Paper ID #19359The Assertion-Evidence Approach to Technical Presentations: OvercomingResistance in Professional SettingsElizabeth L. Miller, Pennsylvania State University Elizabeth Miller is a rising senior studying mechanical engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is a student in the Schreyer Honors College and an Engineering Ambassador. Last summer she had an internship in Siemens’ Energy Management Division, and this summer she will be working in Capital One’s Management Rotation Program.Mr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering
Paper ID #9931Living With Contradiction: Cultural Historical Activity Theory as a Theo-retical Frame to Study Student Engineering Project TeamsMr. Michael L Jones, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto Michael Jones is a doctoral candidate in the Faculty of Information, University of Toronto and professor of Communication, Culture, Information and Technology at Sheridan College, Oakville ON. Michael’s research interests are in project-based learning in technology education, with his dissertation looking at how Formula SAE engineering student project teams engage information management contradictions
Paper ID #22728Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Use of Metaphor in Presenting Proto-types to a Technical and Non-technical Public AudienceMr. Jared David Berezin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jared Berezin is a Lecturer in the Writing, Rhetoric, and Professional Communication (WRAP) program within the Comparative Media Studies/Writing Department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Jared teaches in a range of communication-intensive courses at MIT, including Communicating Science to the Public, Product Design, Flight Vehicle Design, Environmental Engineering, and Nuclear Science. He has also been a
writingknowledge transfer: a student who successfully completed freshman composition may still beunable to transfer skills, habits of mind, and approaches to writing from that setting toengineering because the rhetorical situations look drastically different [2].Yancey, Robertson,and Taczak define transfer as a “dynamic rather than a static process, a process of using,adapting, repurposing the old for success in the new,” and they argue that reflection—reflectionthat allows students to develop metacognition and a robust theory of writing—is integral totransfer [2]. In addition, for learning to take place and successful transfer to occur, students needto recognize what they don’t yet know [2].With an eye toward asking students to develop an engineering
a disk jockey (tofree his mind, develop capacity to be creative, and disconnect from fear ofrejection), three design classes, an internship, and his major project. Following isa short excerpt: I was able to apply both of these skills (creativity and research) in conjunction during my internship where I had to design a test fixture…. During this time, I realized that innovation is not a linear process. The steps to pursuing a design is iterative, and creativity can be utilized simultaneously with research. I also learned that there will always be stages of failure. Learning how to overcome these challenges, thus gaining support from real engineers in the field helped build both my creative
a pre-packaged lesson that connected engineering design via Mind-storms to the New York Common Core State Mathematics Standards for her math teacher col-leagues. The third sub-case explores Julie’s role as an FLL coach while she prepared for and fa-cilitated students’ participation in a regional competition. Overall, these sub-cases reveal howcommitments to pre-college constructionist-oriented engineering education can result in “doublebinds” [9] where constructionism is simultaneously positioned as an advantage for students’learning and long term development but also a disadvantage to participating in larger educationalstructures in- and out of Julie’s school.Sub-case 1 - Pi Day In 2015, Pi Day (March 14th; 3/14) fell on a Saturday
Paper ID #29814Designing for a Sustainable World: Integrating the United NationsSustainable Development Goals into a First-Year Engineering Course inScience, Technology and SocietyDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that explore social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice, including Sci- ence, Technology, and Contemporary Issues; Technology and the Frankenstein Myth; The LEGO Course: Engineering Design and Values; STS and Engineering Practice; and The Engineer, Ethics, and Profes
our uncertainty (tolerance for ambiguity). In this course, students experiencedmultiple levels of uncertainty and instructors offered permission as part of the course design tosafely take risks, fail, and move forward. As a result, final products were much more innovativeand creative in nature than ideas presented at the beginning of the class. Students recognized theimportance of the challenges they faced (group dynamics, work dynamics, distaste for the coursedesign and overwhelming amount of group work, etc.) in moving through the creative designprocess.With that in mind, we look to student reflections, specifically those of the engineering students,to identify strategies that contribute to creative practice and to help students
, and drawattention to the lack of local design epistemologies in humanitarian engineering scholarship andpractice.I argue that as students, teachers, and researchers, we equate the minds of those who occupyeconomic and social margins with the possession of marginal intellect when we set out to help oraid them without recognizing the validity of and valorizing their ways of knowing. I providethree exemplar grassroots practices of seeking feedback, perceiving needs and problems, andorganizing instrumental assistance and cooperation. Learning how members of socially andeconomically marginalized communities apply their minds, mouths, hands and feet to solvelocally occurring problems may help us interrogate our scholarly, pedagogical, and
