-project so students can apply EM knowledge to a real(istic) scenario and the resulting consequences. Students focus on technical aspects and analyze social and technical consequences. • Redesign classroom assessment rubrics to incorporate engineering habits of mind. Include sections for systems thinking (technical aspects), innovation (design aspects), adaptations and improvements (iterative processes), socio-cultural and ethical considerations (social aspects), communication (understanding the problem and considering multiple perspectives), collaboration (teamwork and fostering new strategies), and finally sociotechnical integration (understanding emergent factors).The Projects course taught at
nanotechnology: how experiential learning enhances engineering education?” Proceedings 2016 Annual Conference for the American Society of Engineering Education, ASEE 2016, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. [4] H. Ledford, “Team science,” Nature, vol. 525, no. 7569, p. 308+, September 2015. [Online]. Available: ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com. [Accessed January 23, 2018].[5] D. Song, “Artificial mind: Interdisciplinary learning,” NeuroQuantology, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 107+, September 2017. [Online]. Available: ProQuest, https://search.proquest.com. [Accessed January 23, 2018].[6] A.L. Potter and J. Youtie, “How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology?” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1023
Paper ID #21479Engineers’ Imaginaries of ’The Public’: Dominant Themes from Interviewswith Engineering Students, Faculty, and ProfessionalsDr. Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney’s research focuses on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsi- bility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seat- tle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD
Paper ID #22414From ’Empathic Design’ to ’Empathic Engineering’: Toward a Genealogy ofEmpathy in Engineering EducationDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 From “Empathic Design” to “Empathic Engineering”: Toward a Genealogy of
Paper ID #24028Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems viaEfforts to Integrate Design Principles into Engineering EducationDr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Dean for Curricular Transitions, Associate Professor in Science and Technol- ogy Studies, and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems via Efforts to Integrate Design Principles into Engineering EducationIntroductionHuman-centered design
Paper ID #21858Inner Engineering: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study Evaluating the Useof Contemplative Practices to Promote Resilience Among Freshman Engi-neering StudentsMr. Mark V. Huerta, Arizona State University Mark Huerta is a second year PhD student in the Engineering Education Systems & Design (EESD) pro- gram at Arizona State University. His primary research interest is integrating the ideas behind mindfulness among engineering students to promote resilience, self-regulated learning, and creativity. Mark is also the Chairman and Director of Programs of a non-profit called 33 Buckets, which empowers rural communi
journal articles published under her name. She has also written in thegenre of science fiction, and published books in the body-mind-spirit genre about her empathic encounterswith horses. She has taught courses in Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy; Gender Issues and Ethics in theNew Reproductive Technologies; Religion and Technology; STS & Engineering Practice; The Engineer,Ethics, and Professional Responsibility; STS and the Frankenstein Myth. Rosalyn regularly incorporatesmindfulness practices into her engineering school courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Dimensions of Diversity in Engineering: What We Can Learn from STSIntroductionThe challenge of increasing diversity in engineering is
Paper ID #22401Exploring the Human Dimension of Engineering Through the Built Environ-mentDr. Jeffrey C. Evans P.E., Bucknell University Jeffrey C. Evans, Ph.D., P.E., F. ASCE is Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Bucknell University in Lewisburg, PA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring the Human Dimension of Engineering through the Built EnvironmentAbstractHumanities and social sciences along with mathematics and natural sciences are at thecore of liberal learning. Further, the proposed ABET student outcome five requiresstudents to
that remainon the margins of society, and how this wealth of knowledge relates to engineering practices,habits of mind and dispositions [35]. 8 Laura did not have the resources to buy a new stove. Her family owned a restaurant in Mexico and they needed the stove as soon as possible. To solve this problem, Laura and her family designed a stove made out of inexpensive raw materials, including adobe, empty coffee and soup cans, barro (a mixture of clay materials), and a pipe. They also repurposed an antique washing machine, called chaca-chaca (as it is commonly known in Mexico for the sound it makes during the washing cycle), by disassembling it and using
, are two-fold. First, the UTAs might serve as aspirational peers that are more relatable and approachableto the first-year engineering students. With this intention in mind, the UTAs typically circulatedthrough the classroom in the second half of the semester during “work days” when the first-yearstudents were working on the provisional patent application assignment. Further, UTAs offeredoffice hours and selected a location in the student work area. Secondarily, the UTAs took fieldnotes following semi-structured observational guidelines that described the interactions andactivities in the discussion section. The UTAs met with the research team to review the fieldnotes and deliberate on the activities every other week for the duration of the
codes of conduct ashistorically contextualized, negotiated settlements, rather than uncontested statements of moralgood.One of the ways that equity-minded engineering educators have addressed this problem is byrevealing the omission of social justice issues in engineering education. Riley and her colleagueshave written extensively on this topic [7, 9, 12, 20, 21]. Related to the accreditation process, forexample, Riley highlights the incompatibility of diversity initiatives with outcomes-basededucation [20]. Beyond accreditation, Riley, Slaton and Herkert trace the uphill battle faced byengineering educators trying to infuse specific equity issues into their professional code ofconduct [21], Riley and Lambrinidou note the omission of social
