2006. In addition to trainings located on Universitycampus, INSPIRE with support from the National Science Foundation, has provided five yearsof TPD for engineering in one school district located in the Southern United States. Throughoutthe course of working with multiple schools in that school district, some teachers communicatedthat they would no longer participate in engineering. The district adopted new testing standardsthe second year of our project and many teachers reported stress related to the new associatedcurriculum and amount of time spent testing. As is the case for all teachers, especially in gradeswith high-stakes testing, instructional time is quite valuable; doing anything above and beyondwhat directly maps to the standards
included among them are Vice President for Educational Research, Vice Provost for Research and Graduate Studies, and interim Dean of Engineering at Drexel. He has also held positions with the General Electric and DuPont companies, has been a staff member of the Science Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives as a Congressional© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Fellow, a Program Director at NSF, and a Visiting Scientist with the Legislative Office of Research Liaison of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. He has been Principal Investigator of a number of bioengineering research projects involving implantable transmitters and sensors and their use in
enroll in calculus.Taken together, this knowledge provides compelling evidence of the importance ofcommunication skills in engineering, and suggests that emphasis on the integration of math andcommunication skills in engineering would benefit women students in particular.4. Demonstrate and Encourage ResilienceThis practice is about helping students learn to embrace challenges and setbacks by teachingthem that their academic skills are malleable. In addition to combatting the negative stereotypesof their technical abilities that girls and women face, this practice is an important life lesson forall students.Using spatial skills as an example of a broader phenomenon, the Assessing Women inEngineering project suggests that “score differences
students, who were contributing to the project only part-time. Involvedstudents, both graduate and undergraduate, were coming from various disciplines, includingmechanical and software engineering, economics, education, business and art design.Exhibit OverviewThe exhibit station consists of two main components: a set of interactive computer games and anexhibit kiosk, which constitutes both the physical display environment and houses the computerequipment 11. These parts are designed to complementarily satisfy the three goals of exhibitdesign, mentioned above. The physical display environment is developed to attract the visitorsand support the knowledge acquisition by presenting content materials and graphic instructionsfor the games. The game
AC 2008-1731: SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS’ IMAGES OF ENGINEERING: WHATDO ENGINEERS DO?Faik Karatas, Purdue UniversityAmy Micklos, Purdue UniversityGeorge Bodner, Purdue University Page 13.1083.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Sixth Grade Students’ Images of Engineering: What Do Engineers Do?AbstractThere has been a growing interest in teaching engineering in the K-12 context. It is thereforesomewhat surprising to find that there have been few investigations on students’ views ofengineering and the nature of engineering (VNOE) at this level. This project is based on theassumption that understanding students’ VNOE has as much
thinking and creativity in engineering students and teaching science to education professionals. Dr. High is a trainer for Project Lead the Way pre-Engineering. She initiated an engineering program at Stillwater Middle School. In the summer of 2008, Dr. High was part of a professional development workshop for 80 Northeast Oklahoma middle level teachers to develop integrated engineering curriculum.Pasha Antonenko, Oklahoma State University PAVLO (PASHA) ANTONENKO holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in English and German philology from Nizhyn State University, Ukraine, and a Ph.D. in Instructional Technology and Human-Computer Interaction from Iowa State University (2007). Dr. Antonenko is an Assistant
recruit from the local labor supply. But,evidence indicates efforts must be made locally to encourage young people to enter into technicalcareers.A recent study performed for the Memphis Regional Economic Development Council reported ahidden labor supply of 532,090 workers in the metropolitan area.5 The report states thatMemphis is facing several key challenges: ≠ African-Americans are under-represented in high-tech occupations ≠ Gaps exist between education, workforce development and business ≠ Educational attainment is low ≠ Performance in math and science is lowThe study’s recommendations relevant to this project are: ≠ Better communicate emerging career opportunities to lower income youth, especially in the
