Carolina State University, Department of STEM EducationAbstract The purpose of this study was to develop a framework for assessing students workingthrough an engineering design challenge. Using a case study approach to theory building wecollected artifacts from a pre-service teachers in a second level Engineering Design Thinkingcourse. The students produced artifacts in the form of conceptual models, graphical models,mathematical models and finally working models. Student-generated mind maps, designjournals, final design products and their accompanying documentation, and peer checkingprocedures were also collected and triangulated with the modeling artifacts for the purpose ofthis study. The result was a working framework that helps eliminate
or science teachers) completeda total of 20 modules at the end of the three week Institute. The 5E Inquiry Model15 wasintegrated into an instructional design for teachers to follow in the module writing process.A typical day at the Institute started with a one-hour presentation by STEM experts with the goalbeing to share samples of STEM research in the world. STEM technology workshops based onWeb 2.0 technologies were another key component. Teacher participants were presented withspecific technologies for approximately two hours each morning. Afternoon professionaldevelopment sessions were devoted to teams working in separate spaces on their specificmodules, with hands-on support from the STEM graduate students and the science
detrimental to people and the larger environment.Another approach educators can take to encourage children to critically analyze technologycomes from the ‘critical text analysis’ (CTA) and ‘critical literacy’ traditions in literacy (i.e.,reading/writing) education.11 Advocates of CTA assert that it is imperative for individuals of allages to not only decode what they read, comprehend what they read, and consider text use andtheir purpose for reading, but also to ask questions about text positioning, i.e., to ask: ≠ How does this text position me, others, or reality? ≠ Does this text include or ignore my or others’ voice(s)? ≠ In whose interests has this text been written?12For example, elementary children have examined advertisements sent
writing. Each program hasa cognizant WIMS faculty or staff member who has responsibility for the educationalinstruction and overall management of the program.For in-school and teacher education initiatives, the WIMS Education Program has formedpartnerships with the K-12 school districts of Ann Arbor, Houghton/Hancock, Okemos andEast Lansing area schools, and DAPCEP (Detroit Area Pre-College Engineering Program, anacademic outreach program associated with Detroit schools), and with university-level outreach Page 12.1330.3organizations. Other individual schools that have partnered with WIMS are Grand Rapids HighSchool, Cass Tech High
Debra Gilbuena is a graduate student in Business Administration and Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. She currently has research in the areas of solar cell development through thin film technology, business plan writing and engineering education. Debra has 4 years of experience including positions in semiconductor manufacturing, propellant manufacturing, electronics cooling and sensor development, an area in which she holds a patent and has provided international consulting. Debra was awarded the Teacher's Assistant of the Year Award for the College of Engineering at Oregon State University for her work as a Teacher's Assistant in thermodynamics courses. She has interests in
paper surveys,including classroom climate, teacher personality traits, student-to-student interactions, and eventhe day of the week or the time of year that students complete the assessment. Many of thesecomplicating external factors may be playing a much greater role than our program ininfluencing student attitude, which confounds the application of a straightforward quantitativedata analysis.Post-program attitude scores from our participating schools can be compared with each other andwith the results of the TIMSS study to provide a benchmark indicator of how our students’attitudes measure up to their peers, both locally and across the country (Figures 2 and 3). Datashown include the average post-program values from four questions in our “I
teachers revealed that they saw engineering as beingless accessible to their students than teaching, medicine, law, and business. “It’s hard, andfemales and minorities cannot succeed in the engineering world,” is the prevailing attitude, thesurvey concluded. It is difficult to imagine that the teachers are not passing this viewpoint on totheir students.It is revealing to look at how engineering is viewed from the perspective of girls and the peoplewho influence them – teachers, school counselors, parents, peers, and the media. A recent studyby the Extraordinary Women Engineers Project (2005)3 indicates that these groups simply do notunderstand what a career in engineering involves. Engineering is just not on anyone’s career“radar screen.” The
