undergraduate students in developing thesehands-on activities for K-12 outreach. Since then other benefits have come from this course.There is now a dedicated Engineering K-12 Outreach Laboratory (Figure 16) in our School ofEngineering building. This provides us with an on-campus location where we can host groups ofscouts, individuals and schools interested in STEM fields. This course was instrumental instarting a K-12 STEM outreach “library” of hands-on activities, which can be used on- or off-site.Practicing engineers from the area are also excited with our K-12 STEM library. Many havevolunteered to host their own workshops at events such as Women in Engineering and MathOptions Career Day. However, most were uncomfortable with developing the
then connected to a small electric water pumpwhich is itself driven by a photovoltaic panel. This gives students an opportunity to be sure theirsystem is working and to make preliminary observations of the water heating effect. As the initial system is observed and proven to be functional, student groups are asked todiscuss possible variables affecting performance, and select a variable to test during the follow-on lab the next day. This team discussion is critical in understanding how engineers reallydevelop their own investigations. From NGSS Appendix F - Science and Engineering Practicesin the NGSS: “In laboratory experiments, students are expected to decide which variables should betreated as results or outputs, which should
project helped me to learn what research is like. We run into many problems along the way, but we were able to cope with them and complete our project, and still have fun along the way What, to you, were the most important features of PGSS? Please explain. Being in a setting with other driven, intelligent students who also wanted to be here allowed me to preform my best. The laboratory experience and team project. It showed me what scientific research is really like. It allowed me to use equipment and technology not available at my high school. The most important part was getting to work with equally brilliant people. I never
, evaluated, refined, and Page 22.959.15improved their knowledge of Robotics, and they developed effective skills for using LEGORobotics in the classroom.References1 Carbonaro. M. Rex, M. & Chambers, J. Using Lego Robotics in a Project-Based Learning Environment.2 Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. NY, NewYork: Basic Books.3 Johnson, J. (2003). Children, Robotics and Education. Artif Life Robotics.,7, 16-214 Verner , I.M. & Ahlgren, D.J. (2004). Robot Contest as a Laboratory for Experiential EngineeringEducation. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 4(2), 1-155 Nalajala, T.D. (2003
and fault detection. In the NASA University Research Center (URC) Structures, Propulsion and ControlEngineering (SPACE) Laboratory, research is being conducted on a testbed version of theJWST.9 This fellow’s research explores using control algorithms, such as an H-infinitycontroller, to perform control of the mirror shape, adjust for disturbances, and allow for precisionpointing of the telescope at a simulated source target.4. Background Mathematical Concepts The hands-on activities and demonstrations presented in this paper reinforce some Page 22.1613.5abstract mathematical concepts covered in Algebra II and Pre-Calculus
of ideas – considering how to address the challenge and possible approaches 3. Multiple perspectives – obtaining input from various sources; literature, others, etc. 4. Research and revise – conducting an experiment, doing some calculations 5. Test your mettle – testing your findings by some means 6. Go public – telling others what you foundA series of three applets and associated lesson plans were developed: (1) Linear Relationships; Page 22.1655.4(2) Mass and Volume and (3) Structure Property Relationships. During the Fall of 2010, theapplets and lessons were beta tested in five individual classrooms/laboratories with 150
theactivities in the project. Many of the teachers’ resources for science are outdated and limited.Moreover, they mentioned lack of space, specifically, computer laboratory, or science laboratoryscheduling issues. To address these needs, the instructors brought materials with them to theclassroom to help the teachers. This encouraged teachers to share materials with other teachersand with other schools. Finally, teachers mentioned the limited science curriculum in theirdistricts. We are working with our district partners to address this challenge. We are proud to saythat, due to our encouragement, some of our district partners are currently revising their sciencecurriculum to incorporate science and engineering
distribution, transportation security, and the economy, among others, including those listed as the 14 Engineering Grand Challenges of the 21st century,6 • Exploration of existing patent publications and applications, detailing the fabrication, testing and performance evaluation of the patented device or concept, • Investigation of laboratory and so-called “workshop” projects that detail experimental setup, measurement, and test procedures, and provide results that are novel, entertaining, and motivate replication or further investigation, • Characterization of mechanisms, their applications, and the dynamics governing their behavior, • Formulation of thought provoking mathematical puzzles or problems
interested and qualifiedstudents prepared to enter STEM careers must be increased.One of the reasons for declining enrollment in many STEM programs is that students are oftenturned off by the way these subjects are taught, with traditional classroom lectures and “cook-book” type laboratory experiences that provide little opportunity to actively engage in creative,real-world problem solving. Engineers and scientists are problem solvers— individuals whoskillfully apply their knowledge to tackle real-world problems by designing experiments,building prototypes, analyzing and interpreting data, and presenting experimental results topeers, supervisors and customers. It follows that in order to attract more students into STEMcareers, students must be
. Page 22.1045.5 • Multimedia Design*: This course is focused on 2-dimensional layout and learning a variety of software skills. This course contains minimal math content. • Architectural & Civil Engineering Design+: This course covers a wide variety of topics. One of the topics covered, for ~1.5 days, is the statistics of human factors and its usefulness in design. • Prototyping Laboratory: This course requires students to complete the design and prototyping of a variety of projects utilizing a variety of 3-dimensinal fabrication tools. The strong design component contains a substantial measurement and calculation component due to numerous and subtle calibrations and corrections that are
scientist, then a research fellow, at the Space Science Laboratory of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, AL. In 1995, he received the Arizona Mortar Board Senior Honor Society award for outstanding faculty service. In 1997 he was awarded an International Research Fellowship by the National Science Foundation for study at the Uni- versity of Melbourne. In 2009 he was recognized by ChEE and the College for Excellence at the Student Interface. He is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi and Phi Lambda Upsilon honor societies, and the College of Fellows at Rice University’s Will Rice College. Jim’s research interests include: transport processes in natural and engineered systems; separations and water
educationinfrastructure components such as laboratories, instructional materials, and teaching facilitieswould need to be developed and installed.Yet, there are an estimated 30,000 Technology Education teachers across the U.S. who providekey components of the infrastructure needed to implement engineering education in K-12education. These components include: time in the school curriculum; physical facilities that lendthemselves well to engineering design-based instructional activities; technical expertise; and asthis study indicates, a substantial and increasing desire to implement more engineering,mathematics, and science content and methods in their programs. It’s a scenario of opportunityand challenge. Despite the contributions Technology Educators have been
Computer Engineering of the University of Toronto for nine years. Presently, he manages the undergraduate hardware labs group and is responsible for the operation of all labs supporting electrical engineering courses with practical compo- nents. Within Engineering Education, he has a special interest in experiment design and delivery, as well as in the improvement of laboratory settings to enhance practical learning. Page 22.608.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Engineering with Electricity and Magnetism: A Guided-Inquiry Exercise for High-School Students to
was to build a water turbine capable of turning on three light emittingdiodes (LEDs). During the second day, students explored water quality and the process ofbioremediation. They visited an SRP Water Quality Environmental Laboratory and were given atour of the facility by two SRP scientists. Students were given background information onbioremediation and then challenged to design, build and test a water filtration device that wouldremove certain contaminants. On the third day of the internship, students had the opportunity ofsharing their lunchtime with SRP engineers. The engineers spoke with the students about what Page 22.442.3their job at
the implementation of high-engagement teaching methods.Erin Bowen, Purdue University Dr. Erin Bowen (previously Dr. Erin Block) has multiple areas of expertise include aviation psychology, human performance in aviation maintenance and high-consequence industries, and safety in high-consequence industries. Her research and expertise has been featured in several national and international news outlets, including an appearance on the nationally syndicated radio program, "Rudy Maxa's World with Christopher Elliott". Dr. Bowen is a member of the multidisciplinary Hangar of the Future research laboratory at Purdue, identifying and building tools and processes to enhance Next Generation
Page 15.1054.9seemed to know that engineers weren’t just workers who build things, but was unclear on whatelse they did.Half of the participants made a clear distinction between scientists and engineers. Many phrasedthis in terms of the real world and the laboratory, like Tim, who said, “I think scientists are morein labs, and engineers are a more ‘open-world’ kind of thing. Like, they do more stuff besidesinside their office and what-not.” Taylor represented this trend neatly, saying, “Scientists areindoors, engineers are out.” Similarly, Cory said that an engineer is “somebody who studies alot,” so the interviewer asked “So, are most engineers at universities?” Cory seemed to agreewith this logic, but was hesitant to counter her previous
AC 2010-2063: A FUNCTIONAL K-12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FORTEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYSteve Macho, Buffalo State College Steve Macho completed a BS at St Cloud State University, and M.A. & Ed.D. in Technology Education at West Virginia University. Steve is a Minnesota farm boy who has been involved in technology his entire life. He worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico Highlands University, and is currently an Assistant Professor of Technology Education for at Buffalo State College. He became a member of the Oxford Roundtable in 2008 and plans to present another paper there in 2010
selective university admissions practices, particularly in the STEM fields. Tours were held on the Vanderbilt campus and in their STEM laboratories. Attendees were encouraged to return to their classrooms with stories of how their subject areas are used in real research.3) Strategic Technical Experiences and Mentoring with University Partners Attendees learned about successful partnerships as well as brainstorm projects and programs on which to build a long-term partnership between their school and near-by higher education and professional entities. They also developed strategies for working with scientists and