Science Education from Cornell University.Cathy Lachapelle, Museum of Science, Boston Dr. Cathy Lachapelle has worked on a number of research and evaluation projects related to K-16 science and engineering education. Cathy received her S.B. in cognitive science from MIT, and her Ph.D. in Psychological Studies in Education from Stanford.Anna Lindgren-Streicher, Museum of Science, Boston Anna Lindgren-Streicher is a Senior Curriculum and Research Assistant at the Museum of Science, Boston. Anna received a B.A. in Psychology from Tufts University and has worked for two years with K-12 teacher professional development programs related to engineering
formulatecurricula9, 10 that integrate engineering design core ideas and practice in a multidisciplinarylearning environment. This approach promotes the linking of concepts and hands-on experienceduring the learning process which helps students better remember11, 12 what they learn. Moreover,if the experience utilizes the same tools used by engineers, it can be useful for students whenentering the job market or pursuing higher education. A number of curricula have been proposedto integrate these aspects,13 for example those from Project Lead The Way (PLTW).15NGSS defines the three core ideas of engineering design14 as: (1) Definition of the problem, (2)design of solutions to the problem and (3) optimization of the solution. The curriculum describedin this
theirstudents interest and understanding of engineering substantially. Similar results weredescribed by Yilmaz & Guillen5 and Specking & Clausen6 after middle and high schoolstudents attended summer engineering camp for various durations. Lyons7 stated thatmiddle school students’ perception of engineering changed significantly (positively) afterinteracting with engineering students through conversation and project work performedone to two days a week over an entire year. Vernaza & Aggarwal8 described a positiveimpact on the middle school students after their participation in the half-day MechanicalEngineering day event. Students felt they had an increase in engineering knowledge andwould recommend their friends who were interested in
problem with a socially relevant theme and is designed to increasethe students’ awareness of current affairs and possible engineering solutions. Each student teamis required to build a robot that can perform 8-10 tasks that relate to the overarching theme, andto research the theme and develop a product or strategy to address the social issue. Thetournament consists of the robot competition, presentation of the research projects, and ananalysis of the technical and creative merits of the robot design. Historically, FLL has addressedissues such as alternative power sources and use of resources (2007), an exploration into thepossibilities of nanotechnology (2006), the ocean resources and how we interact with them(2005) and making the world more
theInternational Technology Education Association (ITEA) and the National Science Foundationpublished the Technology for All Americans Project, A Rationale and Structure for the Study ofTechnology 1. Specific recommendations about the content of technology education were made in Page 11.224.22000, when the National Research Council joined with the ITEA to establish national standardsfor technological literacy 2. Two years later, the National Research Council published two studiesthat convincingly make the argument for K-12 engineering education. These studies are RaisingPublic Awareness of Engineering, and Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to
at New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has spent the past thirty years designing and implementing professional development programs and curricula for K-12 teachers in science and technology. At the college level, he collaborates on projects exploring teaching methodologies and assessment strategies in first-year college courses in the sciences, engineering, and computer science.Ronald Rockland, New Jersey Institute of Technology RONALD H. ROCKLAND is Associate Dean of the Newark College of Engineering, and an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology and Biomedical Engineering. He received a B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. and Ph.D. in bioengineering and electrical engineering from New York
, drafting or even homefixing projects. It is important to note that K-12 science educators are capable and well-trained todeliver all the desired skill sets listed above, however they are asked to prepare students forexams rather than ensure the development life-long learning skills. Often they are required to doso with very limited resources. The results are shortcomings evident in college students whoeither lack an overall interest in engineering and science or simply do not have the required skillsto compete and become successful in today’s global and technologically-advanced marketplace.In turn, this can be considered as a threat to national growth and competitiveness in both theeconomic and defense sectors, which eventually will impact the
