social welfare history, and service-learning. Her research interests are guided by two over- arching themes, social work education and the culture of the profession, and generally fall within three domains: professional socialization, educational innovations, and educational outcomes. Some specific projects in which she’s currently engaged explore questions of professional socialization; professional self-care; critical thinking as a process and outcome; social work’s environmental paradigm; and trans- disciplinary educational approaches. She’s currently collaborating with colleagues from engineering to develop trans-disciplinary approaches to education for reflective practice in a global society, and with colleagues
Art.Interdisciplinary context is provided in order to establish a sense of application and relevancethat can be taken on to advanced coursework in either discipline. For each visual concept, termsare defined, student outcomes are listed and an assignment is provided for use in a project-basedlearning environment.Background:In Experiences in Visual Thinking, Robert McKim1 looks at the kinds of images that provide afoundation for visual thinking, which he defines as seeing, drawing and imagining. EdwardTufte’s books2,3, provide ample evidence that an awareness of visual design and anunderstanding of visual concepts are critical for effective statistical and scientific communication.His historical examples and worst-case examples are particularly relevant to
ABSTRACTThis paper describes the way innovation and entrepreneurship have been integrated intoan engineering curriculum through a year-long liberal arts seminar. This three-coursesequence has “The City” as its topical focus, and it incorporates principles ofentrepreneurship and innovation through course content specifically centered on theseconcepts through experiential learning in a service project, and through critical thinkingand rhetorical analysis of students’ own research strategies using the Burkean parlormodel of academic and professional conversation.In Fall Quarter, students read texts, view films, and study other cultural products relatedto the concept of “The City.” They examine how depictions of entrepreneurs andindustry illuminate our
-Packard Inkjet. Henderson was featured in the book—Engineers Write! Thoughts on Writing from Contemporary Literary Engineers by Tom Moran (IEEE Press 2010)—as one of twelve ”literary engineers” writing and publishing creative works in the United States. Henderson’s current project is a textbook pioneering a new method for teaching engineers workplace writing skills through the lens of math. Page 24.64.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Math-Based System to Improve Engineering Writing OutcomesIntroductionThis paper
that this multidisciplinary projectprovided an outlet where both engineering and fine art majors could put theory into practice in asafe environment where the outcome did not have to be perfect. Working in multidisciplinaryteams provided an opportunity for both engineers and fine art majors to gain an appreciation thatboth majors work hard but in different ways. The artists described how the experiencehumanized engineering, but gatekeeping did emerge when it came to engineers painting andmaking creative choices on the project. While the project did provide opportunities to exchangeskills and knowledge between the majors, it also lead to some resentment from the artists aboutthe abundance of resources provided to engineering majors by the
followingsection, the benefits of UDL are especially important for our Tech Comm courses, whichcombine students from our various fields of study.UDL and Technical CommunicationTech Comm is a required, upper-level writing course usually taken by students in their junioryear. The course is based in the rhetorical tradition, which means that analyzing and adapting toa specific audience are central to the writing process. The course objectives, which aredetermined by the writing faculty and shared across all sections of the course, include writing inseveral genres, collaborating with teammates, and developing project management skills. Withinthese shared objectives, Tech Comm instructors have freedom to design their own courses andassignments. While some
and Mold Making program, leadingto an Associate of Applied Science degree.Identifying linkage to outcomes such as these is fairly common at the program and course level.In this study, the relevant skills are integrated at the assignment level as well. In courses whereassignments did not support these skills, assignments were added or modified as appropriate.For example: communication, critical thinking, and teamwork were integrated into laboratory(machining) sections through the use of individual and team based projects. These projectsrequired written plans, written evaluations at the conclusion, a reflective paper to cementlearning, and a presentation to the class and others.This paper will provide a detailed description of how this
learning contexts. She is particularly interested in how students navigate communication challenges as they negotiate complex engineering design projects. Her scholarship is grounded in notions of learning as a social process, influenced by complexity theories, sociocultural theories, sociolinguistics, and the learning sciences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 How Writing for the Public Provides Affordances and Constraints in Enacting Expert Identity for Undergraduate Engineering StudentsThe science communication field has recognized that the present media landscape is fracturedand segmented with social media and online communities making up important spaces whereaudiences
earn a Master of Science in Engineering in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, while working with the Austin chapter of Engineers Without Borders as a volunteer and project lead for a project in Peru. She has published and presented on incentivizing decentralized sanitation and wastewater treatment, on sustainability of coastal community water and sanitation service options, as well as on integrating liberal arts and STEM education, currently through the vehicle of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program. She has co-designed workshops oriented toward educational change for Olin’s Summer Institute and the joint Olin College-Emerson
of a single course. It’s a bit likeinvestigating dark matter; one can hypothesize without seeing it that it exists because of radiationsignals observed when particles collide, but not really understand what it’s composed of or howit holds galaxies in the universe together. Our goal in this project is to provide student writerswith a means to jumpstart their understanding of writing as compositional decision-making byequipping them with the means to quickly, and literally, “see” their composing decisions.To help students notice and reflect on composition decisions in their writing, our team of writingresearchers, educators, and statisticians is piloting use of a suite of computer-aided learning toolsfor corpus-based text analysis in core
