AC 2007-92: DESIGN PANEL: A TOOL FOR ASSESSMENT IN DESIGN COURSESDave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver Dr. Dave (Dae-Wook) Kim is an Assistant Professor of School of Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Washington, Seattle, and his M.S. and B.S. at Sungkyunkwan University, Korea. His teaching and research interests include manufacturing processes, composite materials, and mechanical behavior of engineered materials.Hakan Gurocak, Washington State University-Vancouver Hakan Gurocak is Director of School of Engineering and Computer Science and Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Washington
Department where he teaches 3D Design Principles and 3D Computer Modeling. Professor Radermacher specializes in three-dimensional problem solving and multiple-material construction techniques. His research activity primarily focuses on themes of technology, consumerism and personal identity. He creates objects and sculpture that question product marketing, consumer attitudes and social formations. Professor Radermacher exhibits his work in national venues including the S.O.F.A. expositions in New York and Chicago. Professor Radermacher is an active member of the “Foundations in Art: Theory and Education” organization and the College Art Association
Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 MAKER: Programmable Logic Control (PLC) Based Automated System for Water-Level Control for Teaching Pneumatics and
&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MAKER: Smart Lighting Module for Teaching High School Science and Engineering
AC 2010-1873: EFFECTIVE TEACHING OF COMPLEX MANUFACTURINGTOPICS TO UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERS UTILIZING A NOVEL, BROADLYBASED, INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL COMPANYMartin McCarthy, University of Auckland Martin McCarthy has a Masters Degree in Engineering Management from the University of Auckland and has recently submitted a PhD thesis. He is a is a Senior Tutor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Auckland and is a Chartered Engineer by profession with many years experience in mechanical and electronics product design, manufacturing systems and fire prevention. Mr. McCarthy's current interests include research into the effective teaching of engineering design and manufacturing with
, implementation of Autodesk MoldflowTM as an instructional tool forpromoting a dynamic interactive classroom environment and providing seamless integration ofclassroom activities such as traditional classroom teaching, computer simulation ofmanufacturing process, and actual physical laboratory experience related with the process. In thatregard, Autodesk MoldflowTM is used as one of the tools that would be used for promotingpositive outcomes associated with the student learning. Autodesk MoldflowTM is used formodeling and simulating of the plastic injection molding process. During computer simulationlaboratories, specific examples of Autodesk MoldflowTM is introduced for providing ideas tostudents on how the manufacturing process would be improved by
. Similarly, Mold Making I and II were taught in the springsemester.Combining the laboratories in this way allowed a different approach to teaching the laboratorysections. Since the enrollment numbers for each section were small, instructors decided thatlaboratory sections of various courses could be offered concurrently. Instead of having dedicatedlab time for each course, they could all be combined (Table 4). Combining the laboratories wasnot as complex as it may appear. Although a student could take nearly any course in anysemester they mostly followed the traditional schedule pretty closely. This meant that in the fallsemester for example, students were either in Machining I, or Die Making I and II. In alaboratory populated by a larger number of
development of facilities inlimited square footage for a combination of physical laboratories, teaching and computingspaces, in varying areas ranging from 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing to EngineeringMechanics. Additional laboratory design activities have also been carried out for creative andinnovative design spaces including some for integrated capstone and cross-disciplinary projects,along with off-campus development. This paper will summarize educational learning andresearch facility development trends in academia including selection of educational equipment,digital tools, flexible furniture, and utilization of white board paint or magnetic boards. Safetyand environmental issues are covered. The trends in K-12 education and their
