advantage, the Wright STEPP graduates are chosen to assist the instructors duringthe program. Every year, around 20 Wright STEPP graduates are hired on hourly wages to assistthe instructor in teaching duties. These students are not required to start teaching from day one.The Wright STEPP students are introduced to the instructors a week before the program starts,and periodically there after. Through these meetings, instructor guides the students and trainsthem in various skills in planning, organization, and leadership necessary during college.Through this program, students were able to develop mentorship and networking skills, and werealso able to hone their technical knowledge. With the idea of designing a program to prepare the first-year
in solving design challenges, and believe that they can go on to be good scientists and/or engineers. Parents have also developed positive attitudes towards STEM programs as well as positive perceptions of STEM jobs and careers, and their STEMrelated childrearing practices improved (including athome exploration and experimentation, the quality of questions asked at home, and building together). Evaluations also indicate that Engineering students benefit by learning how to create lesson plans as well as engineering design challenges, sharpen their own understanding of engineering concepts in the process of breaking them down to explain to a nonprofessional or
administered during summer camps.Evaluation MethodologyEvaluation Questions Data Sources Data Evaluation Methods1 What NASA themes were selected Teachers' and students' self-reports Description of percentages offor LRGV SoI activities during the of NASA theme of the summer participating teachers and studentsproject? camps 2011 and 2012 by theme2a Did teacher training activities Participants' responses to workshop Comparison of diversity against thereach the planned diversity of questionnaire demographic items plan and against published data oncertified teachers
/theengineeringplace/:The Engineering Place is NC State’s K–20 education and resource headquarters for exploringengineering. Through hands-on summer camps, in-school mentoring, dynamic volunteerprograms, topical workshops and much more, The Engineering Place builds excitement aroundengineering for students and teachers.Engineering summer camps have been offered at NC State University for almost 20 years. Overtime the focus, purpose and strategy associated with planning and executing the camps hasmatured to support the current 41 weeks of camp per summer. In the most recent summer thesecamps engaged over 1,700 students in grades 2-12 at various locations across the state. Severaldesign elements of The Engineering Place summer camps are particularly unique
knowledge about a particular system in an exploratory way, often withthe goal of getting some product/idea to produce desired behavior.1-5 Tinkering thus contrastswith more deliberate activity towards conceptual understanding of how some phenomenon worksor more pre-planned approaches to design. Some researchers have argued that tinkering is anunproductive process because it does not always lead to progress and/or conceptual learning.4,5Others view it as productive for students’ learning and for generation of novel solutions.1-3 In thispaper, we do a fine-timescale analysis of the process of tinkering to speak to this tension aboutthe productivity (or unproductivity) of tinkering for novice designers and programmers. Weclaim that tinkering, or ad
are at different temperatures. • As temperature increases, more energy is added to a system. Explore Students • Energy in the • Planning and • Creativity planned and form of heat carrying out • Collaboration conducted an is thermal investigations • Communication Page
computingand career plans. Amongst the selected students, there were only four that had little or noexposure to programming. Most of the girls had taken a high school computing course and insome cases they had two or three years of computing instruction. Two of the girls had taughtthemselves how to program. The most frequently mentioned language that the students knew wasC++, followed by Java. Other languages mentioned included Basic, Pascal, HTML, Alice,Python and Scratch. Five of the girls indicated plans to go into computer science as a career.Many were trying to decide between computing and other scientific or engineering fields.When asked what led to their interest in computing or programming, most of the students cited ageneral interest in
to get information to support my opinions. 8. I usually have more than one source of information before making a decision. 9. I plan where to get information on a topic. 10. I plan how to get information on a topic. 11. I put my ideas in order of importance. 12. I back my decisions by the information I have on hand. 13. I listen to the ideas of others even if I disagree with them. 14. I compare ideas when thinking about a topic. 15. I keep my mind open to different ideas when planning to make a decision. 16. I am aware that sometimes there are no right or wrong answers to a question. 17. I develop a checklist to help me think about an issue. 18. I can easily tell