on a project in a way that could be described asmultidisciplinary. “Interdisciplinarity is a means of solving problems and answering questionsthat cannot be satisfactorily addressed using single methods or approaches.”21Multidisciplinarity, on the other hand, is less integrative, and combines contributions frommultiple disciplines in a weaker and often temporary manner, with collaborators staying rootedin their own disciplines.22-25 Because most engineering design work at minimum requiresengineers to engage in multidisciplinary interactions,10, 11, 26, 27 knowledge of and attention toBNAs could benefit faculty and students in many teamwork settings, and not only those that areinterdisciplinary. Literature ReviewFrom Boundary Objects to
(e.g. sameinstitution or different institution), the style of mentorship preferred by mentor and mentee, theability for mentees to network within the EER community, the academic rank of the mentor andmentee, and the interpersonal relationships between RIEF grantee pairings. The aim of thepresent work is to illuminate the ways in which these findings resonate within the EERcommunity, as well as to move towards impactful distribution of future results. The outcomes ofthe study are related to a larger project which will fuse our team’s experience hostingworkshops, networking with RIEF grantees, and developing training materials for faculty joiningthe EER community. Developing an understanding of best practices for faculty-faculty peermentorship
lead of Area of Specializa- tion Mechatronics Systems Design. She worked as a Visiting Researcher at Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing in Disputanta, VA on projects focusing on digital thread and cyber security of manufacturing systems. She has funded research in broadening participation efforts of underrepresented students in STEM funded by Office of Naval Research, focusing on mechatronic pathways. She is part of the ONR project related to the additive manufacturing training of active military. She is also part of the research team that leads the summer camp to nine graders that focus on broadening participation of underrepresented students into STEM (ODU BLAST).Dr. Denise Tombolato-Terzic
], [2] stressed the need for engineers to possessleadership abilities. The former emphasized engineering graduates “must understand theprinciples of leadership and be able to practice them in growing proportions as their careersadvance. Additionally, the latter report stated, “it is becoming increasingly recognized that it isimportant to introduce engineering activities, including team-based design projects … early inthe undergraduate experience.” Curricular approaches that engage students in team exercises, inteam design courses, and in courses that connect engineering design and solutions to real-worldproblems demonstrate the social relevance of engineering. However, the designs of theseapproaches and assessment of their effectiveness are not
disciplines, the structure and coursework of the classallow students to explore varied perspectives and approaches to addressing global problems.This paper argues that engineering students need to engage with the SDGs in the context ofengineering problems to equip them as innovative problem solvers. Further, evaluatingengineering projects and processes simultaneously through social, political, and environmentallenses expands the context and considerations taken in the problem-solving process.The proposed course will be piloted through the Civil and Environmental EngineeringDepartment at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). Toencourage collaboration between students from diverse disciplines, the course will be offered
internal team leadership needed toresolve common behaviors within dysfunctional teams. While no new theoretical results onteamwork are presented, the authors have focused instead on applying their experience asmanagers of teams in major corporations and institutions of higher education to explore what aneffective teaming curriculum might include and to develop related assessment tools. This paperoutlines a strategy for integrating deliberate teaming instruction into senior-level engineeringcapstone or project courses. The curriculum focuses on building team leadership skills andtechniques for addressing challenges such as planning and execution, social loafing, andprocrastination. Models for assessing students‟ teaming skills and for providing
of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Gray receieved his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2000. He then earned a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech in
current research projects deal with earthquake risk management technology in Mexico and the United States, environmental data justice in the US/Mexican borderlands, and the development and practice of engineering expertise.Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines Leslie Light is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines, and the Director of the Cornerstone Design@Mines program. She received a B.S. in General Engineering, Product Design from Stanford University and an MBA from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, specializing in Entrepreneurial Management. Prior to joining Mines she spent 20 years as a designer, project manager, and
designers’ beliefs about design character. These studies have highlighted the importance of cross-disciplinary skills and student engagement in large-scale, real-world projects. Dr. Exter currently leads an effort to evaluate a new multidisciplinary degree program which provides both liberal arts and technical content through competency-based experiential learning.Ms. Iryna Ashby, Purdue University Iryna Ashby is a Ph.D student in the Learning Design and Technology Program at Purdue University with the research interests focused on competency-based education and assessment, micro-credentialing, and program evaluation. She is also part of the program evaluation team for the Transdisciplinary Studies in Technology – a
