Paper ID #30045The Modalities of Governance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for
, educators havetried to design curricula that foster this associative learning —which, we know from our ownexperiences, is how we learn best outside of the classroom. Twenty-first century engineeringeducators have been mindful of ABET’s EC2000 student outcomes a-k, including ethicalunderstanding, the ability to communicate effectively, and “the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context.”2 Engineering educators who struggle to help students achieve these ABETlearning outcomes might consider working together with liberal arts faculty to integrateengineering with humanities understanding. What the environmental historian William Crononwished for liberal arts
are but tools to assist our reflection. The engineering profession is empowered as wellas constrained by a number of firmly held assumptions.17 Liberal education should strive to helpstudents re-imagine engineers’ roles in society by reflecting on the most powerful andconstraining assumptions.Knowledge is meaningful only within particular contexts. This lesson applies to not onlyengineering but also history, literature, music, and any other field of study. Understanding thecontextual nature of knowledge will help students assess engineering knowledge morecomprehensively and practice engineering in ways more sensitive to local and global contexts.AcknowledgementsThis research is partly supported by Philip L. Alger Fellowship for graduate study
designs might cause harm, even when wellintentioned. And because most programs provide few opportunities for students to frame—andreframe—engineering problems from different points of view, students tend to frame engineeringproblems from only one, often dominant point of view. We argue the writing process can hold akey role in developing framing practice, as it can be threaded into core coursework to supporttechnical understanding that is contextual and open to critique.In this paper, we detail our approach to and student outcomes from a comprehensive andcollaborative writing intervention. Our approach supports students to develop as critical thinkersand writers in tandem with technical understanding. Our approach builds on past research
interdisciplinary experience of the authors and avoid creating silos within differentsections of the course.Future WorkWe argue that CSPs are a promising area for enhancing engineering education and we lookforward to investigating these methods. Future work will focus on identifying appropriateexamples for teaching energy concepts through CSP, developing and offering the course, andmeasuring the impact of CSP on student learning. One of our major challenges will bedetermining how the examples identified in this research can best be integrated to achieve ourdesired learning outcomes. We anticipate that we will need to overcome our own biases aboutwhat counts as engineering and that by working as a group we can collectively broaden our owndefinitions of
to how the rehearsal process begins. In professional practice, the table read is anopportunity for the actors to begin to explore their characters and for the designers and directorto share their initial ideas. As such, it gives us a forum in which to discuss the responsibilities ofeach theatrical position, helping students to later choose their role for the final sceneperformance (one of actor, designer, director). The table read also serves the purpose to explorecritical analysis and its application within theatrical practice: the need to make use of extra-textual resources (e.g., historical research) to deepen the interpretation of the play; howindividual words, lines and scenes contribute to the construction of character, theme and story
SPSU. This historical datademonstrates a continuing confusion about engineering technology and the role of an1 SPSU is an unit of the University System of Georgia located in Marietta, Georgia. Its vision is to be acomprehensive university with a unique purpose. Through a fusion of technology with the liberal arts andsciences, we create a learning community that encourages thoughtful inquiry, diverse perspectives, andstrong preparation of our graduates to be leaders in an increasingly technological world. The university –faculty, staff, students, and graduates – aspires to be the best in the world at finding creative, practical,and sustainable solutions to real-world problems and improving the quality of life for people around theglobe.2
, and has been published in 2015 Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education along with his research team. Eddington has also served as a series editor, contributed to trade publications, and facilitated workshops all related to higher education administrators’ work experiences.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for
the purpose he envisioned; that the collection be used as aneducational tool through which viewers would gain a better understanding of past ways of works,industrial and engineering principles, and over 400 years of human achievement.As a result of his connection with MSOE and admiration for the school and its programs, Dr.Grohmann ultimately decided that it was the best venue for fully exploring the potential of his artcollection. So, in 2001, he made the initial gift of nearly 500 works to the school with the initialplan being to display the works on campus while researching individual works, artists, andsubject matter. In making this gift, the ultimate goal was to establish a venue that would be apermanent home for the housing, care, and
. In asimilar vein, Tobias quotes Susan Voss as saying, “no one can learn … about engineering whohasn’t designed or built or measured something.”20On a superficial level, it makes perfect sense that more information about technology principlesand operations, as well as technology-making practices, should help students in understandinghow a given technology fits within its larger social context. On a deeper level, however, it is notlogical to claim narrow technical expertise is required for functional literacy about technologyuse, for assessing the acceptability of broad-impact risks created by technologies, or foranticipating the social impact of technologies whose relationship to social action and interactiontranscends underlying technical