engineering design is Page 25.549.4continually informing and informed by the engineer’s interaction with plans, designs, andartifacts (collectively, representations), as well as through communication with otherhuman beings16 such as clients and peer professionals. As such, Dym (1994) argues thatrepresentation is central to design, and that the “multiplicity or diversity ofrepresentations” enables reasoning and analysis about function, form, and intent16. As anengineer develops, interprets, and interacts with representations, the engineer mayrespond by retracing the problem objectives and constraints, deciding to revise orimprove parts or the whole design
. Toearn credit as an implementer, each teacher must reflect on lessons learned in the classroom andshare with peers. Some teachers report that this is the most valuable step in learning to use IEI—taking the time for meaningful reflection, and developing conclusions from their own teachingthat represent value to other teachers pursuing inquiry learning techniques: “Overall, this course has become much more beneficial to me as a teaching practitionerover the past few days in reflection than I would have imagined. The workshop was hands-onand informative, the presentations and feedback sessions brought more “realness” to theapplication and the learning process of the inquiry activities, and the reflections especially, haveforced me to dig
October-November-December Substantive/Progressive Learning Tasks (SMART goals – Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Realistic and Timely) In this unit: Students will listen, read, and write about how their actions can help others by using grade level standards for writing. Students will apply Cornell three column note taking. Students will develop an understanding of S.T.E.M. (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) by using mathematics and technology. Students will apply creative computing and Scratch, through sample projects and hands-on experiences Students will explore the arts by creating projects that include elements of music, design, drawing
and passing judgment on a possible or planned solution to theproblem. Evaluation (EVAL): Comparing and contrasting two (or more) solutions to theproblem on a particular dimension (or set of dimensions) such as strength or cost. Decision(DEC): Selecting one idea or solution to the problem (or parts of the problem) from among thoseconsidered. Communication (COM): The participants’ communicating elements of the designin writing, or with oral reports, to parties such as contractors and the community. Other: None ofthe above codes apply. See table 1.Table 1Coding Scheme and Description Code Description of Code Problem Definition (PD) Define what the problem really is, identify constraints
remotely operated vehicle). (SeeFigure 9) Figure 8: (a) buoyancy lab, (b) Stokes’ law lab Figure 9: Styrofoam cup that has been submerged in approximately 3,000 meters of water, next to a comparison cupEngineering and Society (3 hour unit)The goals for this unit are for the students to: Understand the societal and environmental impacts that engineering and its products can have Be able to identify both positive and negative impacts of engineered systems Discuss the ethical obligations of engineersIn preparation for this unit, students were asked to choose an invention and write a briefhistory of it. They were then asked to list 3-5 positive aspects of this
. 410 E: And you have to assume that the person that gave you the design knew what the 411 heck they were doing and understood how to make this so that when you go to use 412 their plan that it's going, going to work. 413 K: Yeah 414 J: Yeah 415 [00:32:22.14] 416 E: That--‐--‐ that's that's the level I mean, that's the level of expertise that we didn't 417 have today. You know, we put stuff together and learned some things through each 418 iteration, but they really didn't, I mean, when we talked about writing stuff down 419 and those sort of things we we, I, we just seeing what they would write down is 420 important, and most of what they wrote down they could never repeat. Nobody
disciplinesmeaningfully” (p. 2).Engineering education, at any grade level, cultivates competences that are useful beyond theacademic context. Ioannis N. Miaoulis5, founding director of the National Center forTechnological Literacy (NCTL), writes “I use my engineering training constantly to solveproblems far removed from engineering, such as dealing with personnel issues or fundraising”(p. 39). The content of engineering allows students to make connections between their academicstudies and their daily lives. Engineering education trains students to think analytically, and touse their knowledge base to make improvements. As Author4 states “Engineering requiresstudents to be independent, reflective, and metacognitive thinkers who can understand that priorexperience
thestudents to explore an area they find interesting in greater depth than the time constraints of theactivities allow. This gives students the opportunity to experiment and come up with ideas of theirown to implement. Utilizing information, skills, and engineering vocabulary acquired in theactivities, each student interactively designs a final project which is presented and demonstratedfor their peers, parents, and instructors. A point of emphasis is for students to explicitly discusskey decisions and incremental developments throughout the week with regard to the iterativeengineering design process: planning, analysis and design, testing, and evaluation.Projects fall under one of four main categories, and within each group, students are encouraged
