Development. In addition, she has developed numerous tools to mentor young women considering engineering as a career and has been involved in the development of a women in engineering role model book for K-12 Page 11.1349.1 students.Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology PATRICIA A. CARLSON is professor of rhetoric at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is a long-time advocate of writing in engineering education. Carlson has been a National Research© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Council Senior Fellow for the U. S. Air Forcer, as well as having had
University CAROLINE BELLER earned her B. S. in Education from Florida Atlantic University in 1967 and her M. Ed. In 1989 and Ph. D. in 1998 from Texas A&M University in College Station, TX. Dr. Beller is an Assistant Professor in the School of Teaching, Curriculum, and Learning in the College of Education at Oklahoma State University. Her main research interest are in science education and professional development. Dr. Beller has presented extensively at state, national, and international conferences in her research areas.Pamela Fry, Oklahoma State University PAMELA FRY was named Dean of the OSU College of Education in March 2005. As dean, she also serves as the Director of
investigation raises the awareness of these issues, providing the motivationand foundation for a more complete and thorough examination in the next several years.References:[1] M. M. Atwater, "Equity for Black Americans in Precollege Science," Science Education, vol. 84, pp. 131-286, 2000.[2] "Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology," The Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Females and Minorities in Science and Engineering and Technology Development, National Science Foundation, 2000.[3] "Georgia Department of Education Website," http://www.doe.k12.ga.us.[4] S. Goodkin, "Leave No Gifted Child Behind," in The Washington Post. Washington D.C., 2005
career-related questions from the audience and/or facilitate a Family Engineering activity. Page 25.636.8Table 2 provides a sampling of Family Engineering activities, the ‘engineering hook’ thatmotivates families to participate, engineering fields introduced through each activity, and thetype of activity.Table 2. Sample Family Engineering Activities. Name of Activity Engineering Hook Engineering Field(s) Type of Activity Opener Activities Diving Board Dominoes How far out can Civil Engineering Hands-on design, you build a Mechanical building, and testing
hosted by Ted Koppel. http://www.ideo.com/ 2. Brasier, Terry G. 2008. The effects of parental involvement on students’ eighth and tenth grade college aspirations: A comparative analysis. Dissertation for Doctor of Education, North Carolina State University, 138 pages. http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/3952/1/etd.pdf (last accessed, April 2011). 3. Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME), 2011. https://engineering.purdue.edu/CATME 4. Compton-Lilly, C. and Greene, S., editors, 2011. Bedtime Stories and Book Reports: Connecting Parent Involvement and Family. New York: Teachers College Press, p.24-25. 5. Crawford, M., Schmidt, K. “Aims for Engineering
Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(9), 876-884.11. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998, July/August 1998). Cooperative Learning Returns to College. What Evidence is there that it works? Change, 27-35.12. Murray, S. L., Meinholdt, C., & Bergmann, L. S. (1999). Addressing gender issues in the engineering classroom. Feminist Teacher, 12(3), 169 – 18313 Tonso, K. L. (1996b). Student learning and gender. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(2), 143-150.14. Labrie, A. M., Lemanowski, V.L., Smiley, B.A., Yezerierski, E.J., Baker, D.R., Anderson-Rowland, M.R., “A New Look at Gender Equity Professional Development for Secondary Science
principles, therefore clearly indicatingthat the course learning outcomes were achieved. Similar results were also obtained for 3groups of students who took a similar course by the same author during Summer 2007.Some of the 31 multiple choice questions used in the pre- and post- tests presented inFigs. 2 and 3 were:1. The function of an electronic communication system is:2. How do changes in frequency affect wavelength?3. Modulation is:4. The two ways a radio wave can be modulated are:5. Why modulation is necessary is radio communication?6. Examples of electric signal transmitting media are:7. Which of the following devices is (are) wireless communication device (s)?8. One way to increase the capacity of a cellular wireless network is by:9
scientists and engineers made me see that I want to be a scientists or engineer when I grow up.” “My sister did a science fair project before the scientists and engineers came to the help. I remember she struggled with her project. It was great having the scientists come and help out. It made the process easier.” “I looked forward to the people from SPAWAR coming to help.” Page 22.1161.8From teachers: “The S&Es from the lab provide such good role models for the students. Many have never met a scientist or engineer.” “The scientists have been a great help at listening to what we needed. The project
for this research. MBTI issummarized in Figure 1012,13. MBTI includes four categories that indicate how anindividual processes and evaluates information11. The first category describes how aperson interacts with his or her environment. People who take initiative and gain energyfrom interactions are known as Extroverts (E). Introverts (I), on the other hand prefer arelatively passive role and gain energy internally. The second category describes how aperson gathers information. People who process tangible data with their senses arereferred to as Sensors (S), and persons who prefer theoretical sources of data are calledIntuitors (N). The Sensor versus Intuitor category is an interesting area of study when itcomes to engineering education
university faculty, in order to develop and commercialize economically competitive new products that strengthen rural economies, create new and enhanced jobs, capital investment and an increased tax base. Dr. Vaidyanathan has thirteen U. S. patents and twenty-two pending patent applications. He has developed six different products from concept stage to commercial stage including a product commercially being sold to Airbus, Eurocopter, Lockheed and Boeing. At Oklahoma State University, Ranji works collaboratively with faculty members from various disciplines and colleges to develop products and solutions for Oklahoma small manufacturers. As the Herrington Pro- fessor, Dr. Vaidyanathan works with the Helmerich Research