specific genres is considering audience [25];often, students think only of the teacher or instructor as the audience because they have not beenasked to write for an authentic audience in schools settings. This is especially true for technicalreport writing in engineering laboratory assignments, where students tend to not perceivesituations in which an audience might exist [26]. Instead, they tend to write as a means to justifythat they followed their laboratory and technical processes accurately, with an audience (i.e., aninstructor) in mind who has sufficient expertise to judge this.Although a common place to focus on writing in engineering has been short and long reports inlaboratory courses [20, 23, 26-30], others argue for a broader
prison: Vintage, 2012.[25] P. C. Gorski. (n.d., February 04). Circles of my multicultural self. Available: http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/activities/circlesofself.html[26] J.A. Mejia, I. Villanueva, and R. A. Revelo, Using literacy to identify hidden factors that compromise equitable and effective engineering education, In Proceedings of the 2018 American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New York, 2018.[27] K. Boykin. (2007, September 05). Have the folks at intel lost their minds? Available: http://thenewblackmagazine.com/view.aspx?index=939[28] G. Ladson-Billings and W. F. Tate, "Toward a critical race theory of education," Teachers College Record, vol. 97, pp. 47-68, 1995.[29] E
learner.” (ID 54, File 05) Instructors: Individual (62%): -“Math is the skill that springs to mind first, but there are more skills that define a professional engineer. A “professional” has a level of expertise, responsibility, and accountability that he or she
, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas encountered by students as they move through these institutionalized trajectories. He is co-editor of a 2010 National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Learning Research as a Human Science. Other work has appeared in Linguistics and Education; Mind, Culture, and Activity; Anthropology & Education Quarterly, the Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science; the Journal of Engineering Education; and the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. His teaching interests
technology and society. There is aneed to reliably capture student learning about complex and dynamic socio-technical systemswithout privileging an assessment tool that a priori evaluates “more is better”. With that in mind this manuscript addresses three key issues in this area. The firstobjective, efficiency, is to interrogate the use of concept maps to capture student learning aboutthe complexity of socio-technical systems in large-scale engineering programs where a review ofeach individual map would require extensive time investments. Conducting the conceptmapping exercise and analysis strategy are impacted under this objective. This leads to thesecond objective, methodological development, which assesses how complexity can be evaluatedin
positiveinterpersonal (such as belongingness) and intrapersonal (such as mindfulness) competencies thatcomplement the field’s traditional focus on academic competencies (such as GPA). Thisapproach to conceptualizing thriving is consistent with Seligman’s (2013) claim thatinterventions which mitigate problems differ from those that foster thriving.The purpose of this conceptual framework for engineering thriving is to take the first step indefining the competencies relevant to engineering student success, as informed by a search ofengineering education literature, review of professional reports relevant to undergraduateengineering student success, feedback from engineering education faculty and conversationswith undergraduate engineering students. As a result
Paper ID #22728Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Use of Metaphor in Presenting Proto-types to a Technical and Non-technical Public AudienceMr. Jared David Berezin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jared Berezin is a Lecturer in the Writing, Rhetoric, and Professional Communication (WRAP) program within the Comparative Media Studies/Writing Department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Jared teaches in a range of communication-intensive courses at MIT, including Communicating Science to the Public, Product Design, Flight Vehicle Design, Environmental Engineering, and Nuclear Science. He has also been a
done for the project partner. So, I’dsay it’s pretty much client-based.”Similarly, when describing the design process, Sebastian emphasized the human aspect bystating, …that’s what I really like about EPICS. It makes you think about the user. It adds a constraint to all your designs, which usually ends up improving it because eventually, even if you did design something without the human aspect in mind, you would have to incorporate that eventually because humans are usually always the users.Here, Sebastian emphasizes HCD as part of EPICS when considering both immediate andhypothetical or future users. Also related to design, Sara discussed the change in thoughtregarding engineering from a HCD perspective. When asked if
Paper ID #22504Developing an Integrated Curriculum-wide Teamwork Instructional Strat-egyDr. Natasha D. Mallette P.E., Oregon State University Dr. Mallette worked as a design, process and research engineer before obtaining her PhD in Chemical and Biological Engineering at Montana State University. She has five years of professional experience and almost four years of chemical engineering instructional experience, including two years at Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison. Her current research focus is effective teamwork instruction in engineering curriculum. Her past research explored biofilms and fungal production of fuel
Paper ID #23720Fostering Engineering Thinking in a Democratic Learning Space: A Class-room Application Pilot Study in the Azraq Refugee Camp, JordanMr. Claudio Cesar Silva de Freitas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Claudio holds Bachelor’s degree in Control Engineering at Higher Education Institute of Amazonia (2011), and he holds his Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the State University of Camp- inas (2014). Currently, he is pursuing his Ph.D. at Purdue University in Engineering Education. He has experience as a visiting graduate researcher at the University of New Mexico (USA) and professional
Paper ID #22147Building Your Change-agent Toolkit: The Power of StoryDr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a research professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic.Prof. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical
Paper ID #22246Examining the Relationships Between How Students Construct Stakeholdersand the Ways Students Conceptualize Harm from Engineering DesignAlexis Papak, University of Maryland, College Park Alexis Papak is a Research Assistant at the University of Maryland, College Park with the Physics Edu- cation Research Group. They completed their Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Their research interests lie at the intersection of ethnic studies, critical pedagogies, and STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta