AC 2008-584: LABORATORY EXERCISES FOR TEACHING LEAN ENTERPRISEM. Brian Thomas, Cleveland State University Page 13.834.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 LABORATORY EXERCISES FOR TEACHING LEAN ENTERPRISEIntroduction to Lean EnterpriseLean Enterprise is a corporate philosophy and culture, having its focus on providing andincreasing the value delivered to the customer. It pursues this goal through a continuous processof identifying and eliminating waste and non-value-added activities, improving product flowthrough the enterprise, and pursuing perfection in the final good or service sold to the customer1.While Lean Enterprise
2006-37: AUTOMATION LABORATORY DEVELOPMENT ENHANCESSTUDENT LEARNINGDavid Farrow, University of Tennessee-Martin David Farrow is an Assistant Professor at the University of Tennessee at Martin. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. degree from the University of Texas at Arlington in 1989, 1990, and 1995, respectively. Dr. Farrow has taught courses in solid modeling, mechanical vibrations, automatic controls, automated production systems, and instrumentation and experimental methods at the University of Tennessee at Martin for three and a half years.Robert LeMaster, University of Tennessee-Martin Robert LeMaster is an Associate Professor at the University of
, however, is reduced due to limited interaction, delayingfeedback until after an exam, and tediousness of many repeating laboratory sessions.We are implementing steps to teach manufacturing laboratory to a large class of 250 studentseach semester. Complementary online instructional videos and class lectures, Clickerassessment, regular grade feedback, and cellular manufacturing laboratory exercises are utilized.Laboratory exercises are grouped into cellulars to save resources, space, and are synchronizedwith relevant lectures to facilitate students’ understanding. For each laboratory exercise, theoverall lab objectives are covered in class, but details of tooling and machine operation areshown using online professional videos so that students can
Hands-On Industrial Robotics Laboratory DevelopmentIntroductionThis paper presents efforts of the author in developing practical hands-on laboratory exercises inRobotics and Automation, based-on his work in two different universities. The laboratoryexercises evolved into their current state after more than a decade of teaching with ABB, Eshed,and Fanuc robots. The author’s previous laboratory development included programming olderASEA IRB 6 and modern ABB IRB 140 robots using ARLA and RAPID languages respectivelyas well as integrating conveyors, sensors, Prolight NC machines, and Eshed’s Scorbots into asmall work-cell structure. After working with ASEA and ABB robots, the author had to go backto the FANUC technology due to change in teaching
AC 2007-273: CAN LEAN MANUFACTURING BE APPLIED TO UNIVERSITYLABORATORIES?Shirish Sreedharan , University of MissouriFrank Liou, University of Missouri Frank Liou is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR). He currently serves as the Director of the Manufacturing Engineering Program at UMR. His teaching and research interests include CAD/CAM, rapid prototyping, and rapid manufacturing. He has published over 100 technical papers and has research grants and contracts over $8M. Page 12.340.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Can
AC 2007-99: MICRO-MANUFACTURING IN THE CLASSROOM ANDLABORATORYDavid Wells, North Dakota State University David L. Wells has been Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at North Dakota State University since January 2000. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in process engineering and production engineering systems design for conventional manufacturing, electronics assembly and micro-manufacturing. His active research lies in micro-assembly, micro-machining, PCB process engineering, printed electronics, applications of RFID technologies, quantitative manufacturing management and manufacturing engineering pedagogy. He is active in SME, ASEE, SMTA, IEEE and ABET. Prior
. Course Description and ObjectivesWhile PLC’s remained as the major component, the course modification allowedinclusion of various technologies, connections and contrasts between them, and their past,current, and future roles in industrial controls area. The added content and their detailsare presented in Table 2. Since a few new components were introduced to the curriculum,main hands-on additions were limited to the hardwired ralay-logic and integrated-circuitbased controls areas. These components were critical in teaching PLC basics and logic to Page 11.455.2the students. Besides having hands-on laboratories, demos and review discussions werealso
2006-544: AUTOMATED ROBOTIC WORKCELL DESIGN TOOLKIT -PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONSheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University Sheng-Jen (“Tony”) Hsieh is an Associate Professor and member of the Graduate Faculty at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is a Halliburton Faculty Fellow for 2005-2006. His research interests include intelligent manufacturing system design, virtual instrumentation, thermal profiling for process and product characterization, and simulation and modeling. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation Laboratory, a state-of-the-art