supported by the National Science Foundation Under Grant No. 1158615In addition to aligning with the cognitive science and teacher professional development research,an engineering concept driven approach to teacher professional development provides a commonbasis for teachers to define and understand engineering. The concepts also provide a point ofcomparison to differentiate engineering from science. And perhaps most importantly,engineering concepts provide entry points for their inclusion into the existing science curriculum.Thus the development of a conceptual foundation has been critical to every aspect of the project,grounding the research and activities, including institute planning, instrumentation development,research design and project
, algebra, andgeometry.4.2 Management Skills Team-building Skills: Fellows collaborate with one-another in a peer-learningenvironment to use laboratory lesson plans developed by others in their classrooms. Fellowspartner with their teachers to implement laboratory lessons in their classrooms. Moreover,Fellows work with students to prepare for and compete in the FLL robotics competitions.Finally, Fellows work with research mentors toward their research assignments. To performsuccessfully in these activities, Fellows are developing and mastering team-building skills. Leadership Skills: Fellows serve as STEM role-models to students and as technicaladvisors to teachers in K-12 classrooms. In addition, Fellows provide technical mentoring
“Juicy details Text animal homes Questioning Words” Identify Looking at Students create Introduce Build and test animals’ how habitats the animals in engineering a hamster STEM basic needs provide for the story above and the exerciseintegration animals’ with tangrams, engineering habitat trail activities Sort animals basic needs. and then create design cycle. using 3-D by Using pattern some on their Plan the geometric characteristics blocks to own. hamster shapes
students aboutdesign decisions; group discussions and interactions (e.g., during the planning, creation, orimprovement phases of the engineering design process); and the testing process. The mostsignificant challenge regarding the cameras was that it was often difficult for teachers to recordwith the camera and manage the other responsibilities of teaching simultaneously. Before andafter teaching with the cameras, teachers were largely positive about their and their students’comfort with the cameras, and identified multiple instructional benefits of the cameras.Instruction was enhanced most especially by the ability that the cameras afforded to encouragestudents to provide good explanations and use evidence-based reasoning. The use of
: Teachers’ Use of Digital Resources in STEM Teaching,completed by a well-known national research organization [21]. Teachers need new models tosee the transformative powers of non-textual digital resources in their classrooms. Unfortunately,studies indicate that traditional approaches to in-service training for teachers (usually of the “halfday workshop” variety) often do not lead to change in classroom practice by these sameeducators [39].We report here on the dynamics of combining PRISM assessment results and the emerging needfor new IT literacy skills in 21st century STEM careers to guide a PRISM transformation. Inbrief, we plan to move from being a convenient resource provider to becoming a majorcontributor in STEM pedagogical reform by1
from Trinity University in 2002 and her MS in Science Education from the University of Texas at Austin in 2007. She has worked at the Austin Children’s Museum since 2006 and now serves as the Science Content Developer. She has taught ACM’s robotics after-school programs and currently coordinates the Museum’s outreach classes in local elementary schools. Christina’s other duties at the Museum include developing the science content for exhibits and programs, and assisting in the planning for the new Museum. Contact: csoontornvat@austinkids.orgKathy Schmidt, University of Texas, Austin KATHY J. SCHMIDT is the Director of the Faculty Innovation Center for the College of Engineering at
undergraduate student in the School of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering at Purdue University, West Lafayette. He plans on pursuing an M.S. in dynamics and control of astronautical systems, but is interested in engineering education research as well.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 26.846.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 High School Students’ Ability to Balance Benefits & Tradeoffs while Engineering Green Buildings (Fundamental) AbstractThe ability to balance benefits and tradeoffs is