program wascomplete. Mentions of different topics are indicated in Table 2. Students mentioned multipletopics, and 2 students indicated “all.” The results were not overly surprising to us, given theactivities for the particular concepts. The green buildings topic, for example, involves a tour ofon-campus LEED-certified buildings and construction projects, including the IntelligentWorkplace a living laboratory of current green building design research in the Department ofArchitecture. Student responses specifically mention the tour and recall visiting one or two ofthe spaces. Life cycle thinking involves an activity where students are introduced to the idea ofsupply chains and the material and energy resources consumed for a common product. This
enrolled in theirGK-12 program; an NSF initiative that partners graduate student “experts” with K-12 teachers.The study found that teachers who were enrolled in the program reported that the hands-onaspect of the program was important in helping them apply science and math principles.17A similar study was conducted on Project STEP at the University of Cincinnati, which partnersundergraduate and graduate students with middle and high school teachers.18 This study foundthat teachers reported Project STEP as important to them for content support, especially forkeeping them up-to-date on current technology trends.18 These teachers also noted that beingenrolled in the program was a motivator for them to teach and learn STEM content.18These studies have
Engineering Initiative and has led the TeachEngineering digital library project from its inception. In 2004, she founded the ASEE K-12 Division and in 2008 received NAE’s Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. Page 15.189.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Are French Fries and Grades Bad for You? Conflicting Evidence on How K-12 Teachers Search in a K-12 Engineering Digital LibraryAbstractThe TeachEngineering digital library provides teacher-tested, standards-based engineeringcontent for K-12 teachers to use in
School District. Thus we can makemore data-driven decisions, scale cost-efficiently and identify long-term school partners thatneed and want to co-invest in the Family Science Courses. Ability to support the Family ScienceCourses is measured by parent response and administration’s efficiency (e.g. the time taken torepair computers). The map can be accessed from www.IridescentLearning.org, “About Us”,“Impact” and “USN Map Project”. We also use a poverty map from United Way to determinewhether we were operating in the high poverty areas.We work with partner schools in order to recruit families by showing videos from previousFamily Science Courses at Back to School Nights and parent meetings and by sending invitationletters to the parents. An
,like the New Jersey Project. This 1986 conference developed an inclusive curriculum that beganas distinct women’s studies and evolved into curricular integration of race, ethnicity, class andgender, introducing both content and methods. By 1996, the project grew to involve more than100 faculty members in two- and four-year higher education institutions; it was followed by theCurriculum Mainstreaming Teaching Initiative that involved faculty from New Jersey, Maryland,Massachusetts, New York, Illinois, California and Tennessee.History textbooks in British Columbia tended to add content about women’s issue in sidebarsand asides from the main text. This “filler feminism” trivialized the contributions of women anddepicted a subservient, lessor role
standards involved in designing engineering curricula. He is currently conducting research on an NSF project led by Dr. Stephen Krause, focused on the factors that promote persistence and success for undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Cen- ter for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His
AC 2007-1732: DELIVERING CORE ENGINEERING CONCEPTS TOSECONDARY LEVEL STUDENTSChris Merrill, Illinois State UniversityRodney Custer, Illinois State UniversityJenny Daugherty, University of Illinois,-Urbana-ChampaignMartin Westrick, University of Illinois,-Urbana-ChampaignYong Zeng, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Page 12.443.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Delivering Core Engineering Concepts to Secondary Level StudentsIntroductionWithin primary and secondary school technology education, engineering has been proposed asan avenue to bring about technological literacy. 1,2 Different initiatives such as curriculumdevelopment projects (i.e., Project
bioengineering research and in more recent years has turned his attention to engineering education research. He is the P.I. of the GK-12 project to which this paper relates. He is the inaugural recipient of the Bernard Gordon Prize from the National Academy of Engineering as well as many other honors.Adam Fontecchio, Drexel University Page 13.319.1 Adam K. Fontecchio received his B.A. in Physics in 1996, his M. Sc. in physics in 1998, and his Ph. D. in Physics in 2002, all from Brown University. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and an Affiliated
following pivotal factors which impact a woman’s career and earning power:choice of field of study, family and career choices, and gender discrimination. The reportcorrelating with the table above, states that one method to increase the number of womeninterested in STEM fields is to promote careers for women in STEM fields in interesting ways;allowing them to see how they could have a positive impact on society through work as anengineer or scientist.11Research suggests that pre-college outreach is especially successful when participants are giventhe chance to recognize the relevance and importance of STEM-based academic studies using“real-life” engineering projects. Judith A. Ramaley, visiting senior scientist at the NationalAcademy of Science
