Paper ID #39840Rogue Engineering: Teaching Frankenstein as a Parable of (Un)ethicalEngineering PracticeDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that analyze social and ethical aspects of engineering design and practice. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Rogue Engineering: Teaching Frankenstein as a Parable of (Un)ethical Engineering PracticeAbstractMary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is widely regarded as a foundational work of
Paper ID #43601Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training among EngineeringMaster’s StudentsElana Goldenkoff, University of MichiganDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training amongEngineering Master’s StudentsAbstractAlthough development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been underway fordecades, the acceleration of AI capabilities and rapid expansion of user access in the past fewyears has elicited public excitement as well as alarm. Leaders in government and academia, aswell as members of the
ResearchersAbstractThis pilot study explores engineering students' views on social responsibility in undergraduateresearch experiences. Participants displayed high concern for human welfare and safety butneeded more education and training to understand the importance of being socially responsiblescientists and engineers. To address this, the authors recommend incorporating a formalcurriculum to facilitate students' understanding and articulation of their views on socialresponsibility in science and engineering research. The authors provide suggested case studiesfor engineering educators to incorporate social responsibility topics into their curriculum,enabling students to learn and debate the ethical and social implications of their research,promoting critical
student success; and (c) cultivate more ethical future scientists and engineers by blending social, political and technological spheres. She prioritizes working on projects that seek to share power with students and orient to stu- dents as partners in educational transformation. She pursues projects that aim to advance social justice in undergraduate STEM programs and she makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research.Devyn Elizabeth ShaferDr. Brianne Gutmann, San Jos´e State University Brianne Gutmann (she/her) is an Assistant Professor at San Jos´e State University. She does physics education research with expertise in adaptive online learning tools, identity-responsive mentoring and community
power through the design and deployment of structures, technologies, andcomplex systems. While contemporary corporate-driven Western engineering is often framed assolving problems and enhancing quality of life, the forces driving technological development—economic interests, techno-evolutionary pressures, political agendas, technological pathdependencies, national security concerns, individual ambitions, and considerations of ethics andecological sustainability—often conflict, ultimately undermining these aims. These systemic andpsychological dynamics are frequently obscured in engineering discourse and education.Recognizing them is essential to understanding how individual mental states and behaviors bothshape and are shaped by broader social
sociotechnical education in theclassroom. [5] For example, we examine approaches to engage technically-minded students toconsider sociotechnical skills as central to their engineering education. This holds for broadengineering ethics courses as well as ethics modules embedded within core technical courses.Courses that explore engineering culture by integrating ethics and history encourage students,many of whom are interested in using teamwork to solve problems, to think how they mightimprove upon past collaborations if equipped with hindsight. We also discuss classroomexperience with students who are technically-minded (or expertise-minded) but have their homein Colleges of Arts and Science and major in pre-med, pre-law, or pre-business fields such
of technical knowledge with social, ethical, and contextualconsiderations—is key to addressing these gaps and must be actively embedded intoengineering education (Reddy et al., 2023). Adopting sociotechnical approaches to engineering involves the intentionalconsideration of how the full realm of factors¾environmental, social, ethical,economical¾come to inform the needs of empathy-driven innovation. Of particularimportance in this approach is the need to proactively consider what the impact oftechnologies and innovations will be on people, society and the planet. To date, a hostof innovations have failed and/or proven to inconsistently perform as a function of usercharacteristics (i.e., hair texture in electroencephalography caps) due
Paper ID #46249Issues at the Intersection of Engineering and Human Rights: Insights from aSymposium of the National Academy of EngineeringMs. Casey Gibson, National Academy of Engineering Casey Gibson, M.S., was an Associate Program Officer at the National Academy of Engineering of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine from 2023-2025. She primarily helped lead initiatives related to the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering program. Gibson holds an M.S. in Humanitarian Engineering and Science with a specialization in Environmental Engineering from the
Paper ID #49216Sociotechnical integration in data science educationProf. Cathryn Carson, University of California, Berkeley Cathryn Carson is an STS scholar and a historian of science and technology who has been active in interdisciplinary collaborations in undergraduate and graduate education, including nuclear engineering and data science. Ari Edmundson is an STS scholar and intellectual historian who has collaboratively developed integrated course materials and dedicated courses to embed critical thinking about human contexts and ethics in data science curricula. Ramesh Sridharan is a computer scientist
principles for equity-centered engineering education are therefore instructional infocus and address the development of equitable classroom environments, including equitableassessment strategies, and the need for assessment of equity content. To date, most publications on equity-centered engineering course implementationsdescribe efforts in engineering design or ethics courses and modules. This may suggest that anequity lens is only or most relevant in those courses; however, if the goal is to promote students’capacity for equity-minded engineering practice, educators must center equity in a variety ofimpactful courses across students’ academic paths [17]. Indeed, Leydens and Lucena [18] arguethat engineering science courses are perhaps the