Paper ID #20504MAKER: Using 3D Printed Experimental Design and Measurement of Inter-nal and External Flow Convection Coefficient Using 3D Printed GeometriesMr. Michael Golub, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Michael Golub is the Academic Laboratory Supervisor for the Mechanical Engineering department at IUPUI. He is an associate faculty at the same school, and teaches part-time at two other colleges. He has conducted research related to Arctic Electric Vehicles. He participated and advised several student academic competition teams for several years. His team won 1st place in the 2012 SAE Clean
- quisition boards;E-learning platforms;e-teaching;Experimentation;LabViEW;Learning pro- cess;Remote laboratories;Student-centered learning;.[15] B. Kapralos, A. Hogue, and H. Sabri, “Recognition of hand raising gestures for a remote learning application,” (Santorini, Greece), pp. COST 292; aceMedia; K–Space; Muscle; Eu- ropean Association for Signal Image Processing –, 2007. complex problems;Distance learn- ing (DL);hand gestures;hand motions;International (CO);markov modelling;motion cue- ing;Multimedia interactive services;Omni directional;Remote learning;.[16] J. Dong and H. Guo, “Enhance computer network curriculum using collaborative project based learning,” (Vancouver, BC, Canada), 2011. California State University
questions are common. Penetration of Clicker in science andengineering fields is observed since the latter version of Clicker allows students to respond witheither numerical answers for a work-out problems or alphabetical selections for multiple choicequestions.The role of Clicker as teaching and learning enhancement tool has been discussed in theacademic community since 1980s. There are few published papers on using Clicker onengineering subjects and no report on how Clickers can be used effectively in laboratory. Weimplemented Clicker in manufacturing classes with the following objectives: i) Creating a more dynamic learning environment, ii) Enhancing study outcome, and iii) Reducing tedious paperwork and workload in many repeating
Conference, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL.[7] Hsieh, S., "Development and Evaluation of Remote Virtual Teach Pendant for Industrial Robotics Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 35, No. 6(A), pp. 1816-1826, 2019.[8] X Chen, G Song, Y Zhang, “Virtual and remote laboratory development: A review,” Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 2010 (ASCE), pp 3843-3852.[9] Ming Teng, Hugh Considine, Zorica Nedic, Andrew Nafalski, “Current and Future Developments in Remote Laboratory NetLab,” Vol. 8, No. 8, 2016, pp 4-12.[10] Siew Wei Tho, Yau Yuen Yeung, Rui Wei, Ka Wing Chan1 and Winnie Wing-mui, “A Systematic Review of Remote Laboratory Work in Science
, S., "Current Trends in Remote Laboratories," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 4744-4756, Dec. 2009.[3] Grodotzki, J., Ortelt, T.R. and Tekkaya, A.E., 2018. Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0: Achievements of the ELLI project at the TU Dortmund University. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, pp.1349-1360, 2018.[4] Hsieh, S. “Design of Remotely Accessible Automated Systems to Enhance Industrial Automation Education,” ASEE 2017 Annual Conference, June 25 - 28, Columbus, Ohio.[5] Hsieh, S. “Development of Remote Virtual Teaching Pendant for Robot Programming: Lessons Learned,” ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, FL.[6] Hsieh, S. “Lessons Learned from Remote
response of the students in the final anonymous class evaluation of MMAE 546in Fall 2008 to some survey questions on the lab session of the class.The following are some comments from the students on the experimental section:• “Laboratory experiments were very helpful in understanding course material “• “The labs are extremely helpful”The comments above and Figures 2 and 3 have shown that most of the students strongly agreethat adding an experimental section has improved the class quality, and also the lab session hasbeen well organized.Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the students’ evaluations on the author’s teaching quality (in theofficial class survey organized by the university at the end of the semester) for MMAE 546 inFall 2007 and Fall 2008
particularly useful to teach concepts of reverse engineering.A three-dimensional co-ordinate measuring machine (3D CMM) is shown in Figure 5while Figure 6 shows the cold isostatic press (CIP) used in the manufacturing of powdermetallurgical parts. The laboratory is equipped with a conventional workshop thatcontains lathe, milling machine, drill press, belt grinders and power saw as shown inFigure 7. An advanced HAAS CNC machining center is shown in Figure 8. An injectionmolding machine that produces polypropylene and polyethylene parts is shown in Figure9 while a MIG welder is shown in Figure 10. Figure 11 is a display case that exhibitssome of the components made by the students in this lab. Figure 12 is a SAE Baja vehiclemanufactured by RMU
assignments. The assignmentshave been designed based on the real life ergonomic problems in different areas ofergonomics. The students were challenged with five different assignments coveringdifferent sections of ergonomics, work design and safety. In addition, each student needsto submit a term paper or case study focusing on any specific application area ofergonomics towards the end of the semester. For each assignment, the students wereasked to study and investigate the ergonomic issues from their daily life accessories,classrooms and laboratories and offer possible solutions for the non-ergonomic designsand issues. For each assignment, the students need to prepare a report including the imageand brief description of the non-ergonomic design
the conventional machine tools that populate the typical manufacturing engineering laboratory. Many processes require quite different machine tools (e.g., manufacture of electronic devices or nano-scale products). Others at least require resolution, tolerances and control well-beyond the traditional norms (e.g., micro-manufacturing). A simple or universal solution to the equipment challenge does not seem to be available. University budgets everywhere are under great pressure, and coaxing out the significant new investments necessary will likely be at long odds. There are very few opportunities to compete for grant funding for teaching apparatus -- not nearly enough to serve the needs of even a significant fraction of
, academically, and professionally, one teachingassistant responds, “Instructing helps solidify concepts and processes in my own knowledge. Inaddition, questions posed by others help me look at things in ways that I didn’t originally.” Itbecomes evident that experience with the teaching the CAM workflow does not only benefittechnical engineering skills, but also professional skills such as training and mentoring.SummaryThe preceding describes the development and implementation of a CAM workflow at largeMidwestern university’s fabrication laboratory. This workflow is integral to the laboratory’smission of providing engineering students with the manufacturing knowledge required to helpthem become more informed designers/engineers. This approach was
Professor with Drexel University, Engineer- ing Technology program. Her area of expertise is in thermo-fluid sciences with applications in micro- combustion, fuel cells, green fuels and plasma assisted combustion. She has prior industrial experience in aerospace engineering that encompasses both theoretical analysis and experimental investigations such as designing and testing of propulsion systems including design and development of pilot testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and
that is the result of neuroscience research on how the human brain processes and retainsnew information”. 1Introduction“Acknowledging that students learn at different speeds and that they differ in their ability tothink abstractly or understand complex ideas is like acknowledging that students at any givenage aren’t all the same height: It is not a statement of worth, but of reality”.2 In adifferentiated classroom and laboratory, the teacher proactively plans and carries out variedapproaches to content, process, and product in anticipation and response to student differencesin readiness, interest, and learning needs. According to Tomlinson, our teaching style “caninfluence a students’ IQ by 20 points in either direction, that’s a 40 point IQ
2020 and 2021 [1]. The study will present the developmentand implementation of AM techniques in the flipped classroom (FC), online/on-ground workshopformat, and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).In FC, concepts are learned out of class and the laboratories or problem-solving activities areworked out in practical settings under the supervision of the instructor or assistant [2]. Severalbenefits of FC have been reported in other fields, but not in the 3DP field. One FC study has shownthat integration of 3DP and Industry 4.0 (known as the fourth industrial revolution for the cutting-edge automation of traditional manufacturing practices using modern smart technologies) couldbe successfully implemented in multi-disciplinary engineering teaching
generationof infrared imaging cameras that are comparatively inexpensive, easier to use, and more functional, aswell as free-ware and widely available commercial image processing software (ImageJ, MATLAB).The paper presents an effort on developing educational laboratory projects with an infrared imaginganalysis component for compatibility with course delivery by remote access via the web, or intraditional lecture and hands-on laboratory format.BackgroundInstruction in the basic engineering disciplines of heat and mass transfer, fluid mechanics, and processcontrol can be enhanced and expanded by incorporating various imaging capabilties into experimentsand projects used to teach the concepts and practice of these subjects. Image capture
