actual proposalreview experience, three reviewers (the Senior Design engineering instructor, the writinginstructor, and the external sponsor) for each of the six teams were invited to read the proposaldraft and provide qualitative feedback in response to four guiding questions: (1) How thoroughlydoes the proposal address the client’s needs and design criteria/constraints? (2) Is the proposalsufficiently persuasive to convince the client/sponsor that the team has a sound plan for carryingout the work, as well as the capability to succeed in that work? (3) How well is the proposalwritten and organized? (4) Does the proposal display a high level of professional appearance andattention to detail? These questions correspond to the Proposal Grading
offering. The two instructors heavily involved students inshaping the design of the course both in the planning process prior to the start of the semester, aswell as through detailed feedback activities during the semester. This paper will explain the goalsof the course and will offer an analysis of student responses to the learning experience--whichwere overwhelmingly positive--based on various feedback mechanisms. Drawing upon theanalysis of these data and on the experience of co-creating and co-teaching this course, we havealso compiled lessons learned about how to design such a course and the most successfultechniques used to achieve desired student outcomes. We conclude with next steps for revisingand expanding these learning experiences
. Page 26.866.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Humanizing Signals and Systems: A Reflective AccountAbstract:In this paper, I authentically and reflectively depict my journey as an engineering educatordelving in the challenge of integrating technical content of a continuous-time signals and systemsclass with the social, value-laden realities that encompass such concepts. I refer to this particularchallenge as humanizing the technical content of signals and systems. Specifically, I describe thesignals and systems course and how I structured content and assessment plans to create space forhuman values. Additionally, I critically examine how some barriers that worked against myefforts
examples that show the benefits of a cognizantview of the ideas that define the discipline with increased involvement of an integratedcommunity [14].Course DescriptionAt Fulbright, engineering concepts covered by the first-year course UG1070: Creating & Makingare focused on cross-disciplinary approaches. Focus on transferrable skills mixed with practicalexposure highlight elements of design, human psychology, technology literacy, project planning,and project management. The design work incorporates primarily human centered design withother concepts of ideation and divergent thinking to spur innovation [1], [15]. Psychologicalconcepts covered involve self-inquiry through Myers-Briggs and Jungian analyses and focusedon investigating the
We have implementeda similar multi-year plan known as the Integrated Projects Curriculum (IPC), thatfunctions effectively for our smaller engineering program at Messiah College.Evaluating multi-year project work in various phases of development entails uniquechallenges as compared to the traditional capstone approach, but using a portfolio toassess the ongoing project work serves as a practical and effective tool, with sufficientflexibility. The portfolio for engineering assessment has been described by Williams.2 Inrecent years, a number of authors have identified various uses3 of the portfolio for thepurposes of engineering education; this paper focuses on our experience of portfolio usefor multi-year projects, in a progressive development
twelve credit experience.Table 1- Course Objectives for the Summer Grand Challenge ProgramRH330 • Analyzing contexts, audiences, and genres to determine how they influence communication • Crafting documents to meet the demands and constraints of professional situations • Integrating all stages of the writing process, ethically and persuasively, to respond to technical contexts and audiences—from planning, researching and drafting to designing, revising and editing • Collaborating effectively within and across teams with overlapping interestsME497 • Provide strategies and practice for design development • Applying a systems approach
major with a high level of one-on-one advising. However, a high degree of flexibility also contributes. In the LSE program,iterative revision and recreation of an individualized curriculum and career plan are understoodas signs of success rather than failure or deviation. Students are encouraged to understand anddesign their major as a “whole-person technical degree” that does not require them to pass, toassimilate, to compartmentalize, or to conform to stereotypes. We suggest that this holisticflexibility may disrupt barriers such as impostor syndrome by positioning the student not asimpostor but as designer and creator – even when enrolled in technical courses in which thesex/gender ratio is skewed male. Lessons learned from “liberal studies