respond to the complex ethical, social, political, andenvironmental challenges of today, they may begin to eschew traditional case studies that portrayengineering as objective and apolitical. In this way, they may begin to “transgress” againstdominant views of engineering that can limit students’ critical thinking and engagement withsocio-political issues within engineering contexts. Liberatory pedagogy also disrupts the statusquo of power dynamics and practices in the postsecondary classroom, opening up space for newclassroom activities and assessments that create a more collaborative and equitable learningenvironment [1].In this paper, I explore the redesign of an undergraduate engineering technology and societycourse in relation to the idea of
curriculum frameworks thatemphasize systems thinking, ecological literacy, and holistic problem-solving approaches [2]. Byintegrating sustainability principles across technical disciplines, universities can cultivate a newgeneration of engineers who are not only technically proficient but also ethically conscious andenvironmentally responsive. This paradigm shift requires ongoing pedagogical innovation andinstitutional commitment to reimagining engineering's societal role.Realist review, or a realist synthesis, is a method for studying complex interventions in responseto the limitations of conventional systematic review methodology as it examines the differences,intended or unintended, between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes for individual
the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering culture, engineering careers in the public sector, and ethics and equity in STEM. Dimpho has several years of experience in thDr. Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) at the University of Toronto. Emily spent 20 years as a professional engineer, first as an R&D engineer in a Fortune 500 company, and then leadingDr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto Andrea Chan is a Senior Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoMs. Emily Macdonald-Roach, University of Toronto
University Channel Islands and Virginia tech he explores community empowerment for environmental justice, global engineering ethics, critical pedagogy coupled to STS, He specializes in sustainable technology, social movements, and community engagement stemming from a background in Science and Technology Studies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world Cultivating “global competency” in a divided world: A collaborative autoethnography of the cross-border, dialogue-based curriculum designINTRODUCTIONBACKGROUNDAmid the pandemic and geopolitical conflicts, the world and local communities are facingsupply chain
personal insights, emotions, and experiences through poetry writing. 5. Fostering Interdisciplinary Connections: Explore the intersection of engineering and other disciplines, such as literature and art, to foster interdisciplinary thinking and broaden students' perspectives on their field of study. 6. Stimulating Critical Thinking: Challenge students to analyze and interpret poetry written by others, including poems related to engineering themes, to develop critical thinking skills and appreciate diverse perspectives. 7. Promoting Empathy and Ethical Awareness: Encourage students to consider the societal, environmental, and ethical implications of engineering projects through poetry that explores
intention to major, which reinforces theimportance of curricular structures that enable students to experience a sense of community andconnection.” While the National Academy of Engineering in [14] states the system to educateengineers should include several elements including “the economic, political, ethical, and socialconstraints as boundary conditions that define the possible range of solutions for engineeringproblems and demand the interaction of engineers with the public.[14, p. 18]” The NationalAcademy also stated that surveys of pre-college students consistently demonstrate an interest incareers where “helping-others” is a key aspect and that it would be “particularly helpful if theengineering community could successfully communicate the
promote a movement toward Solidarity Engineering that contributes to an ethic of care,love, equity, and justice among people and planet.Keywords: Solidarity Engineering, Ethics of Care, Love, Social Justice, Equity, Sustainability,Capitalism, Militarism, Collaborative Inquiry, Engineering PathwaysIntroduction “We live in a world in which a tree is worth more, financially, dead than alive, in a world in which a whale is worth more dead than alive. For so long as our economy works in that way and corporations go unregulated, they're going to continue to destroy trees, to kill whales, to mine the earth, and to continue to pull oil out of the ground, even though we know it is destroying the planet and we know that
, invokes a context inwhich “societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view onthe (ethical) acceptability, sustainability, and societal desirability of the innovation process andits marketable products” (Von Schomberg quoted by Schwartz-Plaschg, p. 149). In other words,the language of RRI assumes a very different kind of relationship between actors than does thelanguage of regulation. An awareness of the power of analogies can heighten our sensibilitiesregarding the linguistic choices we habitually make.Where analogical imagination refers to the context evoked by a particular choice of words,analogical reasoning is a form of critical thinking in which we make an implicit comparisonexplicit and explore how the
Paper ID #42156The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation &Identity FormationDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College ParkDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation and Identity FormationAbstract
instructor to broaden my skillsetto hopefully fill in some of the gaps that I found during my undergraduate internship. I originallydid not see the benefit of leadership activities in my undergraduate degree, similar to theparticipants in [14]. These experiences changed my perception of myself, as I found that Ienjoyed the teaching and service work that I did more than the technical work that I did for myresearch. This led me to pursue an academic career as a teaching-focused faculty member. In myteaching, I try to incorporate non-traditional engineering topics, like sustainability, ethics andaccessibility, and professional skills, like communication and reflective practices, into theclassroom, to introduce them to a different side of engineering