networkingtechnologies have been developed. For example, remote laboratories (also known as e-Lab,Tele-Lab)5,6, virtual laboratories8,9,10,11, and hybrid laboratories6 have been developed to reducelab equipment setup costs and increase accessibility. Other developments include the use ofinteractive9, multimedia-enhanced12,13, and integrated14 approaches and the Design-Build-Testconcept15 to make learning more interactive and visual. However, there have been relatively fewattempts to use technology to teach PLC programming.The author was recently awarded a National Science Foundation grant to develop an IntegratedVirtual Learning System (IVLS) for PLC education that incorporates intelligent tutoring systems,simulations, and animations. A prototype version of
2006-721: MANUFACTURING LABORATORY LEARNING MODULES ONCAD/CAM/CMM AND ROBOTICSR. Radharamanan, Mercer University Dr. R. Radharamanan is a Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. He has twenty-eight years of teaching, research, and consulting experiences. His previous administrative experiences include: President of International Society for Productivity Enhancement (ISPE), Acting Director of Industrial Engineering as well as Director of Advanced Manufacturing Center at Marquette University, and Research Director of CAM and Robotics Center at San Diego State University. His primary
2006-2116: MANUFACTURING SIMULATION FOR INDUSTRIAL PROJECTSPaul Nutter, Ohio Northern University Paul Nutter, CMfgE, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technological Studies at Ohio Northern University. He has been teaching industrial technology for six years, and has 26 years experience in manufacturing and industrial engineering. Paul is active in the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, serving as chair of the Student Relations Subcommittee for 2005, and on the Member Council for 2006. Page 11.910.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Manufacturing
Paper ID #7529Theme-based Teaching /Learning: A New Approach in Teaching Manufac-turing ProcessesDr. Masud Salimian, Morgan State University Faculty at the department of industrial engineering, Morgan State UniversityMr. Yaseen Mahmud, Morgan State UniversityMs. Avis L. Ransom, Morgan State University School of Engineering Early career engagement as a systems and logistics engineer by Department of Defense contractors, Avis Ransom, applied a bachelor’s degree in chemistry and an M.B.A. in the management and development of technology and in the application of engineering to address DoD requirements. Following fifteen years
Course Using Design-Based Teaching ApproachAbstract: Introduction to Manufacturing Processes is one of the core courses in most mechanicalengineering, manufacturing engineering, and industrial engineering programs. The current coursecurriculum and teaching style mainly depend on the lectures for the manufacturing processes thatare aligned and synchronized with the laboratory work (project) to gain the required knowledgeand skills. According to students’ feedback for this course as well as similar courses offered at otheruniversities, the course is time intensive, involves no critical thinking, requires limited classparticipation, and is not well connected with real-world manufacturing problems
from 1983 to 2002; where he founded the current University of Miami industrial assessment center funded by the Department of Energy.Vasim Shaikh, University of North Texas Vasim Shaikh received his B.S. degree in Production Engineering from the University of Mumbai in 2005 and Masters of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering Systems from the University of North Texas, Denton, in 2008. Currently, he is pursuing his Ph.D. degree in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of North Texas, Denton. He has been working as a Teaching and Research Assistant in both the departments of Mechanical Engineering Technology and Materials Science and Engineering at the University of North Texas, Denton. His
. Page 23.470.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Electrical Safety, the NFPA and PLC Safety William T. Evans, PhD, PE University of Toledo: Email:wevans@utnet.utoledo.eduAbstract:As a professor responsible for teaching the principles of PLC programming, the presenter hasalways considered it a responsibility to train students to be aware of the general rules forconstructing an electrical control panel. Both general practice and rules that have become part ofthe OSHA requirements have been taught. The present state of electrical control hasoutdistanced what was considered acceptable practice as little as 10 to 15 years ago
manufacturing laboratory is high and some students might not comprehend the linkamong different processes. This model is popular among community colleges or vocationalschools, but may not be best for engineering students since the latter only need to understand themanufacturing processes rather than acquiring hands-on manufacturing skills.We propose a new manufacturing teaching practice at our university by introducing group cellsand simulated production lines. A group of students is responsible to produce products for thewhole group. After learning and practicing basic machine tool operations in a cell (lathe, mill,sawing machine, and specific manual operations), each subgroup of two students operate amachine tool and produce identical components for
