Light.Challenges of the Smart PLC Traffic Light Controller: This project intentionally leaves a marginfor students to go farther with their work. Student teams can modify or expand the projectconsidering the pedestrian crossing the intersection, and also thinking in drivers who want to doa left turn in any of the streets.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the Research Experiences for Teachers Program(RET) under the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1300779. Any opinion, findings,and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material are from the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the view or opinion of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES1. Hsieh, S. and Hsieh, P.Y., “Web-based Modules for Programmable
-apprenticeship. Both categories usedthe prevailing knowledge and technology at that time to build better technologies. Forexample James Nasmyth’s [1] definition of engineering as “common senseapplication of materials” reflects the knowledge and technology, exclusive tomechanical elements, prevailed at that time. Makers are individuals who design andbuild new devices and share their experiences with others. Universities provideopportunities to wake up the dormant geniuses of such individuals among studentswho sometimes may not be turned-on by the traditional classroom teaching. But tomake full exploitation of their geniuses they have to have a comprehensiveknowledge of the prevailing technologies. This paper describes the method by whichknowledge of
work supported by the National Science Foundation’s AdvancedTechnology Education Program under Grant No. 1304843. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] The San Antonio Economic Development Foundation (SAEDF) Industrial Sectors at SanAntonio. Available online at: http://www.sanantonioedf.com/industry-sectors/advanced-manufacturing/[2] The San Antonio Manufacturers Association (SAMA) Alamo Region Manufacturing IndustryWorkforce Assessment Report (November 2015). Available online at: http://www.sama-tx.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SAMA_Workforce_Assessment_Report-Final-120115.pdf[3
part of further simulation process. Fig. 3 – The Cloud Manufacturing frameworkThe system part responsible for modeling interaction includes simulation based on DEVSformalism. Data defines interaction between devices and produces predictiveenvironment for the next steps of the process. Thus system holds information aboutphysical devices and provides decision making support, analytics and prediction. Virtualclones of the environmental nodes on the previous level are modeled as atomic parts of theDEVS model [12]. The simulation process is described in details below. SimulationThe cloud manufacturing framework reflects current system state in the cloud. Suchrepresentation allows to monitor and control the devices
interaction,will be added to the module.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s ResearchExperience for Teachers (RET) Program (Award No. 1300779). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] http://docs.opencv.org/trunk/d9/df8/tutorial_root.html[2] YeeHui Oh, ChengYew Tan, Vishnu Monn Baskaran, "Active participant identification and tracking using depth sensing technology for video conferencing", 2013 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS), pp. 7-12, 2013.[3] Tussanai Parthornratt, Natchaphon Burapanonte, Wisarute Gunjarueg
will select the initial curriculum modules to address.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0603221. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography1. Faux, Jeff, The Aerospace Sector as a National Asset, Testimony before The Commission on the Future of theUnited States Aerospace Industry, May 14, 20022. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing,http://www.bls.gov3. Sietzen, Frank, The State of Aerospace, State by State, Aerospace America, May 20034. Press release, aerospace Industries
on strategic goals it doesn’t matterwhether the problem is customer related or shareholder related; it doesn’t matter if the problem isa process problem or a design problem; and it doesn’t matter if the problem requires what onemight classify as Lean or Six Sigma tools. What matters is that the strategic goals are determinedby reflecting on both the customer and shareholder values and projects are selected in such a waythat they have the largest impact on the strategic goals.Does Six Sigma belong in the Manufacturing Curriculum? Average without Standard Deviation or some other measurement of variation is inadequate todescribe a set of data. The central tendency tells us where the target is located; but, does not tellus how the values are
include continued development of web-based problem-solving environmentsfor automated system design, implementation of automated cognitive task analysis within theseenvironments to facilitate continued research on design problem-solving, and development of anundergraduate-level system integration course.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by a National Science Foundation grant no. 0238269. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Hsieh, S. "Automated Manufacturing System Integration Education: Current Status and Future Directions," Proceedings of 2005 ASEE Annual Conference