crucialmechanism by which U.S. engineering education settings have grappled with unwanted politicalsensibilities is through silencing. There is an enduring sense that rigorous, respectableengineering training, as well as engineering in action, from the technical classroom, at the labbench, or on the factory floor must exclude the subjectivities we know as “politics.” This isdespite the concession by some that value systems known as “ethics” or “rigor” may (must) bebolstered [26], [27]. Across many technical subdisciplines, so-named ethics and other liabilitysystems are today seen to represent the universe of Engineers’ moral responsibilities in itsentirety. We are prompted to ask, then: How precisely does such apparent depoliticization ofEngineering
Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[7] Gupta, A. (2017, June). A practitioner account of integrating macro-ethics discussion in an engineering design class. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[8] Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2018). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and engineering ethics, 24, 551-583.[9] Winiecki, D., & Salzman, N. (2019, January). Analyzing and Working-Out Ways of Addressing Problems of Social-Justice in an Engineering or Computer-Science Context. In 2019 NSF REDCON (Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Department CONference), Arlington, VA.[10] Gupta, A., Turpen, C., Philip, T., & Elby, A
incorporating liberative pedagogies into a traditional technical engineering coursein thermodynamics. Riley discusses several course reforms suggested by liberal pedagogies andassesses those reforms. The reforms do bear some overlap with our study as they are ‘big ideas’rooted in a liberal arts context. Some examples of overlapping reforms include 1) creatingcommunity, 2) ethics, 3) de-centering Western civilization in the engineering classroom, and 4)problematizing science as objectivity and normalizing mistakes. Riley’s work succeeds inincorporating concepts from the liberal arts into engineering coursework for engineering students.Our project differs because we are trying to understand how engineering student curiosity can beleveraged to increase
University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University, and a Master’s degree in Environmental Management from Harvard Uni- versity and a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science from University of New Hampshire. Before earning his doctorate, he has worked for a decade in consulting and emergency response for Triumvirate Environmental Inc.Andrew LiRebecca Jun, University of Virginia
learning outcomes associated with ABET 2021-2022 (Seshagiri &Goteti, 2014). Being attentive to the guidance (and oversight) related to ABET accreditationoffers students, parents, employers, and society the assurance that a college or universityprogram is meeting a standard of quality that is required in the professional engineering domain.A purposeful trajectory toward a rigorous engineering education is critical, in a race to safely,methodically, and ethically address complex technological systems meeting the speed andfinancial pressures of creative design (Dekker, 2011).Capstone design as professional preparation/readinessThe concept of creating multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary capstone design courses at the post-secondary education
students’ professional identities.Almost every single one of our students shared feeling ambivalence about pursuing engineeringas an undergrad and then an “ah-ha” moment when they found a graduate program thatemphasized the inherent social dimensions of engineering. One student said that he never reallyhad a strong engineering identity because of “engineering education, culture, and what isemphasized and what’s not emphasized.” He described a chemical engineering unit on processsafety, which was used to think about ethics. He recalled, “The opening line is, if you blow upyour plant, you’re not gonna make any more money… that’s always been such a turnoff for me. Iwas not motivated by, I would say, those traditional engineering ideals of efficiency
Paper ID #47581Contextualizing Engineering Education by incorporating Indigenous KnowledgeSystems (IKS) in the Curriculum DesignDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is the Associate Professor of Practice and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, and Art of Thinking for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral Philosophy from OCMS, Oxford – Middlesex University, London. He
HurricaneKatrina. Two readings covered: 1) the culmination of many decisions that led to segregation andinequity in New Orleans, and 2) the engineering failures of the levy system which lefthistorically black neighborhoods at risk. Class discussion began by acknowledging the sensitivityof these topics. The discussion focused on the convergence of the articles. This topic relates topower imbalances in both political institutions and engineering decision-making.Third, we asked students to select a scenario either local to the community the university is in ortheir hometowns that centered on public health, environmental, or ethical concerns related toinfrastructure or industry. Scenarios selected included historical sites, such as the Love Canal, tomodern
followed human subjects research ethics guidance from theuniversity at which the interviews were conducted and the authors’ university.ContextSeveral contextual factors undoubtedly shaped the interviews that were analyzed for this paper.First, a COVID-19 resurgence drove many campus activities back to the virtual realm. Second,Canada’s Indigenous people were frequently in the news. The nation’s Truth and ReconciliationCommission ,which was formed as a result of growing awareness the horrific situation withResidential Schools, was frequently in the news [25]. Canada recognized Sep. 30 as the NationalDay for Truth and Reconciliation with a number of educational and recognition activities.Perhaps related to all of the news and events, it is not
,pedagogical and student experiences. Similarly, with a focus on an engineering thermodynamics course,Riley [5] motivates the use of liberative pedagogies in engineering education by relating pedagogy tostudents’ prior experiences, student responsibility and authority, including ethics and policy, decenteringwestern knowledge systems.Institutional and Data Collection ContextThe student co-authors of this paper, who are currently in their sophomore year, are enrolled in anundergraduate engineering program developed around the intellectual theme of “human-centered”engineering. The program integrates the university’s liberal arts curriculum with an experientialengineering curriculum emphasizing societal responsibility.For the liberal arts requirement of