essential to prepare students for “active lives as informed citizens” [39-40].The curriculum for the major in Engineering Studies consists of fundamental courses in math,science, and engineering sciences – selected by each student from an approved list – as well asconsiderable coursework in the traditional liberal arts. The framework for students to integrate allthese courses is provided by a three-course required core curriculum in Engineering Studies:Engineering Economics; Engineering & Public Policy; and Engineering and Society.The Engineering Studies Core CurriculumThe mission of the Engineering Studies Program at Lafayette College is to help students from avariety of majors connect engineering and the liberal arts (Figure 1). The learning
at Loyola University Chicago. She teaches graduate-level courses in program evaluation, qualitative research methods, and mixed methods. She has been the PI on seven major evaluation projects that ranged from one to five years in length. Her scholarship focuses on practitioners’ data use and evaluation capacity building within non-profits through coaching. She received a Bachelors in Psychology from Calvin College, and a PhD in Educational Psychology from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Integrated Social Justice Engineering Curriculum at Loyola University ChicagoIntroductionIn
origins to the 1994 ASEE report Engineering Education for aChanging World, which, among many other recommendations, asserted that “engineeringeducation must take into account the social, economic, and political contexts of engineeringpractice…” [2, pp. 20–21]. The report emphasized that contextual skills should be deliveredthrough multi- and interdisciplinary coursework, integrated into the existing curriculum, andfocused on an understanding of the ethical dimensions of engineering. A decade later, theNational Academies report Educating the Engineer of 2020 re-emphasized the importance of thethemes of interdisciplinarity, societal context, and ethics to the engineer of the then-future [3].In 2018, Dr. Ruth Graham, in her report on The Global
. 2Harvey Mudd College, whose 1957 founding mission was to produce alumni who would“assume technical responsibility with an understanding of the relation of technology to the rest ofsociety” [10], designed its engineering curricula to include one-third of students’ coursework inhumanities and social science fields. In 1970, Harvey Mudd integrated bold reforms thatemphasized connections across disciplinary boundaries, emphasized “the human basis of alltechnical problems,” and encouraged students to cultivate humility in appreciating the limitationsof their knowledge: “Insist that tools take you only so far” [11]. The 1970’s WPI Plan [12] was are-framing of Worcester Polytechnic Institute’s technical curriculum in societal context,emphasizing
human variability into account during userinterviews, but not applying those insights into mathematical models that determine how theactual product is shaped and manufactured. How might instructors integrate inclusive practicesinto these courses without adding even more material into content-packed classes? This work inprogress paper presents an ongoing case study as one attempt to answer that question.Our setting: transforming a middle-years course at a research-centric institutionOur case study occurs in a required undergraduate course in biomedical engineering at a largepublic research-intensive university. The course, which we will call Conservation Principles forthe purposes of this paper, is typically taken in the second or third year and
Paper ID #30435Real-World Examples and Sociotechnical Integration: What’s the Connec-tion?Jacquelene Erickson, Colorado School of Mines Jacquelene Erickson is a fourth year undergraduate student at Colorado School of Mines pursuing a major in Electrical Engineering. After graduation in May 2020, she plans to work in electrical distribution design at an engineering firm.Dr. Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines Stephanie Claussen is a Teaching Professor with a joint appointment in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division and the Electrical Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines. She ob
as “engineering” by faculty and students, leading toan engineering workforce poorly trained in dealing with the social dimensions of sustainableengineering solutions. This important concept currently receives little attention within thestandard engineering curricula, particularly within the engineering sciences.The pilot-study research presented in this article uses a mixed-methods approach to assess thestate of social justice awareness of students as they enter an “Introduction to Feedback ControlSystems” (IFCS) class. Social justice interventions are integrated to support students as theylearn about the inherent, yet often invisible, connections between social justice and controlsystems engineering. Instruments, such as surveys and focus