createhigh quality assignments and associated rubrics that will foster better integration of writing intothe undergraduate, upper-class curriculum. The QEP initiative has two main programs: facultyworkshops and funding for projects aimed at enhancing student writing. The RGS-infused heuristic we develop here stemmed from funding from this QEPprogram, specifically for the development of a faculty learning community, which was part of alarger “Improving Disciplinary Writing” Action Project grant funded by this midsize researchinstitution’s (MRI) Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). One way disciplinary writing and genrecan be explored is through faculty learning communities, or intentional groups of (ofteninterdisciplinary) faculty seeking to
Utah.Dr. Mercedes Ward, University of UtahProf. Tariq J. Banuri, University of UtahProf. Sajjad Ahmad, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dr. Ahmad is a Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). His teaching and research interests are in the area of sus- tainable planning and management of water resources, water-energy nexus, and stormwater management . He is particularly interested in using systems approach to address water sustainability issues.Dr. Rasool Bux Mahar, Mehran University, Pakistan He is a working as Professor in U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water at Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro
environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Dr. Christopher Zobel, Virginia Tech Christopher Zobel is the R.B. Pamplin Professor of Business Information Technology in the Pamplin College of Business at Virginia Tech. His research and teaching interests center around humanitarian supply chains and quantifying disaster resilience to enable more effective operations management. Dr. Zobel is one of the co-Faculty Leads for Virginia Tech’s NSF-funded Interdisciplinary Graduate Program on Disaster Resilience and Risk Management.Dr. Margaret Cowell, Virginia Tech Margaret Cowell, PhD is an Associate Professor of Urban Affairs and Planning at Virginia Tech. She teaches courses on economic development, urban
institution had the financialmeans to create, build and sustain an engineering program. These studies revealed both the needand the necessary resources to develop an engineering program. The next step was the hiring ofa Dean of Engineering to develop the curriculum plans, seek approval from the regional accredit-ing body (SACS) by way of a substantive change, and securing approval through the university’scurriculum committee, recruit students, and hire faculty to deliver the courses.Adding engineering is not free of impact on other disciplines. Additional students are recruited tothe university and they need to take specific math and science courses, as well as take courses tosatisfy the general education core. This potentially requires additional
Journal of Planning History, Perspectives on History, the Journal of Urban History, Reviews in American History, History News Network, Punk Planet, and Pitchfork.com. His first book, tentatively titled ”Between Being and Becoming: On Architecture, Student Protest, and the Aesthetics of Liberalism in Postwar America,” is forthcoming from the University of Pennsylvania Press. Page 25.798.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating Entrepreneurship and Innovation into an Engineering Curriculum Through Service Learning and the Liberal Arts
infrastructure, articulated well by theAmerica 2050 plan (Regional Plan Association 2008), then our nation absolutely requires aneducated populace, across all disciplines, who understand the realities of how the components,systems, and meta-systems that underlie our daily lives actually work.BACKGROUNDThe word infrastructure has come into vogue with the American body politic; in the most recentState of the Union address, President Obama lamented “Our infrastructure used to be the best,but our lead has slipped... Countries in Europe and Russia invest more in their roads and railwaysthan we do. China is building faster trains and newer airports. Meanwhile, when our ownengineers graded our Nation's infrastructure, they gave us a D.” (Obama 2011) In his
activities. They identify learningneeds, plan and implement the activity or curriculum, assess the learning outcomes, and makedecisions about how and to whom outcomes are reported, whereas the organization providessupport when needed or invited. Full community control demonstrates a great degree of equityand power sharing, with the community as the authority.Fourth, the community has agency over the outcomes, while acknowledging that educationaloutcomes are influenced by social, economic and structural factors. Thus, mature projectsinclude interventions also address social, political or economic barriers to participation. In suchprojects, community members collect and control their own data, and their own narrative, andthe data are used in ways that
need for instructional resources and strategies to teachcommunication skills, engineering faculty at the University of New Haven have beencollaborating to develop technical communication curriculum, including a series of onlinemodules. The present study is a pilot study intended to evaluate the implementation of selectedinstructional resources and strategies integrated into a chemical engineering laboratory course,where students were required to write bi-weekly technical memos based on the results ofexperimental work.One innovative aspect of this pilot project was the team-taught approach to instruction. In thislaboratory course, the engineering instructor collaborated with a writing instructor to plan anddeliver instruction. Although team
Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. The Biomedical Engineering and Software Engineering programs are preparing for accreditation in the next review cycle. Also, a special interdisciplinary General Engineering program is offered that is not accredited. At SJSU, BS Engineering programs are treated as accredited, since all programs are designed with assessment and accreditation in mind. Rationalization for the Course Sequence: The 120 Unit Plan Discussions of reduction in units to earn a baccalaureate degree have occurred within the California State University (CSU) system since the 1990’s. Much progress was made to reduce programs in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. By 2008 approximately 81% of degree programs met the 120-unit
Paper ID #25682An Integrative Education in Engineering and the Liberal Arts: An Institu-tional Case StudyDr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt P.E., Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infras- tructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including engineering economics, sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infras- tructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory
attain these non-cognitive competencies, which are goals for K-12 and higher education [10].Given the raised awareness for the importance of these non-cognitive skills, assessmentsdeveloped to measure these are essential. As per the NASEM report recommendations, thespecific skills or constructs need to be clearly conceptualized and must be designed, developed,analyzed, and interpreted based on stakeholder needs [10]. The purpose of this research paper isto introduce a new and innovative methodology to the engineering education researchcommunity, named Concept Mapping [11], which has traditionally been used in evaluation andprogram planning in the health sciences. This methodology will be explained in the context ofhow it was used in developing
resourceful, knowledgeable learners, strategic, goal-directed learners, andpurposeful, motivated learners: “A key premise of UDL is that a curriculum should includealternatives to make it accessible and applicable to students with different backgrounds, learningstyles, abilities, and disabilities and to minimize the need for assistive technology” [4]. Thefollowing statements explain each of the three main principles of the UDL framework: ● Principle 1 suggests representing information in multiple ways. For example, including video lectures with built in navigation through slides or captions. ● Principle 2 recommends integrating options for planning and composition. For example, providing varied forms of graphic organizers
% had bachelor’sdegrees and 47% had graduate degrees. But only 37% had degrees in engineering or technology.Thus, those leading the majority of companies which are advancing our technology have liberal,non-technical degrees. It is therefore surprising that many collegiate engineering programs havereduced the number of liberal arts courses required in their plan of study in favor of moretechnical courses.4Fortunately, some still recognize the importance of a diverse foundation to build a well-roundedgraduate. Yale and Johns Hopkins universities have begun offering Bachelors of Arts degrees inengineering for students seeking greater technical understanding within a broader liberal artscontext.6 Such schools are integrating the two disciplines in
engaged in a pluralistic,complex world, we have undertaken a project to develop and assess core liberal educationoutcomes. This paper describes the planning and actions thus far to meet these new requirementsat the university and specifically in our engineering programs. We have begun to expandoutcome assessment to include five “intellectual and practical skills,” specifically, critical andcreative thinking, inquiry/analysis, problem-solving, and information literacy. VALUE rubricsare being used as part of the process to ascertain where the best opportunities are to measurestudent achievement within the engineering and technology programs. An assessment frameworkis presented and successful pilot results are discussed.The ChallengeOur regional
self-motivation, distractions, technical issues,and computer illiteracy. These virtual issues are huge, problematic factors that affect studentsacross the board, regardless of the subject matter. However, given than many already perceivethat STEM subjects are too hard to begin with make it even more difficult for teachers trying toeducate and inspire students in a virtual environment. Taking all this into consideration, it isimperative for faculty to effectively plan an outreach that provides an environment for studentsto feel comfortable venturing into fields of studies which they do not feel comfortable with.Building upon this current body of knowledge, our outreach plan sought to integrate necessaryaspects of teaching that would be fun
performance mea- surement, decision-making & optimization, service-learning and community engagement. Dr. Luo is a LEED AP BD+C and a CM-BIM holder.Dr. Wei Wu, California State University - Fresno Dr. Wei Wu, LEED AP, CM-BIM, A.M.ASCE, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construc- tion Management of the Lyles College of Engineering at California State University, Fresno. He received the Bachelor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a focus on Built Environment from Hunan Univer- sity in China, the Master of Science in Environmental Change and Management at University of Oxford in the UK, and the Doctor of Philosophy in Design, Construction and Planning at University of Florida. He is an associate