further insight.&V. ConclusionIn this study, we implemented a series of lesson plans designed to provide students with hands-on programming and circuitry, while simultaneously teaching students about the growing field ofcybersecurity. This study makes a strong case for the use of Arduino-based lesson plans in thehigh school setting to teach cybersecurity concepts and generate interest in STEM andcybersecurity career paths. The authors found that the project discussed previously could befeasibly executed in the high school classroom, and yielded non-significant increases in STEMinterest as assessed by pre and post-survey in a group of 12th grade students already largelycommitted to pursuing careers in STEM-related fields. Despite this non
odd shaped package to an engineer. Along the waythey ponder who an engineer is, what they do, and where they work before eventuallymeeting up with a team of engineers. In particular, the focus of the storyline was upon thetake-away message that engineers make the world a better place through the process ofasking, imagining, planning, and creation to solve problems that are small or great whichis derived from the National Academy of Engineer’s report Changing the Conversation.9The text of the storyline allows the reader(s) to become an active player in a journey tofind the “engineer” through several artifacts and locations that illuminate aspects of theengineering occupation through what, where, who and why questions. In addition, thestorybook
1 2 3 4 5 access 3. The material posted on WebCT was a good 1 2 3 4 5 supplement to the taped lectures 4. I am confident that I met the course 1 2 3 4 5 objectives 5. The face to face meetings were valuable for supplementing the material on WebCT and 1 2 3 4 5 the taped lectures 6. My overall impression of the course was 1 2 3 4 5 favorable 7. I plan on majoring in engineering in college
engineering and may need some additional training to feel comfortable usingeveryday activities to introduce engineering concepts.This work will be used to inform a study in which we plan to investigate how parent-child conversations, situated around several activities at a museum, help to developengineering interest and expertise. Additionally, the findings were used to developresources for parents.References 1. Yun, J., Cardella, M., Purzer, S., Hsu, M., & Chae, Y., (2010). “Development of the Parents' Engineering Awareness Survey (PEAS) According to the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Framework.” In the Proceedings of the 2010 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2010
designs the best toy and develops the most effective marketing presentation will be granted an exclusive contract with NASA to begin manufacturing all the toys for the people who will be living aboard the space station. Each Toy Company not only has to design a toy that will function in space, they must provide a proof of concept prototype and develop a marketing plan to sell their toy to potential space families.”Students are given the opportunity to ask questions which lead to a discussion and lessons aboutthe International Space Station. Students are then assigned to work in heterogeneous teams offour which become their “Toy Company” based on grade, gender and their responses to theMultiple Intelligence Test for Young People17
relevance is influential inattracting and retaining students (in particular underrepresented minorities) in STEMdisciplines.2,3,8 Thus, inquiry-based activities were emphasized in the course modules. Theformat is aligned with research-based GCS and state standards for instructional planning anddelivery. The major components include (1) goals that are aligned with the North Carolina K-12Curriculum, (2) activator activities that test students’ prior knowledge, (3) teacher input activitiesin which the instructor teaches new knowledge through demonstrations, (4) an inquiry-basedsmall group activity facilitated by students, and (5) a concluding activity that requires students toreflect on what they learned and share their findings with others. A rubric
from the program, and how they viewed engineering.Many students reported finding engineering to be much more creative than they expected. Avideo highlighting some of the interviews is available at:http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/summer-workshop/overview.html.Conclusions and Future StepsWe plan to offer two sessions of the Design it! Build it! Summer Engineering Workshop atDartmouth this summer, a residential and a day program. This summer we are targeting womenand minorities by working with the Admissions Office at Dartmouth to advertise to schools andguidance counselors in New England. We plan to improve activities by making them moreinquiry-based and designed to foster creativity and work on correlating enjoyment and learningwith level of