this paper wedescribe the design of the new general engineering curriculum at the University of San Diego.The argument for an engineering curriculum with a broad foundation that includes the liberal artsis not novel. Just after the creation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 1955, theEngineers’ Council for Professional Development commissioned a study to investigate howengineering education could keep pace with rapid developments in science and technology. Theresult of this study was the influential Grinter report1, among whose recommendations includedan emphasis on the importance of integrating liberal arts into engineering education. While thereport argued for balance between the technical and liberal arts, few current
the engineering curriculum?Compared to all the elements of the engineering curriculum, the ES is the most distant andinaccessible to partnerships and collaborations between ES instructors and everyone elsecommitted to engineering education—such as design faculty and HSS faculty within engineeringeducation contexts. Interdisciplinary collaborations are becoming more common in Intro classes,design courses, and HSS [2]. Even the basic math and science courses have become sites ofinnovative pedagogical interventions [3]. But for the most part, the ES remain closed to theseinterdisciplinary collaborations and integrations. Why is that?An obvious response is that the ES tend to be among the most technical components of anengineering education. But
limit [2]. With the financial crisis that struck the country in 2008, efforts to manage the fiscal crisis replaced those to reduce the curriculum of the approximately 19% of degrees that remained above the 120-unit limit within the 23 campus system. The CSU Board of Trustees presented a proposal in September 2012 to achieve the unit reduction, in part, by eliminating all advanced GE requirements. This proposal was prepared with no faculty input, in direct contradiction to the deeply engrained shared governance culture within the CSU system. Faculty and campus outcry was immediate and aggressive. The Academic Senate at SJSU, in response to a mandate from the SJSU president, developed an alternative proposal that
. Page 26.866.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Humanizing Signals and Systems: A Reflective AccountAbstract:In this paper, I authentically and reflectively depict my journey as an engineering educatordelving in the challenge of integrating technical content of a continuous-time signals and systemsclass with the social, value-laden realities that encompass such concepts. I refer to this particularchallenge as humanizing the technical content of signals and systems. Specifically, I describe thesignals and systems course and how I structured content and assessment plans to create space forhuman values. Additionally, I critically examine how some barriers that worked against myefforts
resistance may be student perceptionof writing as an audience-driven performance rather than perceiving writing as part of criticalthinking and creation of social action4. In data- and content-focused fields and disciplines, suchas those in STEM, it is difficult to integrate different forms and genres of writing into upper-levelundergraduate courses due to time constraints and concerns about coverage. Writing is seen as aseparate intellectual process because there are a limited number of courses taken as corerequirements from Humanities and Social Sciences, and many courses and writing programs donot demonstrate overt connections to STEM epistemologies. Although practicing STEM facultystress the importance of writing as part of their own careers
historian or philosopher or writer thinks, are reserved forhistory and philosophy and literature majors in their more advanced classes. In the generaleducation curriculum, integrative learning is little more than a fantasy. For the engineeringstudent, this approach often leads to compartmentalized learning, where students do not connecttheir general education courses to their engineering courses. When it comes to integrating engineering and humanities within a single course, the prospectsare more promising but the effort much more daunting. Engineering and the humanities are sofar removed from one another —sometimes quite literally situated on opposite ends of largecampuses, in separate colleges and institutional environments that make it
to determine which of the MSAs have solutions that are working and emulate themelsewhere where a change is warranted. From an engineering perspective, some of the solutionsthat can be considered are: better body camera data streaming; integration of audio signalprocessing; mobile app development useful to police officers and minority youth, communityblogs for interaction between the two groups, and enhanced transparency among all thesubgroups involved.Discussion:The current status: We have completed one case-study and expect to develop two more case-studies by the end of this year. We will offer concurrent courses in spring ’18 and add the top 3to 4 case-studies from the course to our case-study portfolio. We will also monitor our studentsas
nationally with an award for excellence in promoting professionalism, ethics, and licensure in the curriculum; • Our program leading to the Bachelor of Arts in Engineering Studies has, since 1970, prepared its graduates to be “technological integrators;” many work as engineers, and many others work in public policy, business, education, medicine, and law. Required coursework includes some fundamental engineering courses, some translational courses in engineering economics and engineering policy, and a sequence of courses in engineering studies – typically seminar-style, discussion- and writing-intensive courses that ask students to consider the history of technology, interrogate the