from the Royal Charters awarded theseinstitutions. In practice, although they set their own examinations each year, very fewcandidates entered for them. Instead they took examinations and courses in the technicalcolleges that comprised the bulk of the third level public sector. These examinations wereregarded as equivalent to those set by the institutions. In practice the majority of thestudents in science and technology took „ordinary‟ and „higher national certificates‟ thattogether with „endorsement‟ subjects were considered to be the degree equivalent that theinstitutions required. For purposes of teaching the Ministry for Education regarded themas such.By 1966 a new composite examination that covered all the recognized institutions led
both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University,she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis.From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement ofTeaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSFinnovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences forhigh school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:”Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and
theories,methods, and promising practices across institutions and disciplines. Harassment, threats, andintimidation cannot be tolerated if we are to engage this call to the best of our abilities. It iscrucial that all our students are able to realize their potential, and that our profession welcomesand cultivates talent to more fully enhance and protect the welfare of people and the planet.Each of us is a potential ally to another STEM diversity researcher. We offer [35] a shortacronym to help scholars remember how to respond in such an attack: RSR, for Report, Support,and Recommit. When a scholar is attacked, they (or a supportive colleague) should Report theattack to multiple bodies: the unit, college, and university levels; to law enforcement
instructor had the studentsevaluate and inventory a second loaded document. Post-test instructions were identical to thepre-test instructions. The instructor did not inform the students that they were evaluating thesame loaded document a second time. Table 1 in Results shows anonymous class-level resultsfor the diagnostic, as well as for the pre- and post- tests.Engineering Design Class: During the first round of assessment and test teaching, SpringQuarter 2013, academic year 2012-2013, the writing instructor began a partnership with a seniormechanical engineering faculty and department co-vice-chair. The agenda of this partnershipwas to investigate new methods and best practices for assessing and improving student writing inengineering classes
tasks, and meet objectives. Their ability to meet their objectives, and in fact, surpass allexpectations can best be demonstrated through a quote from a retired Brigadier General withclose ties to Franklin Military Academy, “[This was] a great event...probably the mostsignificant Zoom Conference I have attended this year. If the Richmond West PointSociety can provide Franklin and other Schools with kits, the ability for 360 Cradle to Careers(C2C) to have greater impact becomes a model that is replicated across the country. Movementis minimized but access and mentoring both for the events and post counsel are possible. WestPoint Cadets were phenomenal and as an advertisement for what I believe is the Nation's bestholistic development university
papertherefore presents information about the institution’s development of new degree-levelcoursework on accessibility to be implemented at education institutions nationwide. Theinformation exchange and comparative analysis of approaches to accessibility education in theRussian Federation and the United States help to identify potential avenues for the application ofsuccessful education strategies to promote awareness of accessibility issues and to prepareengineering students for professional practice.IntroductionFreedom of movement is identified as a human right within the Universal Declaration of HumanRights. Public transportation system planning decisions, vehicle and infrastructure design,communication practices, and passenger services all impact
Future WorkWe found evidence that boundary negotiating artifacts offer a useful theoretical framework forstudying interdisciplinary engineering teamwork. They provide information on, and sites ofanalysis for, interactions and practices that remain underexplored in engineering educationresearch. Our findings suggest that BNAs deserve more consideration within engineeringeducation because of the increasing significance the field is placing on teamwork,interdisciplinarity, communication, and project management skills.The purpose of this paper was to introduce the concept of boundary negotiating artifacts andpresent preliminary data on their use in one interdisciplinary graduate research team. We willcontinue this work during a second, similar study
computing in society.These courses included an array of humanities/social science (HSS) courses and engineeringcourses (e.g., capstone design). Many described feeling somewhat unprepared for a variety ofethical situations on the job. Most advocated for greater engineering ethics education, primarilythrough integration into existing engineering courses. Limitations in the work include a fairlysmall sample. The results provide insights into how educational practices are influential in termsof the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of working engineers with respect to ethics andbroader impacts.BackgroundThere are numerous incidents of unethical practices in engineering [1,2,3] and times whennegative impacts to communities and individuals have
employability in the 21st century. This skill list has been modified and adopted bymany institutions. The SCANS report of 20001 identified the following essential workforce skillareas; use of resources, acquiring and using information, interpersonal skills, understandingsystems, selecting and using technology, basic skills, thinking skills, and personal qualities.This report was the starting point for the definition of 21st century Workforce Skills at acommunity college. A college team was assembled to review this report, assess its applicabilityto local employers and community college graduates, and advise on implementation. Localemployers were interviewed to determine which of these Workforce Skills best fit and bestserved graduates of 2 year
Professor of English in the Department of English at Carnegie Mellon. His current research interests include pedagogy of communication and design for students and professionals in the technology/engineering disciplines, and computer-aided rhetorical analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Making the Invisible Visible in Writing Classrooms: An Approach to Increasing Textual Awareness using Computer-Aided Rhetorical AnalysisIntroductionWriting requires countless composing decisions that are typically beyond the writer’s consciousgrasp. For students, writing can feel like a process that they have little control over, and a skillthat only a certain few possess. Much of the skill in being