AC 2011-635: HIGHER TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION IN ENGLANDAND WALES 1955-1966. COMPULSORY LIBERAL STUDIESJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Ed- ucation. During the period of the paper was a lecturer in radio communication at Norwood Technical College, Senior Research Fellow in Higher Technological Education at Birmingham College of Advanced Technology, and Leverhulme Senior Research Fellow at the University of Lancaster respectively. he has an MSc in Engineering Education from the University of Dublin Page 22.776.1
participating on an integrative team or educationalexperience required the faculty involved to grow, learn, and get out of their comfort zones.Session I was primarily concerned with integration within engineering curricula, while thesecond session was primary concerned with integration that occurred in particular courses orother educational experiences.Although the papers in all of the sessions reflected significant progress and accomplishment inintegration, “Measuring Change Over Time in Sociotechnical Thinking: A Survey/ValidationModel for Sociotechnical Habits of Mind” by Leydens, Johnson, Claussen, Blacklock, Moskal,and Cordova provides the most fully realized account of sociotechnical integration, which theauthors implicitly define as highlighting
perceived divisions between STEM andthe liberal arts by linking those perspectives and assignments to broader habits of mind that arenecessary for engineers and designers. We then describe our strategies for integrating a richdesign experience into the course and consider how that integration alters typical approaches todesign projects. Finally, we discuss our plan to implement assessments that account for bothstudents’ technical abilities and their application of course theories and concepts.Course development was supported at the Institution by a summer course development grant thatencouraged faculty to partner across disciplines to create unique course offerings. Thepartnership between the Humanities & Social Sciences (HSS) and the
AC 2012-4526: A WORKSHOP TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLSFOR TEACHING ASSISTANTSDr. Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth A. DeBartolo is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Rochester Institute of Technology. She earned her B.S.E. at Duke University in 1994 and her Ph.D. at Purdue University in 2000. She works with students on assistive device design and determining mechani- cal properties of materials. DeBartolo serves on her college’s leadership teams for both multi-disciplinary capstone design and outreach program development.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology Margaret B. Bailey, P.E., is a professor of mechanical engineering
effective mentorship and social support tracks directly onto gender, ethnic, race,and class differences. With this contingency in mind, the measurement of self-efficacy can betied to a much larger social project. Most suggestively, Jaffee and Riley draw our attention tothe fact that it is in leaving engineering that some women express agency. We certainly need notaccept as final or desirable the departure of these young women from STEM fields, but if we areto understand the complex relationship between identity, self-efficacy, and equitableopportunities in STEM disciplines, such broadened definitions of what counts as self-confidenceand self-determination will be vital. McLoughlin's work on so-called non-traditional students (aproblematic word in
detection of elementary particles. Takai is an Adjunct Professor at Stony Brook University.Dr. Sunil Dehipawala, Queensborough Community College, CUNY Sunil Dehipawala received his B.S. degree from University of Peradeniya in Sri Lanka and Ph.D from City University of New York. Currently, he is working as a faculty member at Queensborough Community College of CUNY.Prof. Dimitrios S. Kokkinos Ph.D., Queensborough Community College, CUNY Dimitrios Kokkinos, Department of Physics, Queensborough Community College of CUNY, Bayside, NY 11364. Phone: 718-281-5708; Fax: 718-631-6608; Email: dkokkinos@qcc.cuny.edu. Professional Preparation: Graduate Center of the City University of New York, electrical engineering, Ph.D., 1984
Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and As- sistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, and the measurement and support of change of ”habits of mind,” particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity
Paper ID #19305Systematically Integrating Liberal Education in a Transdisciplinary DesignStudio EnvironmentDr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some of her previous research has focused on software designers’ formal and non-formal educational experiences and use of precedent materials, and experienced instructional
education ofengineers for decades, and we will continue to be in this struggle for the long haul. Now is thetime for us (once again) to organize, to build coalitions, and to leverage all of our socialanalytical ability toward the effort of winning hearts and minds in support of the broad educationof engineers. What appeared to be consensus over EC2000 is now revealed to have been fragileat best, and we must work to strengthen and re-build this movement. I propose several ways inwhich the LEES Division can act as a clearinghouse with convening power to build coalitionsacross those who advocate for liberal education of engineers, across ASEE divisions, and acrossthe broader set of professional engineering societies, which comprise the membership of
AC 2011-634: HIGHER TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION IN ENGLANDAND WALES BETWEEN 1955 AND 1966. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THEBRITISH ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRY TO ITS DEVELOP-MENTJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Ed- ucation in the University. During the period of this paper was a lecturer in radio communications at Norwood technical College, Senior Research Fellow in Higher Technological Education at Birmingham College of Advanced Technology, and Leverhulme Senior Research Fellow in Higher Education at the University of Lancaster. Has an MSc in Engineering Education from the University of Dublin