Page 14.804.3 • Mechanical and Bulk Deformation • Casting • Polymer Processing • Powder Metallurgy / Sintered Materials • Mechanical Properties of Materials • Electronics Assembly - Electronics, Packaging, Circuit Board Assembly, IC and Component Fabrication (new) • Basic Material Classes (new) • Basic Cost Analysis (new) • Design Methodology (new) • Work Design (new) • Metrology (new in that differences between samples)The “items”, pedagogical techniques or innovations to be included in the pilot course were: • Integration of Lecture, Lab and Design Lab. This meant that the subject matter presented in class will precede that in the practical lab, the homework and tests will reflect not
contexts, engage with other learners, andapply the reflection/action education principles. Short, interruptive lectures are mixed withdemonstrations, video clips, exercises, lab activities, and whole class involvement (problemsolving and troubleshooting).The course is concentrated at activities to design and build a specific robotic application. Theclass is divided into two groups with seven group members in each, and each group works onone project of building a robotic application. The lectures starts with an introduction to roboticcontrol systems exploring different control systems that have been applied in industrial roboticsapplications. Then Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), the most popular controller thatused in building industrial
”: mechanics in the 17th and 18th centuries and thermodynamics in the 19th century.These origins have been reflected for well over a century in Mechanical Engineering (ME)curricula [1]. In January 2002, The National Science Foundation chartered a workshop on“Redefining Mechanical Engineering” to explore new possibilities for ME education.Recommendations were made to streamline and update ME curricula by introducing emergingknowledge related to micro/nano technology, product design and realization and etc. andexposing students to computational methods and design practices employed by practicingengineers [2]. To keep up with the national trend in ME education, we plan to implement threetrack areas in the program: (1) Mechatronics; (2) Design and
industrial training room settings. Several consulting firms have also developedproducts of their own. One popular program [6] developed by the National Institute of Standardsand Technology (NIST) consists of using two circuit board assemblies to simulate two differentlines of products as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Simulation Kit Developed By NISTSimulation using one of the readily available kits is usually carried out in three or four rounds.The general pattern that has been found most practical is to let the first round be completelychaotic to reflect manufacturing conditions in non-lean manufacturing companies. This isfollowed by a second simulation round wherein the participants are given the leeway to makeimprovements
RangerLean Manufacturing SimulationSimulation using one of the kits mentioned above is usually carried out in three or four rounds.The general pattern that has been found most practical is to let the first round be completelychaotic to reflect manufacturing conditions in non-lean manufacturing companies. This isfollowed by a second simulation round wherein the participants are given the leeway to makeimprovements based on their past learning and experience. This is then followed by a final rounddemonstrating how a cellular lean pull system can be instituted. In some simulation setups, anextra fourth round is included to not crowd in the introduction of all the lean principles into asingle round.In the first round of simulation, products are released
: internet, videos, class exercises, discussions, and case studies • Informal classroom learning environments where diversity is accepted Most of the students at RMU are regional, commuter students who work whileattending school, which means that the flexibility for organizing activities outside of thescheduled class times is quite limited. In addition, students often say, “Our friends in artsand management have fun and still get A grades, why do we have to work so hard to getgood grades in engineering?” In other words, some students feel that the faculty sets thebar too high in engineering, and therefore the grade does not always reflect the hard workthey put into the learning process. Further, the lecture rooms are typically equipped
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation orRockwell Automation. Landon Gray and Arun Kumar’s programming efforts were instrumentalin making this vision become reality.REFERENCES[1] Asfahl, C.R., (1992), Robotics and Manufacturing Automation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY.[2] World Programmable Logic Controller Markets, Frost & Sullivan Research Publication 5191-10 – PublicationDate: January 30, 1995[3] Surma, D.R.,”Lab Exercises and Learning Activities for Courses in Computer Networks,” Proceedings -Frontiers in Education Conference, v 1, 2003, p T2C21-T2C25[4] Niyazov, R.S. and Ardebili, M.K.,”Laboratory