planning to start engineering at Loyola University Chicago (LUC), the new Director decidedto integrate social justice with engineering in the curriculum. This decision seemed a naturalextension of Jesuit universities’ emphasis on social justice. LUC’s BS Engineering Scienceprogram began the following year in August, 2015.BackgroundIn his 1968 survey for ASEE, Liberal Learning for the Engineer, Sterling Olmsted counted 93engineering schools that had initiated programs in liberal studies in the last three years. By 1973,as a result of this report, almost 200 technical colleges experimented with curricula to address thesocial implications of technology. Two curricular approaches included “humanizing”engineering through interdisciplinary education and
outcomes (listed in Table 1 below) focus on both products and habits. Table 1. PITCH Outcomes. 1. Technical Communication Products 2. Technical Communication Habits a) Plan, design and produce letters, a) Use appropriate format and content; technical memoranda, short reports, b) Exhibit clear, precise and logical formal e-mails, reports documenting expression; experimental or simulation methods c) Demonstrate appropriate organization, and results, and formal level of detail, style and tone for a reports (proposals, analyses, progress given audience, situation and purpose; reports
grappled with MIT’s unique wartime experience.Without question, the MIT administration, beginning with Karl Compton and James Killian,played a key role in MIT’s postwar transformation.1 Yet it was the Lewis Survey thattransformed MIT’s organizational structure through its “Four School Plan,” began the work ofredefining the role of the faculty at a “technological university,” and most importantly built aconsensus among the faculty for a way forward. This paper looks closely at the intense efforts ofthe Lewis’ committee—its members met no less than 119 times over the course of three years—and how their views evolved in conversation with the MIT administration. Especially amidstpresent-day concerns about the erosion of shared governance at many U.S
attending class and coming prepared,complete assignments in a timely fashion, participate in class, communication, avoid makingexcuses, respectful of others’ ideas and opinions, and develop a comprehensive plan to achieveeducational goals [11]. Students must make a choice to become a part of the learningcommunity and to take time to think about their future. When discussing universities one mainlythinks of academics, however, there are other opportunities in which students can participate.What is the right mix of curricular and co-curricular activities? Kovalchuk et al. see this as the 3right question to ask and that a lack of a proper mix can adversely influence readiness whenbecoming part of the
(LMSS).The initial interview with each engineer was semi-structured and focused on employmenthistory, career plans and aspirations, family background, experience of engineering coursework,and other similar themes. For those engineers with more than one interview, the interviewsconsisted of learning about the engineer’s current work projects, work environment and closecolleagues; and assessing the engineer’s attitude about his/her work activity and workplace socialenvironment.The analysis was conducted in several steps. First, the interviews were professionally transcribedand then thematically coded by Vinson. From these interviews Vinson was able to reconstructthe work history of each engineer, accounting for why engineers left or returned to
to be conducted in order to substantiate the results.Program Goals Moving ForwardEven though Rensselaer’s Engineering Ambassador program aims to promote engineering to anunderrepresented audience, the Ambassador role models currently do not depict the audience weare attempting to attract. Going forward, Rensselaer plans to address this, in addition toincorporating representation from all engineering majors. With these goals in mind, Rensselaer’sAmbassador recruitment efforts have become targeted to help encourage a diverse population ofEngineering Ambassadors. Expanding industry connections will also help to strengthen thesustainability of the program within Rensselaer’s School of Engineering culture and community.The university partnership
utilitarian goals supportingcareer development and professionalism to more holistic goals of citizenship and broadliberal education. The goal of this work is to support ongoing conversations in highereducation about integrative and interdisciplinary education efforts by providing a sharedlanguage and classification system for understanding these efforts.Higher education wrestles with the balance of what Kwame Appiah has called its“utopian” and the “utilitarian” instincts: the “utopian” motivation to educate citizensbroadly, regardless of their future plans; and the “utilitarian” goal of burnishing theircredentials for the job market. Stewart-Gambino and Rossmann (2015), surveyingevidence of the effectiveness of integration efforts both historically