22.1135.2communication skills to engineering students, an effective implementation faces manychallenges. Students must have the time to complete technical communication assignmentswhile also mastering the design process and completing a project with intensive design andmanufacturing content. Faculty must create assignments in a variety of technical communicationmediums that allow them to provide constructive feedback while working under resourceconstraints. In addition, the evaluation of technical communication skills must be consistentacross multiple faculty members and the assignments must allow faculty to evaluate and providetechnical communication feedback to individuals as well as to complete teams so that individualswith weak communication skills cannot
– rather than simply developing their stores ofknowledge about their profession [6, 7]. We bring this discussion into the context of engineeringeducation by showing how contemplative dialogic processes can impact the formation ofengineering students.Undergraduate engineering education often involves hands-on and team projects, but discerningwhen and how to critically reflect on conversational skill development can be a challenge. Wepresent conversation architectures as potential solutions that complement existing practices andapproaches in engineering education. Conversation architectures are our umbrella term forcommunication and participation structures designed to scaffold the creation of reflective spacewhere students can focus on
thinking. The purpose of this joint-inquiry course was to providean opportunity for the students and the professor to explore these questions, to identify and learnsome common “habits of the mind” of engineers, to enhance their sensitivity to when thesehabits of the mind can be used as effective tools to think critically about the world, and topractice applying these concepts to the analysis of systems that are not normally encountered ordiscussed in the context of the engineering classroom. This paper describes several highlights ofthe course’s design and implementation, including the readings, discussions, activities, and thefinal term project. Also included are students’ perceptions of the course elements as told by thestudent co-authors of
social sciences, and foreign languages.”8 Union College is experimentingwith pairing courses, one taught by an engineering faculty member and another taught by onefrom the humanities or social sciences.9 Pairings such as music and acoustical engineering haveproven to complement each other while generating both interest and benefit to both schools.O’Neill-Carrillo, et al.10 have utilized engineering projects at the university level to respond tofundamental needs of society and address social, environments, and socio-economic issues of thelocal community thorough creation of academic structures that enable direct interaction amongstudents, faculty and community members. Catalano11 described a new interdisciplinary coursefor both engineering and
withactual engineering projects to show students how intricately linked communication andteamwork skills are with engineering problem solving and design. Much emphasis is placed onsenior capstone courses, as this meets the immediate demand of preparing graduating seniors forthe non-technical aspects of their careers. In contrast, freshman classes receive less attention interms of their position to “set the tone” for the coupling of communication and engineering,likely because the demands placed on freshman engineering classes are already high. They serveas a recruitment tool, pique interest in engineering, expose students to the many and varied areasof concentration in the discipline, and perhaps, introduce students to engineering projects andbasic
doctoral degree at the University of Georgia, Learning, Design, and Tech- nology program. Before that, she had worked for the Korean Government in nation-wide ICT integration projects to K-12 schools over 10 years. She specializes in inquiry/ critical information-based problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (e.g., OER, social media, games, and augmented reality).Dr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for over 25 years, and she continues to work on externally funded
engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication decisions involved in describing the products of open-ended design scenarios.Dr. Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan Laura K. Alford is a Lecturer and Research Investigator at the University of Michigan.Dr. Katie Snyder, University of Michigan Dr. Snyder is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She teaches writing and presentation strategies to students in the College of Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Implementing a Single Holistic Rubric to Address Both Communication and Technical Criteria in a First Year
interdisciplinary core of the first-year program introduces students to topics spanning thearts, humanities, engineering, and the social, natural, and computational sciences. The initialengineering focused course, Creating & Making, is focused on practicing skills in ideation,project scoping, project management, reporting, communicating, and other aspects of designmethodology. The course content is community driven and while nucleated with concreteexamples of course material from the instructors, allows the student body to explore and reflectupon the benefits and drawbacks of the provided examples and to organically investigatealternative approaches through their practice. In this approach, rather than outlining a discretesubset of material, the
Paper ID #8570An Integrated Approach to Developing Technical Communication Skills inEngineering StudentsProf. Ronald S Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is the Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven. He leads the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits and implemented a similar program in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University when he was the chair there. Dr. Harichandran received his BE in Civil Engineering from the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, and his MS and PhD from MIT. He was a faculty member
, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty-led projects while also supporting instructors to improve their teaching in the classroom. Previously, Dr. Cutler worked as the research specialist with the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE - W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical
chair of the ASEE ChE Division, has served as an ABET program evaluator and on the AIChE/ABET Education & Accreditation Committee. He has also served as Assessment Coordinator in WPI’s Interdis- ciplinary and Global Studies Division and as Director of WPI’s Washington DC Project Center. He was secretary/treasurer of the new Education Division of AIChE. In 2009 he was awarded the rank of Fellow in the ASEE, and in 2013 was awarded the rank of Fellow in AIChE.Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts. Her training is in