AC 2008-2735: ELEMENTARY TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INENGINEERING: LESSONS LEARNED FROM ENGINEERING IS ELEMENTARYChristine Cunningham, Museum of Science, Boston Page 13.479.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Elementary Teacher Professional Development in Engineering: Lessons Learned from Engineering is ElementaryThe Engineering is Elementary (EiE, www.mos.org/eie) project aims to foster engineering andtechnological literacy among children and their educators. EiE is creating a research-based,standards-based, and classroom-tested curriculum that integrates engineering and technologyconcepts and skills with elementary science topics
design as the focus of instruction in the technologies. This goal, longrecognized by technology educators in the United States, has been realized in the UK.During the 1960s there were growing 'grass roots' concerns in the UK that technology educationfocused predominantly on manual construction skills and neglected higher order thinking skills.To address this concern a series of government-supported studies, pilot projects and reports ledto a paradigm shift in UK technology education. The emphasis went from the training sphere toa focus on design as a process involving critical thinking skills such as evaluation, ideasgeneration and synthesis, as well as manual and manufacturing skills. This educational evolutionlead to the Parkes Report5 which
. With expertise in the design of PD and learning communities, Beth leads a collaboration with educators as co-PI on an NSF K12 engineering education project. She is the 2014 Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Council for Advancement and Support of Education Massachusetts Professor of the Year.Ms. Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College After participating in the instructional design of Through My Window during her four years as an un- dergraduate, Isabel is thrilled to be working full-time as the outreach coordinator. She graduated summa cum laude from Smith College with a double major in Economics and Spanish in Spring 2014 and now works on the Springfield Technical
AC 2007-3069: ADAPTING A POST-SECONDARY STEM INSTRUCTIONALMODEL TO K-5 MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTIONDonna Diaz, Clemson University Dr. Donna Diaz is Research Assistant Professor at Clemson University in the Department of Mathematical Sciences. Her responsibilities include designing and delivering professional development for K-5 teachers in the content area of mathematics. She is a member of the Math Out of the Box curriculum development team, assisting in the design and delivery of teacher development and student curriculum materials. In addition she serves as Principal Investigator for teacher development projects funded by the National Science Foundation, Appalachian Regional Commission, and
pretest and posttest as part of regular classroom activities and themean scores for these students are similar to the expected mean for freshman engineers based onprevious research. Course content includes multiview projection, dimensioning, workingdrawings, creation of design solution alternatives, and CAD. Instruction techniques includesketching and the use of manipulatives along with lecture, demo, and CAD tutorials.In phase 2, the assessment of haptic tendencies of college students who plan to becomeelementary or secondary STEM teachers will be undertaken. Recruitment of subjects will beginlater in 2014. The primary reason for this testing is to determine if the haptic tendencies of thesefuture teachers are similar to students self-selecting
, Polytechnic Institute of New York University Dr. Vikram Kapila is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU-Poly, where he directs an NSF funded Web-Enabled Mechatronics and Process Control Remote Laboratory, an NSF funded Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics, and an NSF funded GK-12 Fellows project. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests are in K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and linear/nonlinear control for diverse engineering applications. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he
property. This approach is usually much more cost effective than runningexperiments. Once predictions have been made, experiments might be conducted to verify thevalidity of the projected behavior for targeted substances. Extracting information from a QSPRis one such CAMD strategy that enables this form of advanced computationally aided decisionmaking.The web applets are an embedded element of the broader lesson plans which apply the Legacycycle pedagogy. The Legacy Cycle is a strategy that uses challenge questions to promote studentdriven inquiry. While the Legacy Cycle concept is explained in detail elsewhere 12, the basicelements include: 1. The challenge – a statement or question that provides an objective and motivation 2. Generation