Chinese history. Leighbody andKidd also concluded "learning requires active experiences" in their survey3.Nowak4 ranked teaching strategies and learning activities within technology education. Thehighest ranked strategy was the one with product-oriented and laboratory-based content. Thesecond highest rank was for strategy using technology focus, and the lowest was for strategy thatrelied heavily on classroom orientation.Having hands-on laboratory is one condition, but the laboratory practices should be relevant toprepare graduates for their manufacturing career. Miller5 surveyed 25 department heads of USmanufacturing programs and concluded that an exemplary manufacturing program should: a) Require more technical coursework, b) Require or
AC 2011-190: EMPLOYING ANIMATRONICS IN TEACHING ENGINEER-ING DESIGNArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University ARIF SIRINTERLIKCI received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Tech- nical University, Turkey, and a Ph.D. degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the Ohio State University. Currently, he is a Professor of Engineering as well as Co-Head of Research and Outreach Cen- ter at Robert Morris University in Moon Township, Pennsylvania. His teaching and research areas include rapid prototyping and reverse engineering, robotics and automation, bioengineering, and entertainment technology. He has been active in ASEE and SME, serving as an officer of the ASEE Manufacturing
Paper ID #24940Teaching Composites Manufacturing Through ToolingMs. Nikki Larson, Western Washington University After receiving my bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering from Bradley University, I started working for Boeing. While at Boeing I worked to receive my master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis in Materials and Manufacturing. After leaving Boeing I spent several years in equipment research and development at Starbucks Coffee Company. From there I decided my heart lied in teaching and left Starbucks to teach Materials Science Technology at Edmonds Community College. I eventually moved to
Project in Projects a local company IE Studentslocal industryThe Explorers Event is conducted every year in February and targets high school students. Theevent involves teaching the high school students Lean manufacturing concepts and it includeslectures and in-class activities. Students are also given tours to the different laboratories andparticipate in other laboratory experiments conducted on different topics including 3D printing,laser welding, etc. Figure 1 shows pictures from a recent Explorers Event. Figure 1. Lean number games workshop for high school studentsThe Lean 101 workshop is a 3-hour course offered to all Engineering students who are interestedin learning
AC 2007-2822: LAMPSHADE GAME FOR TEACHING LEAN MANUFACTURINGErtunga Ozelkan, University of North Carolina-Charlotte Ertunga C. Ozelkan, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Management and the Associate Director of the Center for Lean Logistics and Engineered Systems at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Before joining academia, Dr. Ozelkan worked for i2 Technologies, a leading supply chain software vendor in the capacity of a Customer Service and Global Curriculum Manager and a Consultant. He also worked as a project manager and a consultant for Tefen Consulting in the area of productivity improvement for Hitech firms. Dr. Ozelkan holds a Ph.D. degree in Systems and
. Practical skills that help foster the understanding of conceptualknowledge. It allows for them to gain crucial skills in diagnosing problems on a conceptual andinstrumental level.3 Numerous studies have been conducted over the years on the significance of emphasizingpractical skills in the classroom/laboratory. Students are either placed in one of two categories:active or passive. For the students who are considered active, their dependency on engagement inexperimentation in the course laboratory is critical to their understanding of fundamentalconcepts.1 This imbalance, or gap, in the teaching education leads to several unprepared engineersmoving into the workplace without sufficient skills required to contribute right away
joined United Arab Emirates University in August 2016. Mr Airani has in depth knowledge of machining & manufacturing processes reinforced with over 20 years of experience in the industrial sector. He is interested in exploring the shortest and easiest machining processes for any given component and in teaching machining processes for students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MAKER: Generations of NC Machining through Laboratory Work Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, Yusuf Khan Airani Department of Mechanical Engineering United Arab Emirates University Po Box 15551, AlAin