manufacturing experience. The course exists as aproblem based learning (PBL) environment, and as such it focuses on the five primarycharacteristics of such an environment: Problem-focused, student-centered, self-directed,self-reflective and having a facilitator instructor [1]. This environment is intentional to allowthe students to synthesize what is actually required within the context of their project.Schwering supports this methodology and defines the act of providing an open-ended projectbased project as one of the hallmarks of a superior capstone experience [2].Students enrolled in the capstone course divided into groups of five or six members. Theclass typically has between four and six of these groups. One of the group member will takethe role
upon to add incritical areas of information such as how this is used in industry or typical production rates anddurability associated with the tooling and manufacturing methods, that were missed in thestudent presentations. Student suggestions were to amend the grading rubric for the presentationto reflect the importance of these areas so their understanding of each method would increase.Although the students appreciated the support and the use of gateways to keep their projects ontrack, they felt that four meetings were a bit excessive. They recommended that the meetings bereduced to three.The Project: Second Offering:The second offering of the course was much smaller, with only 20 students. Because of this, thenumber of tooling choices was
theimportance of customer discovery [8]. Student teams also benefited from video conferences witha number of industrial experts and consultants. Each student team presented their challengestatement and discussed possible solutions with the industrial experts. These experienced AMexperts from industry helped troubleshoot the teams’ design ideas leading to improved finalprototypes. Overall, the course was a success in terms of students’ interdisciplinary teamworkskill development and creative problem-solving using AM.This novel pedagogical approach contains several best practices. This paper will report thedevelopment and implementation steps of this original course. The evaluation results will also beprovided to reflect the pros and cons of the course
artifact(the mood ring). Project 2 will be a computer-based design implementation using 3-D modelingto support online game design and programming.Outcome of the workshop will also be reflected in participant behavior and hands-on applicationof gained knowledge and skills (we will have to include evaluation plan). Participants will gainexperience in using freely available and popular software tools.The Electronic Mood RingThe original Mood Rings were popular in the 1960s and 1970s; they included a special type ofmaterial that changes color in response to heat. As body heat warmed up the ring, it wouldchange from dark to brown to yellow to green to blue. The electronic ring that girls were askedto design is similar, but it uses a temperature sensor
]. Firms established in theU.S. have decided to keep manufacturing here in North America (N.A.), and countries in Europehave decided to move to U.S. manufacturing organizations. In N.A. there is a return ofmanufacturing, though not strong. The reshoring pattern does not reflect the reported trend bythe media and politicians, but this may indicate increased decisions to not send existingproduction to offshore facilities. Manufacturing organizations should take an active role in improving their workforcethrough P-20 life-long learning approaches [8]. Manufacturing organizations are facing an agingsociety. Countries with aging workforces will have employees needing lifelong learningopportunities as their companies will need to retrain and
also very promising.Participants were given the opportunity to add their reflections on the studio workshops. Askedabout what they liked the most about the workshop, a recurrent comment was that they enjoyedthe opportunity to interact with educators from other institutions and professionals in the field ofAM. Another major highlight was the usefulness of the hands-on aspect of the workshops,including the process of putting together the 3D Printers as well as the chance to design an objectof interest.When asked what they would recommend changing about the workshops, a few participantssuggested to (i) allocate more time towards the hands-on activities (ii) reduce the number of “talks”by presenters, and (iii) add a component of training related
author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography[1] Bureau of the Census, Statistical brief: advanced manufacturing technology SB-13-90, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1990.[2] U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Trade in Advanced Technology Products - Flexible Manufacturing (Grouping 06) by Country (YTD DECEMBER 2015) - Monthly and Cumulative Data (in Millions US $). Available online at: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/product/atp/2015/12/atpctry/atpg06.html (last accessed in July 2016).[3] U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Trade in Advanced Technology Products - Flexible Manufacturing (Grouping 06) by Country (YTD DECEMBER 2014) - Monthly and Cumulative Data (in Millions
