at the University of Dayton. He received his B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering at UCA in El Salvador. He obtained his M.S. from Clemson University and his Ph.D. from Mississippi State University, both in Chemical Engineering. His laboratory research involves nanotechnology in chemical and biological pro- cesses. His educational research interests are community-based learning, open-ended laboratory experi- ments, teamwork, collaborative and active learning, and Transport Phenomena computational modeling.Dr. Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Homero Murzi (he/´el/his) is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Homero is the leader of the
IEEE, she is a member of the IEEE Standards Association and is in the Standards Development Working Groups of several standards related to online laboratories, learning environments, and privacy, security and governance of data related to learning systems. In ASEE she serves in the ASEE International Activities Committee and is Secretary/Treasurer of the ASEE International Division. She is an internationally registered Professional Engineering Educator (iPEER), ranked at level 5: Engineering Education Researcher, out of 6 levels. According to Google Scholar, her h-index is 25, i10-index is 59, and she has over 1900 citations.Jusmeidy ZambranoLaura Eugenia Eugenia Romero Robles, Tecnologico de MOnterrey
material was to some extentbeneficial for learning, but it cannot be replaced by the face-to-face environment thatallows association with laboratory equipment and field trips that provide a directapproach to the area of study [29], [30], [31], from this deduction doubts and concernswere born by students about the lack of practical training within their areas of study[32].The Covid-19 pandemic has changed the lives of the general population includingstudents in particular aspects, among them are students who were in the transition stagestarting their university studies (Post pandemic students) and students who wereinterrupted in the middle of their process (Pre pandemic students), however, bothgroups were separated from their social groups and were
applicable) and energy–environmentinteraction related inputs to the students.(d) It should provide a balance between theory and practical aspects. Therefore, its curricula shouldinclude inputs on laboratory and demonstration experiments, hands-on-skills training, trouble-shooting,design and manufacture inputs besides lectures, tutorials, assignment and seminar, etc.(e) It should be flexible and dynamic thus allowing for future improvements in the content and structureof teaching/training programme.(f) It should be compatible with global efforts to facilitate effective and mutually beneficial experiencesharing and interaction with other institutions in the world.(g) To the extent possible, the university level teaching/training programmes on
, one male and one female during the competition. Each year MTSUstudents participate in the “NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge” a half-mile simulatedlunar terrain course that includes "craters", rocks, "lava" ridges, inclines, and "lunar" soil. Thestudents are aware of the challenges they face during the competition, so they design the Roverto withstand the deterioration the vehicle could undergo. The design and construction of theRover is completed in three different laboratories located on the MTSU campus in the VoorhiesEngineering Technology building. More than 80% of the parts are designed and manufactured bythe students alone. This hands-on method is a great advantage for students to learn from theirmistakes and be equipped if any
procedures and skills. Moreover, engineering students inBangladesh need a conducive learning atmosphere. They should have access to a library,laboratory, and other resources. This can contribute to an environment that is favorable tolearning. The expanding economy of Bangladesh has afforded students the chance to obtainexpertise in engineering [18], which has also served as a significant motivation for the students.Engineering students recognize that their education and experience may give them a competitiveedge in the job market. As a result, they are encouraged to work diligently and achieve success.In Bangladesh, the combination of enhanced educational resources, a competitive job market,family and peer support, and a booming economy might all
Awards. These awards are offered toprofessionals, artists, and people from academics at any career level. However, some awards maybe for certain types of scholars and are limited to specific career levels. In general, some awardsallow you to select the country and/or host institution while others do not permit that. Similarly,some awards require you to have a letter of support from the host institution at the time ofapplication. For the Fulbright Scholar award, there are three different categories: Teaching,Research, and Teaching-Research. The research award consists of activities related to research thatincludes scientific research, practice-based research, etc. The research work can be applied andcan take place in a laboratory, field, or an
