Paper ID #10605Exploring How Design Critique Processes Shape Fifth Graders’ Peer Inter-action in Collaborative Engineering ProjectsDr. Michelle E. Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, focusing her studies on learning, cognition, and motivation with an emphasis on classroom discourse. She joined the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University in 2010. Her interdisciplinary research draws on traditions in qualitative inquiry, sociolinguistics, complexity theories, and the learning sciences. Partnering with teachers
://www.CPST.org5. Farmer, H. S.; Wardrop, J. L.; Anderson, M. Z.; Risinger, R. (1995) Women's careerchoices: Focus on science, math, and technology careers . Journal of CounselingPsychology, 42(2), 155-170.6. Lent, R.W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, Hung-Bin, Schmidt, J., Brenner, B.R., Gloster, C. S.et al. (2005) Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering:Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1) 84-92.7. Schaefers, K. G., Epperson, D. L., Nauta, M.M. (1997) Women's career development:Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors. Journal ofCounseling Psychology, 44(2), 173- 183.8.Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D., & Larkin, K.C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction ofacademic success and perceived career
students. European Journal Of Engineering Education, 25(2), 145-155. doi:10.1080/0304379003085446. Sergey A. Filippov, Alexander L. Fradkov, Boris Andrievsky, Teaching of robotics and control jointly in the University and in the high school based on LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT, 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano (Italy), August 28 - September 2, 2011.7. Alimisis D., Robotics in Education & Education in Robotics: Shifting Focus from Technology to Pedagogy, in David Obdrzálek (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Robotics in Education, September 13 – 15, 2012, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 7-14
goodpartners/partnerships, and identifies some of the benefits for the parties involved.Introduction: Engineering is ElementaryEngineering is Elementary (www.mos.org/eie) is a research-based, standards-driven, andclassroom-tested curriculum developed by the Museum of Science, Boston that integratesengineering and technology concepts and skills with elementary science topics. EiE materialsalso connect with literacy, social studies, and math. Each of the 20 EiE units reinforces oneelementary science topic, focuses on one field of engineering, and is set in a different country.The units each begin with an illustrated storybook in which a child confronts a problem. S/hesolves it with the mentoring of an adult engineer who introduces the child to the
) curriculum (Museum of Science, Boston). The focusof the professional development (led by the researchers) was to orient teachers to engineeringand technology, uncover misconceptions, and provide an overview of the EiE curriculum alongwith an in-depth examination of one EiE unit they would implement in the Fall 2013. All fourteachers are employed in schools with large percentages of non-White students and studentsreceiving free or reduced lunch. We deliberately chose to work with schools with diverse studentpopulations with the goal of providing an opportunity to enact innovative, engineering-basedcurricula in hopes of challenging the status quo in a non-dominant demographic elementaryschool population.Each teacher implemented one EiE unit during
Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3): 378-394.16. Birbeck, D. & M. Drummond, 2005. Interviewing and listening to the voices of very young children on body image and perceptions of self. Early Child Development and Care 176(6): 579-596.17. Clark, A., 2005. Listening to and involving young children: a review of research and practice. Early Child Development and Care 175(6): 489-505.18. Bromfield, R., 1995. The use of puppet in play therapy. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 12: 435-37.19. Cunningham, C.M., Lachapelle, C., and A. Lindgren-Streicher (2005). Assessing Elementary School Students’ Conceptions of Engineering and Technology. In Proceedings: American Society of Engineering Education. Portland, OR.20
with a BS in Logic and Computation from Carnegie Mellon University, and is now engaged in the research and development of STEM curricula using classroom robotics technologies and game-like systems.Christian D Schunn, University of Pittsburgh Christian D. Schunn is an Associate Professor of Professor of Psychology, Intelligent Systems, and Learn- ing Sciences and Policy at the University of Pittsburgh. He received his PhD in Psychology from Carnegie Mellon in 1995. His research ranges from cognitive / social psychology studies of science/engineering and connections to classroom science instruction to studies of peer feedback in science and instruction
, including their capacity-building and school partner- ship programs. She coordinates the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s NSF-funded TEAMS Program (Tomorrow’s Engineers. . . creAte. iMagine. Succeed.) which engages more than 2,200 K-12 students in engineering throughout the academic year and summer months. She is also a contributing curriculum writer and editor for the TeachEngineering digital library, also an NSF-funded project. Janet holds a master’s degree in Information and Learning Technology from the University of Colorado Denver and a bachelor’s in Communication from the University of Colorado Boulder.Prof. Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder
Paper ID #13552Investigating Middle School Students’ Perceptions of Communication Chal-lenges in Collaborative Engineering Design Learning (fundamental)Dr. Michelle E Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, focusing her studies on learning, cognition, and motivation with an emphasis on classroom discourse. She joined the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University in 2010. Her interdisciplinary research draws on traditions in qualitative inquiry, sociolinguistics, complexity theories, and the learning sciences
. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual,1, 25-37.9. Barrows, H. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions forTeaching and Learning, 68, 3-12. Page 23.709.1210. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93,223-231.11. Duek, J. (2000). Whose group is it anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL). InHmelo, C., & Evensen, D. (Eds). Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 75-107). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.12. Dods, R. (1997). An action