0.950 1.500*14 Consider a relevant real-world problem -1.400 1.300 0.417 (Data not available) and develop a plan to address it15 Design or implement their own problem -1.500 1.417 1.583* (Data not available) investigation* significance results from difference in means being outside of bootstrapping 95% C.I.Table 3 is the statistical analysis comparing the past and current cohorts on their perceivedimportance of a variety of STEM concepts and the importance of using these as a teachingobjective. The difference in means was calculated by using (past cohorts mean value minuscurrent cohort mean value). Therefore, a positive difference in the mean values results in ahigher value
indicated that curriculum changeultimately rests on the classroom teacher. For example, in several studies on the integration ofnew science curricula, researchers found the following barriers: lack of equipment, lack ofsupport from a professional development team, lack of time to plan and teach the lessons,insufficient teacher content knowledge, and teacher beliefs about the teaching and learning andthe innovation to be implemented that were incompatible with success.5, 6In terms of engineering curricula specifically, researchers have found additional constraints. For Page 22.877.3instance, Hutchinson, Bryan, and Bodner found that teachers
practice‟10. The teachers utilized these same strategies and materials as they formed small teams to plan and practice teach, the same curriculum to Upward Bound students in the afternoon sessions. In this situation, the curriculum materials are used as a mechanism to engage teachers in concrete tasks of teaching, assessment, observation,and reflection that illuminates the processes of
participate in activities designed to strengthen their academic ability, character, social skills,and awareness of career opportunities available to them upon high school graduation.Program proposals are solicited by the Kauffman Scholars management each year frominstitutions of higher education, museums and other organizations. These proposals must includea rough outline of the pedagogy and academic plan the students participating in the particularsummer institute will follow and other details such as transportation, housing and mealarrangements. A specific budget must be submitted along with the plan for funding of thesummer institute. Once a specific proposal is selected for funding, Kauffman managementworks with the hosting organization to adjust
will be a highly visible national model that will generateexcitement in engineering education.This project is unique in that the activities are developed or selected entirely by engineeringstudents and delivered to school districts by students/faculty. The College of Engineering atRowan University currently has six professional engineering student chapters. These are IEEE,ASCE, ASME, AICHE, SWE, and EWB. Engineering students develop and pilot the activities,lesson plans, and handouts, for the Engineers on Wheels project. The professional chapters travelto select school districts throughout the academic year to expose the challenges and excitementof engineering to K-12 students and educators. Travel is conducted in colorful vehicles
Boston University’s graduate program in Human Development and a B.S. in Psychology from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Emily Davidson, MIT EMILY DAVIDSON is a senior at MIT, majoring in Chemical Engineering with a double minor in Physics and Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences. She has been a mentor to teen interns at Terrascope Youth Radio since the program's inception, and helped to develop the education plan for the program's first summer intensive session.Elizabeth Jones, MIT ELIZABETH JONES is a sophomore at MIT, majoring in Environmental Engineering. She has been a mentor to teen interns in Terrascope Youth Radio since 2009, when she played a major role in
. Each EiE unit has commonelements, including a four-lesson structure. The first lesson introduces a field of engineering anda design challenge through a fictional story. The second lesson explores the field of engineeringmore broadly through hands-on activities. The third lesson includes a controlled experiment formore in-depth exploration of different materials, processes, or design elements that will informthe final design. For the fourth lesson, students plan, create, test, evaluate and improve theirdesigns. As a result of engaging in engineering challenges and better understanding engineeringconcepts and being exposed to the kind of work of engineers do, some students might also reportincreases in their attitudes and self efficacy related
-order interpretation ofthe general principles that were not explicitly stated in the problem from these first orderfeatures. Finally, they developed general solution plans. In contrast, novices noted onlyfirst-order features and usually began solving the problem by identifying equations touse. This difference has been discussed as reasoning backwards from the solution goal tothe information in the problem (novices) versus reasoning forwards or developing arepresentation of the whole problem and using it to generate a problem solution (experts) Page 15.1277.3(e.g., Ericsson & Charness, 1994; Ho, 2001; Larkin, McDermott, Simon, & Simon, 1980