decade of gender equity projects in the sciences. Washington, DC.2. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187-206.3. Blyth, D.A., Simmons, R.G., & Carlton-Ford, S. (1983). The adjustment of early adolescents to school transitions. Journal of Early Adolescence, 3, 105-120.4. Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C.M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.5. Eccles
kits that are never truly tackled within science instruction classroom experience.References1. Barger, M., Gilbert, R., Little, R., et al, Teaching Elementary School Teachers Basic Engineering Concepts. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2007.2. Engstrom, D., AC 2008-641: Invention, Innovation, and Inquiry—Engineering Design for Children. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2008.3. Etheredge, S., et al., To Pop or Not to Pop: Elementary Teachers Explore Engineering Design with Pop-up Books. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2005.4. NRC, National Research Council., National Academy of Sciences. National Science Education Standards
, vol. 29, no. 6, pp 935-946, Dec. 2010.4. National Science Foundation. (2011, January 18). General Science and Engineering Indicators of the Digest ofKey Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. [Online], Available:http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/digest08/pages/figure8.htm5. A. Dohm and L. Shniper, “Occupational Employment Projections to 2016,” Bureau of Labor Statistics, MonthlyLabor Review Online, vol. 130, no. 11, pp 86-125, Nov. 2007.6. R. Fry. (2011, January 18). Recent Changes in the Entry of Hispanic and White Youth into College,’’ PewHispanic Center, Nov. 2005. [Online]. Available: pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=567. M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, J. Coleman, “Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K-12 Students to EngineeringFields
Fellow as team partner: Mean Mean Change1) How successful is your Fellow at exposing students to 3.9 4.0 2.6% engineering principles in a lesson plan(s)2) How successful is your Fellow at leading students through the 3.6 3.7 2.7% lesson plan process3) How successful is your Fellow at engaging the class in 3.3 3.8 15% discussions4) How successful is your Fellow at classroom management 3.4 3.3 -2.9%5) How skilled is your Fellow at helping you find
standard. The document provides interesting and important background material related to Content match Background the standard. The grade level of this material is appropriate for this task or else I can easily adapt Object match Grade level the materials in this document to my grade level. I can use a non-textual component(s); e.g., figures, tables, images, videos orSituational match Non-textuals graphics, etc.Situational match Examples I can use the real-world examples provided in the
20, Issue 5, 1983.7. Cawelti, G. (editor), Handbook of Research on Improving Student Achievement, 2nd edition. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service, 1999.8. Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation, National Research Council, Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Technology: New Practices for the New Millennium, National Academies Press, 2000.9. Wenglinsky, H., How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of Teacher Quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2000.10. Loucks-Horsley, S., P. W. Hewson, N. Love, and K. E. Stiles, Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 1998.11
Settings, NationalScience Foundation. Opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF).References[1] National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[2] National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. Pelligrino, J., Chudowsky, N., and
course material. Section 6.4’s “Mathematical Modeling” assessment has onevolume calculation, but the one other problem given has to do with the statistics of a class’ testscores. The “Graphical Modeling” assessment of 6.2 is farther afield, involving the graphing ofcensus data.Principles of Engineering (POE)POE is the second foundation course in the PLTW sequence that we analyzed. Within POEstudents learn about various concepts inherent to the field of engineering. Among these conceptsare thumbnail and orthographic sketching, perspective drawing, free-body diagramming, thedesign process, X and Y components of vectors, thermodynamics, fluid and electrical systems
complete and turn in on weekly basis up to start of fall quarter.Closing Ceremony. The closing ceremony was held on the last day and was attended by the Deanof College of Engineering, Provost, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs, and Vice Provost forDiversity. A highlight of the closing was the presentation of the “Nia” and “Most ImprovedStudent” awards, which were voted by a consensus of the instructors. The Nia award is for thestudent who best represents the objectives of the program; one student is selected from eachsection of courses. The Most Improved Student Award is given to a student(s) who has made themost progress during the program; one student from each course is selected for the award.Other K-12 Outreach and College Retention ProgramsIn
of the Academic relevant content standards, and focused on the big ideasContent and foundational skills critical to future learning in the targeted discipline(s). Learning experiences challenge students to develop higherQuality of the Cognitive Task order thinking skills through processes such as inquiry, problem-solving, and creative thinking. Learning experiences place students in learningConnections to STEM Careers environments that help them to better understand and personally consider STEM careers. Learning experiences often
engineeringengagement and knowledge acquisition by K-12 students through age appropriate activities andlessons. Best Practices Partnership Panel winners' papers are authored collaboratively betweenengineering and technology education faculty and K-12 teachers. Details on the partnership'sstructure and goals and the successful strategies employed to overcome challenges and obstaclesare included. Each partnership's description includes sample student product(s) and conveys howother partnerships may emulate the project.One proposal winner was chosen by a panel of reviewers at each of the following levels:preschool or elementary school; middle school; high school. The three winning abstracts havebeen used to create a conference paper for this session