curriculumincorporating design and problem solving focused on the Engineering Grand Challenges. Theytaught unit operations laboratory courses for 3 years and senior capstone design for 4 years.4 Program Details 4.1 ParticipantsThis study specifically investigated students that participated in a 5-week, faculty-led, globalprogram to Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy in the Summer of 2022 through NortheasternUniversity. The demographics and breakdown of students can be found in Table 2.Table 2:Northeastern University Student Demographics for the 2022 global, faculty-led program Number of students 16 Identified Gender Female 11
are interested inpursuing higher education in the United States. Several unique factors contribute to theattractiveness of U.S. colleges and universities for students from India: • Research Opportunities: U.S. universities provide extensive opportunities for research and innovation. Students can access cutting-edge laboratories, libraries, and resources to engage in meaningful research projects. • International Reputation: A degree from a U.S. university is widely recognized and respected globally. Many employers value the skills and knowledge gained through a U.S. education. • English as the Medium of Instruction: Studying in the U.S. offers the chance to improve English language proficiency, an
earned 58% of all engineeringdoctorate degrees awarded in 2019 [3]. At Purdue University, 128 countries are represented bythe 2,369 IGES in the College of Engineering; this is among a total of 4,992 graduate students inengineering at our institution [4]. There are 52 African students, 814 East Asian or from thePacific, 75 from Europe or Eurasia, 111 from the Near East, 1,161 from South or Central Asia,and 156 from the Western Hemisphere.Although there is a large number of IGES, these students face many barriers that domesticgraduate students do not typically share. For instance, non-native English speakers mayexperience language barriers in the classroom or laboratory. Studies have shown thatinternational students usually read well, but their
gain knowledge on major climate issues. Visitsincluded a tour of CTE, a company that works to make LEED-certified buildings; a biomass landfill;energy storage laboratories of the University of Sao Paulo; Zambianco, a sustainable sugar and ethanolplant; Angra, the only nuclear power plant in the country, and others. Incorporated in the trip was a project where students were split into groups and paired withBrazilian students from the University of Sao Paulo and an employee at CPFL Energia. CPFL is thesecond largest non-state-owned group of electric energy generation and distribution in Brazil. Theprogram's goal was to solve real issues that the company faces. Solutions were required to be analyzed foreconomic, political, and social
UEFS/UFRB Cartagena UC/USB- Uni Valle Program Elements Site Coordinator x x - “INSTITUTION” Faculty Led - - - International Office x x x Reciprocal Program - - - Laboratory Bench Fee - x - University Support - x - Student Exchange Agreement or MOU
: international and domestic undergraduate students in focus in the United States higher education institutions. In addition, Mr. Halkiyo is interested in broadening the participation of engineering education in Ethiopian universities to increase the diversity, inclusivity, equity, and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student groups such as women and men, rich and poor, students from rural and urban, and technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences and thrive in their performances. In doing so, he focuses on engineering education policies and practices in teaching and learning processes, assessments, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo
. T. (2013). Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 346-374.[12] McAfee, M., Armstrong, P., & Cunningham, G. (2009). Achieving Effective Learning in Engineering Laboratory Classes. In 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore. http://cdio. org/files/document/file D (Vol. 6).[13] Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta- analysis. Review of educational research, 69(1), 21-51.[14] Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014
).” Thus, it is assumed that participants mainly considered and discussedenvironmental solutions from business perspectives.7. DiscussionParticipants, both Indonesians and Japanese, expressed that they had the most learning effectiveness innon-technical areas such as “Communication (4.43)” and “Individual and Collaborative Team work(4.21)”. This suggests that interactive methods such as group work on real-world challenges were moreeffective compared to traditional passive learning in classrooms or laboratories. Additionally, scoresrelated to consciousness aspects such as “The Engineer and the World (4.00)”, and “Lifelong learning(3.79)” were high. Thus, this PBL led to increased awareness related to its social aspects.On the other hand, despite