instruments (HPLC, UV,TOC,GC, KF—etc.) and also monitoring drug shelf life through both accelerated and shelf life stability programs. After which started at GlaxoSmithKline Beecham Egypt in which i was a laboratory senior analyst an- alyzing all dosage forms as finished products dealing with all laboratory instruments with very good experience on HPLC and GC in addition of GLP and GMP knowledge, SOP writing and audits carry out internally then i was promoted to a section head of validation and quality assurance for the pharmaceuti- cal industry for both Lactam and non-Lactam areas in which i was responsible for sterile and non-sterile areas qualification, validation and periodic verification dealing with process
CitationTown Member Evaluation ParticipationAnimal Plaques Productivity and AccountabilityCommunity Redesign ApplicationStudents have six-weeks to complete this project, in groups of 4-5 students. Students were required to useengineering and had to report and analyze at each step of the EDP process to assure the systematicdevelopment of their progress. Groups were required to articulate their final decisions in a poster sessionand physical 3D model. They were also required to write a report. For their final presentations, all groupsexcept one used a PowerPoint slide presentation to present their work. This class consisted of all juniorsand
students. More specifically, Collins assists with planning, implementing, managing, and reporting of project activities which include survey development, coordination of data collection, interfacing with data managers, coordination of quarterly meetings of outreach providers to gather feedback, identify best practices, and disseminating findings to stakeholders. In addition, she assists with annual report writing and conference presentations. Prior to working at NC State, Collins was the Online Learning Project Manager for NC TEACH and Project Co- ordinator for NC TEACH II at the UNC Center for School Leadership Development. Key responsibilities there included the development, implementation, teaching, and assessment of
Alabama at Huntsville, where she taught undergraduate courses in industrial and systems engineering and served as the faculty advisor for the In- stitute of Industrial Engineering local student chapter. At RIMES, she is involved in developing graduate courses and exploring research opportunities in systems engineering. She has written research proposals to National Science Foundation, Locked Martin Aeronautical, Raytheon Energy Systems, Texas Higher Education Board, and Texas High School Project. She conducts research with a local charter high school assessing the attitudinal changes in high school students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math. She has published in several peer-reviewed journals and conferences
students, thatengineers undergo to solve engineering problems independent of the discipline, be it civil,mechanical, chemical, or otherwise. The process also includes any kind of problem solvingmechanisms, from specific content knowledge to peer review. This cyclical model is the core ofengineering design curricula; once students understand its steps, they can continue to moreindependent projects that integrate more complex content knowledge. Therefore, it is the firststep in a strong engineering education program (Hynes et al., 2012). Previous programs that usethe engineering design process as a strong basis for engineering learning include the Universityof Colorado at Boulder’s First Year Engineering Project, Purdue’s Engineering Projects
teachers may appear to permitlaziness and irresponsibility. Yet it is challenging to evaluate the level of knowledge or skillsstudents have attained during a group project, placing a burden on teachers.24 Of the commonlyutilized assessment strategies in group-based settings, all possess drawbacks. These include self-assessments (over-inflated grades), peer assessments (heavily influenced by social relationshipswith classmates), situational judgment tests (questions about various scenarios; objectivity isdifficult), behaviorally-anchored teacher-rating scales (difficult to observe all students), and teaminterviews (prohibitively time intensive).24,25,26To model professional work, project-based methods often utilize authentic assessments
) Raymond C. Reese Research Prize. She is involved in a number of professional activities including serving as a mem- ber of the ACI 318 Structural Concrete Building Code Committee for which she chairs the subcommittee on Bond and Development. She is a past president of the MN-IA ACI Section and the MN Section of ASCE. Page 23.1312.1Ms. Heidi A Tremayne, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Heidi Tremayne is the outreach director for the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) with headquarters at UC Berkeley. PEER’s research is conducted in many fields including structural and