andplanned non-residential summer camp. Students were introduced to the micro and nano conceptswith a presentation. They were assigned homework task to list miniaturized components that gointo devices being used in their daily life. Further the authors coordinated a laboratory visit toCAMSS and demonstrated micro-drop fabrication with assistance from graduate students.6. Evaluation of Micro and Nano Course ModulesThe micro and nano lecture modules were evaluated based on two measures namely; (1) Pre andpost learning surveys and (2) NCA&TSU teaching evaluations for the two courses. The learningsurvey included a total of 7 multiple choice questions. The surveys were administered for apopulation size of 25 students from the INEN 324: Computer Aided
Professor of Engineering & Technology at Ohio University, and formerly taught at the University of North Texas. Currently a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology at Georgia Southern University, he teaches courses involving metal forming, plastics/composites, lean manufacturing, and industrial/environmental safety, along with a manufacturing enterprise simulation course for which he co-authored the text and was presented a 2004 Leavey Award for Excellence in Private Enterprise Education. He is faculty sponsor of student chapter S85 of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, has chaired two SME senior chapters and currently is a member of the
. Page 24.780.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Integrating the Energy Efficiency and Assessment Components into ManufacturingAbstractThis paper reports the current developments and implementations on energy efficiency andassessment studies in an engineering technology program. The developments are basically in twocategories: 1) Web-based teaching modules of Renewable Energy Education have beendeveloped through a funded research project. Instructional Materials, Laboratory Practices andAssessment Exercises have been posted to iLearn (which a Desire2Learn system) and Canvas(which is an Instructure system). Developed materials have been tested by
with the 2007 data averaging of 23 new studentsper program as compared to the 13.6 students per program in 2005.The number of full time faculty primarily teaching manufacturing courses declined slightly overthe two surveys, from an average of 3.8 per program in 2005 to 3.6 per program in 2007, or adecrease of 5%. The number of laboratories devoted to manufacturing stayed essentially stableover the surveys, with an average 4.3 per program in 2005 and 4.4 per program in 2007.Industry ties or an industry focus were reported as a key to enrollment increases. Themanufacturing industrial base in the each program’s area of influence was reported as essentiallystable. The primary industries influencing MET programs were reported to be automotive
design –an inexpensive Stirling engine that can be implemented at their schools. The project serves as an integrating exercise that combines the necessary hard skills in manufacturing (i.e., technical drawing, material selection, manufacturing process, and metrology) and soft skills (i.e., design methodology, teamwork, schedule planning, documentation, and communication). c) Clicker assessment. Daily clicker assessment summarizes and highlights key points in lectures and laboratory practices. It also helps to retain new knowledge while providing teaching materials for the participants at their respective schools. Much improvement has been observed among participants after the successful
testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential
, skills and attitude required for value creation…’(http://www.engr.uky.edu/mfs/). One aspect of the program that makes it more innovative than just another onlineprogram is the transformation of features unique to MFS from a face-to-face format to a virtualformat for effective and successful online delivery. A high level of faculty-student interactions,laboratory work and interactive simulations are hallmarks of MFS coursework. The program alsobenefits from instruction by the very successful lean manufacturing systems group established atthe University of Ketnucky to teach the practices of the Toyota Production System forcontinuous improvement. Lastly, the MFS boasts faculty with internationally recognizedexpertise in sustainable
AC 2009-422: INTEGRATING REAL-WORLD MEDICAL-DEVICE PROJECTSINTO MANUFACTURING EDUCATIONSusana Lai-Yuen, University of South Florida Susana K. Lai-Yuen is an Assistant Professor of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida, USA. She received her Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. (Summa Cum Laude) degrees in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University, USA. Her research interests include computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided molecular design (CAMD), human-computer haptic interfaces, computational geometry for design and manufacturing, and engineering education. She is the director of the Virtual Manufacturing and Design Laboratory for Medical