Exposition, 2005.6 D. Bee, B. Puck, and P. Heimdahl, “Ten Years of STEPS Success: Significant Impact in Attracting Girlsto Science, Technology, and Engineering Careers,” Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annucal Conferenceand Exposition, 2007.7 Cal Poly University Fall 2007 Fact Book.8 J. Hubelbank, C. Demetry, S.E. Nicholson, S. Blaisdell, P. Quinn, E. Rosenthal, S. Sontgerath, “Long-term Effects of a Middle School Engineering Outreach Program for Girls: A Controlled Study,”Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annucal Conference and Exposition, 2007. Page 14.743.15
teaching focus on integrated STEM Education.Dr. Karl A Smith, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emeritus Professor of Civil Engineering, Morse-Alumni Distinguished Teaching Professor, Executive Co- Director STEM Education Center, and Faculty Member, Technological Leadership Institute at the Univer- sity of Minnesota; and Cooperative Learning Professor of Engineering Education, School of Engineering Education, at Purdue University. E-mail: ksmith@umn.edu, web: www.personal.cege.umn.edu/˜smith/ Page 26.857.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 How Fifth Grade Students Apply
, Creativity and Cognition Press, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.Dym, C.L. (1994). Engineering: A synthesis of views. New York: Cambridge University Press.Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing boarders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Glaser & Strauss, 1967.Hegedus, T. A., Carlone, H. B., & Carter, A. D. (2014). Shifts in the cultural production of “smartness” through engineering in elementary classrooms. Proceedings of the 121st American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego Lelli Van Den Einde is a faculty lecturer (LPSOE) in the Department of Structural Engineering at UC San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering. Dr. Van Den Einde’s interest in teaching has influenced her current research efforts towards improving engineering education pedagogy through the use of technology in the classroom. She is involved in promoting academic integrity as a way to prepare our students to be ethical practicing engineers, and is the chair of the External Advisory Committee for the IDEA center, which promotes inclusion, diversity, excellence and advancement in engineering. She has conducted research in performance-based earthquake engineering and
AC 2007-340: THE CINCINNATI STEM INITIATIVEEugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati Eugene Rutz is an academic director in the College of Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. His responisbilities include new program development and facilitating use of instructional technologies. Eugene has both academic and industrial work experience and is a registered PE. Page 12.1397.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Cincinnati STEM InitiativeAbstractThe paper describes an innovative approach to providing high school students an introduction toengineering and technology
Paper ID #13597Liberal Studies in Engineering Programs – Creating Space for Emergent &Individualized Pathways to Success for Women in Computing DisciplinesDr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is Chair of the Women’s & Gender Studies Department at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. She is also an Associate Professor in Ethnic Studies, Director of the Science, Technology & Society Minor Programs, and Faculty Director of the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minor- ity and Underrepresented Student Participation in STEM Program at Cal Poly. She previously
AC 2010-194: THE FIRSTE DECADE OF THE NEW MILLENNIUMJoan Kowalski, Penn State University - New Kensington Joan A. Kowalski earned both her Bachelors and Masters Degrees in Civil Engineering from Penn State University. In 1987, she joined the faculty at the Penn State New Kensington Campus, where she has advanced to the rank of Senior Instructor in Engineering. In 1999, she assumed the role of Program Director for the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) Program. She co-founded the Females Interested in Reaching for Science, Technology and Engineering (FIRSTE) Program in 1993 and continues serving as a co-director. This program is designed to attract high school females towards
Paper ID #8889Haptic Abilities and Their Impact on Teaching and Learning in the STEMFieldsDr. Nancy E. Study, Pennsylvania State University, ErieMr. Robert Edwards, Pennsylvania State University, Erie Bob Edwards has a BS in mechanical engineering from Rochester Institure of Technology and a MS in mechanical engineering from Gannon University. He is currently a Lecturer of Engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He teaches in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department. His primary teaching interests are in the fluid and thermal sciences, and teaches Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer. Additionally, he
Carolyn Labun is a Senior Instructor in the School of Engineer at the Okanagan campus of the University of British Columbia. Page 22.685.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Education-Engineering Collaborative Research Project Exploding Stereotypes: Care and Collaboration in EngineeringOverview and AimsResearch has found that students in schools often hold stereotypes of STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) subjects and careers: they view them as male-dominated, individualistic8 and uncaring. They are perceived to marginalize women.6 Thesestereotypes
learning environments and the development of the Arts & Bots program.Emily Hamner, Carnegie Mellon University Page 24.685.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Identifying and Cultivating Diverse STEM Talent through Creative Robotics (Works in Progress)IntroductionIn recent years, there has been increasing concern that the United States K-12 educational systemis falling short in preparing the technology innovators of the future. Students who exhibit theintellectual curiosity and creative problem-solving talents crucial to the engineering process