cell surfaceroughness measurement laboratory for student learning experience in the emerging field ofrenewable energy. Renewable Energy science and technology stimulates discoveries anddevelopments that promise to sustain a wave of new technological and economic innovationsthroughout the world. It is likely that the use of renewable energy will become an increasingnational priority that will affect the next generation of college students. This system is comprisedof several subsystems and elements that are together utilized to automate the gathering andprocessing of solar cell roughness data. While a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) is usedfor controlling the I/O between the robots in the workcell and the Laser Check system, aLabVIEW program
AC 2008-1947: DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONLINE LABORATORY FORCOMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING COURSESYuqiu You, Morehead State University Dr. Yuqiu You has academic background from both automation engineering and industrial technology. For six years, she taught many courses in the area of manufacturing and automation. She has experience in developing new manufacturing courses and establishing online process control station for virtual laboratory. Presently, she is teaching NC-CNC machining technology, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, and Robotic Interface Engineering, Robotic Applications, and Fundamentals of Computer Technology.Xiaolong Li, Morehead State University Dr. Xiaolong Li has an
been chosen as the teaching medium. Three main aspects of theteaching methods include: 1) In-class teaching of lecture material (i.e., casting processes) 2)Hands-on sand casting laboratory where students are engaged in conducting and assisting invarious steps of sand casting process (i.e., premixing, mold preparation, actual casting process,trimming sprues, runners, gates etc.) 3) Numerical and graphical analysis of the casting processthrough simulation. The integrated methodology would be comprised of classroom and labactivities, in which two sessions are conducted in the classroom environment, and one session isconducted in the casting lab. The first classroom lecture incorporates describing the variousaspects of the casting processes such
functions to enhance research capabilities and forinstructional delivery on basic nanofabrication technology. Currently, cross-teaching is inexistence among faculty members from Departments of Technology and Physics with theutilization of some of these facilities and laboratories to enhance nanofabrication hands-onexperience. Some of the major laboratories and facilities are: 1) The Ronald Mason Jr. Nanotechnology Modeling Center (RMNMC) 2) Nanoscience Core Laboratory 3) Molecular Magnetic Resonance Core Laboratory 4) The Computational Modeling Core Laboratory/Supercomputer Center 5) The Visualization Core Laboratory 6) GIS Remote Sensing Laboratory.Utilizing the existing core laboratories and
physical and PLC ladder logic whendesigning simple automation projects. Combined lecture and laboratory activities implementingthe Kolb experiential learning cycle for the PLC module are addressed. The success of themodule is assessed and evaluated through student performance tests in solving design problemsusing ladder logic and through student surveys. Results demonstrate an effective method forstudent learning when lectures and labs are integrated in a meaningful manner.IntroductionIn engineering education, depending on the material to be learned and the instructor’s style ofteaching, a number of teaching and learning methodologies and their combinations are used.Since engineering is considered an applied discipline, many of the methods revolve
course for reverse engineering and rapid prototyping for mechanicalengineering technology students where he employed some engineering methods in engineeringproblem solving and reverse engineering tools in measurements8. Orta, Medoza, Elizalde, andGuerra employed active learning methodologies including reverse engineering in experimentalaircraft design where students learned by stepping backwards through the development process9.Shooter in his paper presented a 3-week module that was incorporated into an interdisciplinaryintroduction to engineering course10. The module employed product dissection and reverseengineering to teach students how to improve existing designs. Lecture and laboratories werecomplemented by podcasts guiding students through
]. Simplylecturing about these steps is insufficient to give students the experience necessary to effectivelyiterate in teams. Failure is one of the main reasons for iteration, but is difficult to teach about.The ability to identify and assess failures or other reasons for iteration can only be properlylearned through hands-on experience. Previous studies have highlighted the ability to teach suchconcepts using hands-on activities such as model building and laboratory exercises. Lemons etal. showed that model building helped students generate ideas, make ties between concept andphysical object, and finally make the students more away of their process-based strategies [6].Mackenchnie and Buchanan have employed hands-on activities in a laboratory class using