, in other words, to see the full picture of what it means to develop andembody empathy in engineering. The being dimension thus indicates that in order toconceptually define and pedagogically support empathy in engineering, engineering educatorsneed to critically and reflexively engage with larger ethical commitments and moral principles.Integration of empathy modules in a project-based engineering and society courseBased on the theoretical model described above, we designed and implemented a series ofempathy modules into a sophomore engineering and society course that is part of the above-described, new, mechanical engineering curriculum at the University of Georgia. The goals ofthe project were to: (i) achieve a substantive integration of
Paper ID #15537Making the Invisible Visible: Integrating Engineering-for-Social-Justice Cri-teria in Humanities and Social Science CoursesDr. Jon A. Leydens, Colorado School of Mines Jon A. Leydens is an associate professor in the Division of Liberal Arts and International Studies at the Colorado School of Mines, USA, where he has been since 1997. Research and teaching interests include communication, social justice, and engineering education. Dr. Leydens is co-author of Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (Morgan and Claypool, 2010) and editor of Sociotechnical Com- munication in Engineering (Routledge, 2014
Educational experiences that integrate liberal education content into theengineering curriculum have expanded as the role of an engineer in the workplace and in societyis reexamined. 4,5 Indeed, as argued by Grasso in 2002, it is engineering faculty’s responsibility tocomplement technical curriculum with a humanistic approach to meet the needs of society. 6 Thiscontent can take many forms such as enhanced discussion of ethics or service learningopportunities. Other examples include integration of curriculum modules covering social justicedirectly into technical coursework, thus forcing students to examine technical concepts moreholistically and blurring the traditional disciplinary boundaries. 7Often these approaches are suggested as a means to
concept, an informed value system, a vision of a possible future, and as achallenge to business-as-usual, sustainability is complexity itself, over-determined. Evendefining it requires interdisciplinarity, and attempting to practice—to live it—in academiarequires the integration, or at least the involvement, of all parts of the college campus, a dynamicinteraction of research, operations, curriculum, and the lived experience of individuals andcommunities.46,47,48 And yet, again, failing to attempt to define for our students what we wantthem to learn about sustainability in all its complexity will only continue our students’unnecessary frustrations.Because it has taken us a few years to get our program in place, to organize previously
-Learning at Benedictine College in Atchison, Kansas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integration of Critical Reflection Methodologies into Engineering Service- Learning Projects: A Case-StudyAbstractThis paper focuses on a case study utilizing critical reflection methodologies in an engineering,service-learning course at a small, liberal arts college. The college started the engineeringdepartment in 2009. As a new program, the department has been working to accredit programsin four disciplines: chemical, civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering. The department isdesigning the degree programs to take advantage of the Catholic, liberal arts mission of thecollege. The
. Lorelle A. Meadows, Michigan Technological University Dr. Lorelle Meadowsjoined Michigan Technological University in 2014 where she is leading the creation of a new honors college uniquely committed to inclusion and equity, and eliminating barriers to high impact educational practices. Prior to joining Michigan Tech, Dr. Meadows was Assistant Dean of Aca- demic Programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan.Her primary responsibility in that role was to assure the delivery of a curriculum that addressed college-wide educational objectives in order to prepare students for the careers of the 21st century. This engagement led to her development as an educational researcher and she now conducts
in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 3, Fall 2016.29. C. Bell-Huff, T. Fernandez, K. Morgan, P. J. Benkeser, & J. M. Le Doux, “A vertically integrated portfolio process to foster entrepreneurial mindset within an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2020 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE2020, Virtual.30. A. Finley & T. McNair, Assessing underserved students’ engagement in high-impact practices, Washington, D. C.: American Association of Colleges & Universities, 2009.31. V. Braun & V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006.32. C. J. Bryan, G. M
Paper ID #16543On the Use of Outcomes to Connect Students to an Engineering Identity, Cul-ture, and CommunityProf. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently a Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin Cities Engineering programs. She is also a program director at the National Science Foundation for TCUP and HBCU-UP in
1970 establishment, the program has experienced significant restructuring, including amajor 2008 overhaul in focus and curriculum, leading to a name change to Engineering Studies[3]. The foundational vision and motivation remain. The curriculum for the major in EngineeringStudies consists of fundamental courses in math, science, and engineering sciences – selected byeach student from an approved list – as well as considerable coursework in the traditional liberalarts. The framework for students to integrate all these courses is provided by a three-courserequired core curriculum in Engineering Studies: Engineering Economics and Management;Engineering & Public Policy; and Engineering and Society [4].Our Engineering Studies degree program [4
. 2 AbstractIn response to the need for a diverse, highly skilled STEM workforce that can workcollaboratively and communicate effectively, colleges of engineering have developed diversity-focused recruitment, retention, and outreach efforts. Many programs have also begun toemphasize technical communication skills. A national organization that integrates these prioritiesis the Engineering Ambassadors Network (EAN), which trains undergraduates to raise awarenessof what engineers do and how they contribute to society. Typical ambassador activities includethe delivery of a presentation and a hands-on activity to middle or high school students.Currently, there are an estimated 634 EAs in the United States
these codes were written [4, 5]. Yarmus [18] and Russell [17] articulate the first line ofthinking. While there are differences in the tones of their arguments, both argue that engineers’ professional societies should use their members’ technical integrity and exemplary ethics as ameans of raising the status and stature of the profession. Unfortunately, by framing engineers’professional integrity as an unwavering platform upon which enhanced occupational statusshould be advocated, they leave little space for critique or improvement in this realm.Hill et al. and Andrews adopt the second line of reasoning. In contrast to Yarmus and Russell,these authors accept that engineers have room for improvement when it comes to ethicalconduct, but by
Paper ID #31588Designing an Engineering Computer Instructional Laboratory: Working withthe PanopticonDr. Shehla Arif, University of Mount Union I am a thermal-fluids sciences educator. My doctoral and postdoctoral work is on experimental fluid dynamics of bubbles. My emphasis is interdisciplinary moving between mechanical engineering, geology, and biology. I acquired PhD from Northwestern University, IL and a post-doc at McGill University, Canada. I am passionate about integrating Engineering education with liberal arts studies. To that end, I am interested in embedding social justice and peace studies into engineering
, and life in constantfear. After my family found refuge in the U.S. and I chose physics as my focus of study, Ilearned that my “otherness” also expanded to being a woman who wanted to learn sciences,being pretty in an academic domain where “prettiness” wasn’t allowed, being feminine in a placewhere the ticket to belong had “masculinity” written all over it. To date, I am still “othered:” awoman in a hard domain of engineering, a scientist by training working in an engineeringcollege, a humanist in the environment of technologists. I have also “othered” myself by choicethrough going rogue and focusing my intellectual vitality efforts in the space of education,shifting away from quantitative towards qualitative research paradigm, integrating
theseperceptions changed after STEP. Data were collected using open-ended entrance surveys andwritten responses on final exams. Research protocols were approved by the Institutional ReviewBoard (#13-577).Context and ParticipantsThe research setting was an introductory engineering course embedded within STEP. The courseis designed to introduce students to fundamental engineering concepts, and course objectivesincluded engagement with the engineering design process, exploration of engineering disciplines,engineering ethics, technical writing, and problem solving with software tools (Matlab). Thecourse curriculum integrated problem-based learning and product archaeology frameworks(Barrows, 1986; Kolmos, De Graaff, Johri, & Olds, 2014; Lewis et al., 2011
relatively new feature of HCD modes of contextualization, butthis emphasis on the bigger picture is a cornerstone of other approaches to contextualizingengineering education. Appreciating complex interactions not only between designers and users,but also between engineers themselves, other human and non-human actors, and broader socialand cultural factors is an important aspect of a mode of contextualization that we describe associotechnical thinking. In this mode, contextualization is a key aspect of curriculum because ithelps students to understand what engineering is: namely, that engineering work is asociotechnical endeavor [10], [38]. Educators who practice this type of contextualization pursue“sociotechnical integration” as a learning outcome