science tests6.Other programs have adopted similar approaches of creating kinesthetic learning programswithin the context of preexisting curricula. The Secondary Schools and Queensland Universityof Technology Engineering Activity Kits (SQUEAK) program was implemented in Australia toattract students of secondary schools to engineering careers. Like Project Lead the Way, theSQUEAK program designed hands-on projects to match to students’ coursework7. The VirginiaMiddle Schools Engineering Education Initiative (VMSEEI) created engineering testing kits(ETKs) to facilitate engineering instruction within science and mathematics courses and has built Page
AC 2011-1098: USING THE PRINCIPLES OF MANUAL TRAINING TOPERFORM S.T.E.M. OUTREACH FOR URBAN YOUTHGreg Murray, Pittsburg State University Greg Murray is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department of Pitts- burg State University in Pittsburg, KS. He received his BSET in 1993, and his MST in 1995 from Pittsburg State University, and his MBA in 2002 from Wake Forest University. Professor Murray worked in indus- try for over 11 years in various product development, process engineering and management roles. He currently teaches subjects based in Engineering Graphics, Computer-Aided Design, Capstone, and Fluid Mechanics.Prof. Randy Winzer, Pittsburg State University Randy Winzer is an
and transgender (LGBT) individuals in U.S.workplaces often face disadvantages in pay, promotion, and workplace experiences.1-7 It is stilllegal in many states to fire LGBT persons due to sexual identity or gender expression.8 Recentscholarship on the experiences of LGBT students and professionals suggests that thesedisadvantages may be particularly pernicious within science and engineering-related fields, giventhe patterns of heteronormativity and heterosexism documented therein.9-12 LGBT faculty inscience, technology, engineering and math (STEM)-related departments face harassment anddiscrimination, marginalization, and chilly departmental and classroom climates.10 In a study oftwo NASA centers, furthermore, LGBT professionals encountered
Paper ID #10876Dive In! An Integrated Design Thinking/STEM CurriculumProf. Shelley Goldman, Stanford University Shelley Goldman is a learning sciences researcher studying how design thinking and technologies can create better access and success for K-16 learners. Current work includes bringing broadening participa- tion in STEM inside and outside of school. A professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Education and by Courtesy, Mechanical Engineering-Design Track, Goldman is on the faculty of the Learning, Design & Technology master’s program and the Learning Sciences & Technology Design doctoral program.Dr
University Dr. Susan Lowes, Director of Research and Evaluation at the Institute for Learning Technologies at Teachers College, Columbia University, has conducted research at both university and K-12 levels, with a focus on STEM learning and on the impact of different technologies on teaching and learning. She has directed evaluations of multi-year projects funded by the U.S. Dept. of Education and the National Science Foundation, and served on Dept. of Education and NSF Advisory and Review panels. Dr. Lowes has co-authored papers and presentations on STEM learning in the sciences, engineering, and mathematics, including, most recently, ”Robots Underwater! Learning Science, Engineering and 21st Century Skills: The
maintaining student interest in engineering and related science and technology and works with several regional K12 programs to help increase the pipeline of students interested in pursuing careers in these fields.Ms. Christine Olson, University of Massachusetts Amherst Christine Olson is a doctoral student in the Department of Communication at the University of Mas- sachusetts Amherst. Her research interests include media production and social participation practices online, social inequality and new media technologies, children and new media, and digital media litera- cies. Her work has been presented at International Communication Association conferences.Dr. Charles M Schweik, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Charles
Engineer in Louisiana.Dr. Melanie L. Sattler P.E., University of Texas, Arlington Page 22.412.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Curriculum Exchange - Educational Aspects of Kinesthetic and Computational ExperimentationAbstract Educational theory and research has shown that kinesthetic experimentation andcomputational modeling significantly influence the way that students learn science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) material. This paper presents evidence that students whohave little or no prior knowledge of engineering are able to
Fontecchio, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Page 26.54.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Hands-On, Arduino-Based Approach to Develop Student Engineering Skills and Introduce Cybersecurity Concepts to K-12 Students (Work in Progress)I. AbstractWithout a doubt, today’s generation is one driven by computer-based technologies. The vastmajority of students uses computers and mobile devices on a daily basis and regularly posts onsocial media sites. As computer-related fields continue to grow, a future job market rich intechnology
Robotics Training for Volunteer Mentors and K-12 Teachers1. Introduction The uses and effectiveness of technology that help shape children’s understanding ofscience and engineering were studied in literature as early as Papert’s seminal work1 onconstructivism. Papert showed that learning to use computers from an early age helps shape theway children think of, learn with, and understand computers and even other disciplines, such asmath. In the years following Papert’s work, many uses of engaging, modern technologies (e.g.,sensors, gaming, and robotics) were examined to develop K-12 students’ learning,understanding, and interest in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) subjects.2-11For example, use of LEGO
specified in theschool district in fact had a broad STEM content, including covering many technology,modeling, and engineering design activities. It was also recognized that it would be important tonot only understand the curriculum as written, but also understand how teachers enacted thecurriculum in their classrooms. We had reason to believe that differences in teacher training, andexperience and attitudes towards STEM would result in differing approaches to instruction, andthat direct observation of classrooms would be the best way to understand and document theseinstructional strategies. In the first six months the research team spent time observing classroominstructional practice using a structured but flexible observation protocol (see