Displaying results 421 - 433 of 433 in total
- Conference Session
- Myths About Gender and Race
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jordana Hoegh, Purdue University
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Women in Engineering
- Conference Session
- Professional Formation and Career Experiences
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Andrea Chan, University of Toronto; Milan Maljkovic, University of Toronto; Dimpho Radebe, University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
9independent drive. Technical specialists were loyal to internalized notions of professionalintegrity, while entrepreneurs were loyal to their personal values, dreams and aspirations.Both groups of engineers on this consolidated independent agent path were less amenableto the visions of their employers than other study participants. Please see Table one for asummary of demographic and mobility patterns across the three consolidated paths.Table 1: Consolidated Paths Illustrating Discrepancies in Mobility Patterns Consolidated path Organizationally Sociotechnical managers Independent agents groomed executives (n=12) (n=12) (n=5) Career path(s
- Conference Session
- Sustainability and Social Responsibility
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia; Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Kari Zacharias, Concordia University; Brandiff Robert Caron, Concordia University
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
definition of it. What engineeringeducation must have is a guiding philosophy based on a clearer visualization of the place ofengineering in modern life” [2], p.12. This historical perspective allows engineering educators to see that the aspirationsexpressed in 2004’s The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century are morea tradition than a novelty [3]. What is relatively new is the emergence of the field of Science,Technology, and Society (STS) and, in particular, attempts to integrate STS into engineeringcurricula. STS provides conceptual frameworks that enable students to see engineering problemsand solutions in sociotechnical terms. As Neeley, Wylie, and Seabrook demonstrated in their2019 paper [4], engineering educators
- Conference Session
- Social Justice, Social Responsibility, and Critical Pedagogies
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Michael Lachney, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; David Adam Banks, University at Albany - SUNY
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
- Conference Session
- Innovation and Reflection
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Scott A. Newbolds P.E., Benedictine College; Patrick F. O'Malley, Benedictine College; Meredith Stoops, Benedictine College
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 5
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Nicole Farkas Mogul, University of Maryland, College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park; Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College Park
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
- Conference Session
- Communicating Across Cultural and Epistemological Boundaries
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
; Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education. ASEE.[12] Nieusma, Dean and James Malazita. 2016. “‘Making’ a Bridge: Critical Making as Synthesized Engineering/Humanistic Inquiry.” Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference & Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education. ASEE.[13] Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.[14] Dym, Clive L., Alice M. Agogino, Ozgur Eris, Daniel D. Frey, and Larry J. Leifer. 2005. “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.” Journal of Engineering Education 94(1):103-120.[15] Kelley, Tom (with Jonathan Littman). 2005. The Ten Faces of Innovation: IDEO’s Strategies for Beating the Devil’s
- Conference Session
- Design, Assessment, and Redesign of Writing Instruction for Engineers
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Stephanie Pulford, University of California, Davis; Jiahui Tan, University of California, Davis; Michael Raymond Gonzalez, University of California, Davis; Amanda Modell, University of California, Davis
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
- Conference Session
- Research on Diversification, Inclusion, and Empathy II
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Joachim Walther, University of Georgia; Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia; Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia; Michael Alvin Brewer jr., University of Georgia
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
who remains in position, until itbecomes uncomfortable for you. Then stop. Observe the approximate distance between you.Describe your thoughts and feelings as you moved closer and closer to your partner. Ask yourpartner to express what s/he experienced as you approached. Make note of your experience aswell as your partner’s. There are a number of incrementally additive instructions that build uponthis. The exercises conclude with the addition of information sharing and listening. Students aregiven this set of instructions: Place two chairs in a position and at the angle that is reasonablycomfortable for both you and your partner. Some compromise may be necessary. Now, onepartner needs to tell a brief story about her/himself (2 minutes or so
- Conference Session
- Why Industry Says that our Engineering Students Cannot Write
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Susan Conrad, Portland State University; Timothy James Pfeiffer P.E., Foundation Engineering, Inc.
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Mechanical Engineering
social theory of genre learning,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 160-185.8. Ceylan, T. “Thinking and writing in engineering education,” Proceedings, 2005, American Society for Engineering Education IL/IN Sectional Conference.9. Fisher, T., Usrey, M., and Beasley, H. “OWL: A wise way to enhance engineering students’ writing skills,” Proceedings, 2003, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.10. Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Reppen, R. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. See Methodology Boxes 4 and 5 for a description
- Conference Session
- Ethical Perspectives on the Grand Challenges of Engineering
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Xiaofeng Tang, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
- Conference Session
- Why Industry Says that our Engineering Students Cannot Write
- Collection
- 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kathryn Mobrand, University of Washington; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Mechanical Engineering
participants’ description of thesituation in which a communication is embedded. Specificity of adaptation refers to whether ornot (and in how much detail) participants described how they adapted their communication to agiven situation.Level of complexity. Our working definition of situatedness includes the entire communicationcontext—for example, the intended audience(s), the purpose, and the conditions of use. The levelof complexity of the participants’ involvement with situatedness ranged from those whoacknowledged a basic concern for audience (all participants) to those who attended to the fullcommunication context. Some excerpts from participants’ portfolios and survey responses
- Conference Session
- Difference, Disability, and (De)Politicization: The Invisible Axes of Diversity
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Donna M Riley, Smith College
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society