of non-STEM education standards English Language Arts (ELA) 22 (96%) Common Core ELA Speaking & Listening 19 (83%) Common Core ELA Reading 18 (78%) Common Core ELA Writing 18 (78%) Social Studies 7 (30%) Visual Arts 7 (30%)There were eight units at the K-5 level, twelve units at the 6-8 level, and three units at the 9-12level. All units targeted education standards from multiple
content of their work to others. Performance assessment is by nature aprocess that requires extended engagement by students in order to demonstrate their proficiencyin the selected subject. For these performances students will invest time and effort to prepareexperiments, write reports and scripts to communicate in a proficient way the content of theirlearning, and produce a final artifact that will accomplish the goal of the assignments that is, toeffectively communicate to the observer what they really learned. Although the exact nature ofthese tasks may differ in terms of (1) subject matter, (2) time for performance, (3) flexibility orchoice of topics, and (4) the amount of external support for the student, they share the commoncharacteristic
enrolled students were considered at risk, with a 6% drop-out rate. Less than 50%of seniors take the SAT Reasoning Test. Of those taking the SAT, the Math Average is 441, theVerbal Average is 409, and the Writing Average is 401, as compared to the state averages of 515in Math, 502 in Reading, and 494 in Writing [13]. Overview of DREAM MenteesThe DREAM program recruits mentees in several ways at AHS. Teachers are asked torecommend students, and mentees from previous semesters are asked to invite their friends. Theprogram strives to mix high achieving students with those who are struggling, in an attempt toraise the success of both groups. No willing participant at AHS is turned away, unless theydisplay a lack of commitment over several weeks
compriseabout 28% of the population, but their presence in nonacademic science and engineeringpositions is only about 9%[5]. Clearly, these groups represent large reservoirs of untappedpotential for new STEM professionals. We can no longer afford to waste the talent of two-thirdsof our increasingly diverse population. As stated in President Obama’s Executive Order No.13583[6]: “We are at our best when we draw on the talents of all parts of our society, and our greatest accomplishments are achieved when diverse perspectives are brought to bear to overcome our greatest challenges.”This important idea is extended in Peter Godfrey-Smith’s “Theory and Reality”, who writes thatsome female philosophers believe that “the experiences of the
College of Basic Sciences both provide a residentialeducational program for high school students. The minority engineering program within theCollege of Engineering has offered an induction program, Recruit into Engineering of HighAbility Minority Students (REHAMS), for approximately 8 years. Each summer approximately35 to 40 high school students reside on the university campus for 3 weeks for an intensiveacademic “boot camp” to prepare students for the challenges of university life. Students arerequired to take a math course, either calculus or college algebra, physics and chemistry.Students are also introduced to resume and portfolio writing, study skills, and the academicentrance policies. Participants tour several engineering labs and
these schools range in cost, focus,targeted demographic and duration. When other summer engineering programs for pre-collegestudents include interactive activities, such as the program at New Mexico State University,11they are not necessarily combined with the range of components implemented by ITE.The emphasis of UVa’s ITE, in contrast to some other similar programs, is to reach out to the toptier of Virginia high-school rising juniors and seniors. The program puts them in a supportiveenvironment with their high-achieving peers in order to introduce them to engineering through ahands-on approach. The program reinforces the value of intellectual achievement balanced with
effective in preparing you to teach using the EiE units? Why? “Questioning strategies; Explanations of purpose” “...turn and talk to peers; questioning strategies; scaffolding...” Page 25.503.8 Informal Formative Assessment We begin all of our workshops (and many of the individual activities within workshops) with brief, informal, formative assessments of participants’ prior knowledge. This helps facilitators gain a sense of participants’ understanding of certain terms and concepts, but it also (perhaps more importantly) continues to model the educational best practices that we hope participants will carry
practices prevalent in high school and introductory university physics and math courses, and developing recommendations to increase gender diversity in engineering education and the engineering profession. Kathy is an elected Councillor for APEGBC (the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia), has served on several educational and governance committees at Camosun College, and is a qualified restorative justice facilitator, peer coach and liturgical musician. Page 26.1734.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Where are the women