enhancing innovation and leveraging assets in developing new products and systems. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Pennsylvania and has been the PI on numerous projects with industry involving new product development and the design of production infrastructure. He is the co-author of ”Foundations for Interop- erability in Next-Generation Product Development Systems” that was recognized by ASME as one of the most influential papers in computers and information in engineering from 1980-2000. During the summer of 1997 and the year of 1998/99 he was a research faculty fellow at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in the Design Engineering Technologies Group. Prior to graduate
structure assignments in a given context so that writing can besuccessfully embedded into existing curricula and appreciated by students in quantitativedisciplines as a critical part of their thinking process. Hence, there needs to be a more structuredapproach in educational design that relates to the “writing in the disciplines” (WID) approach,wherein faculty provide students a clear, discipline-informed framework for writing that seesdisciplinary differences in writing practices through the lens of genre. In this way, students receiveinsight into genres that will likely be part of their future workplace. The main genesis of rhetorical genre studies (RGS) was the work of Carolyn Miller, whowas the first to frame genre as a social action
cognition. She created the synthesis and design studios in the environmental engineering program and is currently developing the professional and design spines for the upcoming mechanical engineering program. She is also interested in faculty development and recently co-organized the NSF-sponsored PEER workshop for tenure-track engineering education research faculty. Page 23.597.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Faculty Reflections on a STEAM-Inspired Interdisciplinary Studio CourseAbstractConcerns regarding America’s
withprocedural approaches to technical writing that serve as incomparable supports when they arelater tasked with larger, more open-ended writing tasks.Using quantitative and qualitative results, this paper provides evidence that experiential learningopportunities in an engineering-focused Technical Writing and Communications course is a bestfit for this demographic’s learning preferences and creates measurable course impacts.Longitudinal data collected from these outcomes allow for a better reading of studentperformance gains, and results will guide future instructional design choices.IntroductionTechnical writing pedagogy, aimed at engineering students, must feature experiential learningand writing-to-learn practices in order to best address the
government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived the graduate level engineering ethics course ”Engi- neering Ethics and the Public,” which she has been co-teaching to students in engineering and science. She is co-Principal Investigator on a National Science Foundation (NSF) research and education project developing an ethnographic approach to engineering ethics education. Page 26.322.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Canons against Cannons? Social Justice and the Engineering Ethics ImaginaryAbstractWhat if social
Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants. Page 22.906.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Integrating Ethics into Undergraduate Environmental Science and Economics Education Abstract Good
generally do not address barriers embedded within the curriculum design, and may or may not increase faculty understanding of best practices for [students with disabilities] (p. 182).27As is the case in other instances of identity-based discrimination in America, even the mostenergetic and best intentioned practitioners continue to operate in settings that tolerate limitedreform.Critical social scientific work on disabilities has offered important framing for understanding thisongoing inequity. To my mind, foremost among its contributions is the idea, developed duringthe 1990s, that that which a culture treats as physical or mental capacity derives from socialvalues and conditions. This “social model” of disability to a degree displaced
SJ concerns [3], we work with more technocratically oriented STEM majors. For thisreason, we decided to start our research by inquiring into perceptions that students have aboutcontextualized and decontextualized problems (Con/Decon), and what resources they would useto try to write contexts, in order to understand how we might successfully coach them to come upwith context on their own.Evidence suggests that the invisibility of SJ concerns in engineering curricula factors into a“culture of disengagement” [2], [5], [7]. This scholarship posits that the divide between technicalknowledge and social concerns in engineering curricula impacts undergraduate engineeringmajor retention -- since students who are more driven by social/humanitarian
twoproblematic ideologies at work in engineering education: an over-reliance on Outcomes-BasedEducation (OBE) and an emphasis on “evidence-based” research and practice, where “evidence”is narrowly defined following the medical model of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nearlyimpossible to execute validly in educational settings. The changes remove or weakenrequirements for educational breadth, including global and social context, engineering ethics, andlifelong learning.One of the stated rationales for these changes is that some outcomes are difficult to assess. To thecontrary, the engineering education community has invested a great deal of time and effortinnovating assessment methods to create increasingly valid, concise, and easy to implement
Paper ID #9583Nature/Society: Situating student learning outcomes in a first-year Sustain-ability Studies courseMr. James E Wilcox , Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute James Wilcox is a doctoral student in Science & Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, where his dissertation project investigates the practices and politics of energy policy interventions. From 2011 to 2013 he was the Program Coordinator for Vasudha, an Undergraduate Living & Learning Com- munity dedicated to sustainability at RPI. Prior to coming to RPI, he served as an Education & Outreach Fellow in the Office of