were thrilled with their newly acquired practical skills and took pride in their workas reflected in their report. The feedback received from a particular student after a week’sinternship training in a manufacturing plant, stated how proud he was with the prior acquiredknowledge and skills that he gained through the course that has impressed his trainer which inturn has motivated him to further enhance his knowledge in manufacturing; summed it all.5. ConclusionsThe goal of manufacturing courses in engineering education is to enable the students to selectand assess different manufacturing alternatives for a given product using Design forManufacturing and Assembly (DFM/A) methodologies. Learning-by-Doing approach mightseem to be more demanding
. Puentudura1 is aimed at guiding the process oftechnology integration in a classroom with an ultimate goal of redefining teaching and learningmethodologies. Figure 1 illustrates on how the course curriculum developed for AdditiveManufacturing course at XXXXXX reflects upon SAMR framework.As shown, integrating mobile based scanning technology to additive manufacturing for realizingstudent project designs with the help of SAMR framework helped in significantly enhancing andtransforming the course outlook over the semester. The course enhancement helped in exposing thestudents to effectively integrate mobile based scanning technology, a reverse engineering approachfor identifying and addressing interface challenges. Figure 1
sufficiently undersized to slideinto the slots on both enclosures. Upon measuring the parts, they found that panel thickness wasthe same as the slot width, leaving no room for clearance. After further reflection and discussionwith the faculty mentors, the students realized that the specified clearances were less than the.012” minimum layer thickness of the Dimension machine. In slicing the STL into individualcross sections, the slight difference was not captured as in effect it “rounded up” and printedanother .012” layer when only a fraction of that thickness was specified by the CAD file. Thiswas remedied by using a deburring knife and razor to slightly trim the guide slots until the panelwas able to slide in with reasonable effort.A second challenge
expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Rampell, C. “Enrollment Drops Again in Graduate Programs,” The New York Times (Sept. 28, 2012). Available online at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/28/business/new-enrollment-drops-again-in-us- graduate-schools.html[2] Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K. and Freeman, C., "Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 668–690, August 2005.[3] Carpinelli, J.D., Kimmel, H.S., Hirsch, L.S., Burr-Alexander, L., Narh,K.A. and Dave, R., "Translating Research Experiences into
work has been supported by the National Science Foundation under grant DUE-1431923/1431721/ 1432107. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of National ScienceFoundation.References1. Blikstein P. Digital fabrication and ‘making’in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors. 2013:1-21.2. Wilczynski V. Academic Maker Spaces and Engineering Design. ASEE Annual Conference; 2015; Seattle, WA.3. Weinmann J. Survey and Analyis of Five Leading University Maker Spaces. Munich, Germany: Mechanical Engineering, Technical University Munich; 2014.4. Barrett T, Pizzico
the Engineering Technology program are beginning to reflect theavailability of makerspace technologies to develop useful products rapidly and at low cost. TheMakerSpace programs and related technologies such as 3D printing and prototype makingencourage curiosity for learning and creating new things and sharing of work and processes withothers in the community of students, teachers, staff, and local residents1. Overall, many differentfields of engineering, academia and artists can benefit from this application, enabling thedevelopment of skill and knowledge in many different engineering aspects and processes.IntroductionLearning should be a journey through inquiry and discovery. Incorporating project-basededucation in engineering technology
machining and steel for welding. • The cost of the materials should not be significantly increased from the current year’s lab.Each team submitted a report describing the proposed product and the sequence of lab activitiesneeded to fabricate each component. Each team also presented a 5-minute “sales pitch” to theirclassmates. The students peer evaluated the projects in four categories: feasibility, cost,presentation quality, and appeal. The highest scoring project (Fig. 5) was created in thefabrication lab the following year (spring semester 2018). Overall, the reflection essays anddesign project established the grade for the hands-on component.Figure 5: The winning lab design project was a Christmas Tree consisting of a milled aluminum“tree” (1
, it was seen as the best option. A heat-reflective layer was also attached to the interior ofthe walls. Inside the drying space, we installed 2 shelves made of a coated mesh framed with cedarwood. A nickel-chrome wire powered by a 12 volt battery acted as a heating source. Internaltemperature was measured and regulated with a thermocouple and a controller, respectively. (a) (b) Figure 2 the Final Design for the Dryer, (a) Design Assembly, and (b) Explosion View of Assembly3.5 Analyze the designThe engineering analysis was conducted from three aspects: 1) structural analysis, 2) flow analysisin the NX CAE environment, and 3) cost analysis for the prototype