devise implementation plans for theirown classrooms. During the second week, each teacher was invited to bring two students toparticipate in a teaching laboratory, with the teachers teaching the modules in a highly supportedenvironment, surrounded by SENSE IT staff (see Figure 4). This opportunity to implement thematerials with students gave the teachers an opportunity to review the materials again and to seehow they worked with students. They found this a very effective approach, both in terms of theamount of additional time they were able to spend with the curriculum and in terms of howseeing their own students work through the modules increased their own confidence in theirability to teach the SENSE IT modules to entire classes.The
process from the need to prototype in an open-ended environment working in teams. Problems are presented that Page 23.1263.3 allow students to define, build, and test the solutions. • Engineering Applications in Math: Students are introduced to salient math topics presented within the context of their engineering application reinforced through hands-on laboratory or computer simulation assignments. • Models and Applications in Physical Sciences: Physical science and lab modules are used to understand the importance of modeling and math in discovering principles of physics and chemistry. Elective
quality, accessibility and breadth.Engineering education has lagged behind other fields in adapting online teaching methodologies (10, 11, 12, 13) . Reasons for this lag include the Five Pillars of Quality Online Learning need for hands on engineering experiences in laboratories with often expensive equipment and substantial computing power (10). Until recently, this type of computer power was not Effectiveness
important inquiry science tools thatallow students to extend their everyday experiences and organize data in ways that provide newinsights. Imagination is one of the least emphasized science processes.13 Indeed, research onstudents’ perceptions of science indicates that they see scientific work as dull and rarelyrewarding, and scientists as bearded, balding, and working alone in the laboratory.14Middle school students need to be able to conceptualize science and mathematics in ways thatallow them to understand and transfer learning to new situations.1,15 Students need to learn in abalanced way. They need both procedural and conceptual knowledge.16 Conceptualunderstanding involves the concepts, operations and relations in mathematics; this web
school courses. Thesecollaborative projects provided a venue for continued dialogue between the partners. In addition,these long term projects produced instructional materials, laboratory activities, pre and post-testassessment data, and allowed for the university students to work directly with the secondaryschool students by functioning as the teacher within the engineering classes. To date, curricularunits have been developed, implemented and refined in the areas of flight, robotics, digitalcircuitry, general design activities, and renewable energy. In addition, the university students Page 14.275.26have been guest lecturers in our classes and
Technology Education Laboratories. Journal of Technology Education. 2005; 42.16. High School Engineering Program, http://www.pltw.org/our-programs/high-school-engineering-program, January 4, 2014.17. Engineering by Design, http://www.iteea.org/EbD/ebd.htm,18. Singhose W and Donnell J. Introductory Mechanical Design Tools. Department of Mechanical Page 26.844.12 Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009.19. Engineering Design Process, http://www.teachengineering.org/engrdesignprocess.php, January 4, 2014.20. NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington
tested in authentic environments, or what we refer to as typicalclassrooms, namely those challenging environments that seek to educate students from allsocioeconomic backgrounds. Through each iteration, both the curriculum and the environmentwere changed on the basis of the formative test results as we attempted to align the curriculumwith the realities of the classroom constraints. The successive curriculum redesigns were basedon multiple sources of data and feedback: task analysis and research on science content learning,alpha testing of the activities in the laboratory (without students), curriculum design with ourteachers during professional development workshops, and pilot testing curriculum in authenticcontexts (i.e., with our partner
for academic year 2007/2008. We also plan on pursuing funding toextend this to the ninth grade in the coming year. We would be happy to share materialdeveloped for this project as well as other information for schools wanting to implementa similar program. References1. “Science Notebook Essentials, A guide to Effective Notebook Components,” Michael Klentschy, Science and Children, Nov-Dec. 2005, pp.24-272. “Information and Inspiration for Innovative Teaching in K-12 Schools,” edutopia, The George Lucas Educational Foundation, http://www.edutopia.org/pbl3. “6 + 1 Trait ® Writing,” NW Regional Educational Laboratory, http://www.nwrel.org/assessment/4. “Terra Nova, The Second Edition (CAT/6
well as in real-world applications to societally relevant energy andenvironmental issues.Participating teachers received this content in multiple modes. They were exposed to differentconcepts while working in the research laboratories as well as during their design activities. Inaddition, they attended a number of lectures both in the US and in the UK. All of these differentvenues allowed participants to gain both theoretical and practical knowledge about a number ofconcepts relative to all three areas: mathematics, science, and engineering. One teacher sharedhis perceptions of the greatest benefit of the program when he said, “as a teacher