Paper ID #33210Science Diplomacy: Results From a Three-Year PilotDr. Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Tech- nology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Oerther earned his Ph.D. (2002) from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Dan’s professional registrations include: PE, BCEE, BCES, CEng, CEnv, CEHS, and DAAS
AC 2012-4231: CAN WE TALK? DISCERNING AND ENGAGING DIS-COURSE DIFFERENCES ACROSS DISCIPLINESMs. Beth Bateman Newborg, University of Pittsburgh Beth Bateman Newborg was one of the initiators of the University of Pittsburgh’s English/Freshman En- gineering Writing program, and has served as the Program’s Director for the past 10 years. Newborg also teaches the upper-level Communication Skills for Engineers course at Pitt’s Swanson School of Engi- neering and serves as the Outreach Director for Pitt’s Writing Center. Newborg has extensive experience as a teacher of professional writing and as a writing consultant in the technical, public policy, and legal fields. With more than 20 years experience in teaching and
Paper ID #10385Exploring Student Sustainability Knowledge using the Structure of ObservedLearning Outcomes (SOLO) TaxonomyDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment. Specifically
business). This was acknowledged by some respondents;e.g., “I am learning more and more about how cities are planned, how they function, and howpeople interact with their communities. Good engineering and design can greatly benefit citiesand their citizens.” While the responses from these non-engineers are not analyzed in detail,keeping these individuals in mind is important because they may be co-workers with engineerswhose behavior contributes to the overall corporate culture in which engineers work.Other demographics reported by the survey respondents included: Gender: male (61.2%), female (37.1%), other (0.6%), prefer not to say (1.2%) Race/ethnicity (5 individuals selected two categories, thus the total percentage exceeds 100
of essential notions of intellect, drive, and self-discipline thatcenter on bodily ‘normalcy’” [8]. Notions of engineering skill have assumptions about “capable”bodies and minds built into them [12]. For example, to be seen as proficient at circuit design andtesting in an electrical engineering lab, one is expected to have the manual dexterity tomanipulate centimeter-long resistors and capacitors and the visual acuity to see small details upclose. A students’ demonstration that they understand the workings of a circuit is often conflatedwith the physical act of circuit-making in the laboratory. In such instances, lack of physicaldexterity or visual sharpness may be interpreted as lack of proficiency at engineering tasks.Because of the
., & Potvin, G. (2010, 2013). GSE/RES:Sustainability topics as a route to female recruitment in engineering (#1036617). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1036617Klotz, L., Potvin, G., Godwin, A., Cribbs, J., Hazari, Z., & Barclay, N. (2014). Sustainability as a Route to Broadening Participation in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20034Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401Krogstad, J. (2015, February 27). Hispanics more
encouraging When a peer gives you feedback on your writing, it is common to feel a little defensive, especially when you have put a lot of hard work into a piece of writing. However, try to hear feedback with an open mind. You and your peers are all trying to do the same thing: become better engineers. As you read your peer’s paper, remember how this might feel. Be encouraging. You have nothing to lose and they have everything to gain from your encouragement. Remember to comment on aspects of their paper that are strong at the same time as you are suggesting areas of improvement. Write
AC 2011-2241: REVISITING COMMUNICATION EXPERIENCES TO PRE-PARE FOR PROFESSIONAL PRACTICEKathryn Mobrand, University of Washington Kathryn Mobrand is a doctoral candidate and research assistant in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. She is working with Dr. Jennifer Turns on preparedness portfolios for engineering undergraduates; her focus is on the communication of practicing engineers.Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an Associate Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering at the University of Washington. She is interested in all aspects of engineering education, including how to support engineering
undergraduate training, teaching, and research assistantships at Cali- fornia Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, where he received a B.S. in Computer Science. Currently, Medina-Kim researches how undergraduate students negotiate commitments to social justice throughout their participation in co-curricular humanitarian engineering projects. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Towards Justice in Undergraduate Computer Science Education: Possibilities in Power, Equity, and Praxis1. IntroductionGiven assimilationist criticism of national initiatives to expand computer science education,recent computing education research has
website, the “division provides a vital forum for those concerned with integrating thehumanities and social sciences into engineering education via methods, courses, and curriculardesigns that emphasize the connectedness between the technical and non-technical dimensions ofengineering learning and work” [1]. To our minds, SenseMaker is a method that works to theseends. It is an approach that provides a way for actors in the social system of engineering1 We note that, at the time of writing, a search of the ASEE PEER document repository for theterm “SenseMaker” yielded zero exact matches.education to make sense of their experiences and decide, for themselves and in collaborationwith others, how to nudge the system closer toward a state that
Paper ID #20026The Whole as the Sum of More Than the Parts: Developing Qualitative As-sessment Tools to Track the Contribution of the Humanities and Social Sci-ences to an Engineering CurriculumDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin Wylie is an assistant professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the